Rioter Comments
Kanohi (EUW)
: Janna - How to counter?
Lulu is also a very good option because you can always W her/or the enemy adc when her shield is on
FeefaAll (EUW)
: Lack of knowledge in low elos and how the **** can we improve that
It's funny. Apparently it is more acceptable to spend more time ranking up than to actually know the champions. Fine, I never mentioned the role experience because, in my case, since I only play support, I already know a thing or two, not everything (before people come call me arrogant or know-it-all), but a thing or two. But I'm not gonna ask silver elo that much. Remember that in the title I'm always refering to low elos. Half you people are acting like the rules apply to every elo. Yes, sure, the 20 champs rule may apply, but the matchmaking is quite different as you rank up. I just don't see why RIOT wouldn't make it harder in lower elos in order to make people feel the need to improve themselves. Also I read that someone told me to learn to carry with other champions. Not to play Lulu, Raka, Janna, etc. In fact, all the supports you mentioned are the most meta right now, as of 14/08/2k17. Learn more carriable champs like brand: lul. For that I play blitz (master 5 with tokens to be m6) and thresh (master 7 with 115k points). Wanna know my biggest struggles? They dont know how to pick the lantern. Oh teach them before the game starts. I already do that and people still don't care. Maybe, after reading all this, I can argue that mastery 3 would suit more people. Still, you guys are terrible at giving out ideas xD Because you don't give them at all, just straight up: This sucks, this will never work. Man it's fine by me and keep enjoying your lives, bois.
Meriipu (EUW)
: so it is not that you do not see the implications, just that you do not care if it would kill ranked queues?
This will be my last answer to you ok? Get this in your head. You are one among many hundreds of thousands of players, yes? The fact it affects you + you not liking it doesn't change **** to the idea. That it is necessary, it is. You're raising really dumb questions. Not even dumb, the dumbest. It would only take people a bit more time to get used to it in order to improve the gaming experience of those who want actually want to rank up. I'm sorry you can't understand my point. Have a good one.
3DIABLO (EUW)
: this game never ceases to amaze me lel
I'd be offended if you called me Ribéry tbh
Meriipu (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=FeefaAll,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=TWH1Esln,comment-id=0005000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-08-13T20:54:21.120+0000) > > It's more unreasonable than me wasting time of my life (and the rest of the team) and LP? If you want to play, there is a mode called NORMAL, yes? Leave the ranked for those who actually want to play the game. If you want to defend your opinion, give one solid argument in favor and don't try to act smart. Even you must have a decent amount of champions in high mastery, even you must've had such problems and I don't understand why you're trying to degrade this whole idea. 1) you asked for a requirement of level 4 or 5+ mastery to pick a champion in ranked 2) to play ranked you currently need 20 champions available (because of bans + picks) 3) with this change, if you do not have level 4 or 5+ mastery on some of those 20 champions, you can not pick them. As a result unless you have 4/5+ mastery on 20 or more of them, you have less than 20 champions available to pick from (even if you own 20+) You can not play ranked with a pool lower than 20. I do not think you understand the implications of the requirements you are asking for.
Dude, I'm raising the bar. Can you get that? I do not care if it gets harder for myself. Community > Me. I do not think you get my point at all. And also, there are players that like to vary their champions in ranked, instead of just spamming Lulu. You're just saying that, because one look at op.gg from you and one sees clearly that with 550+ games with the same champ over the course of 3 seasons, you would be affected by this and you don't want such. Deal with it and step up your own game lul
Meriipu (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=FeefaAll,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=TWH1Esln,comment-id=00050000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-08-13T20:47:22.565+0000) > > Don't you have nothing better to do than to counter every idea I throw out? I wouldn't be eligible for ranked in the first place. Think three times before you talk/post, else you're welcome to leave the thread. Go be bronze elsewhere geee. And first and foremost, usually, there are specific champions that are more frequently banned than others. You're taking the less likely scenarios and trying to make them into a reality. One last thing? Who the %%%% bans 10 supports playable champions and picks another 9? the system already takes that into account, forcing you to own 20 champions now (it used to be 16) so with your proposal you are forcing people to have 20+ champions with level 4 (or 5) mastery it is a completely unreasonable thing to expect of players.
It's more unreasonable than me wasting time of my life (and the rest of the team) and LP? If you want to play, there is a mode called NORMAL, yes? Leave the ranked for those who actually want to play the game. If you want to defend your opinion, give one solid argument in favor and don't try to act smart. Even you must have a decent amount of champions in high mastery, even you must've had such problems and I don't understand why you're trying to degrade this whole idea.
Meriipu (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=FeefaAll,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=TWH1Esln,comment-id=000500000000000000000000,timestamp=2017-08-13T19:06:39.303+0000) > > Bruh XD I never mentioned a number of champions... I spoke only about the mastery level. Nothing more. You're reading things I did not say what happens if you are last pick and the 10 bans + 9 picks cover all champions you have mastery 4 or 5 on?
Don't you have nothing better to do than to counter every idea I throw out? I wouldn't be eligible for ranked in the first place. Think three times before you talk/post, else you're welcome to leave the thread. Go be bronze elsewhere geee. And first and foremost, usually, there are specific champions that are more frequently banned than others. You're taking the less likely scenarios and trying to make them into a reality. One last thing? Who the %%%% bans 10 supports playable champions and picks another 9?
Meriipu (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=FeefaAll,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=TWH1Esln,comment-id=0005000000000000,timestamp=2017-08-13T17:59:42.149+0000) > > I wouldn't be able if the number you randomly gave was implemented xD but this is the exact number you gave I even quoted it in my first post
Bruh XD I never mentioned a number of champions... I spoke only about the mastery level. Nothing more. You're reading things I did not say
Rípley (EUW)
: Good one, though their always angry anyway;) Updating the match making "algorithm" to reflect actual game statistics, so it's not random numbers puled of out of some hairy rioter ass.
And may the Gods of the Rift hear those words
Rípley (EUW)
: There's only one real solution to the problem which will create "prisoners island", but it won't ever happen because the current status quo serves it's purpose, keeping people angry, frustrated, stuck on the eternal gamble known as match making.
Meriipu (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=FeefaAll,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=TWH1Esln,comment-id=00050000,timestamp=2017-08-13T15:49:54.996+0000) > > Sadly on 14 then you would not be able to play ranked with your proposed restriction as you ran the risk of having all your 4+ or 5+ champions banned
I wouldn't be able if the number you randomly gave was implemented xD
Livelyfreak (EUNE)
: Shyvana 'support'
Just go redemption/solari and gg.
Greatatemi (EUNE)
: Heroes of the Storm has a similar requirement for ranked, and yet, no one complains about it. I also think it would be a good idea to implement, as reaching mastery 4 shouldn't take too long, and it would easily reduce the amount of feeders in the game.
Exactly my thought, you only need around 20/30 games with it AND you will be able to be agaisnt a bigger pool of champions therefore making you better without sacrificing your LP or your team's.
Meriipu (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=FeefaAll,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=TWH1Esln,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-08-13T14:00:14.032+0000) > (some people try champions in ranked, I just don't understand how one could do it, call me try-hard or whatever you all want, shouldn't be allowed at all, in fact I propose that master 4/5 is required to play ranked with that champion) > do you have 20 or more champions with mastery level 4 or 5 OP?
Sadly only 14, but like I said, I don't put the time that many people deliver.
Kaluchii (EUW)
: The New Ping And How To Activate It
I would like to leave a quick note here. This can only be done in game, NOT USING THE CLIENT DEFINITIONS. Good job with the video though.
FeefaAll (EUW)
: Lack of knowledge in low elos and how the **** can we improve that
I got more feedback than I was expecting which is always good. Thank you all for that. But talking seriously here, high ranks already have the role experience they need (else they wouldn't be that high rank, because I seriously doubt someone can get carried that hard, discarding the possibility for eloboosting), so I don't really see a reason why it would screw higher ranks but it's just an opinion, doesn't have to right. Also changing my role is the only thing I do not wish to do because I wouldn't be having fun. I simply enjoy too much saving other people (sounds gay af but hey it's me, deal with it) and helping them getting fed and dealing their damage. I just don't see myself as a damage dealer, not much I can add to that. Besides I agree with the Professor when he says you can't always win or lose. But I honestly think you're missing my point. Losing because of build or lack of focus on the right target is something I can argueably bare. But a mid roaming alone in the enemy jungle when s/he's not fed, dying 11 times in a game, knowing what his/her mistake is and keep doing it? Like wtf. People turn off their brain and just don't see their mistake? And plz don't come with the tunnel vision excuse, that's just wanting to prove that your way works degrading other people's opinions and ideas. I wished RIOT added a stat called "Shielding" as in damage that your protect your team from, and that it becomes a part of your overall performance rating and somehow it would help the player climb up in the game. The general idea they give is it's a team game yet you have little to no voice in the way the game goes because you're not a damage dealer. For this, I would rather risk my account and pay for eloboost or just start a new account, go through the WHOLE PROCESS of leveling it up so I get decent placements, and EVEN THAT WAY I'm not guaranteed anything because like someone said, support's depend too much on their team. You either don't support at all in low elos and go full damage dealer or you can't play the game because the community sucks balls and RITO does not care.
Rioter Comments
FeefaAll (EUW)
: Guide for shotcall/teamcall in lower elos
Actually from what I've seen, some guidance in teamfights is needed aswell
Rioter Comments

FeefaAll

Level 30 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion