: I will call flamers and ragequitters assholes as long as I want, report me if you like, I couldn't care less
> [{quoted}](name=Dividedby0error,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=gKGpAFBL,comment-id=000300000000,timestamp=2019-03-19T20:28:59.002+0000) > > I couldn't care less You care enough to rant on the boards. https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QZq6Nq6NZwE/Wi70QoEnOiI/AAAAAAAA1Uk/MhFEj91TMg0pS9wtbaBDRDcgIsVNbmd0ACLcBGAs/s1600/3942b79bc1ebfc85.png
Infernape (EUW)
: no u
https://i.imgur.com/S5Pb1Jg.png[]
xZ257 (EUW)
: Why am I playing with bots in my team in a Co-op vs AI 5v5?
Someone playing bad doesn't mean they're bots. I assume you're talking about [this game](https://matchhistory.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/EUW1/3967634406/2069927135465824), since it's the most recent CoOp 5v5 game. Bot accounts usually have one thing in common: patterns. They tend to play many games per day, usually with the same champions and builds. If you pay close attention to those players, you'll see they have been playing with each other and they're not consistent with their champion picks and builds. I'm not denying the existance of bots, but in this particular case it doesn't look like it.
GokuWin (EUW)
: when do you do a true log / historic / death recap ?
[Ask Riot: Death Recap](https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/community/q/ask-riot-league-client-update-and-death-recaps) > Short version is the Death Recap system has some pretty large structural flaws that make it hard to incorporate new things and a pain to maintain.
Wolfab (EUW)
: Who are your favorite champions ?
You're asking too much of me. I don't have a top 10, but I have a top 4: {{champion:203}} {{champion:35}} {{champion:202}} {{champion:44}} Bare in mind I don't necessarily like those champions just because of gameplay. Lore (background) also plays a big part in my decision.
Shapperzz (EUW)
: Ivern needs another skin
You're 2 months late. https://youtu.be/G8lmryL_8QA?t=152
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: Well because people just get carried out of their own elo. DUUH. I got to gold by sheer luck and I don't even play that good
> [{quoted}](name=M3GTRDragon,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=kJVhshBB,comment-id=0001000100010000,timestamp=2019-03-16T21:10:42.983+0000) > > Well because people just get carried out of their own elo. DUUH. And they drop back down just as quickly. Besides, one game carried by a smurf doesn't ammount to anything. Even if you are lucky enough to be carried by different smurfs in multiple games, you'd way more than 5 games in a row. That's quite a lot. *** > [{quoted}](name=M3GTRDragon,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=kJVhshBB,comment-id=0001000100010000,timestamp=2019-03-16T21:10:42.983+0000) > > I got to gold by sheer luck and I don't even play that good Or maybe you're downplaying your skill.
Psh0 (EUW)
: Everything Wrong With League
**"Everything** wrong with League" \* lists one thing \* https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/307/189/6fe.jpg
Lester the (EUNE)
: Am I the only one who thinks that Leona is unhealthy for the game?
> [{quoted}](name=Lester the,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=9etN8eJM,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-15T21:16:41.745+0000) > > Her kit is just basically a CC bot, and she doesn't have that many counters Soraka is just a heal bot; a bunch Marksmans are just basic attacks bots. That argument is fairly weak. Talking about Leona, 2 of the 3 CC abilities are skill shots. That's the counter-play; you can dodge them. The 3rd CC ability requires her to be in basic attack range. Leona is a melee champion so that's the counter-play. *** > [{quoted}](name=Lester the,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=9etN8eJM,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-15T21:16:41.745+0000) > > When she gets some items under her belt, she is extremely tanky and hard to kill while CCing everyone, meanwhile getting bonus armor and magic resist from her W. Like most other Tanks? How else can a Tank function? Look at Tahm Kench, Alistar and Taric. What do they all have in common with Leona? They're all Tanks, meaning they are supposed to be hard to kill. Now look at their kits. What do Tahm Kench and Taric do differently compared to Alistar and Leona? Alistar and Leona engage/start fights while the other two protect their team. Those 4 champions are put into two different categories: Vanguards and Wardens, respectively. A Vanguard's job is to start a fight and that's exactly what Leona does. She can't do what Taric does. You're complaining about something that is the foundation of a Vanguard champion. If you have a problem with Leona, then you have a problem with every other champion on that list: Alistar, Malphite, Nautilus, Sion, Zac, etc
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: OH YHEA SMURF IMPACT IS SO %%%%ING NEGLIBLE THAT EVERY GAME IS EITHER A STOMP OR GET STOMPED AND THERE RARELY IS ANY BALANCE IN GAMES AT ALL. very negligible.... might as well shoot yourself in the food that blood loss is negligible. (if you didn't get it by now, NO IT ISN'T)
> [{quoted}](name=M3GTRDragon,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=kJVhshBB,comment-id=00010001,timestamp=2019-03-15T02:53:06.951+0000) > > EVERY GAME IS EITHER A STOMP OR GET STOMPED AND THERE RARELY IS ANY BALANCE IN GAMES AT ALL. How is that the fault of smurfs? How can you know someone is a smurf? Because you were stomped? Well, I've stomped many of my games before in this account. Does that mean I'm a smurf? {{sticker:zombie-brand-facepalm}}
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=SadPplSmurfing,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=kJVhshBB,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-03-15T02:36:23.967+0000) > > you are playing a diferent game for sure lol wake up.......if you gave valor to 1 account, ppl dont create another one...use y fkng brain.....go play tetris...you dont know what y are talking about... You failed to answer my question though. Insults won't get you anywhere. Let me repeat it: > [{quoted}](name=Febos,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=kJVhshBB,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-03-15T02:30:28.332+0000) > > how can you prevent players from making new accounts on a **Free-to-Play** game?
: What is the difference between a 6-month account with a 5-year account?
> [{quoted}](name=SadPplSmurfing,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=kJVhshBB,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-15T01:40:27.484+0000) > > why ppl need to creat 2 account riot? do you even care? I'll answer that with a question: how can you prevent players from making new accounts on a **Free-to-Play** game? Find a good solution for that and you might earn yourself a new job. *** > [{quoted}](name=SadPplSmurfing,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=kJVhshBB,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-15T01:40:27.484+0000) > > new runes system bring 20% of smurffs or more Not really. There's literally no incentive for smurfs to exist. There's no level cap and also nothing to gain by making a new account (eg gifting skins like in the past). Besides, it's not like it was that hard to smurf before. Don't use the "you had to buy runes" as an excuse because you could buy two full pages of Tier 3 runes with less than 15k IP. You could go as low as 60 IP if you bought Tier 2 runes instead (77% efficiency). The Rune system did more harm than good for new players. Also, smurfs are a minority. They're impact in the game environment is negligible and there are systems in place to deal with the.
: ADC Neeko is becoming meta, will Riot kill it off?
> [{quoted}](name=Mega Audinoz,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EmOfON78,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-09T15:07:23.852+0000) > > However it's becoming normal to see a Neeko taking attack speed items and such due to her W. Which is odd because she doesn't scale that much with attack speed. She's behind Kennen and Teemo, in attack speed growth, and you don't see them Bot. The problem isn't her W. We can pinpoint the exact date we started see this happening: March 6th. [Patch 9.5](https://euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/game-updates/patch/patch-95-notes) came to live on that date. It should be pretty obvious what triggered this. I don't think nerfing her W would solve much. Maybe it would drop her performance a bit, but I don't think it would push her away from Bot\*. That said, Neeko shouldn't have that much more sucess Bot compared to Mid (57% vs 53%). Her sudden spike in Popularity plus Win Rate needs to be adressed... fast. ######\*Unless they remove both the on-hit damage and the movement speed buff.
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: I'll make a bet
> [{quoted}](name=M3GTRDragon,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=3yEPv7Qv,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-08T23:00:37.354+0000) > > I bet my whole ass on the fact that before I get every champion I will get banned. The deal has been made. If you want yo keep your bottom intact, you better collect all those champions ASAP.
ataglow (EUW)
: Looking for bisexual girls / lesbian girls to play games with <3
https://media.giphy.com/media/PAlCbedELXi5G/giphy.gif By the title I assume heterosexual girls are not your target audience.
0Nocturnal0 (EUNE)
: Classic lol
[Ask Riot: Classic Mode](https://nexus.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/2017/05/ask-riot-classic-mode/)
WolfX10 (EUNE)
: Wait they CHARGE you for getting info about your account?!
Yes. Their justification is they need to manually pull that information from their servers. It makes sense. The price is just to discourage players from asking for that information and it isn't that much (price of a skin). Imagine what would happen if it was free. You'd have many players every single day asking for account information and every one of those requests would be completed manually. Plenty of wasted time. That said, they could have some of the information readily avaiable, like they had in Riot Privacy. I think they disabled that service because of GDPR.
Drumel (EUNE)
: hours played?
There are two ways: - If you're a new player, [Wasted on League](https://wol.gg/), should give you a good estimate - If you're a "veteran" like me (4+ years) then you'll need to ask Riot directly In either case, the most reliable information will come from Riot. You can ask for that information, and much more, by contacting [Riot Support](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests). However, it will cost you (5€ I think).
: Oh, ok makes sense. One question- if i play Mundo, will said mastery grant me AD bonus if i build no offensive items at all, considering mundo get bonus AD from masochism?
As I said before, most champions start with bonus AD by default, unless you buy AP. I think some champions are hard-coded to start with AP, but I'm not sure. In Dr. Mundo's case, he gains bonus AD, even if you don't buy a single AD item. ######As long as you don't build AP.
: One more question... what does it mean that a certain mastery is adaptive?
> [{quoted}](name=PreemptiveMuting,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=L5xvEoYl,comment-id=0003000000000000,timestamp=2019-03-07T22:04:54.428+0000) > > what does it mean that a certain mastery is adaptive? It means it will give you either AD **or** AP, depending on what you're building (not both). Most champions start with bonus AD with those runes. If you buy {{item:1052}} , you'll gain bonus AP instead. Suppose you have {{item:3031}} and {{item:1026}} in the same build. You'll gain bonus AD, because you have more AD than AP from items.
: Back in the day.... well, do we agree that in the early days of LoL the lore was insultingly stupid? Thanks for the reply. Very informative.
> [{quoted}](name=PreemptiveMuting,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=L5xvEoYl,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-03-07T21:19:38.818+0000) > > do we agree that in the early days of LoL the lore was insultingly stupid? It was a different philosophy. The stories were simple, boring and... well... mostly shit, because they were not creating a universe. They had a game based on a vague story of something something. Now it's completely different. Lore is has important, if not more, than the game, League of Legends, itself. For example, when making a new champion, the first thing Riot creates is its background. I lively recommend reading the stories. Some are longer than others, so don't be discouraged if you one seems too long. Here are a few of my recent favourites: [Darius Comic](https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/comic/darius/bloodofnoxus), [Vladimir Short Story](https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/story/art-is-life/), [The Watchers](https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/story/the-eye-in-the-abyss/), [Principles of Strength](https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/story/trifarian-legion/) and [Darkin Lore](https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/story/twilight-of-the-gods/). The last three are quite long. ######I have a bias for Noxus, but most stories are really good reads.
: Hello there. Returned after 17 months of not playing. Any tips how to catch up with the changes?
> [{quoted}](name=PreemptiveMuting,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=L5xvEoYl,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-07T20:46:27.624+0000) > > I am thinking about returning to League, but considering how long ago I left, I do not know even where to start. Before I answer your questions, I suggest you start by reading what reworked champions do differently. You can find the list here: [Champion Update Schedule](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/202294884-Champion-Update-Schedule). Then familiarize yourself with the new [Runes System](https://leagueoflegends.fandom.com/wiki/Runes_Reforged). Everything else, eg new champions and items, will come with time. I mention those two things in specific - reworks and runes - because it's something that existed before you left but completely different now. *** > [{quoted}](name=PreemptiveMuting,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=L5xvEoYl,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-07T20:46:27.624+0000) > > Am i understanding it correctly, or does this new Neeko guy has a W that hits as hard as Jax ulitimate, and still is considered a support champion? Neeko's W isn't that powerful. Neeko maxes W last and she doesn't scale with attack speed, so she doesn't rely on basic attacks, unlike Jax. The best way to understand what Neeko does is to either play her or watch videos. Also, she's not a support. She was supposed to be a Mid champion. *** > [{quoted}](name=PreemptiveMuting,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=L5xvEoYl,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-07T20:46:27.624+0000) > > I used to like playing Nautilus in the jungle, just sort of a kink. Can I pick him up and expect decent results? No. Nautilus is **really** off-meta right now. If he ever sees any play it's either as Support or Top, not Jungle. In the Jungle you want ganking or skirmisher champions (assassins will do too). The likes of Lee Sin, Jarvan IV, Kha'Zix, etc. The Jungle Meta has been very volatile recently, so I'd stay away from it while you're getting used to League again. *** > [{quoted}](name=PreemptiveMuting,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=L5xvEoYl,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-07T20:46:27.624+0000) > > Runes and masteries are gone, right? No more cheap wins by messing with your opponents' muscule memory with unconventional runes? Partially correct. As I said above, the Rune System changed. They combined Runes with Masteries into a unified system. It's does pretty much what both those system did, but now it's streamlined. That said, you need to know what every rune does, so you should at least read each and every one of them. We can now edit Runes on champion select, so you don't need to have multiple rune pages. In other words, if you know exactly what you want each game, one rune page is enough. The IP currency (Influence Points) merged with BE (Blue Essence). Everything you could buy with IP you'll now buy with BE instead. How do you earn BE? By leveling up. We don't earn IP/BE per game now, only XP. On average, about 10..12 PvP games should be enough to level up. Also, we get as much BE now as we did IP back then\*. ######\*Unless you play more than 6..8 games per day. *** > [{quoted}](name=PreemptiveMuting,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=L5xvEoYl,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-07T20:46:27.624+0000) > > Of my 3 favoruite toplane champions Shen, Sion and Mundo, which will be the easiest to pick up in the current enviornment? Sion is probably the best pick, of those three. Now, Top lane is dominated by [Conqueror](https://leagueoflegends.fandom.com/wiki/Conqueror) "abusers" (Major Rune aka Keystone). Basically, you won't see many Tanks Top. *** > [{quoted}](name=PreemptiveMuting,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=L5xvEoYl,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-07T20:46:27.624+0000) > > Oh, i bet there is so much that changed, and I know I will have to embrace being a noob again. But with a bit of help from kind people on the boards, it should be easier. Yes, **a lot** has changed, but it's still very much the same game you knew 1..2 years ago. It's just a matter of catching up really :) I would suggest something else too. If you're into Lore, then now it's your opportunity to start reading. Riot has been updating their lore and it's quite good. You can find all of it here: [Universe of Legends](https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/). To find every piece of art, ["explore the universe"](https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/explore/everything/newest/) instead (you won't find some of the stories otherwise). Finally, there's something else really cool too, now. [Click here](https://map.leagueoflegends.com/en_US) and be amazed :D Welcome back! {{sticker:katarina-love}}
: Nothing was removed? Are you forgetting her E pre-rework? I loved old Kayle, even when people were telling me shes a 'noob champ' and 'useless' and she was my go to top laner because I could win my lane with her before 11. Now you are having to wait until lvl 11 just to feel like you are actually contributing to the game whereas before she had the umph to do it all on her own. She has to rely on the jungler pre-6 and sometimes pre-11 just so she can actually get kills, unless the jungler ends up taking them. I feel like they should have kept her E as it was pre--rework and just changed the rest of it. The conecept behind the rework was great, in actuality before she gets to 11 she may as well be an extra minion in the lane for all the good she does.
> [{quoted}](name=Pandorax13x,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=elvOolRg,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2019-03-07T09:32:07.737+0000) > > Nothing was removed? Are you forgetting her E pre-rework? It's still there; it's in her passive. Now, instead of pressing one ability and going ranged mode, she earns that by level 11 at all time. *** > [{quoted}](name=Pandorax13x,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=elvOolRg,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2019-03-07T09:32:07.737+0000) > > Now you are having to wait until lvl 11 just to feel like you are actually contributing to the game To be honest, I think her ranged form should come sooner. I would switch the milestones around: - Level 6 - ranged champion - Level 11 - AoE But that's my opinion. What you can't say is "they removed her range", because they didn't. *** > [{quoted}](name=Pandorax13x,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=elvOolRg,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2019-03-07T09:32:07.737+0000) > > She has to rely on the jungler pre-6 and sometimes pre-11 just so she can actually get kills Such is the fate of an hyper carry champion. Don't think Kayle is the only one. *** > [{quoted}](name=Pandorax13x,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=elvOolRg,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2019-03-07T09:32:07.737+0000) > > I feel like they should have kept her E as it was pre--rework No. Her E was a gimmicky skill. Before, you wanted max cooldown to have ranged form avaiable at all time. That's a gimmick. What we have now makes more sense, granted what I said above about reaching ranged form at level 6 instead of level 11.
: Ah yes, and the very first champions were also like others — from DoTA or that another one MOBA game that did not really survive under LoL pressure. Everyone copies everyone. The amount of "really cool" combinations is kinda limited (bu the current fashion trend), so you will see the same things going round and round.
> [{quoted}](name=Rainfollower,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=elvOolRg,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-03-07T07:33:44.376+0000) > > Everyone copies everyone. The amount of "really cool" combinations is kinda limited People forget that champions like {{champion:518}} {{champion:555}} {{champion:142}} etc exist. I named those 3 because those are the most recent ones. Not everything on a champion can be "unique". That's madness.
: Point is that, you don't need to know how to play on reworked champions because they DO NOT make any sense. Yes it is matter of perspective and as player I gave mine, good luck riot I hope player base will increase by doing this high quality reworks.
> [{quoted}](name=RENITE OUTPLAY,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=elvOolRg,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-03-07T00:53:29.962+0000) > > you don't need to know how to play on reworked champions because they DO NOT make any sense. Kayle is virtually the same champion she was before the rework: - Invuneralbily - Check - Targeted Heal - Check - Melee/Range dichotomy - Check - Weak early game, strong late game - Check - Hybrid damage - Check - Magic Resist Shred - Check - Area of Effect ability - Check - Wings - Check - Helmet - Check - "An Eye For An Eye" - Check Name one thing pre-rework Kayle did that rework Kayle doesn't. I'll give you a hint. The only thing that change significantly is her Q. Before it was a targeted ability and now it's a skillshot. That's, quite literally, the only thing "new" with Kayle. Everything there now already existed and nothing was removed.
: if you could have any champion's ability, which would it be?
{{champion:245}} The ability to rewind time itself {{champion:35}} Because, sometimes, one of me isn't enough
TechMajin (EUW)
: I thought they released the kayle rework?
[Patch 9.5](https://euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/game-updates/patch/patch-95-notes). The patch wasn't deployed yet, but it happens today (March 6th).
: > [{quoted}](name=Febos,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=BAohu6wE,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-03-06T02:32:44.556+0000) > > Just go through the procedure. > We, me in particular, can't do much for you from our side. The "hardwork" must be done by you. The best I can do is give tips on how to solve it. > > If it's a RAT, Malwarebytes will deal with it. Spyware shouldn't interfere with how you use the system; you wouldn't notice your machine acting oddly. Whatever that is, it doesn't make sense. An attacker doesn't need a virtual environment to steal from/use you. > > I'm intrigued. If you're not trolling me, be sure to update the discussion if you make progress. i think i know who did this to to me :( Friend i met in the EU/W boards discord Thanks for the assist. I did find a RAT
You're welcome. The only way to be sure who did it would be by tracking your network traffic. You can actually report attacks like those to the authorities. Be sure to run another check in a week or so. It sounds like it was rookie attack, but it doesn't hurt to check again. Also, don't link any links, or download anything, unless you trust who you're dealing with. Stay safe! {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
: > [{quoted}](name=Febos,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=BAohu6wE,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-03-06T02:19:23.267+0000) > > A VirtualBox config doesn't mean you've been infected. Are you the only one using your machine? > Why would an attacker need a virtual environment on **your** system? That defeats the purpose of an attack. > Also, if a hacker gets into your machine, why would he knock you off the internet? None of that makes sense. > > You'd be infected and the malicious code would do its thing. Then the attacker would wait for the system to go into iddle state before doing anything with your machine, if the purpose was to be part of a botnet. If the purpose was to steal from you, you'd either not notice it at all or be made aware really fast (ransomware). If the purpose was to destroy your system, well... you'd have figured that by now. > > Anyway, it doesn't hurt to check. Do the following: > > - Download Malwarebytes. If you have a clean machine, you may move the executable to a USB flash drive instead (this shouldn't be needed) > - Disable WiFi adapter or remove the Ethernet cable (in other words, go offline) > - Reboot your system in "safe mode" > - Run Malwarebytes > > If you have a RAT in your system, Malwarebytes should be able to remove it, alongside any other nasty stuff. > Be sure to back up your files, because it may have a trigger to corrupt the entire system (unlikely but those exist). > You may want to remove anything you feel foreign to your system (depends on how well you know your machine). > *** > If you really were infected, you didn't get it from League. It must have been either a link you clicked, file downloaded, or someone in your network (if you have you allowed your local network to share files). No one else touches this pc, i have a premium copy of malware bytes. I have no remote adapters. i never installed virtual box.
Just go through the procedure. We, me in particular, can't do much for you from our side. The "hardwork" must be done by you. The best I can do is give tips on how to solve it. If it's a RAT, Malwarebytes will deal with it. Spyware shouldn't interfere with how you use the system; you wouldn't notice your machine acting oddly. Whatever that is, it doesn't make sense. An attacker doesn't need a virtual environment to steal from/use you. I'm intrigued. If you're not trolling me, be sure to update the discussion if you make progress.
: > [{quoted}](name=Febos,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=BAohu6wE,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-03-06T01:20:31.666+0000) > > Very unlikely to be a DoS or DDoS attack. Probably just a problem with your ISP. To be sure you're not a target of DoS attack, turn on dynamic IP (DHCP) on your router. > > Usually the simpler solution is to just restart your router and/or machine. If you're usually connected via WiFi, try Ethernet to check if the problem persists. No they actually got into my pc, literally found virtualbox with a config and a virtual ethernet adapter on my machine. and my pc has been acting very odd all day.
A VirtualBox config doesn't mean you've been infected. Are you the only one using your machine? Why would an attacker need a virtual environment on **your** system? That defeats the purpose of an attack. Also, if a hacker gets into your machine, why would he knock you off the internet? None of that makes sense. You'd be infected and the malicious code would do its thing. Then the attacker would wait for the system to go into iddle state before doing anything with your machine, if the purpose was to be part of a botnet. If the purpose was to steal from you, you'd either not notice it at all (spyware) or be made aware really fast (ransomware). If the purpose was to destroy your system, well... you'd have figured that by now. Anyway, it doesn't hurt to check. Do the following: - Download Malwarebytes. If you have a clean machine, you may move the executable to a USB flash drive from there instead (this very extreme caution and shouldn't be needed) - Disable WiFi adapter or remove the Ethernet cable (in other words, go offline) - Reboot your system in "safe mode" - Run Malwarebytes If you have a RAT in your system, Malwarebytes should be able to remove it, alongside any other nasty stuff. Be sure to back up your files first (system restore and literally back up your files to an external drive), because it may have a trigger to corrupt the entire system (unlikely but those exist). You may want to remove anything you feel foreign to your system (depends on how well you know your machine). *** If you really were infected, you didn't get it from League. It must have been either a link you clicked, file downloaded, or someone in your network (if you allowed your local network to share files).
: PC got hacked.
Very unlikely to be a DoS or DDoS attack. Probably just a problem with your ISP. To be sure you're not a target of DoS attack, turn on dynamic IP (DHCP) on your router. Usually the simpler solution is to just restart your router and/or machine. If you're usually connected via WiFi, try Ethernet to check if the problem persists.
: Wanna see something funny ?
Unlucky. https://images.rapgenius.com/4e2be86a75bc87dce5cb71bca9be844d.400x400x1.jpg
: ughhh, I can already tell you majored in maths {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}}
Close, but we don't have "majors" where I'm from. My bachelor degree does have quite a bit of math. About 1/4 of it are exclusively math and the rest have math involved in some way. ######Yes, I really like math :)
Vistha Kai (EUNE)
: >It also works the other way around. You may have Platinum 4 MMR and be at Diamond 4 rank. The difference here is it may stop you from losing Diamond rank* even though your skill level isn't there. Actually if you are Diamond 4 with MMR of Platinum 4 then you'll be demoted the moment you lose at 0 LP. >We actually can. We may not be able to see the number itself, but we can infer it. >The only thing constant in 20 consecutive games is yourself, so that's how you can infer your hidden rating. You are aware that it's a very speculative, right? Especially when you are close to the beginning of the season where virtually everybody has their MMR inflated compared to their rank. There is no constant here, because 20 matches is easily enough to get you demoted from Division 1 to Division 4. Your MMR is changing after EVERY game. In my Gold 3 games I'm playing against people from as low as Silver 4 to as high as Plat 1. One game I win 25LP and the next I win 20LP. You can't infer **anything** out of it. That's why OP.GG's MMR calculator didn't work properly.
> [{quoted}](name=Vistha Kai,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=maVVlALu,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-03-03T17:19:23.555+0000) > > Actually if you are Diamond 4 with MMR of Platinum 4 then you'll be demoted the moment you lose at 0 LP. If you pay really close attention, you'll see an "*" near the end of that sentence. Then, if you pay really close attention a 2nd time, you'll see the asterisk would take you here: > In other words, you won't lose X rank unless your MMR drops too much. **I don't know how low you can go compared to your rank's average MMR**. Can't make it more clear than that. Before "correcting" someone, be sure to read **everything** first. *** > [{quoted}](name=Vistha Kai,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=maVVlALu,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-03-03T17:19:23.555+0000) > > You are aware that it's a very speculative, right? Especially when you are close to the beginning of the season where virtually everybody has their MMR inflated compared to their rank. Where did I say "You only need to do this once"? It's implied this is a recursive method. You do this to the past 20 games. You play one more and the **past 20 games** are not the original sample, so you do it again. If you play 20 games after the first analysis, then the you'd be off by 20 games. It's obvious you can't do it once and be done with it. That said, by looking at the past 20 games you can infer what your MMR is, assuming you stopped progressing (LP win/loss stabilize). This should go without saying, but the more games you have the better this method will be. If you only have 20 games, then the level of uncertainty will be much higher than if you had 200 games instead. I didn't mention it because I thought this was obvious. It seems I was wrong in assuming that much. ######Unless you're just nitpicking to be annoying. *** > [{quoted}](name=Vistha Kai,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=maVVlALu,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-03-03T17:19:23.555+0000) > > That's why OP.GG doesn't have their MMR calculator anymore. You're terribly misinformed. The reason why OP.GG doesn't have their calculator is because of the new regulation of [Riot's API](https://developer.riotgames.com/policies.html) > Create alternatives for official skill ranking systems, such as Ranked Leagues (Prohibited alternatives include MMR or ELO calculators) OP.GG removed the calculator to comply with the new terms, not because it didn't work. If you want to "correct" someone, you should at least have your facts down first.
: Why have leagues and divisions?
> [{quoted}](name=Wandering Mist,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=maVVlALu,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-03T16:03:31.460+0000) > > So, why do we have leagues and divisions? What purpose do they serve? Leagues and Divisions are just a representation of your MMR. They are like a coat of paint and that's one of their purposes. The other purpose is to give you a sense of progression. You may have Diamond MMR while in Platinum 4 rank. Your LP gains/losses will reflect that, because you'll feel yourself progressing a lot faster than someone with Platinum 4 MMR in Platinum 4. It also works the other way around. You may have Platinum 4 MMR and be at Diamond 4 rank. The difference here is it may stop you from losing Diamond rank\* even though your skill level isn't there. ######\*In other words, you won't lose X rank unless your MMR drops too much. I don't know how low you can go compared to your rank's average MMR. *** > [{quoted}](name=Wandering Mist,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=maVVlALu,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-03-03T16:03:31.460+0000) > > Without seeing your true MMR it's almost impossible to see if the matchmaking is working as intended. We actually can. We may not be able to see the number itself, but we can infer it: - Look at the past 20 games. - Per game, take the average rank on both teams, excluding yourself. Let's call them "X" and "Y". If there's an "Unranked", you can either exclude it or assume Silver 4. - Per game, take the average rank of the match, using the two numbers from the point above - X and Y. Let's call this new number Z. - Take the average rank of the past 20 games, using the numbers from the point above - "Z1", "Z2", ... , "Z20". Let's call that number "R". The only thing constant in 20 consecutive games is yourself, so that's how you can infer your hidden rating. "R" will be, approximately, the same as **your** MMR respective rank.
Zanador (EUNE)
: But we are kind of experiencing an out of season Harrowing now with medium level necromancers bringing year old threads back. I wonder how that happened. I only browse the boards periodically, but i don't recall something like this happening in a long while.
> [{quoted}](name=Zanador,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=eoTQNEGF,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-03-03T01:32:32.024+0000) > > But we are kind of experiencing an out of season Harrowing now with medium level necromancers bringing year old threads back. I wonder how that happened. I don't browse on "Recent", so I can't tell. I guess it happens if someone comes to the boards, after a lot of time has passed, and has a pending notification. The other day, I had someone reply to a [2 years old comment](https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/champions-gameplay-en/WQfla2hE-old-league-of-legends-old-dragon-killed-at-level-1-leauge-of-legends?comment=00000000) I left on his discussion.
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: you know the forum is dead
Dead? Then why do we have ~10 discussions in the last hour? That's like 1 discussion every 6 minutes ("dead" hour in EU btw). Sure, NA has a lot more discussions/hour, but people like you forget EU is split in multiple boards: [Italian](https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/it/), [German](https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/de/), [Spanish](https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/es/), [French](https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/fr/), etc. If you aggregate all of those, we've probably as much, if not more, discussions/hour compared to NA. Besides, more =/= better. Also, your definition of "necro" is off by a long shot. Most of the "[Recent](https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/)" tab has discussions from the last 2 days.
: t series vs pewdiepie?
> [{quoted}](name=Kapten Linke,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=WQfla2hE,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-03-01T13:01:16.946+0000) > > t series vs pewdiepie? I'm one of the OG subscribers. I've been supporting Felix since ~2012, around the time reached 2 million.
JothEs (EUNE)
: Not really bro, its 90
> [{quoted}](name=JothEs,realm=EUNE,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=HedIWvE7,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-03-01T00:28:03.927+0000) > > Not really bro, its 90 Veigar costs 1350 BE and his shard disenchants for 1/5 of that , like every other champion -> 270 BE. Prove me wrong by showing me a print screen of his disenchant value. If you wait for his price to drop, it won't count.
: Encouraging good behavior was always the objective of the new honors system. People are the ones who understood it wrong especially those who remember the old system. The new honor system have only 3 categories : * Great Shotcalling * Staying calm * Being friendly All 3 of them are good behaviors that have nothing to do with kda or carrying. So it is more about the players misconception of the system
> [{quoted}](name=Doom emissary,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MEUk2Abt,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-02-28T00:26:31.561+0000) > > People are the ones who understood it wrong especially those who remember the old system. > The new honor system have only 3 categories : > > * Great Shotcalling > * Staying calm > * Being friendly No mate, you're the one that didn't understand the objective of the system. In fact, receiving honours isn't necessary to go up in levels. That fact alone is enough to dismantle what you said. The Honour system exists to reward positive behaviour, not encourage it. It really is that simple.
: Encouraging good behaviour
> [{quoted}](name=Wandering Mist,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MEUk2Abt,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-02-28T00:11:25.594+0000) > > The honour system was originally created to encourage people to be good teammates You start with a false statement. The Honour system wasn't created with the intent of encouraging positive behaviour. Instead, it was created to **reward** positive behaviour. Two completely different things. You shouldn't be positive because you're going to win something from it. You should be positive because "it's the right thing to do". The rewards are just a **bonus**. *** > [{quoted}](name=Wandering Mist,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MEUk2Abt,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-02-28T00:11:25.594+0000) > > I've been honour level 5 for quite a long time and what do I get for it? Key fragments! (yay....) Right now I have 45 keys and no chests to use them on I have 12 chests yet to open and was Honour Level 5. My friend has 40+ chests yet to open and was honour level 5 too. *** > [{quoted}](name=Wandering Mist,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MEUk2Abt,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-02-28T00:11:25.594+0000) > > I think it's time to look at other ways of encouraging good behaviour. I disagree. Good behaviour should be the norm, not the exception. In other words, you're expected to have good behaviour. Let me ask you this. Are you against stealing from someone? If yes, what is the reason? Because it's wrong or because you're afraid of the punishment? A similar thing applies to League. I'm not toxic because I'm afraid of a punishment, but rather because I understand that toxicity is a bad thing for the game environment. I'm willing to bet many, if not most, think like me.
: what to do against people who tryhard in norms?
> [{quoted}](name=CampYourLane,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=UbZagExZ,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-02-27T16:56:03.828+0000) > > so what am i supposed to do against people who just play norms to win? Nothing? Isn't winning the objective of the game? If I didn't want to win, I'd hop to Minecraft instead.
: Fiddle rework idea.
I like the passive. Not sure if it would be balanced, but it adds a level of creepiness to Fiddlesticks. Depends on how easy they are to destroy and how they actually spawn. The Q is too much CC, unless each repeated fear is reduced. Just think about what happens with Shaco's W. A good box placement is extremely annoying and not interactive to the enemy (unless they use Sweeper). During fear, you can't control your direction so you're at the mercy of random scarecrows spawn. The E is boring, just like the current skill. It's a targeted ability that bounces. The R is interesting. *** As with many "boring" abilities, I would like to see his E turned into a skillshot. At the very least not a targeted ability. The interaction with Swain could never happen, btw. Riot doesn't do "champion specific interactions" with abilities, not when those interactions remove gameplay.
: Rito be like
> [{quoted}](name=thebombardier92,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=3kG35AnU,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-02-26T13:46:05.477+0000) > > Let's rework Akali because she oneshots people with 2 items and one Active (gunblade) Thta's not the reason why Akali was reworked. In fact, she can still do that.
: How the hell is fiddle a counter to vlad in any way what so ever?
If anyone tells you "Fiddle counters Vlad" just show them this: [Vladimir counters](https://lolalytics.com/ranked/worldwide/platinum/plus/counter/Vladimir/). Not a single Vladimir vs Fiddlesticks game. If he really was a counter, you'd see at least a few games. For starters, Vladimir is either found Top or Mid while Fiddlesticks is found either Support or Jungle. The chances a Vladimir will ever go against Fiddlesticks on lane are pratticaly non-existent. Then you have the problem with Fiddlesticks himself. His kit is better suited as a Jungler, not as a solo laner. He's picked as Support more than he's picked as Jungler, so that says a lot about the champion. Finally, Vladimir has more sustain than Fiddlesticks and doesn't need to be stationary to heal. After level 6 (Q rank 4 with 6 seconds cd), Vladimir will shit on Fiddle.
Waaruii (EUW)
: Mumu ult snare or stun?
Neither. Amumu's R is an **entangle**. It does what snare/root does plus disarm. He's the only champion with it. When snared you can't move your champion. When disarmed you can't attack.
: What champion is similar to velkoz? (Supp)
{{champion:63}} is probably the closest thing to Vel'Koz. {{champion:143}} is my pocket pick. She does pretty much what those two do, but if I'm against either, I usually can't do much to punish them.
: The talent doesn't exist. There are no challenger females in any region. The reason is simply biological. Boys have the upper hand in reflexes and determination, biologically.
> [{quoted}](name=Hook Warden,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=6khR1aZ6,comment-id=0003000200000000,timestamp=2019-02-24T18:13:54.023+0000) > > The talent doesn't exist. There are no challenger females in any region. You sure about that? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjXSlWSmr7g Only took me 1 google search to find one case.
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: @Eambo
Why Eambo in particular? Our NOC friend probably has no say in such decisions.
: Regardinging fan competitions and how easy it is to cheat.
> [{quoted}](name=DemonsWithUS,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=gHExEQEL,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-02-24T00:31:04.875+0000) > > I have now asked many times and have been ignored. > What stops people winning by using a vpn, bulk of accounts and a script? You're ignored because the answer is obvious. Nothing is stopping someone from using their influence (or other methods) to rig the competition. Scripting is less of an issue because there aren't that many tech wizards out here, even for something as simple as that. I can't vouche for this competition in particular, but the winners of some of the previous competitions were ultimately decided by the volunteer team. *** This is very simple really. If you're not competiting, then you shouldn't complain. If you were not going to compete in the first place, like myself, you shouldn't complain either. Even if the contest had judges, what is stopping them from being biased towards someone in particular? I may be naive with this idea, but I believe those competiting are in it for the fun and not the prizes.
Show more

Febos

Level 88 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion