: Not playing doesnt count as good behaviour get over yourself. You were warned in your 14day reform card that ANY toxicity/negativity would result in a perma. So you quit for a year and a half and expect the system to think "wow what a nice player he played ZERO games since his ban and was reported zero times". Then you come back and being unable to control your toxic nature you flame the living %%%% and wonder how you got banned "for just 1 game"?
"Not playing" Didn't even read what I said. If you're so incompetent or so young that you cannot actually read words, then don't use forums on the internet.
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=Shiwah,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=JtA2pLKr,comment-id=00050000000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-07T16:18:41.684+0000) > > You never specified if your last punishment was a 14 days ban. After that, even a slight breach of the rules is enough to get you permabanned. > As I said, time spent doesn't count. If you played few matches in those months, they are the parameter being looked at. > > I suggest to contact support, as someone else said, if you want your case to be investigated again. Riot posts a "how we try to reform players" every two months, then in their advances to try and have people reform, they permaban people who misstep once after a year of good behaviour? What kind of logic is that? Also, we both know contacting support does nothing. "if you want your case to be investigated again" This is the main problem, cases don't get investigated at all. A bot bans you for finding a bad word in a single game, then an automated response is sent to you through support that bans won't be lifted. I wish I was just making this up but the countless complaints now and in the past on the forums about how bans are completely automated can't all be wrong. Just look at today's player behaviours posts, I can see multiple ones where the person in question got banned by a bot for some completely ridiculous reason, and is never going to be helped by support.
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
If we look strictly at time played, I spent about a year (October-January 2017-2018 and June-January 2016-2017) without getting reported at all, if we don't count the time when I wasn't 'technically' playing League, then I have a bad game, and I get permanently banned? What?
: Either you left something important out or you have gotten a warning. You are toxic, yes, but not for instant permaban. Contact support if you are truly baffled over why you were banned. Also, are you sure it is permaban and not a 14 day ban?
> [{quoted}](name=FluffyPidgeon,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=JtA2pLKr,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2018-01-07T16:05:29.456+0000) > > Either you left something important out or you have gotten a warning. You are toxic, yes, but not for instant permaban. Contact support if you are truly baffled over why you were banned. Also, are you sure it is permaban and not a 14 day ban? I didn't leave out anything, I just hit the copy text button in the top right then pasted it here. And yes, the gigantic "PERMANENTLY BANNED" makes it pretty clear.
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=Shiwah,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=JtA2pLKr,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2018-01-07T16:05:28.534+0000) > > You don't de-escalate punishment levels if you quit the game after the last punishment and came back after over a year. I'm assuming you quit after getting a 14 days ban? > > It vaguely sounds like the story of the fox and the grapevines... I quit around January 2017 after I won 7/10 promo games in Gold and got put into Bronze. I did get punished before I believe at around early spring or late winter 2016, but that was two years ago..
: Permabanned
Game 1 KamikazeSquirrel: yasuo as balanced as ever KamikazeSquirrel: yes KamikazeSquirrel: yasuo really needs the babysit KamikazeSquirrel: the most overpowered champion in the game that has gone unnerfed for 5+ years needs ganks KamikazeSquirrel: for a yasuo yes it is KamikazeSquirrel: you could lane 1v3 and still win KamikazeSquirrel: without any skill required KamikazeSquirrel: nope KamikazeSquirrel: im toxic KamikazeSquirrel: wtf did i even say to you KamikazeSquirrel: didnt talk to you once KamikazeSquirrel: go away KamikazeSquirrel: better babysit the uncounterable champion KamikazeSquirrel: like he needs it KamikazeSquirrel: i didnt type during a fight, open your eyes or shut up KamikazeSquirrel: stop trolling and push mid KamikazeSquirrel: or i'll report you for inting KamikazeSquirrel: can't even 1v1 as a yasuo KamikazeSquirrel: jesus christ KamikazeSquirrel: stop talking to yourself KamikazeSquirrel: I don't care KamikazeSquirrel: yasuo i'm reporting you for afk if you keep standing still in the river purposefully not pushing KamikazeSquirrel: shen muted and reported KamikazeSquirrel: who cares KamikazeSquirrel: you'll get banned for afking KamikazeSquirrel: do you think you could muster the nerve to 1v1 with the easiest champion in the game? KamikazeSquirrel: i see not KamikazeSquirrel: you really need kha's help to right click KamikazeSquirrel: nope KamikazeSquirrel: 4/1 yasuo losing lane to jhin KamikazeSquirrel: lmao KamikazeSquirrel: 11 ganks and I only died 7 times KamikazeSquirrel: pretty much yeah KamikazeSquirrel: if you can't comprehend why ninja tabi is the best item vs yasuo KamikazeSquirrel: i don't think you should say anything KamikazeSquirrel: flash on dat sexy 20 gold KamikazeSquirrel: yes yasuo KamikazeSquirrel: kills are what matter in this game KamikazeSquirrel: you displayed your knowledge of objectives when you sat in the river instead of pushing KamikazeSquirrel: amazing comeback KamikazeSquirrel: "could" KamikazeSquirrel: but you %%%%ed up KamikazeSquirrel: and now you lose KamikazeSquirrel: yasuo dies team instantly turns around lmao KamikazeSquirrel: i beg to differ KamikazeSquirrel: yasuo doesn't need to be fed to do anything KamikazeSquirrel: yasuo oneshots you on level 3 while 0/8 the same as if you were 18 and he was 21/0 KamikazeSquirrel: great argument KamikazeSquirrel: shows your impeccable logic and intelligence KamikazeSquirrel: team with kha'zix yasuo and a malphite combo in it blaming it on luck KamikazeSquirrel: the only thing you need to do as yasuo is hit your Q, which isn't very hard with the hitbox of a continent, but you still require malphite to be able to ult KamikazeSquirrel: stop crying jesus KamikazeSquirrel: i didn't even say anything and i'm crying lul KamikazeSquirrel: you're funny KamikazeSquirrel: i bet they'll go do baron or some other intelligent decision KamikazeSquirrel: instead of ending KamikazeSquirrel: like they've done for the past 20 mins I absolutely lost my mind, but I didn't say anything that can be considered "hate speech" if that's what triggers a permanent ban
: Permabanned
What do you want with chat logs?? I admit it, I flamed the living hell out of the enemy team in a game, I deserve some kind of punishment for losing my mind like that, what I don't get is why I get instantly permabanned after more than 1,5 years of not doing anything like that.
Axisdeus (EUNE)
: Do you hear the wind chanting very faintly: chatlogs....unedited...
> [{quoted}](name=Axisdeus,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=JtA2pLKr,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-01-07T15:54:27.620+0000) > > Do you hear the wind chanting very faintly: chatlogs....unedited... ?
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=KamikazeSquirrel,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=sTKpw1Zi,comment-id=,timestamp=2016-07-03T11:04:35.780+0000) > > Faults of this: > > Number 1. Riot preaches that *oh mai gawd someone may have a bad day*; and yet he bans the living shit out of you if you flame certain trolls for two games straight on the same day. There's literally zero justice in this. Yes that is how it is. The system is ot about others, it is about **you** (or us, if u want). And no, they don't ban *the living shit out of you*. You had 2 warnings before. > > Number 2. They don't take the whole chat log, oooohhh noo, they take ONLY YOUR MESSAGES and make them seem like you're the most evil piece of crap flaming toxic troll in the world. They LITERALLY take what you say OUT OF ITS CONTEXT, and ban you based on THAT EVIDENCE. Exactly; that is what the system is all about. Again, about **you** and noone else. Rules are well known. If your team/enemy flames you, report them. Then they also can write threads like this one sooner or later. > > Number 3. Chat restrictions are USELESS. Absolutely USELESS I tell you. Because what do chat restrictions do for you? They're not for a certain time, so you cannot just wait it out and not play then. Oh no... You have to play games where you can NOT communicate with your team. Chat is useless. Pings do the job, so no **life-critical** need.
You didn't even read number 1, and you don't get any warnings. You didn't read Number 2 either. Chat is useless? I kind of wrote this expecting actual competitive players to read it, not someone who has just started playing.
GLurch (EUW)
: >He does not read the post then posts a question about it that is answered in the first few lines, that's the same amount of sense that is commenting "FIRST" under YouTube videos the second they see it. Still,does that allow you to insult him?To me,clearly not.
Pretty sure I don't need your allowance to insult somebody.
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
People who get flamed aren't victims. They don't suffer from anything right after the split second the flaming ends.
Aonivar (EUW)
: Swapped out? Who said anything about things being swapped out. You can replace raped with 'robbed', 'killed', 'assaulted' or whatever unacceptable negative behaviour you like. The crux is that you seem to think that people should be able to do whatever the hell they like without consequence on the internet, and the people that dislike what you do are supposed to be the ones that have to take action, mute you. That's just not how it works and I've told you multiple times why, if you don't want to understand, that's your problem. Thankfully the problem will be fixed when you get your permanent ban. Nothing to do with real life? Well, I guess that explains your entire thread and the post then. For some reason you seem to think that on the internet you should be able to do anything without consequence, but there are. You're being deliberately obtuse, I should have expected that from how you opened this thread, that's my mistake I suppose. You don't want to learn, you don't want to know, you just want to disagree and argue. Have fun with that, I'm out.
It's funny how ignorant you are. "Thankfully the problem will be fixed when you get your permanent ban" You're literally making no sense. One player being banned will make no difference, League will always be a toxic garbage dump because the system is terrible. You're the one that took things out of context immediately and started arguing, so please go take your hypocritical garbage somewhere else.
: I want to add my voice to those saying you are only responsible for your actions,no matter what caused them. The fact that Riot takes only YOUR logs is to make YOU understand what YOU wrote is unacceptable and deplorable. The one and only time I had chat restriction I felt like it was fully deserved and the annoyance of not being able to chat combined with the realization of a true consequence for your actions made me change completely. If you were mature enough you would go through the same process instead of QQ in boards. Also this is your last warning,next time say goodbye to your account forever.
"If you were mature enough you would go through the same process instead of QQ in boards." Oh look, you're flaming me, calling me immature and insulting me by telling me I'm crying! See how wonderful it is to take things out of context? Even better when you get punished like this.
Najns (EUW)
: Well how can they get punished if noone is gonna report them? >As you may have guessed I made this thread directly after I got banned from League for two weeks If you did as you suggested people should do, you wouldn't have been banned.
I said the current way of dealing with toxic people is garbage, not that they shouldn't be dealt with.
GLurch (EUW)
: >You stopped me from playing this game with a terrible community and terrible developers. For that I have to thank you. I also am prohibited from spending any more money on random crap for said game. Finally, once in a lifetime, you did something good Riot. Well done. That's what you wrote.So,I responded to it with "What do you think they want to tell you?If you are still this toxic after the 14 day ban(you are clearly in this post,100% truth,everyone disagreeing with this is braindead,even if you deny it,you still aren't any better Kappa),you get a permanent ban and this is the moment the community tells you "The door is right over there,so get out." So don't do like we are regretting anything and you want to be mean to us by leaving the game.The majority of the community doesn't want you in this game." What is there that I did not understand?The whole post you are doing like you are the victim,when Riot is the victim and they simply said "stop",also everyone can clearly see due to this post that you are still toxic and never reformed,so the permanent ban would have come soon anyways.
"you are clearly in this post..." Either that's you being Captain Obvious or you not reading what I wrote.
GLurch (EUW)
: >Nice job not even reading the whole thing then commenting something braindead under it. You earn a happy sticker, well done to you! This is what you post when he asks a simple question. This is part of it,here is another part of it : >!Another supposed "QQ" thread incoming,*** beware if you don't like the truth or if you're a brainwashed Rioter!*** So you insult everybody that does not agree with you and call what you said "the truth" without any evidence other then personal experience,and this coming from a toxic person that got a 14 day ban recently.
I cannot even decipher what you are saying right now. It just makes no sense. He does not read the post then posts a question about it that is answered in the first few lines, that's the same amount of sense that is commenting "FIRST" under YouTube videos the second they see it.
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
I love all of these real life examples, but once again as I've said to the other person bringing them up, they can't be applied to League, because that's not in real life, and the environment is entirely different. What I said about the one warning before permaban thing was a SUGGESTION - make it so you get a warning telling you you'll be permanently banned unless you stop being toxic. I'm pretty sure that would make me flame less than just purposefully annoying me with chat restricts. It'd encourage me to mute everyone who is flaming better than restricting my ability to actually play the game properly (with no communication).
Aonivar (EUW)
: I've been toxic (well, salty) several times in my games, and I've never had a restriction. Largest difference between what I do and what I see in the chatlogs of other people? I may blame someone, but I don't call them anything. And I never talk more than 2 or 3 lines in total. You get that report only if the punishment was immediately after your report. If that person played a game, you don't get a message (and even then you only get a message if that person has a suspension). Hence, as a player you have no trustworthy way to determine the punishment of any player you reported. When people start excusing actions with "the human nature" I tune out. No, seriously. We're thinking self-concious animals that are in control of our own actions. Yes, sometimes we 'lose' control (or rather, what we want at that moment seems to be more important than the rules, so fuck the rules), but you and I both know that's no excuse. You can't defend rape by saying "Well, it's just male nature to want to have sex with a beautiful woman", it's an extreme case and I'm not saying you'd attempt such a defense, but it shows that this defense doesn't work. As a mature person you are responsible (though perhaps not in 'control') for your own actions. If you take the wrong actions, you deserve punishment. I don't know if skipping chat restrictions into warnings for perma-bans works better. That question can be estimated by looking at how many people got a chat restriction but never got permabanned (ie. that chat restriction worked), or by attempting it. That's up to Riot, but I doubt that this '1 warning before permaban' will work. The problem is the atmosphere, as I tried to explain in my previous answer. The atmosphere Riot attempts to create is one where flaming is a rarity and where, should you not want to listen to a specific person, you can mute them. Yet the consequence of your idea would be to have the opposite: an atmosphere where flaming happens all the time and suddenly the person that doesn't want to read flame (ie. the victim!) has to take actions. That's giving in to people that don't want to listen to rules. It's like as if in real life, you start saying "Well, that girl deserved to be raped because she was alone at night". That's accepting that raping (flaming) happens all the time, that we can't do anything against it and that the victim should have known better. As opposed to the opinion that "Nobody should ever rape anybody, and nobody should ever be raped". Which means you condemn the rapers (flamers), make it socially unacceptable, try to make it impossible, check people who have a history with sexual assault (toxicity) and do whatever you can to prevent it happening again. And of course, despite all of that effort, it still happens and hence you tell your daughter to not travel alone and always carry pepperspray, etc. (ie. you give possible victims a defensive aid, like the mute/report button): better safe than sorry. Once again, I'm not accusing you of rape, neither do I try to make a claim about what you think about it (ie. whether you agree with the first or the second statements), but it's my intent to show that, as a community, accepting negative behaviour/blaming the victim/not punishing the people that do wrong creates an attitude problem that we don't want. And as society has done since its birth: you either grow the hell up and conform to the (ever relaxing) social standards, or you will feel the negative effects one way or another. You are operating with a biased viewpoint. You make a comparison between the number of toxic players of years ago (numbers you don't have) and the number of toxic players now (numbers you don't have). To conclude the number remains static, so the system doesn't work. Ironically, in the previous part of your post you claimed it was human nature to react to flaming with more flame. In other words, you predict that the amount of flamers would rise and rise and rise. So if (as you claim without evidence) the number of flamers remains constant, I'd say that Riot did a damn great job.
I don't see a single way in which sexual assault could be swapped out for flaming, even for the purpose of being an example, so I can't really respond to this. They have nothing in common. The most important thing about this whole ordeal is that it has nothing to do with real life, and general rules and behaviour on the internet highly differs from that of the real world.
Aonivar (EUW)
: Here we go again. Hopefully you're actually willing to listen rather than just whine (Looking at how you started this post, I doubt it, but anyway). Number 1: you (and others) get punished for flaming. Yet you claim that is no justice? Look up what justice means please. Number 2. You flame, you get punished. They flame, they get punished. You have no idea whether they got punished and they don't know if you got any punishment. You want to tell me that just because someone else flames, you are allowed to do it too? That excuse only works in a very small amount of cases in real life self-defence, for instance. In general, when you see someone shout in a library, you do not have the right to start shouting back. Even if the guy is shouting at you. If you then both get thrown out, 'he started it' is not a good reason. Number 3. Ironically you are the first person I've seen that claims this. I've seen several threads of people that ask Riot for a perma-chat-ban rather than perma-ban, because that way they can keep playing and they can't flame either. The argument you make here makes a small bit of sense, being chat restricted is annoying, it's supposed to be. It's a punishment for crying out loud. A punishment is not supposed to be something you just ignore, something that doesn't affect you. It must negatively impact you because that way you, as a mature person, is supposed to learn "A few of my own actions lead to consequences, I dislike those particular consequences, perhaps I should not repeat those actions". If instead the punishment gives you the thought of "I flamed, I like flaming, Riot gave me a chat restriction, now I can't flame, but I want to flame, I will troll instead", then yes the punishment fails. However, it's self-solving: the people that think in the former way are less likely to flame again, the people of the latter category will likely be more toxic and will get a very short ride to a perma-ban. And guess what, I much rather play with the former than the latter, so it all works out. > For that I have to thank you. I also am prohibited from spending any more money on random crap for said game. Finally, once in a lifetime, you did something good Riot. Well done. A sentence in this shows the problem: > I also am prohibited from This fits the rest of your post as well: you claim getting rid of the report button and just give people access to a mute button is better and will result in less toxicity over all. You shift responsibility. Let's say there's a flamer in the game, who is responsible for his flame? The flamer is. Then someone else starts flaming back, who is responsible for that flame? The person that responded. Rather than punishing people for their unwanted actions (ie. flaming) you would go for a mute-system. Flamers can flame all they like, the people just have to mute them, and everybody is happy, that's what you said, no? > People muting others in-game instead of flaming them, thus the flamers would have no way to actually flame since noone hears them, and everyone would be happy. In other words, you show that flaming is allowed in LoL, that it's not moderated, that you won't get punished if you do it. And if someone ever complains about flame on the forums? Well, he should have used the mute button! You should really notice how backwards that is. In the end, LoL can be known as "The game where you can flame without consequence, if you dislike flame you can just mute" or "The game where flamers are not welcome, you will get kicked out if you behave in an unwanted way". I don't know about you (neither do I care), but I'd rather buy/play a game that tries to be the latter, than buy/play a game that gave up and is the former.
Riot always seems to say that people have bad days and shouldn't be punished based on one instant of their actions, and yet they get punished just like that. By the way, you do know if people get punished based on your report. You get a message popup saying that they did. Riot (and you aswell) seem to completely ignore the human factor. It is literally human nature to react to someone trashtalking you, whether or not they are right on the internet. In real life, meh, who gives a damn about what people think of you, but I'm sure about 80% of the playerbase would respond to people flaming them. People shouldn't be punished for responding to flamers. That's why taking text out of its context is stupid. And I still say the same about chat restriction. It is supposed to prevent people from flaming any more. Yet all it seems to create is more toxicity. Honestly, you should just get a warning that "If you are toxic in just one instance, you'll get permabanned", that's pretty unfair and still works better than this. Chat restriction doesn't stop me from flaming, it encourages me to do so due to the frustration over the fact that I can't properly communicate with my team. On the note of responsibilities, yes, people should only have a mute button. If you really don't want to hear someone flaming, you should just mute them. What's so hard in that? You say that it would be better if it was moderated, and in some sense I agree, but just look at how much it is working. This system has been going on for years, supposedly dealing with toxic players, but the numbers didn't decrease at all. NOTHING changed. People still flame when it is that time, and people will always flame at certain occasions. The system does not reduce the amount of flamers for sure, and it does induce some amount of frustration for an amount of players. At best, the system does nothing. At worst, it creates flamers.
Tarolock (EUW)
: >They don't take the whole chat log, oooohhh noo, they take ONLY YOUR MESSAGES and make them seem like you're the most evil piece of crap flaming toxic troll in the world. i meant this, but if you want me to say something about the post then here it is: i dont see any bad side of the report system, you report ppl and they get their punishment, sometimes instantly, sometimes a little later but theyll get it eventually > Chat restrictions are USELESS. Absolutely USELESS I tell you. Because what do chat restrictions do for you? They're not for a certain time, so you cannot just wait it out and not play then. Oh no... You have to play games where you can NOT communicate with your team. Yes. That's justice. "Hey, this guy has been toxic for the last singular game, let's make it so he hates the people and the game itself for the next 10/25 games!" It literally provokes nothing but anger. And no it's not preventive, because that's not how toxicity and flaming works. how is it useless? the other 4 ppl dont have to read your rant and they can use the chat without your brainless shitstorm interrupting it every 2 seconds. and since they cant mute your brain this is the second best thing they can do to remove your toxic crap from the game, and tbh its not really a punishment, its just a warning, since you can still play, still can use pings to communicate with your team and it doesnt limit you in any way >"But it stops people from being toxic!" Eeeeerm... NO? I can perfectly flame my team and their team and the entire universe in five sentences over time, it doesn't prohibit me from flaming if I really do want to flame, which I don't, the single thing that chat restrictions cause is anger and more toxicity if you really dont want to flame then why did you get chat restriction? and if your life is so miserable that you have to flame your team/enemy team for your own enjoyment then online games are not for you, i dont know any online game from the top of my head that tolerates toxic ppl like you, and if you know one then pls delete lol and go play that game >And if for some reason I'm having a horrible losing streak and I'm frustrated and such and I start flaming, whoever I flame should either mute me or live with it like a grown up normal person. with this you just scored an own goal, you are not a grown up normal person since you dont want to mute them and cant live with it because you have to flame >Anyways, point of this is that Riot's system of dealing with toxic players breeds toxic players and bans players with good qualities, the restriction system is rigged, the report system is absolute trash and the whole thing that is designed to make the game a better place just disgustingly makes it worse. a while ago i read a similar post, and my answer to it will be the same here: LoL wasnt a nice place with ponies and butterflies first then RIOT made the banning system to convert nice ppl into brainless toxic craps, it was the other way, im 1000% sure if ppl would not flame/troll anymore (a man can dream right? :D) then the banning system would be useless i hope you get your perma soon so there will be 1 less *sshole to deal with {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
Example of actual flamer who should be banned above ^
Tarolock (EUW)
: you get your punishment only on YOUR actions, not on others, if you flame you get banned, it doesnt matter if you flame on flamers, its still punishable
Yeah, okay... so? This has nothing to do with the post.
Najns (EUW)
: >If it wasn't for Riot's way of dealing with toxicity, there'd be a lot less actual toxicity Really? You really think flamers not being punished would help people become less toxic? People would be even more toxic, because they would be allowed to be. If you believe muting a flamer is the best option, then why in the world would you flame the flamers instead of muting them? You flamed, you got punished. If you'd just mute them and report them after the game, you woldn't get punished. It's that simple.
When did I say they shouldn't be punished? Do you speak English? Read what you quoted again. "If you'd just mute them and rep.." I LITERALLY ADDRESSED THIS IN THE POST.
GLurch (EUW)
: Everyone that doesn't agree with you is straight out braindead? It said "**CREATE DISCUSSION**" when you clicked at this button,not "**CREATE POST WITH PEOPLE THAT ONLY HAVE THE SAME OPINION AS YOU DO**".
Doesn't agree with me? His comment was "Wait, so do you suffer from flamers or you are a flamer? Because QQ thread " Clearly he didn't even read what I posted.
GLurch (EUW)
: > You stopped me from playing this game What do you think they want to tell you?If you are still this toxic after the 14 day ban(you are clearly in this post,100% truth,everyone disagreeing with this is braindead,even if you deny it,you still aren't any better Kappa),you get a permanent ban and this is the moment the community tells you "The door is right over there,so get out." So don't do like we are regretting anything and you want to be mean to us by leaving the game.The majority of the community doesn't want you in this game.
Your post literally made no sense. Have you even read what I said? Doesn't seem like it.
: > "After one-two games of arguing with flamers or trolls" >"if you flame certain trolls for two games straight on the same day" Wait, so do you suffer from flamers or you are a flamer? Because QQ thread {{item:3070}} {{champion:32}} And yes, I got 14 day ban for sarcasm, because it was taken out of context, but I am not here to talk about my "punishments" :) EDIT: I still miss the days of games where you would talk shit and mods in that server would destroy you through chat instead of banning/muting you.
Nice job not even reading the whole thing then commenting something braindead under it. You earn a happy sticker, well done to you! {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
AznaktaX (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=KamikazeSquirrel,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=aA0bMYnY,comment-id=000100000000000000010000,timestamp=2016-07-03T10:31:02.855+0000) > > You don't get warnings tho. You just get restricted after 2 games of arguing with flamers. Suuuureee you do. I also bet the so called "arguing" boils down to "SHUT UP YOU F**KING @$$HOLE. YOU SUCK!!! REPORT ME FOR WHAT??? I AM NOT FLAMING. SCREW YOU!!!" No? Well, prove it.
I don't have to prove anything to you. You're provoking toxicity right now, but I'm not that stupid, thanks.
Rioter Comments
: Must have been full on toxic then. I've never had a chat restriction and I've argued sometimes with flamers. But I've never swore back at them or anything. Just got annoyed and argued with them.
Oh really? Just argued with trolls and flamers in 1 game and got banned for 14 days.
AznaktaX (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Arek of Rivia,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=aA0bMYnY,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2016-07-02T22:21:01.367+0000) > > Thats not true. Get only 3 games where you argue with a flamer. Profit. (Got one my self long ago, I just use /mute all now.) Every time someone says they got chat restricted because of just 3 games, I...just can't believe it. From my experience, people are often not aware of what they say is a punishable offense. I actually DON'T keep my cool all the time, and I still haven't even received a warning, much less a chat restriction. It's really not as hard as people make it out to be. Talk a bit less. Give a few more good words. Mute some more (like a few more...THOUSANDS of people).
You don't get warnings tho. You just get restricted after 2 games of arguing with flamers.
MeanBean (EUNE)
: The fact that the whole report system is driven by the players means that it will never be accurate. People mostly report people for playing poorly according to their standards. I also see at least 2-3 people who flame their (losing) team every single game. Not sure if thats because I play ranked, but I know for a fact that more than 5% of the players I see flame pretty hard. I think Riot is just very lenient with flaming. Its perfectly fine to call someone retarded or bad or whatever. If it wasnt ok, these players I see every game would have had chat restriction, yet they dont. I suspect the 5% are the ones who make real life death threats and stuff like that. Anything less than that is perfectly acceptable, proven by the fact that they are not getting punished.
Nah, I got chat restricted twice for calling people retarded and/or bad.
: Why, do you think it should be more? Or less?
There are atleast 3 people flaming the living crap out of everyone else in each game, so I'd say a lot more xddd
: Which runes and masteries should i use on Malphite nowadays?
Rioter Comments
: Need a fully men teams not pussies Silver 5 + or bronzes
: Well, there are two possible explanations for that: a) The 8 out of 10 are simply not true (taking a glance at your match history this seems to be the case) b) This is ACTUALLY something that happens consistently to you. Since the only consistent factor in your games is you, this allows the only conclusion that you are causing it. This is simple logic. Your teammates and enemies are picked from the exact same pool of players, they are identical. So if there is still a consistent difference between your team and the enemy team, this can only be explained with the one factor that your team always has and the enemy team never has: You. In your case this would mean that your enemies are more often fed than your teammates because of you. But calm down...honestly, I don't think this is true. Your match history show no sign that your statement about enemies being fed 80% of your games is true. You seem to have very similar amounts of fed teammates and fed enemies, so we don't need to draw the conclusion that you are the reason for fed enemies.
Just played 4 games, my team was absolute garbage in all four. Couldn't carry 3 alone 1v9 and even if I could carry 3 of them, I'd barely have LP since I gain like 16 each win and lose 22 on a loss. This makes no sense whatsoever. My team is always absolute garbage or just filled with trolls.
: > don't see how being slightly better than the rest on average will make me able to take on three to four fed enemies every game What did I just say? > you only need to win slightly more than 50% You don't need to win every game! > but I'm pretty sure not even a challenger player could take on 4 fed enemy diamond players on his own. I get the feeling you didn't read my post at all. This is EXACTLY what i just explained. I literally explained to you that even the best of the best don't win every game.
The "every game" was targeted at the fact that 8 out of ten games it is like that, so that means I have to win a majority of those in order to rank up.
Wukongz (EUNE)
: Nah, you don't have to be able to carry 1v9. You oughta focus on playing a small pool of champions and try to ignore the mistakes your team-mates do. I mean you should literally deem them abstract and focus on your game. So someone went 0/10? Good. Try to be 10/0 yourself. You can't win all the time, no one can. Sometimes you lose - and that's fine. It's not your job to go and press the buttons for your team mates. Their bad plays are not your fault - don't blame it on yourself when someone plays very bad. In fact don't blame anyone at all. Pointing fingers even if it is to the mirror achieves nothing. The moment you start concentrating all time and effort on yourself you **will** start climbing easier. But you've gotta ask yourself one thing: do you really want this? If climbing and playing ranked makes you feel bad more than it makes you feel good then is it really worth it? I'll give you an example with myself: Last season I wanted to get to Diamond. I figured I've been playing the game for 3 years and I might as well aim high. I reached 76 LP in plat 1 and was almost there... and then I got 19~ losses in a row or something like this throughout the week. Almost none of them were my fault, but I remember I played really badly in at least 3. I'm talking about afk-ers, ragequitters, people who go 0/19, duo trolls, 40 min all chat flaming and so on. At that point I realized I've had enough of ranked. I rarely play now but I'm planning on going all-in during October. When season 6 started I was gold something on my main and now I'm plat 3. My smurf was either in bronze 1 or silver 5 and I got it to mid-gold. Climbing is possible if you want it.
Games usually don't have much for me unless I can have a sense of achievement, which is only possible in ranked, so yeah, that's why I basically only play ranked now.
Puckomodo (EUW)
: What does 'freezing' a minion wave mean?
It means casting a Sejuani ult on it multiple times.
: > Alright, enough ranting, the ultimate question is:Is it REQUIRED to be able to take on nine enemies to gain rank? That would be required if you wanted to win 100% of your games, which is something not even Korean pro smurfs achieve (they often have 80-90% winratio until they reach master again). Luckily to thats not required to rank up, you only need to win slightly more than 50% of your games to do that. And to achieve a winratio >50% you simply have to be slightly better than the rest on average.
I don't see how being slightly better than the rest on average will make me able to take on three to four fed enemies every game. Sure, if I'm better than them then I have a better chance, but I'm pretty sure not even a challenger player could take on 4 fed enemy diamond players on his own.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Cypherous (EUW)
: Well you wont be, all the server will see is your client leaving champ select or you not picking a champion in time, does this happen in all queues or just draft, you need to find the cause of this on your local machine and fix it, riot wont be able to do anything regarding your series
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
zidic (EUW)
: Buy heimerdinger. You are silver V, you shouldn't be playing lee sin. You will climb with heimer, you will get demoted to bronze with lee. People in challenger and LCS are struggling with Lee. That's why Lee has an unbelievable low win rate in bronze - diamond. Check lolking, its not until Master tier when he starts getting like 52% win rate instead of below 50% which is more losses than wins. Just simply never play these champs: Lee,Yasuo,Cassio,Bard unless you get master one day. Of course, that is only if you want to win.
How the hell does being silver 5 even relate to this post? He didn't ask for a champion to climb with(and if he did the obvious answer would be Lee, heimer is terrible unless your enemy is a potato), he just asked on which champion he should buy so he can play with it whenever he wants to.
Tiger55MD (EUW)
: Can't choose a champion in this game :(((
Azir, Kassadin, Poppy, Swain, Viktor
RageFuel (EUW)
: YEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
loliufg (EUW)
: Riven disabled...
Rito pls make this permanent!
: Why are troll picks not reportable?
Unicorns of Love won against TSM with TF jungle, so surely it can't be that bad...
Show more

KamikazeSquirrel

Level 42 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion