Tarolock (EUW)
: yes its go for fun but players are not like that, thats why the meta for urf had a 10 champ pool, everyone went for the stupidly op in urf champs and played only those and you cant really balance it, it wouldnt worth it, why would they waste time to balance 130+ champs for a gamemode that lasts for 3-4 days a few months apart?
well you do realise you are all speaking of a Meta that got formed with in those few days we firstly had urf in our disposal , and didnt got the time needet to form counters yes ? i mean think a bit , there are tons of tons of item champions combinations now in the game to counter almost everything , hecarim is wreking you ? slow items and armor , zed ? stun him again and again and again . All i hear is about Meta , the meta this , the meta that ...... fock the meta , yes meta might be the moste easy way to get ahead and win , but not 100% reliable , meaning :: Meta does not mean instant win
Tarolock (EUW)
: URF WAS fun but after it popping up twice ppl took the fun out of it, the 3rd time it was here you either picked a champ from the 10 that was viable or you watched a black and white game, so if ppl can make a gamemode crap in less than 2 days so much that riot had to make it random then why do you think it would be any better as a permanent gamemode?
> [{quoted}](name=Tarolock,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=9ltlRNpI,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2017-02-28T09:11:42.177+0000) > > URF WAS fun but after it popping up twice ppl took the fun out of it, the 3rd time it was here you either picked a champ from the 10 that was viable or you watched a black and white game, so if ppl can make a gamemode crap in less than 2 days so much that riot had to make it random then why do you think it would be any better as a permanent gamemode? Because it only needs some minor balance issues after being deployed , and then its fun time , its not like you join Urf mode to win , you join to have fun , try new stuff , troll your oponents , and have lots of laughs with friends and all .... thats the thing , urf is not go for the win , Urf means go for fun
: Well, if they do implement it i hope they put a 2 queue option: ARURF and URF ... because if they put only one, they wont be able to please everyone ... if there is only URF, ARURF people will complaing about not having champ variety (even tho i counted 30+ champs who are more than viable on urf...but whatever)... with only ARURF people will complain they lose on champ select or that they are stuck with champs they do not want to play... TL;DR - if they decide to do it someday, it better have both URF and ARURF options ...
Well , thats what we discus Now right here Dark Kimzark , How we as a comunity to make it hapen
Rioter Comments
pablowa (EUW)
: withour random, every game is eve/jax/fiora/fizz etc. After 2 days every game si the same. there are a lot of champs that are fun and in this random format you can play them, as on avarage, everyone is playing on worse champs. I actually prefer this mode.
Then they could do it this way :: if you play with one champion you chose in Urf , for the next 2 matches you cant pic him or her , thus not making all the matchups the same brocken combinations , OR make you choose a champion pool from witch it will choose randomly what youll get in champion select

Gomoman

Level 30 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion