rajesh31 (EUNE)
: Ashe needs a rework
I somehow like her dialogue. I think the actress' voice & tone fits it very well. I understand some would like to change this to something more flamboyant, but... please no. This would destroy her theme.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: best champ
I, too, don't understand what's the fun with providing the OP false information. That may be fun for you, but not for OP who can't really tell you're joking. @OP - they're having fun - they're recommending the most diffucult champs and recommending against the easier ones. Don't listen to them :)
RogueDek (EUW)
: Who can blame them? Not like you read item descriptions in order to know what every single item does from the back of your head in order to be able to win more? Right? Oh wait...
> [{quoted}](name=DDEK123,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=radIzIP4,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-15T01:53:34.654+0000) > > Who can blame them? Not like you read item descriptions in order to know what every single item does from the back of your head in order to be able to win more? Right? > > Oh wait... Not every item... But I do know all 3 supp items. I've read item descriptions of most items in the game at some point, but I don't remember all / most of them. My poit is, the longer you play, the more you will eventually remember, so accs with lv > 100 should be expected to know the most basic items. Surely its not the first time the ADC sees a supp with a relic shield? So if this is the nth time already, they should be expected to more-or-less know how this item works? Or do they flame every time they happen to have a supp with relic bc they dont know how does relic work?
Rioter Comments
: So in my climb to plat over the years (possibly diamond this season,s till trying xD), this is what i picked up: There's 2 types of roams for a support. The Lane Roam, and the Base Roam. ***Lane Roam*** The lane roam is the one that most people know about, this is the one where the support roams from the botlane towards the midlane. You usually only want to do this kind of roam when you are ahead in lane AND can leave your adc alone for a while without making it impossible for him to farm or get xp due to then being zoned from minions (Which is the reason why you should only do it if your lane is ahead) Another good time to go for this roam is when the enemy and your carry are backing (or resetting the lane) and you are still healthy in regards to mana and hp AND do not have any important items to buy. **Base Roam** The base roam is something that you practically won't see until high plat or Diamond+. The theory behind it is that everytime when you are at base, instead of just walking botlane with your adc, you walk through the jungle towards the river bush in midlane. Then you place a pink ward in said bush. There's a lot of reasons for that. First of all, walking that way towards the midlane allows you to gank midlane on the fly depending how the situation is when you arrive, 2nd of all, your midlaner will thank you for that pink ward, it'll keep him safe in lane. Pathing through the jungle will also allow you to team up with your jungler for a gank mid or bot. Now from here there's 2 ways to go. If you know that the enemy jungler is topside, you'll want to place a deep ward close to their red/blue and then join your carry in botside. The reason for that ward is to provide your team with deep vision of the enemy jungler and allow your jungler to safely invade. It can also lead to some good plays when the mid and jungler team up to kill the enemy jungler when he's doing his red. If you do not know where the enemy jungler is, just path down directly to your adc through the river and place a ward in one of the river bushes. Example for Red Side: https://prnt.sc/kuhywx Example for Blue Side: https://prnt.sc/kuhztk So let's sum up what benefits this roam gives you: * Possible Roam to Mid * Possible Dual roam to mid or bot (Jung + Supp) * Additional Vision for Midlane and river (which helps in contesting dragon and scuttler) * Deep vision of enemy jungle * Blocking enemy jungler from ganking botlane or midlane, or doing scuttle or dragon without your team knowing it. One of the biggest mistakes that I see in gold and below is supports just warding both riverbushes at botlane. It's so ineffective and gives really low actual value not to mention it spots ganks too late. For example, let's say enemy jungler tries to gank from his bot side jungle, and let's compare the ward placements of the base roam againt just placing them in botside riverbushes. Base Roam wards: https://prnt.sc/kui3qb River Bush wards: https://prnt.sc/kui552 The problem with the riverbush wards is that they only spot the jungler when he's already close enough to get into range for a gank when the enemy botlane set it up, and it leaves mid completely unprotected, while not providing deep vision of the enemy jungler or the river area. The base roam wards however spot the jungler long before he's even in range for a gank, allowing you enough time to back off, it also gives your jungler vision to countergang easier + it protects your midlane from ganks from botside.
> [{quoted}](name=Feuerstern222,realm=EUW,application-id=00edEA0o,discussion-id=NhaY0IRq,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2018-09-14T19:28:37.467+0000) > One of the biggest mistakes that I see in gold and below is supports just warding both riverbushes at botlane. It's so ineffective and gives really low actual value not to mention it spots ganks too late. For example, let's say enemy jungler tries to gank from his bot side jungle, and let's compare the ward placements of the base roam againt just placing them in botside riverbushes. > > Base Roam wards: https://prnt.sc/kui3qb > River Bush wards: https://prnt.sc/kui552 > > The problem with the riverbush wards is that they only spot the jungler when he's already close enough to get into range for a gank when the enemy botlane set it up, and it leaves mid completely unprotected, while not providing deep vision of the enemy jungler or the river area. > The base roam wards however spot the jungler long before he's even in range for a gank, allowing you enough time to back off, it also gives your jungler vision to countergang easier + it protects your midlane from ganks from botside. This part I don't really understand (except that I'm guilty of this mistake ;/ ) My thinking is, your "base roam" wards can easily be circumvented by enemy jungler. While it is possible to "base roam" ward in such a way that all jungler's ways are protected, this requires a LOT of wards, so it is infeasible to have these warded all the time. "river bush" wards on the other hand, while they do have all those shortcomings you mentioned, they still have two undeniable advantages: It is feasible to keep them up all the time AND they guarantee to spot the jungler whichever path he would choose. I'm not saying you're wrong, I think most likely I am wrong, but I just don't understand this. Many thanks for your detailed post !
Rioter Comments
: Yeah PvE can be done different ways... I pretty much grew up on the mass effect 3 multiplayer so this is the type of PvE that I’m used to, hence why I enjoy it a lot more than you are.
> [{quoted}](name=swampert919,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=kEJdXrXQ,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2018-09-12T19:54:05.065+0000) > > Yeah PvE can be done different ways... I pretty much grew up on the mass effect 3 multiplayer so this is the type of PvE that I’m used to, hence why I enjoy it a lot more than you are. Ah, and one more thing. This Kayn boss. Does he have to be that... Anime'y ? I used to be a weeaboo, now it annoys me ;/
: Yeah PvE can be done different ways... I pretty much grew up on the mass effect 3 multiplayer so this is the type of PvE that I’m used to, hence why I enjoy it a lot more than you are.
> [{quoted}](name=swampert919,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=kEJdXrXQ,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2018-09-12T19:54:05.065+0000) > > Yeah PvE can be done different ways... I pretty much grew up on the mass effect 3 multiplayer so this is the type of PvE that I’m used to, hence why I enjoy it a lot more than you are. Well, wrt to shooters, I liked Far Cry 1. Wrt more RPG-like horde-like PvE games, I liked... well, that's niche... The Battle for Wesnoth's UMC content SXC. Hmm, I'm thinking... If this Odyssey mode was less URFy, more at a normal pace, maybe with a normal gold system, maybe it would be more appealing to me. Ah, and less grindy.
: Then don’t play it. Horde modes don’t appeal to everyone but there are a decent amount of people who love this kind of thing... seriously let me choose any champion and have it around permanently and I’d play it way more than SR... I’ve always preferred PvE. And then there are people who don’t like it... same as all game modes.
> [{quoted}](name=swampert919,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=kEJdXrXQ,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-09-12T19:02:33.053+0000) > > Then don’t play it. > > Horde modes don’t appeal to everyone but there are a decent amount of people who love this kind of thing... seriously let me choose any champion and have it around permanently and I’d play it way more than SR... I’ve always preferred PvE. And then there are people who don’t like it... same as all game modes. PvE may be nice... but I somehow can't explain it... that's not the way I like PvE done.
Rena (EUW)
: Don't play it. Problem solved. Thank me later
> [{quoted}](name=Rena,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=kEJdXrXQ,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-09-12T19:01:37.205+0000) > > Don't play it. > Problem solved. > Thank me later Missions.
Rioter Comments
Nadatari (EUNE)
: A lot it seems, my friend made three accounts just so he could troll and flame in rankeds :D I have about three smurf acc bside this which I used for trolling/flaming. And since I noticed that Ritos automated report system actually has a lot of flaws I dont even have need for smurfs :D I can troll game and still have good result and I wont get banned! I can flame without using any of the curse words or mention someone mother and I wont get banned :D I actually called dude a stereotypical neandarthal whole game :D And he ragequit! And guess what? Rito applauded me for reporting him :D So yeah!!! Atm I wouldnt even cry over lost account when I can still make smurf acc XD And have you ever played a LoL game? Dont you know what is most used excuse? "I am smurfing dont ban Yas!" " I am Challenger on my main acc!" Do you know how and why did these excuse came to see light of the LoL???? Again, I have 3 accounts I USED just for trolling and flamin! My friend did the same! My brother did the same!!! And I did that after season 6 cause I was fed up with changes Rito made! So it was easier not to %%%%k up main acc and just burn other accs XD Just cause you are Holy Saint doesnt mean others are :D Fact is: Community is getting more toxic by the day and reason is Rito!!! You cant excuse that! I havent even argued in first 5 seasons! But in these last? I started arguing/flaming/trolling every game!!!! And what Rito can do? Nothing! I never used racial slurs! Never mention someones mother and procreation or wished cancer on someone! And I ALWAYS HAD 10 KILLS MORE THEN DEATHS and thats a lot since I only play sona, soraka, and bard as supports :P https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM6mxOx7kfM Link is to video called "Tyler1 leveling new account to lvl 30" Didnt watch it and I wont, this was just example! Boards are full of players " My acc got banned and I am playing on smurf being better now" Hhahahahahahahaha So yeah!!!! There is a lot of time bcs Rito made it SUPPER DUPPER EASY to level new accounts!!!!!! Its SUPPER DUPPER EASY to flame/troll and not get banned! Not even new honor system helps cause with introduction of that system I never once flamed! Until I realised another flaw and that is: If I get any report ( even if I didnt do anything wrong) IT COUNTS TO honor lvl! After playing first three months of season 8 and BEING A %%%%INNGGG GOOD ( I used gj only in chat as positive remark!!! ) I still havent got any higher ( cause there was always that one who has to report me for not having 0 cd on healing abilities -.- ) :D So yeah! I actually never flame a player that feeds!!! Never!!! But a player trying to blame me for his mistake? Well, thats on him :D I dont know what game you are playing but I am playing LoL and season 8 is Trolls and Afkers season!!! Why? Rito will say: "Change is good!"
Wow. I knew the auto feedback system could be circumvented, but wrt the leveling, I can only stare in awe, surprised how little do some people value their time.
Cypherous (EUW)
: > Either shadowpooling persistently toxic players; Won't work and will just create super toxic experiences for players, they already have smurf detection to help move them away from newer players, the "prisoners island" approach won't work https://nexus.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/2017/01/ask-riot-banished-to-prisoners-island/ > It is especially important to keep experience for new players reasonably clean; As above smurf detection is already a thing, prisoners island won't work, there is no actual "solution"
From your link: > If we ship unsportsmanlike players to their own queue, they’d face a swath of issues that basically make League miserable by default. The queue would face higher rates of negativity in game, sure — but the diminished pool of players would also result in terrible queue times and lopsided matchmaking. It’d be emotionally satisfying to say they deserve it, but it’s squarely against our values of putting player experience first. Yes exactly - a perfect incentive and motivation for players put to shadow queue to reform in order to leave shadow queue and never return there, isn't it?
Rioter Comments
Nadatari (EUNE)
: I played lol around 5-7 games per day. I am not playing LoL for about a week anymore! So 5-7 games per day and every game there is either Yas/ Zed/Kha main who rage when their "main" gets banned ( by enemy team ). I played support class only, soraka, sona, bard ( mostly healers ). And I get raged in the game for not having 0 cd in my heal ability ( bcs why not go b when I ping or when I type no mana when you can stay in lane, try to get kills and when you bdie blame sona which already healed you trillion times and has no mana) . I get raged cause I build Iceborn, redemption, Rylai combo on Sona ( this is before this snowballing/instant kill cluster%%%%kk became meta). Its not that they dont realize that I can semi engage/bait, slow and have enough mana and hp to survive their focus on me and in same time do enough of cc to acquire atleast 20 assists till mid game ( this is when there was still mid game -.- ). So yeah, I get raged/ flamed/ trolled a lot!!! Especially since that combo in this snowballing meta means sona can acquire kills even easier then before ( I dont even need to use my ult ). So yeah! I get AVERAGE 3 trolls/flamers per game! Thats a FACT!!! Used to play a lot of normals and I am just a gold 5 :D so that happens a lot. Especially since we all cant be pros to have nice, clean games :D If you want to see how easier is it to climb in ranked just type it in Youtube and have your time laughing XD I managed to get to gold V just by playind duo in solo/duo in less then a month ( 2 weeks ) after that I gave up on LoL XD Btw I made new account just to get emote and I needed only 2 days to get to the lvl 11, get free atleast 5 champs and have 11k blue essence! Meaning, in full week I can play ranked! In season 1/2 you had hardtime lvling and there was no need for smurfing cause wtf you would go through that horror!!!!!!! Overtime, Rito made it easier, A LOT EASIER, to get to the lvl 30 :D And voila!!! You can get banned for flaming and create new account and start playing ranked easily! Btw Tyler1 (or something like that) Search him XD
Yeah - Less than a month. A week maybe if one spends lots of hours every day. This is a lot of time still. How many people are inclined to spend that much time to create burner accounts to allow them to troll in rankeds? While at the same time they could either (a) troll in normals while they're not lv 30 yet or (b) play normally on non-burner accounts? A time of a week to month is a lot of time to pay for a few games of indulging in egregiously toxic behavior. > Btw Tyler1 This doesn't apply - ppl of this kind can spend a LOT of money to purchase burner accounts over and over and over and over and over again. Not everyone is that rich though.
Rioter Comments
Nadatari (EUNE)
: Its not worth your time! You wont stop meeting trolls/flamers/etc! Cause atm every can easily climb and their atitude climbs with them :D I am 80 lvl and and season 1/2 player and I meet then on average 3 trolls/flamers in my team and atleast 1/2 in enemy team (flaming us ) XD Atm listening to Cyka is better :D You cant master this game anymore cause it %%%%ing change every two seconds! SO yeah, you will have difficult time, probably fail and some smurf account will flame! Thats what you get now in LoL :) Thats how every game will be ( unless you are in pro divisions! XD )!!!
> Cause atm every can easily climb and their atitude climbs with them :D While true, grindin an account to lv 30 when you can climb in 10 games takes time. A long time. I can't imagine how would someone spam smurfs grinded to lv 30 just to be toxic in higher divs. > meet then on average 3 trolls/flamers in my team and atleast 1/2 in enemy team (flaming us ) Every game? That's an exaggeration.
haxprox (EUW)
: Started like a couple days ago. Why everyone is so toxic?
1) Unlike in DOTA2, in LoL players can have their account permabanned from the entire game from flaming. This does happen in practice. 2) Actually, some people think this banning policy is too harsh, as permabans can and are dispensed even if it is a seemingly minor infraction that was the last straw that broke the camel's back. 3) Players banned in this manner will create smurfs. These players don't yet value their accounts (since they didn't invest much in their accounts yet) and are likely to flame & troll. 4) Yet other players purposefuly create "burner" accounts just to troll & flame. 5) LoL matchmaker tries to be newbie friendly, it will matchmake young accounts against young accounts only. 6) As a result, paradoxically, as long as your account is young, you will be meeting very good players and/or trolls & flamers often. More often than when your account will become older. 7) Also, as long as your account is young, you will be meeting lots of genuine newbs, which translates for very bad players. 8) As a result, you will often meet players with drastically different skills in your own team and in the enemy team often. 9) As your account becomes older, though, you will start meeting players on more or less the same skill level, which will match your own skill level, far more often. You will also meet fewer trolls & flamers, though you will never stop meeting them completely. (As in DOTA2.) 10) LoL's playerbase is very unhappy with the drastic balance changes that came over last year or so. As a result, you will be constantly seeing complains that LoL is trash, unplayable, etc.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Febos (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Hi im Lasse,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=RrQNerHU,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-08-19T20:23:58.483+0000) > > So you banned my acc byL4sse without any warning there before not even an 2 week ban or chatban. This is a lie. No one is permanently suspended for toxcity on first offense. You **always** get at least a temporary suspension. *** > [{quoted}](name=Hi im Lasse,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=RrQNerHU,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-08-19T20:23:58.483+0000) > > I was tired of wasting my Time to play accs to lvl 30 so i bought one. You banned this acc that costed me like 50 bucks "Bucks" only make sense if you are in the USA. That aside, you're not allowed to buy/sell/trade accounts and anyone caught doing that is suspended. ######Let me also tell you something else. 50€ for an account is too expensive. You got scammed. *** > [{quoted}](name=Hi im Lasse,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=RrQNerHU,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-08-19T20:23:58.483+0000) > > Im a student i dont have the time to play another acc to lvl 30. You should just focus on your studies tbh.
> You always get at least a temporary suspension. How can you know this?
: > [{quoted}](name=Hi im Lasse,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=RrQNerHU,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-08-19T20:23:58.483+0000) > > So riot games :) > First of all why the %%%% do you ban me for flaming an inter? You flamed someone. That's why. > You NEVER actually ban Inters Trollers or Feeders. They do, just not as often as flamers, because of how intent is easier to conclusively _prove_ when it comes to flamers. > So you banned my acc byL4sse without any warning there before not even an 2 week ban or chatban. My flame wasnt even bad or Racist or some shit like that. It was still flaming, though. And that's leaving aside how you're expecting us to take your word for it that you didn't receive a warning of some sort before the permaban. Never mind how racism isn't the only thing that can net you a harsh punishment instantly. > After you banned my acc i played ANOTHER acc to lvl 30 (LMS itzz00m) and guess what happened? You banned it again. Again i just told someone that ruined my ranked game to fck off. Because, you know..._that's_ something pleasant enough for people to want to put up with, right?[/sarcasm] > I was tired of wasting my Time to play accs to lvl 30 so i bought one. Well, that explains everything, then. You literally admitted to doing something that makes you eligible for a permaban on sight. Did nobody teach you that patience is a virtue? Especially when you find yourself getting banned repeatedly with seemingly no drive to actually change your obviously-appalling behaviour in the hopes that you'll actually be able to continue playing? > You banned this acc that costed me like 50 bucks again now tell me is that fair? Yes. You purchased an account and thus broke the rules by doing so. > You ban me 2 times for no reason and then also ban my bought acc? You admitted earlier that you flamed and told someone to, in your own words, "fck off". Who are you trying to fool here? Us or yourself? > I understand the ban of the bought acc Literally two sentences earlier... >You banned this acc that costed me like 50 bucks again now tell me is that fair? r/quityourbullshit > but how the fck am i supposed to afford enough time to play to lvl 30 again? Its boring as hell for me and also not nice for other players cause i mostly wreck them. Here's a simple solution, then - don't behave badly enough to warrant a punishment. The fact that this has happened to you as often as it did should've been enough of a hint for you that this was an issue with you refusing to improve your behaviour, thus causing you to run repeatedly into the same cycle of being banned. Unless you're willing to change your attitude, this will continue happening. > Just give me my acc byL4sse back, check if you warned me and what i got banned for and then tell me it was fair. I'm sure they'll be perfectly willing to show sympathy for your cause and how much you're helping your case if you make even _more_ of a habit of opening up a dialogue by calling people you don't like "dogshit"![/sarcasm] > Im a student i dont have the time to play another acc to lvl 30. I did spend hundreds of euro and now i have nothing Should've thought of that _before_ you started getting repeatedly banned.
It's hard for me to believe that literally telling someone to "fck off" is enough for a permaban on sight. If a single "fck off" really is enough for a permaban on sight... well then I'm not sure if it should.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Serage (EUW)
: Akali Winrate 28%
Where did you get this 28% winrate? [Leagueofgraphs](https://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/stats/akali/platinum) says something different.
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
> they can appeal their penalties, which is an ever-present possibility Yeah... From [official support](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201898070-My-Account-is-Suspended#h1q2): > Suspensions due to the Instant Feedback System will not be lifted or shortened under any circumstance. Very encouraging, isn't it... Why appeal a ban if they themselves clearly state that appealing is pointless since they're not going to lift it anyway? EDIT: And I must say, I do see some water in advices to not wait 14 days and found a new account right away. Once someone gets a 14d punishment the instafeedback system starts behaving like a minefield, permabanning on-sight even for very minor infringements (according to the boards, I personally haven't been punished yet). Given that the system already thought the OP was trolling, assuming the OP was indeed not trolling, we can easily see how things are heading for a permaban after just one more bad game of the OP (which, given they're new, will clearly happen sooner than later)
: there is a button that targets champions only, the default is ` in the settings u can make it a toggle or hold button. minion issue solved
Wow. Ty. But, but... sorry but ` seems pretty inconvenient... I'd bind it elsewhere, but where?
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Restalious (EUNE)
: Greetings, That stinks, most of the players probably were smurfs and they got tilted cause you didn't know how to play yet. I would suggest you play co-op vs AI until you understand the game so noone will report you for feeding, watch some youtube videos to start understanding the game better. Good luck & have fun {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
Stuff like this SHOULDN'T BE HAPPENING. People who are playing their second match ever should be able to play it PvP against other people who play their second match ever or, at least, without fear to be reported. People who perform too good in PvP (or even PvE) matches should be removed from the low level matchmaking queue and instead matchmade against people of levels 30+. In no case should people of low levels be punished for "intentional feeding" unless they literally run it down mid over and over again. Confining new players to bot matches only under the pain of being banned is HORRIBLE new user experience and, I suppose, a receipt for not having many new players.
kriegnes (EUW)
: dont waste your time and space with an useless anti virus and use ur brain instead.
I want a downvote button on this. Use at least Windows Defender; but do use it.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
HapDulap (EUW)
: Can't see the reconnect button - Riot says it's my fault
> but I'm not able to remove it as we had no issues (she said this while the board is full of people having connection issues) Beautiful.
: I think....sh*t happens. You didn't get banned and stuff like that doesn't stay on your account, it sucks but deal with it. A bug happened to me last week where I reconnected at the start of the game before minions spawned, started playing and for some reason the 'Remake' feature came up. My team for some reason remade and It said I left and I lost 16LP. I went to RIOT support, told them what happened, I was chilled and nice about it, I couldn't get my LP back but they apologised and reimbursed me in other ways. It sucks, but bugs exist in every game. Sorry that it happened to you.
> bugs exist in every game. True but why punish players for the game's bugs!
BesniStakor (EUNE)
: clean up your registry
More of that: According to Microsoft: > Some products such as registry cleaning utilities suggest that the registry needs regular maintenance or cleaning. However, serious issues can occur when you modify the registry incorrectly using these types of utilities. These issues might require users to reinstall the operating system due to instability. Microsoft cannot guarantee that these problems can be solved without a reinstallation of the Operating System as the extent of the changes made by registry cleaning utilities varies from application to application. source: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2563254/microsoft-support-policy-for-the-use-of-registry-cleaning-utilities According to Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP: > No. Not only is it not necessary, it's a very bad thing to do. > Registry cleaning programs are all snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry entries doesn't really hurt you. The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit it may have. Source: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-performance/is-there-a-microsoft-licensed-registry-cleaner-i/b03cd0ad-a92c-41b2-9bf0-b7be06c43047?auth=1 https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-files/registry-cleaners/5311416e-e8f5-460b-981c-925abf7c22bd (links to additional info on the topic on these answers) There still is more of this, but I think I'll limit myself to this for now
BesniStakor (EUNE)
: clean up your registry
I have heard opinions that CCLeaner & other pieces of software of the kind are more harm than good. They are unlikely to make any significant improvements but there's the risk they will actually break stuff. I can't find all such links but I can find one of them, here ya go: https://www.reddit.com/r/Windows10/comments/3y84al/can_someone_explain_why_ccleaner_has_gotten_such/
Rioter Comments
: Why build BOTRK first with Ashe?
Why the downvote? Is it wrong to ask to understand why is it optimal to build a given item on a given champ?
  Rioter Comments
Mada (EUW)
: I have 7! Ohh, the disappoints...
Thanks to U I now have 2 :) I can read neither.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Èclair (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=YetAnohterone,realm=EUNE,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=zfP9ua8n,comment-id=000200000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-06-27T17:21:23.949+0000) > > Not sure what is your point, then? > You point out that in DOTA you can equip any skin you want whenever you want: > You point out that you don't want others to vote you out of equpping your own skin: Yes, when you can pick a cosmetic on individual level without being forced into something picked by majority. This is exactly what I stated in previous posts - I'm not sure why are you looking at my statement looking for _"gotcha ya!"_. There's none. > I point out that all you want (being able to equip your own skin regardless of others' votes) is possible just as well with my idea. I also point out that, with my idea, others are able to see your own skins even if they don't have them purchased. >You say that this is exactly why DOTA's system is better than mine? Because it allows people to pick cosmetics on invididual level and allows sharing of cosmetics within your party _(to anybody in your team actually)_ without having your friends forced into another cosmetic. That's why voting on them makes no sense when there are better alternatives.
> Yes, when you can pick a cosmetic on individual level without being forced into something picked by majority. Because this is precisely what I want to provide! > I'm not sure why are you looking at my statement looking for "gotcha ya!". There's none. I'm not looking for any gotcha ya EXCEPT the fact that I really don't get it when you say my idea is bad because it doesn't allow X while I explicitely mention thatI want to allow X! It's not really looking for a gotcha ya... I just can't shake off the feeling that I misunderstand you or you misunderstand me. > Because it allows people to pick cosmetics on invididual level and allows sharing of cosmetics within your party (to anybody in your team actually) without having your friends forced into another cosmetic. OK now it finally starts making sense. What you want is not being allowed to pick a skin you've purchased. (or more precisely, you want it, but again, I want to provide that.) What you want is to be able to freely choose which skin of your teammates you want to pick, rather than being forced to choose between stardard skin, your own skins or the one skin others have voted for. If that is your point, then I finally get it. To which my response is... Well, your point is, of course, valid. Except one thing. Story-wise... all those champs fight on one field, right? That's why I thought it made sense to provide a "global" skin for all champs, even while providing opt-outs and overrides. I mean, it's similar to champ skins... when you bring Santa Braum for instance, all others see Santa Braum, and not Dragonslayer Braum.
Èclair (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=YetAnohterone,realm=EUNE,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=zfP9ua8n,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2018-06-26T19:57:39.889+0000) > > Check it and you always have your own skin. I ONLY want to enable other players to see your skin even if they don't have it IF THEY WANT IT. That's why I said Dota system is far better over what you're proposing. > But we still have [Santa Braum](http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/File:Braum_SantaSkin.jpg) and [many other ice / snow / winter theme skins](http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Champion_skin/Skin_themes) available all the time If you purchase them. They are still seasonal skins available to purchase only during certain events. Of course you can use them all the time - they are premium cosmetics while SR skin was made to enhance winter event. > This apparently already happens with champ skins... [the right skins for Trynda allow efficient canceling of non-crit AAs](https://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/abidingwraths-build-guide-to-tryndamere-521741) Last time somebody linked Mobafire I lost my faith in humanity. But here we go again: > Some skins attack faster than the other. No, certain skins do not attack faster and it's not that Highlander Tryndamere allows you to attack faster or has obnoxious crit animation. It's not an objectively better skin that gives you advantage over your opponent. Some people prefer other skins over it because it comes down to mostly personal preference and wich skins animations you know. Most people cannot even utilize this mechanic well enough to worry about that and if you know how to do it and practiced enough skin won't make a difference.
> That's why I said Dota system is far better over what you're proposing. Not sure what is your point, then? You point out that in DOTA you can equip any skin you want whenever you want: > This is exactly why Dota system is working so well - when you want to hear any announcer you want, you just equip it. You point out that you don't want others to vote you out of equpping your own skin: > If consumer wants to purchase cosmetic product you offer, the last thing they need is somebody voting them off from equipping it just because there's global system in place to ensure that all players hear the same announcer or have the same map skin. (...) You aren't forced into paying for product you can use only from time to time for no good reason. > But I don't have other players voting on whether I can equip a skin I paid for or have other premium cosmetic forced upon me with only option being to go back to classic skin. I point out that all you want (being able to equip your own skin regardless of others' votes) is possible just as well with my idea. I also point out that, with my idea, others are able to see your own skins even if they don't have them purchased. You say that this is exactly why DOTA's system is better than mine? I really don't get your point - why is it better to not allow others to see your skins if they want it? Again, if they want to play on their own skins, they CAN - just like in DOTA. > If you purchase them. They are still seasonal skins available to purchase only during certain events. Of course you can use them all the time - they are premium cosmetics Other than the issues with unfair advantages I admit I didn't foresee, I can't see why winter SR couldn't be the same. Seasonal skin available to purchase only during a certain event, premium cosmetic to use all the time if one has them. > Last time somebody linked Mobafire I lost my faith in humanity. Didn't know Mobafire is considered a sub-standard resource. Is it? Good to know, thanks! (that's a non-sarcastic thanks, btw.) However, I suppose at least not all guides suck there, since some are written by diamonds, plats and challengers (not the one I linked to).
Èclair (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=YetAnohterone,realm=EUNE,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=zfP9ua8n,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2018-06-25T20:38:53.954+0000) > > I must say I don't really understand why do people oppose my idea so strongly on the basis of "forcing" them into drastic cosmetic changes they may not like. This one's on you as I explained why this idea is bad. No need to build a strawman. If consumer wants to purchase cosmetic product you offer, the last thing they need is somebody voting them off from equipping it just because there's global system in place to ensure that all players hear the same announcer or have the same map skin. This is exactly why Dota system is working so well - when you want to hear any announcer you want, you just equip it. You aren't forced into paying for product you can use only from time to time for no good reason. > Very well, you don't like some skin, just check it. You want your own skin, just check it. >All what I propose is to allow others to see your skin if they want it. But I don't have other players voting on whether I can equip a skin I paid for or have other premium cosmetic forced upon me with only option being to go back to classic skin. > This is because in my way other players may sometimes be able to use other skins they don't own if they want it, while in the simpler approach they may never be able to. You don't need to force it globally to do so. Well, at least not with announcer packs. Map skins are different cup of tea. First of all, game readability - you can't just swap the colour palette on SR and call it a day. You have to ensure that visual telegraphs are well visible on new textures, whether it goes well with colour-blind mode, optimisation _(winder SR is known to cause some FPS loss)_ and how much visual noise is there _(again, people complained that colour scheme is too glaring and tiresome for their eyes)_. If you offer a product, you should ensure it's 100% playable and won't cause any issues. But giving players option to change map individually would probably affect competitive scene. People are already looking for skins that reduce visibility of hitboxes to gain small advantage and giving them option to swap the colour palette of an entire map on a whim would certainly be exploited. You can toggle this for ranked mode but I doubt that mode-locked cosmetic would go well with the community. Not to mention bugs and other technical issues that come from supporting multiple map skins. > Also how is my proposition worse than the current situation, that is, during some special events Riot gives all players map skins (like winter map skin) and/or announcers and removes them as soon as the event is over? Now we are unable to use the winter map skin even if we liked it. Because it's an event related change. Winter SR is only special because it was seasonal. It doesn't make sense from marketing standpoint to offer seasonal skin free to toggle entire year and if you want to sell it for people to use on a daily basis you would encounter problems I mentioned earlier. It's the same argument as why URF isn't around all the time or why we can't have Halloween event lasting half a year.
> [{quoted}](name=MadEclair,realm=EUNE,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=zfP9ua8n,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2018-06-26T10:52:07.249+0000) > If consumer wants to purchase cosmetic product you offer, the last thing they need is somebody voting them off from equipping it just because there's global system in place to ensure that all players hear the same announcer or have the same map skin. > This is exactly why Dota system is working so well - when you want to hear any announcer you want, you just equip it. You aren't forced into paying for product you can use only from time to time for no good reason. > > But I don't have other players voting on whether I can equip a skin I paid for or have other premium cosmetic forced upon me with only option being to go back to classic skin. > > You don't need to force it globally to do so. Well, at least not with announcer packs. Once again let me quote myself: > Of course, add the following two options in the settings: (...) and Always see own global cosmetic (if checked, the player will always see map skins / announcers they've brought themselves, even if the other players see other skins / announcers). Check it and you always have your own skin. I ONLY want to enable other players to see your skin even if they don't have it IF THEY WANT IT. But once again, you want to always see your own skin you've purchased, YOU CAN. > Because it's an event related change. > Winter SR is only special because it was seasonal. It doesn't make sense from marketing standpoint to offer seasonal skin free to toggle entire year and if you want to sell it for people to use on a daily basis you would encounter problems I mentioned earlier. But we still have [Santa Braum](http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/File:Braum_SantaSkin.jpg) and [many other ice / snow / winter theme skins](http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Champion_skin/Skin_themes) available all the time EDIT: > But giving players option to change map individually would probably affect competitive scene. People are already looking for skins that reduce visibility of hitboxes to gain small advantage and giving them option to swap the colour palette of an entire map on a whim would certainly be exploited. This apparently already happens with champ skins... [the right skins for Trynda allow efficient canceling of non-crit AAs](https://www.mobafire.com/league-of-legends/build/abidingwraths-build-guide-to-tryndamere-521741)
Show more

YetAnohterone

Level 48 (EUNE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion