Kiokyshin (EUNE)
: ***
Necromancy best be kept away.
: > [{quoted}](name=Alatharia,realm=EUW,application-id=yTagKVTg,discussion-id=PAMJqeEP,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2019-11-29T16:02:07.513+0000) > > But since you you guys asked for feedback, here's my honest feedback: > > Next time, either don't have any prizes at all, or clearly explain how the winners will actually be chosen. The original post only mentioned answering the questions correctly, nothing about length or depth or details. Hidden rules aren't fun. I would assume it is common sense that just like with every exam, high- effort and extensive display of knowledge are always beneficial, would you disagree? I think it goes without saying, the more you write the better the chance of winning. The winners were chosen by the points they reached. If in an exam I, for example, am asked about a question regarding the story of Snow White and what made her fall to a death- like sleep, simply answering "apple" will bring you some points but answering "poisoned apple brought to her by an old hag, the queen" will bring significantly more points :D We can see what some other volunteers have to say but I am a bit against explicitly telling participants to write more and in extensive detail because the people who naturally do so and truly think about putting their effort into these contests should be awarded accordingly.
> [{quoted}](name=The Iceborn,realm=EUW,application-id=yTagKVTg,discussion-id=PAMJqeEP,comment-id=00070001,timestamp=2019-11-29T16:16:51.109+0000) > > high- effort and extensive display of knowledge are always beneficial, would you disagree? Yes, I disagree. Where I study my teachers would rather have concise/"to the point" answers instead of lengthy ones\*. Being able to write an essay doesn't correlate to being knowledgeable about a specific topic. As the saying goes "less is more". ######\*For example, in one of my exams last year I got full points on a "elaborate on the question" about Dynamic-Link Libraries. When I reviewed my exam, the teacher told me I was one of the few, out of 100+, to have full points on that specific question. My answer was, quite literally, 4 lines long. *** Regardless, thanks for the quizz! There should be more of these, even if no rewards are involved (would have less entries to review too).
: > [{quoted}](name=Declined,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=zttGlFA4,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-27T16:52:02.093+0000) > > leave us a like for visibility and a comment so that you have a chance to express your opinion and be heard. In other words, if the name isn't green or orange it won't be read by anyone who could forward the information.. It's not like this issue isn't already known by Riot, it's just that they couldn't give a %%%% about it.., which is why there isn't a post explaining why it's happening in the first place. Talk about the shittiest customer support in the history of the planet...!
> [{quoted}](name=Axiomandis,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=zttGlFA4,comment-id=001a,timestamp=2019-11-27T18:28:40.585+0000) > > In other words, if the name isn't green or orange it won't be read by anyone who could forward the information.. Not necessarily. Anyone can spark the discussion that will have Riot's attention. It's easier for a Green or Wrenchie because: - We, community, tend to pay more attention to them too - They work more closely with Riot than most of us It's better to have a single discussion than multiple about a specific topic. A single discussion gets more visibility quicker.
FTZT (EUW)
: Changing username
[Upvote and comment on this discussion](https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behaviour-en/zttGlFA4-not-wanting-to-change-your-login-name)
S0M3D4Y (EUW)
: Upgrading account to Riot account
> [{quoted}](name=S0M3D4Y,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=ZidUeVEp,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-27T03:09:58.485+0000) > > because it's already taken... by you. Do you have an account on other servers, eg PBE? If yes, do all those accounts share the same username? If yes, then that is the source of the problem. Riot is merging accounts from different servers into one. That means repeated usernames have to go. In my case, I had a PBE account with the same username as my EUW account. That PBE account has been locked for quite some time due to inactivity, but the username still exists in their DB. I had to change the username on my EUW account because of that.
: > [{quoted}](name=ReaLEgGacHe,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=1clEeoN3,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-27T01:26:54.917+0000) > > Hi guys, > i didnt receive any Email to change my username but when i logged in the client today, it shows i have to change my username. > I clicked the link where i have to confirm my password. > I did and with a click on the arrow i came to a page with the Hint LOL Accounts are now RIOT Accounts and i have to change username. > So lets do it, but then im back to the page where i have to confirm my password. > > and this loop does not end, i cant do anything and there is no other option or button to click. > What do I have to do? I thought i was having the dumb, glad (kinda ??) to know its not just me. > [{quoted}](name=Febos,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=1clEeoN3,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-11-27T01:38:31.686+0000) > > Something is fishy. Choosing a new username shouldn't need to happen. > A quick google search and turns out more people have the same issue. This is a major _quack_ by Riot. Surely they could have found a different way to handle this. > > Wait. Riot should address this issue in the following days. Wait you say. Call me an addict low life but it kinda rubs me the wrong way to have to "wait" for riot to fix their problems when their problem prevents me from playing the game. And dont give me the "its a free game dude", i put some change into skins so...
> [{quoted}](name=KrystalClear,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=1clEeoN3,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-11-27T03:10:39.020+0000) > > Wait you say. Call me an addict low life but it kinda rubs me the wrong way to have to "wait" for riot to fix their problems when their problem prevents me from playing the game. There's nothing else you can do. Waiting is the only option because the problem is on Riot's end. Anyone with IQ above 70 should be able to understand this. *** > [{quoted}](name=KrystalClear,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=1clEeoN3,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-11-27T03:10:39.020+0000) > > And dont give me the "its a free game dude", i put some change into skins so... I'm with you. I understand that Riot is merging accounts, but I don't think this is the best course of action. At the very least they should have issued a warning beforehand.
: Cant do Riot Account update, endless loop
> [{quoted}](name=ReaLEgGacHe,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=1clEeoN3,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-27T01:26:54.917+0000) > > it shows i have to change my username. > I clicked the link where i have to confirm my password. Something is fishy. Choosing a new username shouldn't need to happen. A quick google search and turns out more people have the same issue. This is a major _quack_ by Riot. Surely they could have found a different way to handle this. > [{quoted}](name=ReaLEgGacHe,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=1clEeoN3,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-27T01:26:54.917+0000) > > What do I have to do? Wait. Riot should address this issue in the following days.
: Blizzard games never ban people unless someone opens a ticket and gets a human response, something Riot does not do. Riot depends on some shitty bot that can barely function. Valve and FACEIT are 2 COMPLETELY different organizations, nice to see you can do your research well :) valvr does not ban people for toxicity in their competitive mode or any mode for that matter, and FACEIT is 3rd party who organizes 3rd party tournaments, what they do in those tournaments has nothing to do with Valve. The reason FACEIT exists is that the ranked ladder in CSGO does not show who is the best, it's not like Challenger with ladder ranks, it's just a single rank that is at the top. Never played Tribal wars so I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Minecraft is just a terrible example since there are millions of servers with millions of different server owners who have millions of different views regarding toxicity Again never played any of the epic games' games so I will give you benefit of the doubt Similar situation to Minecraft for CIV, I play on the online version which the developers have provided and I do not get banned for calling anyone whatever I want.
> [{quoted}](name=Doby flonk u mom,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=tWcBLibK,comment-id=000e0000,timestamp=2019-11-26T16:31:46.824+0000) > > Blizzard games never ban people unless No "unless". If people can be banned it doesn't matter how. *** > [{quoted}](name=Doby flonk u mom,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=tWcBLibK,comment-id=000e0000,timestamp=2019-11-26T16:31:46.824+0000) > > Minecraft is just a terrible example since there are millions of servers Why is it a bad example? Because thousands of servers punish verbal toxic behaviour? It is just as good of an example as any other. *** > [{quoted}](name=Doby flonk u mom,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=tWcBLibK,comment-id=000e0000,timestamp=2019-11-26T16:31:46.824+0000) > > CIV, I play on the online version which the developers have provided and I do not get banned for calling anyone whatever I want. The developers didn't provide anything. You play with other people out of your own volition. If you decide to play with other people, you do it at your own risk. I mentioned the No Quitters group because that is one of the most famous Civ5 groups. If you want to play with them, you have to follow their rules. *** Just to make something clear here. CS:GO, Payday2, CoD, TF2, Brawhalla and GTA V, are all rated M - Mature (17+). League of Legends is rated T - Teen (13+). Maybe you weren't aware of that. That in itself just blows most your examples out of the pool. ######That said, online interactions aren't rated by ESRB. Regardless, one can expect the online interactions rating to only go down, never up. Meaning, in League's case the only interactions shouldn't suddenly become rated M. *** > [{quoted}](name=Doby flonk u mom,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=tWcBLibK,comment-id=000e0000,timestamp=2019-11-26T16:31:46.824+0000) > > Riot depends on some shitty bot that can barely function. It's not a bot. That's all I'm going to say about this topic. This has been discussed to exhaustion and gets annoying after the 20th time.
: Plese Guys stop spamming about the results they will be announced sooner or later stop baiting me. Every time i see a new comment i get hyped but every time it is another dude complaining XD
You're doing Gods work here. {{sticker:zombie-brand-clap}}
: What other games ban people for use of chat?
- [Blizzard](https://eu.battle.net/support/en/article/42673) games. - [CS:GO](https://www.pcgamer.com/20000-toxic-csgo-players-banned-in-six-weeks-by-faceit-and-googles-new-chat-ai/). Valve has started banning players for verbal toxicity. - [Tribalwars](https://www.tribalwars.net/en-dk/page/rules) - Plenty of Minecraft servers - [Epic Games](https://www.epicgames.com/site/en-US/community-rules) - [Civilization 5 - No Quitters Group](https://steamcommunity.com/groups/NO_QUITTERS/discussions/0/458605613393949565/) (just because you mentioned it in another comment) Those are some of the most popular ones. All of them have similar rules in their guidelines. Just because not all of them enforce said rules, doesn't mean you're immune to punishments. Just like in League, just because some trolls/griefers can get away with their behaviour, doesn't mean they will get away for ever. *** Riot Games was one of the first to crack down on toxic behaviour... for good reason. If even with all the systems in place League has the reputation of having a toxic community, imagine what it would be like without them. Besides, it's quite amusing to see toxic players complaining when they are punished.
Orvvadasz1 (EUNE)
: How do you get those items tho? You get only 1000 gold from the new supp items after that its only the passive gold regen. Also you left out that the old supp item regenerated gold even after lvl 3. You cant count that in when you compare the 2. The old supp items gave you healing when sharing a minion or dealt bonus dmg when poking. Also the poking and the farm sharing supp items are no where near balanced. The new poking item is definetly superior to the farm sharing. You can gather gold far faster with Spellthief than with the Pauldron. It gives you much better stats too. You still didnt talked about the mid and late game gold. How do you get gold if you are a little behind and doesnt get kills? Thanks for answers.
> [{quoted}](name=Orvvadasz1,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=ExAE3JkZ,comment-id=00070000,timestamp=2019-11-25T14:04:23.112+0000) > > How do you get those items tho? You get only 1000 gold from the new supp items Why the _quack_ do people like you insist on reading half of something? What part of the "you don't need to spend 1400 G on upgrades" did you not understand? For the sake of argument, let's make an hypothetical case for both versions of the item Spellthief. ##Old Spellthief Every 30 seconds, you have 3 charges. Let's say you use 3 charges for every 1 minutes of the game. In 10 minutes time, you generated 330 G from hitting the enemy and 120 G from its gold per second, for a total of 450 G. At this point you have enough gold to upgrade to Frostfang and close to completing the quest, so let's round it up to 500 G. In the following 20 minutes of the game (30 minutes in total), you generate 1320 G from hits and 240 G from its gold per second, for a total of 1560 G. I'm being very generous here. In no game would you be able to consistently proc the passive every minute. Bare in mind that you had to pay for the upgrades. From those 2060 G (500 G pre-quest and 1560 post-quest), after paying for the item cost 1800 G (upgrades included), you're left with 260 G. That's how much **extra gold (260)** that item actually generated in 30 minutes. *** ##New Spellthief Every 30 seconds, you have 3 charges. Same scenario as above; every 1 minute you use all 3 charges. In 9 minutes time, you generated 405 G from hitting the enemy and 108 G from its gold per second, for a total of 513 G. The item upgraded itself. In the following 8 minutes of the game, you generated 360 G from hits and 144 G from its gold per second, for a total of 504 G. Upgrades itself for the last time and the passive turns off. In the following 13 minutes of the game (30 minutes in total), you generate 234 G from its gold per second. In total, you generated 1251 G. From those 1251, you have to pay the cost 400 G, so you're left with 851 G. That's how much **extra gold (851)** that item generated in 30 minutes. *** ##How long until Old Spellthief catches up? It still has a long way to go. The difference is 591 G. Following the same criteria (3 charges every minute), you need: (22\*3 + (-0.1)\*60)\*time = 591 60\*time = 591 time = 9.85 minutes Basically, you need 10 more minutes to generate enough gold to make up the difference. So yeah, after 40 minutes, the old spellthief is factually better. Now ask yourself this question: How many games go over 40 minutes? From those games, does it really matter if the Support is still generating gold? As a Support, you should be full build by 35 minutes. I'm not going to waste more time with this. I gave you the proof that confirms my claim. If you don't understand simple math, that's your problem.
Orvvadasz1 (EUNE)
: New support items are basically useless in late game
> [{quoted}](name=Orvvadasz1,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=ExAE3JkZ,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-24T17:06:14.752+0000) > > It only costs 400 gold > You get very low health and low AD or AP compared to the items before and no mana or health regen and 0 cooldown reduction. No. You're missing the bigger picture. It's not "only 400 gold". You pay 400 gold for EVERYTHING it gives, including stats and wards later on. Let's get a few facts straight here. - Old item cost - Spellthief - 400 G - Eye of the Frost- 850 G - Eye of the Watchers - 1800 G - New item cost - Spellthief - 400G - Frostfang - 400 G - Shard of True Ice - 400 G - Old item stats - Spellthief - 10 AP, 25% mana regen, 2 G per 10 - Eye of the Frost - 20 AP, 10% cdr, 50% mana regen, 2 G per 10 - Eye of the Watchers - 35 AP, 10% cdr, 50% mana regen, 200 HP, 2 G per 10 - New item stats - Spellthief - 8 AP, 10 HP, 2 G per 10 - Frostfang - 15 AP, 70 HP, 3 G per 10 - Shard of True Ice - 60 AP, 150 HP, 3 G per 10 - Old item gold efficiency (stats only) - Spellthief - 343 G worth of stats - 85.75% gold efficient - Eye of the Frost - 824 G worth of stats - 96.94% gold efficient - Eye of the Watchers - 1683 worth of stats - 93.5% gold effiecient - New item gold efficiency (stats only) - Spellthief - 201 G worth of stats - 50.25% gold efficient - Frostfang - 513 G worth of stats - 128.25% gold efficient - Shard of True Ice - 1705 worth of stats - 426.25% gold efficient More obvious than this is impossible. It's clear that the new support items are way superior to the old alternatives for one simple reason: you don't have to pay for the upgrades. The gold income you lose from its passive effect (22 G per hit) is **heavily** outweighed by what you gain. In other words, the 1400 G you don't have to spend on upgrades can be spent somewhere else: - Missing the 50% mana regen? Buy Chalice for 900 G; - Want more cooldown reduction? Buy Fiendish Codex or Kindlegem for 900 G or 800 G, respectively; - Feeling the crave for more damage? Needlessly Large Rod on sale today! Only 1250 G. Supports are "punished" early game because we only get 50% of our gold's worth in stats. The missing mana regen early on is a big hit, but, once you recall the first time, that problem disappears because you can invest whatever gold you earned into what you're missing. When you earn your first upgrade, then your investment starts paying for itself... a lot. You're a lot stronger now than what you would be if you had to buy the upgrade yourself. I hope my point is clear. ######The same argument can be made for the other support items. {{sticker:sg-syndra}}
PP Dual (EUW)
: TFT Tournaments starting in 2020
> [{quoted}](name=PP Dual,realm=EUW,application-id=N9uP9Byj,discussion-id=I8tqE83R,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-24T17:44:12.228+0000) > > Waiting for Riot response. You should test your luck over at [NA boards](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/esports). Not only does it have more reach there, but also more players to discuss the topic. On that note, artificially up-voted discussions are really unnecessary.
: Since the latest patch, there's been thousands of complaints with massive fps drops (including myself even with a high-end pc). It's not targeted at you, but for people who experienced this problem.
> [{quoted}](name=ToastAndJam,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=TEWmzlg0,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-11-21T23:40:39.118+0000) > > including myself even with a high-end pc Precisely my point. My machine is a potato and I don't have any FPS drops. The reason can only be one thing. The source of the problem, in your case, is whatever I have disabled in my settings. My educated guess is to point at the new effects that cover the map, which can be disabled by turning off eye-candy (like I said above).
Morrhen (EUW)
: How's that I'm the only one speaking out of my arse? Fact is: It doesn't matter if RIOT HAS planned it for the future. Does it exist now? No. Has it existed these... uhhh, let's not be harsh... 3 years? No. Could have Riot stopped making new skins with each patch and instead made huge changes to protection? Absolutely. Better to have safely protected account with all the RP items, rather than hacked and banned mess. :) Yeah, it's ignorant to say ''duuuuuuuurrrr, just make a new launcher lul''. But, let's not pretend that it's impossible. Especially for Riot which can't be described as ''broke'' indie studio.
> [{quoted}](name=Morrhen,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=vdKAPNfB,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2019-11-21T23:45:46.615+0000) > > Could have Riot stopped making new skins with each patch and instead made huge changes to protection? Absolutely. > Better to have safely protected account with all the RP items, rather than hacked and banned mess. :) Maybe I wasn't clear enough. The reason why 2FA hasn't existed for the last 3 years is **because of the old launcher**. The old launcher had plenty of tech limitations and it was going to be replaced in the following years. Why develop a feature for something that they know is going to be retired after a few years? Mind you, this feature is supposed to be connected with every game Riot owns, not League specifically. What you should be asking is "Why isn't it here **now**?". That's a valid question, since the old launcher was retired. Maybe they're still fixing something. When it comes down to security, we can't have another situation like Crash™
: FPS drop after 15-20 minutes, any tricks?
> [{quoted}](name=Extreme Occident,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=JhpAk6zk,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-21T20:58:32.908+0000) > > after 15-20 minutes, idk why. Probably because of the 3rd Dragon. Low your graphic's settings or just disable eye-candy.
: Solution for Massive FPS drops since Latest Patch - Found
Disable eye-candy. I haven't experience any FPS drop. My machine runs in "potato mode".
Morrhen (EUW)
: Ah, too bad amarite? Played by millions yet there's no two factor authentication. Must be really hard to implement something like this. Welp, they're very busy making another Miss Fortune skin which makes both wallets and PPs tingle C:
> [{quoted}](name=Morrhen,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=vdKAPNfB,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-11-21T21:37:31.901+0000) > > Played by millions yet there's no two factor authentication. Speaking out of your arse. One of the reasons why Riot made the new launcher (Riot Launcher) is to introduce 2FA. They even had a post on "Ask Riot" about it: [Ask Riot: Two-factor and Runes Reforged](https://nexus.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/2017/07/ask-riot-two-factor-and-runes-reforged/) > one of these planned features is a two-step verification for logins.
: After thousands of hours played and hundreds of pounds spent, Riot decided to permanently ban me
> [{quoted}](name=mbark LpVN,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=vdKAPNfB,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-21T21:23:44.932+0000) > > Riot acknowledge that Hackers gained access to my account No, they didn't. The Support Specialist said, and quote: "Every action taken from your account is your responsibility even if you're not the one doing it." Nowhere in that sentence are they saying "Yeah, we can see you got hacked".
Typda1 (EUW)
: Skin shard for an owned skin?
> [{quoted}](name=Typda1,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=QQQZl9PR,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:14:53.542+0000) > > I thought i read before that that's not possible. Nope. You probably misread something. What you can't get is a **permanent** skin shard for a skin you already own\*. How do you get **permanent** skin shards? By re-rolling. When you re-roll x3 skin shards, you get a permanent skin shard that unlocks automatically. ######\*There's one exception. You can get a permanent skin shard for a skin you already own IF you own EVERY skin.
Moo Samuels (EUNE)
: TWISTED TREELINE SUNSET
[Announcement](https://euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/riot-games/announcements/thanks-all-twisted-treeline-players) > players who played more than 10 games of Twisted Treeline over the map's lifespan Every season, and every game-mode, should count.
: The current state of the game. If you're not happy with the game, help me hopefully change it
> [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > Because league is dying It isn't. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > League is a bad game, it's really bad It really isn't. I've played plenty of bad games and let me tell you League is way above. I'm guessing you don't have much experience with games. Probably played less than 20 your whole life. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > Adc's that can just AA you 5 times and kill you because they're broken. Late game, maybe. Before level 11, not a chance. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > Mages have way too much damage, and burst through tanks. Late game, maybe. Before level 11, not a chance. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > Literally all junglers oneshot now {{champion:20}} {{champion:106}} {{champion:19}} {{champion:154}} {{champion:36}} etc You don't know the meaning of the word "literally". *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > 2\. Gamemodes > Saw the video about normal urf? The urf everyone wanted? Acting like it's special bringing it back after 4 years doesn't make it special, you only prove that you've been hiding it on purpose, while that's the most fun gamemode ever. And why don't keep the gamemodes forever or rotate them every day like Overwatch? On this one I'll spend a bit more time. Riot already gave us the reason why they don't have game-modes on rotation. It looks good on paper, but in reality it does more harm than good. As the saying goes: "A picture is worth a thousand words": https://nexus.leagueoflegends.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/02_Game_Hours_Per_Mode-1_d6f0glgzkxp91uhuagi2.jpg In case you don't want to bother with that graph, let me boil it down to a few words. Most game-modes are only fun for a couple of day. There's a reason why ARAM stuck around for too long. People keep going back to it. The same can't be said about others, **especially** URF. URF is a well known case of inducing player burnout. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > 3\. Overall gameplay > Adc’s for example, they are waaaaaaay too strong! you press right mouse button and kill people, and sometimes you don't even need to kite anymore. This is the thing I find more hilarious. Usually Low MMR players complain about ADCs being too strong, while on the other hand High MMR players complain about them being too weak on their own. Right now, with the duo-lane experience changes, I'm more inclined to believe the latter. In any case, maybe there's a healthy middle ground. Maybe ADCs aren't strong nor weak. I don't know because I don't play ADC, but let me tell you they aren't as strong as you make it out to be. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > 4\. Client > Remember that the client never actually had bugs? Probably not You _quacking_ dare say you've played League for 6? What a joke. Anyone that has played League regularly for at least 4 years knows that is a lie. Listen here. I've played League since 2012 (8 years and counting) and there were as many bugs back then, if not more. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > 5\. Ban system > Flame a little bit, instant ban. False. No one is punished for "a little bit" of flame. Heck, you won't even go to a temporary suspension, let alone a permanent one, unless you go way overboard. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > And when you want to better your behavior by turning of chat, you can't. Crazy idea here, but listen to me. What if... and this is just a suggestion... you don't use chat to begin with? I know, I know. It's **reaaaally** hard to resist the temptation to click that button, **especially** when your team is soooooo bad. It itches all over your body and you **MUST** tell them how shit they are. Am I wrong? Do yourself a favour and, the next time you want to flame someone, bite your finger. The pain should be enough to condition your brain to not even think about flaming. *** > [{quoted}](name=BlackHasC4nc3r,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=EeXpq73q,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-20T22:41:46.452+0000) > > I hope this gets big. It won't. It's just a generic rant. We see plenty of those around here.
Temp14232 (EUW)
: Champion with biggest outplay potential
Kled doesn't cover many roles and doesn't have outplay potential. Outplay potential would be something with clever tricks up their sleeves. Something like LeBlanc or Irelia. You're not left with many choices and many of those choices only see play in 1 or 2 roles. *** I recommend my main: Shaco. He has more "passive outplay" than anything else. You can still actively try to outplay people, with clever W placement, but it's much harder. "Passive outplay" means you setup your lane in a way that makes the enemy walk into traps, literally. Big outplay potential with his R. Shaco is mostly played Jungle, but has started to see more play Support and Top. LeBlanc, Irelia, Fiora, Fizz, Akali, Katarina, etc, are all champions with outplay potential. If you want something easy to start off, maybe go with Fizz. He's pretty forgiving. Almost exclusively played Mid.
Shamose (EUW)
: > * laughs in Quicksilver Stash * Do you have a stash of sashes? I usually buy one.
Phone auto-correct.
Sarokh JR (EUW)
: Welcome to League of CC
_\* laughs in Quicksilver Stash \*_
: New Patch with Linux
I can't help you with Linux :( I have this though: [League of Linux](https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflinux/). It turns out more people are having the same issue. Someone in that sub-reddit said a patch for Wine is already avaiable. [Read this comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflinux/comments/dyvdse/did_the_new_preseason_patch_break_league/f84km6r/).
Morrhen (EUW)
: It's for a reason. My personal experiance with ADCs has been terrible. Basically... you're most of the time useless without your babysitter who has to do all the work for you, just to get you fed enough to be useful. Your entire laning phase is about last hitting every single minion. You didn't manage to do that? Oh boy, you can't afford those items which makes you useful then! And once you get out of the lane, your entire gameplan is to run around the map (kite) and attack REALLY fast. Respect to people who actually put up with marksman class.
> [{quoted}](name=Morrhen,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=6OGE5bvH,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-11-20T01:33:17.926+0000) > > Respect to people who actually put up with marksman class. I like Marksmen as much as the next guy. To be honest, ADC is the only role I actively **refuse** to play. It's just too stressful.
: RIP Twisted Treeline
Shame really. I've been advocating for TT changes for quite a while. The game-mode just isn't worth Riot's investment, I guess. R.I.P. Twisted Treeline.
Gladiator47 (EUNE)
: This Game is literally the very worse.
Good Riddance. The moment you mentioned Tyler1 I knew you were a lost case. Don't dare compare your situation to what Tyler1 had. {{sticker:sg-lulu}}
: why is the next champ another adc
> [{quoted}](name=voidscaler,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=6OGE5bvH,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-19T21:45:51.198+0000) > > why are we not getting a new top laner, a tank jug or fighter? Two reasons: - Tanks are boring - There are 21 Tanks and 32 Fighters, versus 20 Marksmen. Marksmen are the 2nd least populated class. In fact, 80% of the Marksmen class consists of champions released before 2016; 60% before 2013. In other words, most Marksmen are relatively old and they are less than most other classes. That's the tiny detail many players like you like to forget.
JustClone (EUNE)
: Febos. Do you know even one person in 9 years who got banned for afk?
> [{quoted}](name=JustClone,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WBgPYNeu,comment-id=00040000000000000001,timestamp=2019-11-19T15:02:32.533+0000) > > Febos. Do you know even one person in 9 years who got banned for afk? I do not. That said, it wouldn't be the first time Riot has done manual punishments.
Drygarn (EUW)
: Time and date is hard stuff
Are you for real? [End of Season 9](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/360038152893-What-League-Rewards-Will-I-Get-2019-End-of-Season) > season ends exactly at midnight on November 19th Can't be more explicit than that. "Midnight", 00:00, 24:00 and 12:00 pm are all the same thing. A new day starts at 00:00 aka "midnight". The announcement clearly states the season ends on November 19th, at 00:00. If you look at your computer clock, you'll **always** see the day change when it hits 00:00. This is stuff we learn at primary/elementary school. I mean, telling time is one of the most basic skills anyone can have. Unless you're home schooled, you have no excuse to not know this stuff. {{sticker:sg-lulu}}
Zedant (EUW)
: When the realization suddenly hits you,you can never go back
R.I.P. DFG - 2009/2015 No item can ever replace you {{item:3070}} {{item:3070}} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73ck5pFfGxk
ImChrisBe (EUW)
: New summoners rift?
Pre-season patch: Patch 9.23. Expect it by November 20th (Wednesday).
: maybe it's because Im not english. Between 13-20 years you are at your peak reaction time. Usually you can make a decision in about 150 ms. Each year has you got older your reaction time grows, a 30 years old can be near 250 ms. So having a meta that forces you to have a high speed reaction time takes out older people. You still have strategy, tactics, predictions, team play that I think should be the main skill on a MOBA. xPeke, Ocelote, Faker are gods on all of that skills, but their reaction time gone down, so they can't micro on profesional level. My point is if you got a color blind person, you adapt the art so he can play too. We can adapt the meta for the same reason. Like the 3 points lane on basketball too, it's to give more oportunity's to shorter people
> [{quoted}](name=DevilWorld,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=PZdy8QVM,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-11-18T15:41:50.008+0000) > > So having a meta that forces you to have a high speed reaction time takes out older people. Let me see if I got this right. You want Riot to dumb down the game because as players get older they start to play worse? Excuse me, but I'd rather not live in fantasy world. Not everyone can be challenger. There's literally a hard cap to how many challengers players can exist in any region. There's a reason for that. It's called competition. If you're not good enough to reach their level... well... to bad. You don't see other sports changing their rules to accommodate "less skilled" players. My point is, why do you feel the need to dumb down the game? Also, where does it stop? That sort of mentality is a slippery slope. *** > [{quoted}](name=DevilWorld,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=PZdy8QVM,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-11-18T15:41:50.008+0000) > > xPeke, Ocelote, Faker are gods on all of that skills, but their reaction time gone down, so they can't micro on profesional level. So what? That argument is whack. Those players you mentioned can still kick your ass with one eye closed. They might not be able to compete against the best of the best, but they're much better than most other players.
: Already stated it was false and was my first believe! about the rapport count! they endorse it!: calling people monkeys and tell them to get cancer, go back to bananaland, they %%%% ure mother and that kind of talk is not following theire own ZERO POLICy on this matter!
> [{quoted}](name=brandforth,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=EpB8lP0p,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2019-11-18T15:37:55.762+0000) > > they endorse it!: calling people monkeys https://i.gyazo.com/97289af24e8a197fb08af27c3b07e43a.png Saved that one for people like you. As you can see, that dude got temp-banned for asking "Who's the real bonobo here". It wasn't even an insult, but he got punished by it anyway. [Source](https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behaviour-en/AYLxB5OE-your-thoughts-about-my-suspension). Thus, your argument is invalid.
: Nobody get's banned for it because the leaverbuster system is the punishment for going afk. Aka it's not bannable.
> [{quoted}](name=Emperor Talquin,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WBgPYNeu,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2019-11-18T18:00:37.988+0000) > > Nobody get's banned for it because the leaverbuster system is the punishment for going afk. Aka it's not bannable. I assume you know what abusive behaviour is. If you consistently AFK/leave in your games, the warnings become punishments, most cases in the form of low priority queue. If even after that you keep doing the same thing, those will inevitably scale into something worse. [IFS FAQ](http://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/207489286) > The League of Legends community is empowered to report players they believe have violated the Summoner's Code and **consistently created a negative experience in games**. Regardless of the circumstances, behaviors such as in-game taunting; harassment, offensive remarks, intentionally feeding, **etc**. That isn't the extensive list (notice the "etc"). AFK/leaving creates a negative experience in games. It just so happens they have a dedicated tool to deal with those cases, but that doesn't mean you're immune to the other.
: > [{quoted}](name=Febos,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=PZdy8QVM,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2019-11-18T15:24:54.665+0000) > > Why? Because younger folk are better than you? > Whack. > > {{sticker:sg-lulu}} No, because the vast majority of them are bad mannered and disrespectful. Thank you for just demonstrating that fact.
> [{quoted}](name=ÜFudginator,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=PZdy8QVM,comment-id=000000010001,timestamp=2019-11-18T20:22:39.580+0000) > > No, because the vast majority of them are bad mannered and disrespectful. Saying "vast majority" implies you have stats to back that statement up. Care to share? *** > [{quoted}](name=ÜFudginator,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=PZdy8QVM,comment-id=000000010001,timestamp=2019-11-18T20:22:39.580+0000) > > Thank you for just demonstrating that fact. Tell me again how I was being disrespectful.
: racist & toxic people can get away easy with the new support system!
> [{quoted}](name=brandforth,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=EpB8lP0p,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-18T14:20:32.560+0000) > > But a single dude reporting the whole team won't be doing a thing in this game sadly. Wrong. One report is all it takes to trigger an investigation. *** > [{quoted}](name=brandforth,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=EpB8lP0p,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-18T14:20:32.560+0000) > > AKA Riot endorses raceism. Big leap in logic you have there. Just because Riot don't give you a way to witch-hunt people, doesn't mean they endorse racism. In fact, racism is part of their Zero-Tolerance policy.
: I have 4 permabanned accounts. Did I change?
> [{quoted}](name=PoppinCherry,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=UvEvwqs7,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-18T00:14:03.658+0000) > > Will I ever change? No. If you don't want to reform, then don't. Keep wasting your time by making new accounts and starting over again.
: If going afk isn't bannable, why would saying easy be bannable :D
> [{quoted}](name=Emperor Talquin,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WBgPYNeu,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-11-18T14:49:29.814+0000) > > If going afk isn't bannable It is.
: They should just disallow under 18s anyway. BUT, the parents are the ones who are responsible for their offspring's behaviour so I don't blame Riot for not implementing something like that.
> [{quoted}](name=ÜFudginator,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=PZdy8QVM,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-11-18T13:19:26.227+0000) > > They should just disallow under 18s anyway. Why? Because younger folk are better than you? Whack. {{sticker:sg-lulu}}
: Getting older with League Of Legends
> [{quoted}](name=DevilWorld,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=PZdy8QVM,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-18T13:08:28.111+0000) > > The change to get players compiting of every age it's to **set right timers**. Every character, movement and skill should be balanced with that in mind. > You want a skill to be a reaction dash? It should give you at least 0.3 sec between the casting and the window to press the button. > You want a skill to be a prediction dash? It should give you under 0.15 sec between the casting and the window to press the button. I've read this 5 times now and I still have no idea of what the _quackary_ you're talking about.
: VPN Connection Issues
> [{quoted}](name=Ruat Caelum,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=6vBGYU0F,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-17T21:03:02.252+0000) > > What kind of nonsense is that? What is the reason we can't use a VPN while playing LoL? I'll try to answer that with a question. Do you know what a VPN does?
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=Marlo Stanfield,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=ya6LR81w,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-11-17T05:11:32.089+0000) > > suck my cock im a tank Small pee-pee
: Is there any reason to enable "/All chat"?
> [{quoted}](name=Valor1Blade,realm=EUW,application-id=00edEA0o,discussion-id=JdTpXy17,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-15T15:04:04.173+0000) > > Do you have it activated? And if yes, then tell me why. When someone is tilted, they usually complain in all chat. That tilt/rage (whatever you want to call it) feeds me. Basically, I "provoke" the enemy players during game (eg emotes or /laugh) and then get the payoff in all chat. \* There's no other reason to have all chat on. If you want to make friends, all chat isn't the place for it; if you want to have a dialogue, you shouldn't be playing the game to begin with. ######\*Messing with emotes and champion interactions isn't against the rules. Some would call it a form of "banter".
: PERMABAN FROM RANKED (suggestion)
> [{quoted}](name=Arthur Fenix,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=z9lbHbhg,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-15T13:58:38.155+0000) > > My suggestion is SIMPLE, if you rage quit or go afk cause you tilted, in a Ranked game, you should be BANNED from ranked (you can still play normal, aram or what the hell you like) for LIFE. What I'm about to say next may sound crazy but... can't said banned player make a new account to play Ranked? (avoid the ban) Crazy idea, I know. I mean, no one would make a new account, on a free to play game, in case they get banned. {{sticker:sg-lulu}}
: imagine if morde did 360dmg with passive meanwhile i regen 76health with maokai's passive
1. For you to only heal 74 HP with Maokai passive, it means it's still very early game. Pre-6 to be exact. At level 6 you heal, **at least**, 90 HP. 2. Assuming you're going even in lane, Mordekaiser should be about the same level. Let's say level 5. 3. At level 5, to deal 360 damage with his passive, Mordekaiser needs to be fighting for **at least** 12 seconds. If you're fighting Mordekaiser for 12 seconds, you're clearly doing something wrong. Mordekaiser is a champion that excels at prolonged fights. Your champion, Maokai, per contrast, doesn't do well in prolonged fights before level 11, which is when he already has some items had his heal starts to kick in. Basically, you _quacked up_ by picking a fight you couldn't win.
: You didn't get it. There is code in matchmaking that prevents placing of unequal teams against each other, no matter how big is their MMR, it is so-called "fix code" which helps to overcome troubles of duos and bad players. So if, for example, there would be bad player with 30% winrate, another such player will be on other side. This code exists and works. But sometimes it does NOT. And I don't have explanation why. It is so ugly and stupid, disgusting algorithms which create predetermined games. I can even make a code which will compare two teams and predict a one-sided games with 80% probability.
> [{quoted}](name=galoisgroup,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=LQORlULq,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-11-14T01:33:02.644+0000) > > You didn't get it. There is code in matchmaking that prevents placing of unequal teams against each other, no matter how big is their MMR, it is so-called "fix code" Stop spouting nonsense. You clearly don't know how the Match Making System works. Even if you did, I'm the last person you could ever hope to teach it to. You can't teach me something I already know.
: Why didn't girls play Esport in the 2019?
> [{quoted}](name=Bronze Never Die,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=6j9T0Esb,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-13T23:00:23.995+0000) > > I didn't know that all Esport players are men! First things first, League of Legends isn't the only E-sport. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIU6NADq-4k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Gz9um3wV1o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj86R08B3EI If you count transgender woman too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jcdI0p7P54 Those are the ones I know. I'm sure there are more. *** > [{quoted}](name=Bronze Never Die,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=6j9T0Esb,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-13T23:00:23.995+0000) > > * maybe because gals strength on video games don't match with boys! On a professional level, women have worse performance than men, in this game. In general, a woman is just as good as a man. *** > [{quoted}](name=Bronze Never Die,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=6j9T0Esb,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-13T23:00:23.995+0000) > > * Or it is a rule that boys can only play Esports? No such rule. *** > [{quoted}](name=Bronze Never Die,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=6j9T0Esb,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-13T23:00:23.995+0000) > > * Or community don't appreciate it? The community applauds whenever there's a female professional player, granted that she deserves the spot. *** > [{quoted}](name=Bronze Never Die,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=6j9T0Esb,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-13T23:00:23.995+0000) > > * Rito Bribes Pro Girls who seeking Esports to convince them to get away from Esports! ( It sounds really dumb) I sounds dumb because it is. *** > [{quoted}](name=Bronze Never Die,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=6j9T0Esb,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-13T23:00:23.995+0000) > > * Girls brain have the ability to process multiple ingoings faster than boys brain That stereotype really needs to disappear. Women are not inherently better than men at multi-tasking, nor the other way around. *** > [{quoted}](name=Bronze Never Die,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=6j9T0Esb,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-13T23:00:23.995+0000) > > Girls have few hard days every couple weeks and it might affect them to be toxic or troll, also something like smashing keyboard because of the fury Scientifically speaking, even though women, in general, tend to be more emotional than men, that doesn't mean they can't control their actions. In fact, men tend to lose control easier than women. That said, you don't see professional players smashing their stuff when they are mad. *** *** Simply put, we don't see as many professional female players because: - They aren't seeking that environment/career path - Those that do aren't as skilled as their male counterparts That's it. There's nothing preventing women on becoming professional e-sport athletes. But while on the topic of E-sports, let me introduce you something else: [Sjokz](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQrXse5TDdg) - E-sports presenter. Usually the host for Riot Games events (now a freelancer). [Ovilee May](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5uc0d1ncHQ) - E-sports interviewer. [Froskurinn](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSBYf1M12EY) - E-sports caster. Those are 3 that I know.
Show more

Febos

Level 114 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion