Rioter Comments
Black0Price (EUNE)
: Permanent Suspension Policy
I am very lucky I got my only chat restriction on my second account. I was very sad because I thought I was better than this. I have received no punishments on my main, but to be honest, there are recent occasions where if I got a suspension, it would be justified. Ranked can become very nerve-racking if you anticipate a good result. But I'm afraid many people repeat this negative behavior very often in order to finally receive a punishment. Especially such a severe one. When you find someone who plays poorly or gives up, there are not much you can do. You can try to help them or help others who may win the game on their own. You cannot reason with people who have this attitude. Spamming in chat changes nothing. Only if you make a comeback you may persuade them to give it a try. In the end, the team with the better attitude usually wins. Matchmaking is not always fair. I am starting to accept this. I have complained to Riot about that, even curse them in a report. Which is a childish thing to do. But then I realized not even I perform the same in every game. There were games where I could not focus, I was angry or desperate. Thankfully those were quite rare, but in the end, we may all end up feeding or play extremely poorly. That being said, despite those severe punishments, there is still toxicity. And Riot is in a very difficult spot because League needs to have a good reputation in order to survive. If we had somehow become less toxic, I believe they would consider lifting some of those punishments. But as the problem remains, I don't see how they would be able to do something about this, without the fear of harming the game even further.
: Twisted Treeline being abandoned
Twisted Treeline is my favorite map when I feel like playing against bots. It has a great atmosphere, feels so mysterious and gothic, I hope it won't get removed.
Chrysies (EUW)
: You make the same mistake almost everyone else does, either you play to win or you play to pad the personal stats. Having high kda doesn't translate into winning games, taking objectives do. I can tell you I've had games where I massively out-cs the enemy carry, only to watch fellow players from other lanes (or my jungler) tower dive the enemy botlane because they were on 50%, and die.., leading to a crushing defeat since they'd keep tower diving in other lanes also. The worst thing about this game, is that people are so fixated on KDA that they more often than not leave empty lanes to chase half a map, for a single kill that they usually don't get anyway, instead of securing map control.
These are things I hadn't ever deeply thought about. You are so right about these - to be honest, I always had a feeling that the team who was controlling dragon or baron or was setting up lanes to push against us or had more vision, was the most dominant, even if they were somehow back in kills. I cannot count the games where we got involved in a said tower dive, only for it to backfire (about every time) and having to deal with a destroyed base a few moments later. {{sticker:katarina-love}}
: I usually feel bad for support players because they have to put up with the adcs bullshit. It's difficult to have a strong botlane in silver too since a strong combo is rare e.g. poke adc and a hook support. And in the end the adc gets the most credit even tho they are usually trash. If you decided to play again maybe swap roles and play carry champs.
Lol. It's true sometimes supports deserve some credit as well. Regarding swapping roles, I will keep it in mind, I wish it was something I was aware of back when I started playing. Thank you for your advice.
: So you main support I see, I main support myself and I too had the same issue in silver, couldn't get past that one last step. My guess is that since you had a smurf on your team and still lost the game then it was probably a bad timing, enemies could also have smurfs and the matchmaking is weird. Like if there is only one good player with a high mmr, he might be placed with people of lower mmr against people with medium mmr. So what happens is that it becomes a kind of 1v5 situation in which you can't do much unless you have a hard carry champion, in silver and gold Nasus or Yi or Yasuo would be great example, but if you have lets say a 23/2/7 Elise, they can't do much even though they play well. Have you considered changing role? At least till you can get where you want to be. You can see my name, we both play in the same region, if you want you can add me. I'm not some kind of super high elo just G3. Good luck on the rift. (if you don't quit) {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
Hi! You are right, especially lately, I mostly play support and sometimes top, but not a carry champion, mostly supportive champions (tanks). As I was playing all these years, I noticed that very few people wanted to play support or frontline, and most would opt for the most damage, even on roles they didn't have to. So I thought, it would be great if I could fill this gap and learn to play what others see as a hustle. I thought it was what most teams needed/ were missing. If I have to change the role in order to carry, I'll become quite frustrated, as I have not practiced at all on these type of champions. So, basically, I'll have to start over when I was actually thinking to progressively kind of quit the game anyway. I kind of thought it as a meme of how lower elo players, only chose difficult carry champions to play, focusing more on mechanics and less on "macro". But turns out they were the ones who were right (at least as a first step into learning the game). The rules might be different for us. I wish I had a chance with my preffered playstyle, that seems I practiced for absolutely nothing. It's a shame. Thank you for your help. {{sticker:katarina-love}}
Rioter Comments
Vistha Kai (EUNE)
: >Regarding reproduction, are you telling me you would break up with a girlfriend if you'd find out she wouldn't be able to have kids? No, you are not telling me that. But what if having kids was the reason I started looking for a partner in the first place? There'd be two options then, very costly fertility treatments, which may or may not work out, or adoption, which may not even come into consideration if I wouldn't want to raise somebody else's kids. You don't need a girlfriend or a wife to be socially successful and neither need one if you want you just want go 'adventuring', >I know: Here's a question: What if you woke up in a dimension where you are a girl? Would you like guys all of a sudden? Would you force it on yourself to like guys because now you are a girl? Kinda weird isn't it? I've seen enough hentai to know I shouldn't answer this question. It could get weird for **_you_**. >However, I am not sure if your beef is with homosexuality or with annoying people shouting about it. The latter. If those people want to "make it right" they should go where queer people are still actually systematically oppressed. It's the same issue with feminism in fact. What are you marching for if you were were already give all rights the other side had years ago? Who is oppressing you? >What I am saying is, it's good to respect people with different views on the matter. And not judge them or make them feel uncomfortable. And by respect, I do not mean admiration. Just a state of mind that they at least deserve to be treated like everyone else. That's called "manners". To not be unnecessarily rude to people and other things along that line.
> But what if having kids was the reason I started looking for a partner in the first place? That would be a pretty sad reason, wouldn't it? Your goal wouldn't be to find happiness. Just have kids. I am not saying kids don't bring joy to their parents. But you kind of need the right circumstances for that. You really think like a machine. That's another topic though. > I've seen enough hentai to know I shouldn't answer this question. It could get weird for you. Why wouldn't it get weird for you? What would you do, avoid the subject? I don't think you would have that luxury then. And again, no I am **not** talking about manners. I am talking about respect. You can have manners and no empathy for others. Listening and understanding others is more important than just saying "good morning" and go on with your life. You will not really listen or attempt to understand someone you do not respect. > _However, I am not sure if your beef is with homosexuality or with annoying people shouting about it._ > The latter. We are done then I agree. {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}}
: it's possible because they have rank in solo que and no rank in flex so we are matched together in flex still feels unfair as shit
You are right, flex or normal matchmaking doesn't take into account progress from solo queue. Don't get so upset though, solo/duo is fairer. Just have fun in flex and practice, better don't think about it too much.
: are not you unranked?
you play with gold+ players in ranked? That's impossible if you are iron or bronze.
: can gold+ players gtfo my games?
gold+ players are stealing our lp again {{sticker:sg-shisa}} and riot does nothing
Vistha Kai (EUNE)
: >Homosexuality is not being forced as "ok", because it is "ok". Do you, perchance, watch the news sometimes? >Why wouldn't it be? Think about it: You don't like football. I'm into that. This analogy _(heh)_ isn't applicable to this subject. >Do I have to apologize to you because I am watching sports or playing? Or should you apologize to me because you don't? It's your business. I don't care what you are doing in your free time. It's yours. And that's why we don't have to force anything on each other. Now, I do not care what people do in the privacy of their house. Public spaces concern us both though. >Because it's already "ok". It's "OK", because after many years it was made "OK". This is this "homonormativity" I've mentioned. >But is it true that you need to be 'sexually abused as a child or otherwise have a dysfunctional family' in order to become heterosexual or homosexual? To be honest, I am not a scientist. But I do not think children who have been abused ended up one way or another because of that. This is something science should answer. I'll approach this from a different angle then. Did you know that children of single mothers make up for majority of inmates in prisons in USA? Does it mean that everybody who grew up in a single-parent family is destined to be a criminal? No, but it increases chance for it to happen by a lot. Does that mean people who grew up in "healthy" families can't be criminals? Of course they can, but due to such upbringing they are less likely to. >Just to add here that there are observations confirming homosexual behavior in animals, so it's not exclusively a human trait. Have those animals 'been abused as kids'? Idk. Animal studies aren't perfectly applicable to humans, especially since we cannot truly determine what's, figuratively, going on in their heads. First of all there are tens of thousands of different species out there. There are animals which have only one sex, those that can pick their sex, those that require a partner to procreate and some can in emergency situations impregnate themselves. For some homosexuality is natural, for others may be the only way to survive, for others it may mean a specimen is too weak, perhaps sick, to compete with others. But is it natural for humans? Well, for one humans cannot naturally reproduce without an opposite sex being present. Is it normal? Certain groups have been pushing for decades to make it "normal". >Homonormativity, heteronormativity, fancy words about what groups of people want to force on others. How about we stop forcing anything, and accept other people's choices since they don't affect us. You do not affect me if you like women or men, blondes or brunettes, tall or short. It just doesn't. I couldn't care less. If you truly "couldn't care less" you wouldn't have opened this thread to begin with, let alone write a comment and not to mention continuing a discussion. >People suicide for many serious reasons. Do you think people do not suicide in heterosexual relationships? Come on. You are right. Just because somebody is walking on a highway, doesn't mean somebody in a rural village should feel completely safe crossing the street. It's just that one of them is much more likely to die prematurely. >Anyway. Let's stop being negative-malicious-a##h##es (pick a word) about that and start worrying about something that actually affects us. There are many things that you think do not affect you, until the life proves you wrong. >I don't mind if anyone anywhere is straight, gay, alien, robot.. They deserve my respect like anyone. And my discretion. I still can't grasp how somebody you most likely don't even know exists "deserves respect". When I think of "respect" I think of somebody who is wise and who could be for one reason or another be an example for others. A complete stranger does not command respect. Manners, however, are a given. >_you guys turned me into a toxic player. If you turn me into an SJW as well... I'll find you... _ Nah, that requires a very particular mindset, which you don't seem to have. I recently _(today in fact)_ came upon a great example of such mindset in relation to a game called "Rimworld" while looking for modifications for said game. [Here.](https://www.reddit.com/r/RimWorld/comments/9vmve4/how_i_learned_to_love_male_justice_warriors_and/)
I couldn't care less about other people's choices as long as they don't affect me and they are happy about them. But, I do care about human rights and well-being in a society. Because that affects me. I live in one too you know. I can't help it. Regarding reproduction, are you telling me you would break up with a girlfriend if you'd find out she wouldn't be able to have kids? No, you are not telling me that. But still, attractiveness is sometimes subjective, I don't know how each person chooses his/her spouse. People have feelings. If a girl finds only other girls attractive... Maybe reproduction is not her primary concern. Maybe she just feels affection towards girls. What should I tell her? "girls suck d*cks 4 life?" I'd be a hypocrite because we'd happen to have the same preferences. I know: Here's a question: What if you woke up in a dimension where you are a girl? Would you like guys all of a sudden? Would you force it on yourself to like guys because now you are a girl? Kinda weird isn't it? But the problem is, you are probably looking for scientific evidence about the subject. I cannot provide any answers, I am not a scientist, you are not a scientist, we should make our research somewhere else. Nothing to add here. However, I am not sure if your beef is with homosexuality or with annoying people shouting about it. What I am saying is, it's good to respect people with different views on the matter. And not judge them or make them feel uncomfortable. And by respect, I do not mean admiration. Just a state of mind that they at least deserve to be treated like everyone else. I really have nothing more to add. It was really nice talking to you. > Nah, that requires a very particular mindset, which you don't seem to have. I feel relieved. Thank you {{sticker:sg-kiko}} (that was close)
: Scared to Ranked cuz of reactions
> the other one is a very nice girlfriend of mine but she always says things like "wow ur gonna carry that, u gonna be diamond soon, you are the best" and she sometimes specs me, its cute and all Sorry, can't relate _PepeHands_
xPenguinn (EUW)
: cursed player? or bad player? (probably the latter) :(
We are cursed to be bad {{sticker:zombie-nunu-bummed}} My guess is you will climb if you give it some time. Practice a little more, find a couple of champions you are good at and like to play, and eventually, you'll get there. I am not high elo myself, wish I could help more.
Vistha Kai (EUNE)
: >Homosexuality isn't being forced as "ok". The whole joke is... it actually is. >Did anyone force you to be heterosexual? No. You just want to. All that needed to happen was for me to not be sexually abused as a child or otherwise have a dysfunctional family. After that it was just nature. No study was ever able to determine a "gay gene". Thus it's an acquired behaviour. Not every behaviour is a behaviour you willingly want to have. Behaviours can be changed, but a lot of them require outside help. Homonormative narrative prevents people from being able to get such help. They are told to accept themselves instead. >For someone else, it's not his/her cup of tea. So why should you argue over this? Each person seeks happiness the way he seems fit for him/her. Is it really happiness when it pushes people to suicide? Or to change partners like gloves? >The point is: Let's not be negative about that. It's not even our business if someone is heterosexual or not. Negative =/= malicious.
Homosexuality is not being forced as "ok", because it is "ok". Why wouldn't it be? Think about it: You don't like football. I'm into that. Do I have to apologize to you because I am watching sports or playing? Or should you apologize to me because you don't? It's your business. I don't care what you are doing in your free time. It's yours. And that's why we don't have to force anything on each other. Because it's already "ok". But is it true that you need to be 'sexually abused as a child or otherwise have a dysfunctional family' in order to become heterosexual or homosexual? To be honest, I am not a scientist. But I do not think children who have been abused ended up one way or another because of that. This is something science should answer. Just to add here that there are observations confirming homosexual behavior in animals, so it's not exclusively a human trait. Have those animals 'been abused as kids'? Idk. Homonormativity, heteronormativity, fancy words about what groups of people want to force on others. How about we stop forcing anything, and accept other people's choices since they don't affect us. You do not affect me if you like women or men, blondes or brunettes, tall or short. It just doesn't. I couldn't care less. People suicide for many serious reasons. Do you think people do not suicide in heterosexual relationships? Come on. Anyway. Let's stop being negative-malicious-a##h##es (pick a word) about that and start worrying about something that actually affects us. I don't mind if anyone anywhere is straight, gay, alien, robot.. They deserve my respect like anyone. And my discretion. _-edit-_ _you guys turned me into a toxic player. If you turn me into an SJW as well... I'll find you..._ {{sticker:darius-angry}}
Vistha Kai (EUNE)
: >I'd say no. Some players struggle to work as a team. Such an interaction would alienate them even more from their teammates. I can't see any correlation there.
Some teammates do not perform as well as their opponents on their respective roles. For example, my jungler is not as good as the opponent. I have two choices: I will either try my best to make up for him, or I will distance myself from him and think "you know what? opponent jungler plays better. My tr*sh jungler doesn't deserve to win". Here's why: Some players are not too hesitant of showing their frustration about their teammates. Allowing them to interact even further with their opponents, would give some people a false belief that their true team should be the opponent who wins rather the teammate who struggles. And they would treat the honor as a form of a negative statement about their own teammate. Resulting in encouraging toxicity rather than reducing it. This is my opinion on the matter.
Vistha Kai (EUNE)
: >Homophobia IS serious. It'll always be serious. >Or is being beat up and/or murdered not serious enough for you? Or being disowned and abused just for being gay. Don't forget AIDS due to widespread promiscuity. > I'd say those are pretty serious things > Just because people can't get over the fact that men can love other men and women can love other women The most serious issue is the fact that homosexuality is being forced as "OK". There's a stigma involving anything that'd deny it as normal or speak anyhow negative about it, with people who are actually looking for help being denied it and forced to live with their problems instead of trying to solve them.
Homosexuality isn't being forced as "ok". "Not being rude about these subjects" is being forced as 'ok'. Did anyone force you to be heterosexual? No. You just want to. For someone else, it's not his/her cup of tea. So why should you argue over this? Each person seeks happiness the way he seems fit for him/her. The point is: Let's not be negative about that. It's not even our business if someone is heterosexual or not. (English is not my native language, sorry if I misunderstood your comment)
SANEakaIN (EUW)
: Insane idea : Honour your enemy
I'd say no. Some players struggle to work as a team. Such an interaction would alienate them even more from their teammates. Don't get me wrong, you have good intentions, but there are people who would probably misuse this feature. And would negatively affect their gameplay even further. In case you are not aware, you can level up in honor just by playing games and honor others, so it's not like it would be too beneficial for your opponent anyway.
: How are you supposed to win games when your team dont give a damn about objectives?
Idk about high elo. But in lower elo just help the team with whatever they want to do. If they follow you for an objective on the way, even better.
AcidBuny (EUW)
: the 100% sure way of being non-toxic
Oh, you will get punished. You'll eventually demote.
Madlife 1v9 (EUNE)
: 2 weeks for this?
> Madlife 1v9: donky cityyyyyyyyy Madlife 1v9: ihhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa Madlife 1v9: iiiiiiiiiiiihaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Madlife 1v9: iiiiiihhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}}
: Star Guardian Anime/Manga adaptation
A "_possible _ success"?? I have even more ideas. How about a post-apocalyptic Road Warrior Miss Fortune movie? Where the world has deprived into chaos, and survivors fight over each other for gasoline? Or a Warrior Princess Sivir show. Once a fierce conqueror, now tries to atone for her sins. Ok, listen to this: "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away..." {{champion:11}}
Ãgnus (EUW)
: Which house did you choose?
Warband! because it's pink and cute EHEHE
: Would you report more often if you received a reward for doing so?
To be fair, reporting someone always leaves me a bad taste in my mouth. But it's a dirty work I do when I feel the actions of someone ruin the game. But asking a reward for that? Come on.
: Would you report more often if you received a reward for doing so?
I'd report all 9 of you every game if I'd get a reward for that. I mean, that seems toxic, but hey: I'd get rewards. Am I right? {{sticker:vayne-pose}}
: Does the champion you play affect your mood?
I eat snacks whenever I play {{champion:31}}
Mártir (EUW)
: So Lux gets another Skin, while there are Champs that dont for like 4 years... :-D
There is no point in creating skins for unpopular champions.
: Why would i recieve a 25 game chat restriction when i am constantly getting flamed by my teammates
A game is a game, not a council. If some players don't know how to build or help or whatever, they certainly won't do it in the next 5 mins because you just told them. I had a jungler playing a tank support champion, who at some point went on to 1v1 a top bruiser. Who cares what my opinion was on this? That's what he did. He may be right, he may be wrong. Either way, arguing over that would take too much time and would also stress us even more. Your best chance is to play around that as best as possible, there's no other way. And regarding flamers? They have their opinion. They may feed all game in iron, and still think they are challenger material. So be it. News flash: you can ignore them and then everyone will be happy. Better care more about people you actually want to care, and less for the next iron zed god. And remember there's always room for improvement. You are not always right even if, at the time, you think you are (Unless you are already Challenger. Then you're probably almost always right).
: Victorious Skin Store?
Rare skins are cool. But I am having second thoughts after the Maokai incident.
Mártir (EUW)
: To see Riot made a new Champion Roadmap...
HYPERS. I hope she will be easy to play. Riot, I'd also like to request a cute and easy top laner. I mean Quinn is okayish but Riven-Fiora-Irelia are not very valid options :( (animation cancels? rly?) And no- imagining that mecha Malphite is being piloted by an anime girl isn't 100% doing it for me.
: donate to be entered into the rp giveaway ❤️
You're writing this anonymously from a level 22 account 🤔
MrPing01 (EUW)
: Im fed up with this communuty
Whenever you aim to play 100% seriously mute them all. It will work. Chat is usually toxic, with extremely rare exceptions of it actually being funny and a positive experience. But often you don't miss a lot by muting. Let me update you about what you'll probably miss: "no gank" "nice flash" "2v1" "u bad" "ff" "report" "ks" "go afk" "ez" "i'm pro"
C4libur (EUNE)
: Why is that even offensive to them?
You probably asked out of curiosity but to them, it seemed like you were criticizing his pick. A misunderstanding, it happens.
: Why are beginners always the toxic once?
I don't think they are beginners. I remember when I first started playing I was super anxious but also excited and happy. I legit leveled up to level 30 by playing only against bots and I was so hyped! Even after level 30 I was playing against bots, and if it wasn't for someone on my friend list suggesting me to try PvP, I wouldn't have stopped that early. With time I learned a few things, and whenever I see someone performing poor (imo, idk if they actually do) I become upset. Now I am frustrated, negative and toxic.
: My friend is getting boosted while playing his worst role.
Riot should consider removing the duo queue. Duos can play flex anyway. We need a ladder to display pure INDIVIDUAL progress, not "tag".
: So this happened....
I try to sympathize. I really do. I will just pretend I am sad about the difficulties of Diamond players. I am not jelly or anything bois & girls- my thoughts are with you. Diamond really sucks... I mean... I totally understand- yea.
FcAVA17 (EUW)
: How to control toxic people
You are helpless against/with angry people in a game. They may are right, they may are wrong, it doesn't matter. You have to mute them, play as best as possible, and that's about it. It sucks.
: I do disagree on controlling toxic players. While you can't control your teammates if they are toxic. If your opponent has a toxic behavior, aggro him usually leads him to making more mistakes and an easier victory. I mean aggro him by Mastery spamming his corpse, laughing in his face or just killing him over and over.
This breeds more toxicity. No thanks.
: How can people flat out flame their team and then claim that they're not toxic?
These persons gather a lot of reports fast. But the problem is until they get punished, their toxicity affects everyone. At the end of a game, the opponent support wrote "better support wins". He didn't play better, and that's what still bothers me. It's like a reminder that individual games can be unfair, and there is nothing you can do about it, but focus on the bigger picture. Reports can work, punishments can work, but in the meantime, more people will suffer from the toxicity of the few. -edit-
Dispret (EUNE)
: Streamers issue
I agree some streamers are toxic and influence their audience. Which they shouldn't. But I guess it's part of their "show" and as such people should not take them too seriously. I watch those streams for fun but don't get me wrong, I also watch very calm and positive ones as well (like Good Guy Garry and BoxBox), so they kind of bring me back down to earth. But you know, what's Hash without a good top lane complaining :) (though -ok- not exactly toxic)
Fr0sting (EUNE)
: Rito, stop trolling
You decided to throw the game because they didn't leash {{sticker:sg-lux-2}} leash > win. Alrighty then.
RayleighTT (EUNE)
: but that means that if germans started the world war 2 , and the other countryes are guilty equal of the masacrs and people died , that means Uk, france ,USA are equally same responsable for war as germans been in world war 2 , so again it dosn't matter who push the button first in a nuclear war , let's start to learn from this ... , if someone push nuclear button just pray and wait them hit... . Exactly the same stuffs happen when you entry in a conversation with someone flames you , how much you would try ,take over lot's of games with trollers/toxic players/bad players and you will see what i am talking about , is one to be quiet and shut up and no give satisfaction to someone flame ,but when you attacked every day and riot firewall is garbage then what you can do when you are stressed high and you can't think anymore clean.
The problem with League is the innocent teammates, who are here to have fun and not participate in a drama. So, if anyone flames you, ignore him. Mute him and report if necessary after the game. Mute works wonder no joke. For example, I mute opponents as soon as the game starts. I do not want to listen to their complaints {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
zekaa03 (EUNE)
: Banning champions sucks
Players should not ban their teammates' champions, but, this is not true in all cases. For example, I queue mid and a teammate gets top. I will play Lux and my top declares Yasuo. However, I chose first while my said teammate is the 8th person to lock his. Chances are, the other team will pick him first and I will have to face a champion I will lose to, just because my teammate declared him. When you play a team game, you have to compromise and help your teammates the best way you can.
Tarolock (EUNE)
: as soon as others seeing it as toxic... i cant stand talkative ppl, there is so much useless stuff leaves their mouth its just annoying as hell, and its even worse during the game, because you are not playing at all, you are typing that novel that noone asked for, its distracting YOU from the game and distracting OTHERS, maybe even makes it impossible to make tactics on the chat because you flood with useless stuff
> and distracting OTHERS So true.
lLeBlacnl (EUW)
: a Question
What do you mean RP code? A League of Legends Prepaid Card? It's written on them if they are for EUW, EUNE etc.
Murdarici (EUNE)
: It's simple
As a friend told me: _'kill games'_. Imo most fights happen for nothing. I can count on the fingers of one hand the games we rotated after we won bot, and those times seemed so special and rare, I felt I was playing in LCS.
Rioter Comments
Murdarici (EUNE)
: I just said "permanent is permanent, so NO!" and then people start escalade the situation. Ironically toxic player whine, I say just a line, if everybody ignored it was just a dumb line with many brave downvotes, but people escalade the situaitons, instantly the toxic is a victim and need protection :D {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
Actually, I am triggered by your statement. No, I didn't mind at all xD Just found the part of "let's celebrate the saving of his soul" and stuff zealous and funny. Cheers {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}}
Murdarici (EUNE)
: Difference is I was not toxic didn't break his "reformed spirit", made a small joke on an website, he can always ignore or not read. While he is doing that to "me" when I am trapped with his behavior in a game and I am force to stay there and take it. Also again you take everything literally. Just cause a random person on internet say he is sorry by a random action he did, mean nothing, we are not the internet strangers therapists. If he is sorry because he was toxic then should not continue to do that and that's it! not come and whine on forum how sad he is cause he flamed others, omg poor soul he is toxic in game and now a victim on forums. The toxic player became a victim cause he write some winning thread, omg let's all hug and cry to celebrate the saving of his soul!
I agree! I say we lynch him! Mob bring the rope
: I'm confused as to Riot's position on smurfing
What if I smurf from Bronze in Diamond? Can I do that? {{champion:17}}
Show more

ˉÐęqûńˉ

Level 70 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion