: Create a nice atmosphere from champion select till the end of the game, by having an active positive attitude. By doing this players will recognize you as a nice teammates to play with. When you are in game and you want your team to do something, *suggest* your team to do what you want. Don't tell it as if you expect your team do what you say, but see it as a nice bonus thing if they do what you want. Never say 'you' to your team, always say 'we' even if you are not involved in the the things you are making a point about. Having kills can help you, but it's not necessary when you want your team to listen to you. Doing this doesn't guarantee your team to listen to you, but it helps a lot in getting more influence. Always be aware that the things you want to do are not always the best things. Having influence on your team doesn't automatically make your decisions good decisions. Your team always has the right to not listen to you, as you are only a random that they got to deal with.
> [{quoted}](name=sander599,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=8zALNz9L,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2016-05-24T13:59:39.240+0000) > > > When you are in game and you want your team to do something, *suggest* your team to do what you want. Actually, is the opposite. You need to be polite ofc, but, most importantly, you NEEEEEED to look super confident about your decisions. While a "mmm maybe we could drake now?" is often read as "this guy is not that sure of himself/the call, better not listen" a "free drake guys, let's go!" send a totally different message, making u look like in total control. If they still don't listen suck it up and don't show your frustration ofc, but u need to act like u are stating something so obvious and simple they would be fools in not doing it.
: Her kit IS flawed All control mages have skills that interact with each other lux, zyra, anivia... they all have the potential for control and massive damage output Taliyah has neither. Her whole kit is isolated skills that barely interact with each other and provide little to no interplay (except for an impossible to land knockup that interacts with a damage ability that has conditional triggers)
> [{quoted}](name=Discordchaosgod,realm=EUW,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=NUAxXzr8,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2016-05-24T13:52:10.481+0000) > >Her whole kit is isolated skills that barely interact with each other and provide little to no interplay (except for an impossible to land knockup that interacts with a damage ability that has conditional triggers) So basically u are saying "they don't interect...except when they do it", and u are clearly biased when u state than the "knockup is impossible to land". This without pointing out that "interacting skills" aren't in any way a necessity, that u can't label a kit flawed just for this reason.
: it's my suggestion she's extremely weak as numbers show ._. she either needs massive buffs or some sort of minirework
> [{quoted}](name=Discordchaosgod,realm=EUW,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=NUAxXzr8,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2016-05-24T13:45:02.844+0000) > she's extremely weak that's not a reason for a rework a rework is needed when the KIT is flawed, so u can't just balance a champ properly by changing numbers ekko kit is a good example (WAY too overloaded, even Riot admitted it), while Tali atm seems quite ok: the ult takes pratice but for now buffing her seems the way to go
Clearoi (EUW)
: Struggle in jungle?
It depends on the camp and on the jungler. For istance, if u have a super efficient AoE u may want to focus the big one cause the small minions will die in a blink anyway, and not all the small ones are equally dangerous. The little wolves, for example, aren't that scary, while the three mini raptors are a huge pain and is usually wise to deal with them first.
: Taliyah rework/buffs ideas
a...REWORK after ONE week? LOL?
shiloe (EUW)
: apart from that i think in a normal game conditionl people tend to listen to the jungler's decisions making which is sad cause i m a terrible jungler
> [{quoted}](name=shiloe,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=8zALNz9L,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2016-05-24T13:35:25.378+0000) > > apart from that i think in a normal game conditionl people tend to listen to the jungler's decisions making which is sad cause i m a terrible jungler Meh. I am a jungler main and my rule still apply: do well and u will become the "leader", do kinda meh and u will get flamed/ignored I will agree that on average that role grant you a little more "credibility" at the start, but is veeery easily lost...
shiloe (EUW)
: how to make your team listen to you?
U need to performe well. Is sad to say but if u are not doing very hot u will generally be ignored, even if your calls are 100% right.
: movement restricted
U still couldn't move starting another (custom) game? It happened to me once long time ago but the next game I was ok...
CB86 (EUNE)
: BUG on Fiddlesticks
Why downvote him for an honest mistake, lol. Anyway, Lux ult is not a channel, can't be stopped unless u kill her (and I agree the design is very counter intuitive).
ZseLotH (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=GattaPaciugo,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=BkKceUqR,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2016-05-24T11:30:38.728+0000) > > is actually very right > the system value the damage/kill aspect WAY too much At least for supports. It should value number of assists, damage taking, healing done, wards placed, pinks bought, wards destroyed, pinks destroyed, map control, time enemies illuminated by wards etcetc. But guess its easier getting s/s+ by killing 10 enemies.
> [{quoted}](name=ZseLotH,realm=EUNE,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=BkKceUqR,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2016-05-24T11:38:04.957+0000) > > At least for supports. It should value number of assists, damage taking, healing done, wards placed, pinks bought, wards destroyed, pinks destroyed, map control, time enemies illuminated by wards etcetc. > But guess its easier getting s/s+ by killing 10 enemies. not only on support but on pretty much every champ more focused on utility and/or champs that can be build more or less offensive for istance: they compare how well eve (my main) generally does, ok problem is: eve can be build full ap, hybrid, full tank etc; and in a system like this "tank eve" will be hugely penalized, cause she will deal less damage and on average rack up less kills
Neo9876 (EUW)
: How to get an S on Support!
is actually very right the system value the damage/kill aspect WAY too much
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=Shiwah,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MYwog8qE,comment-id=000000010000,timestamp=2016-05-24T11:05:16.846+0000) > > You're forgetting the existence of report categories. Not forgetting at all, just totally irrelevant > Also, the reports are validated on a per-reported-match basis. Also, u are again claming random stuff with nothing to back it up.
: There isn't, but if the player hasn't done anything wrong, there's nothing to worry about.
> [{quoted}](name=Cobaltmotari,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=MYwog8qE,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-05-24T10:31:18.570+0000) > > There isn't, but if the player hasn't done anything wrong, there's nothing to worry about. not true, unless u get ONLY false reports: then the system will review him, find him "innocent" and mark all the reports as not accurate but if u are occasionally a bit toxic (but not often enough to be punished, normally) then the "false" ones will contribuite on triggering the reviewing system that WILL punish him (cause yeah: the system is automated and cannot tell if a report is true or false just by "looking at it"; he need to "review" the player, find him innocent, hence marking the reports as not accurate)
XxanastxX (EUNE)
: If i use 420 in my name willi get reported for having an unappropriate name
U should't do this just because is SO stupid and childish LOL. "Ehy look a drug reference, I am too cool for school!!!"
Solash (EUW)
: Not quite sure why people are saying Overwatch will be the death of LoL...
rotfl, who the fuck said such a stupid thing ahahhaha
: Is ignoring a given role in Dynamic Queue reportable and can you get punished for it ?
In theory, is 100% bannable. In reality meh, is really hard to tell if the system atm has the means to detect something like that.
iKinneas (EUW)
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=iKinneas,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=4xcKFzjB,comment-id=000300000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-11T12:25:51.292+0000) > > If you actually know how those pop up boxes are set out, you will know that if there are any chat logs, you can see the start of them without scrolling down. u are not fooling anyone dude LOL
iKinneas (EUW)
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=iKinneas,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=4xcKFzjB,comment-id=0003000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-11T12:19:55.937+0000) > > http://puu.sh/oegKa/d76738278e.png in that picture u can clearly see that u can scroll the page WAY down from there, u just posted the one image that doesn't show any bit of the chat log, LOL.
Silisa (EUNE)
: I don't know what to say. You already tried the _Contact the Support_ route, so all that I can do now is upvote the thread and hope that it will get enough community attention to get noticed by the Reds. Good luck.
> [{quoted}](name=Silisa,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=4xcKFzjB,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-11T11:32:01.294+0000) > > I don't know what to say. You already tried the _Contact the Support_ route, so all that I can do now is upvote the thread and hope that it will get enough community attention to get noticed by the Reds. > Read what I wrote, don't fall for it. He can totally see the chat log even without an email, is clearly BS us.
iKinneas (EUW)
: Really Riot, really?
First of all I remember u on the forum, u were toxic as hell. Second of all while u are suspended u can still log in the account and see the chat log popping out, with a handy button to cut paste the whole thing if needed. So u can stil see/post them :)
Rioter Comments
: That's why I have a VERY hard time trusting the report system.
almost forgot: calling "naive" an "insult" is sign of either embarassing ignorance or dishonesty don't worry tho: I don't think u are an ignorant :)
: Look...i have no interest in arguing with you, but your tendency to regard your personal theories about how stuff works as actual facts makes this discussion very difficult. Just because you THINK it works like that this doesn't mean it does. > Neither this one. Or, at least, nothing remotely good enough to be worth mentioning Says who except you? Thats a personal theory of yours and nothing more. You don't even provide a reason for your opinion, let alone a source. > is stil basically "get enough report for flame, u will get punished" No. Thats simply not how it works, that how you THINK it works. Reports are checked and the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment. [One of many sources](https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/37jego/doing_badly_is_not_reportable_being_toxic_while/crncnvr). > To be clear, in general: taking what Riot says regarding anything like is the absolute truth and there is no possible way they could be not 100% transparent on some isseus to avoid problems etc is naive. And randomly assuming that the amount of reports trigger a punishment although there is no reliable source whatsover for that is less naive? Btw: Riot shares all PB data with every scientific institution that requests is, it's basically impossible for them to lie about anything without being caught sooner or later. So no, trusting Riot statements about PB is not really naive. I am not saying they are perfect and I am sure they were wrong about some stuff several times....but you can't just disregard everything they say just because it MIGHT be wrong. A lot of the information about PB out there is on scientific level and thats the best level of sources you can get. > That's SO clearly false is painful. It might have been five or severn, but otherwise this statement is correct and can be backed up with a variety of sources (GDC talks are probably the easiest ones). > The automated system is in place basically cause there are WAY too many cases for Riot to handle, same exact reason why if u submit a ticket u will get an answer from a BOT the vast majority of the time. Of course it's automated for that reason, thats not a secret. How would you handle reports from a game with about 50-100 million matches played per day? The support answers btw are NOT writte by bots. They are macro answers given by humans. I met many of those humans, so I can confirm that they are indeed human or VERY good androids. The only exception is the Blitzcrank bot that helps with account recovery, but this bot explicitly says he is a bot and can be replaced by a human on request (and I doubt this bot was what you were refering to). > I'd like to see a link of ONE guy punished for his behaving in champ select Then search for it. You can do that exactly as good as I can. And sorry, my kindness and time has limits, i am not investing hours to search for a source that you are going to disregard as "naive to believe it" anyway while you don't bother to provide a source for ANY of your statements. If you want to stay adamant about your believes about the report system despite sources that contradict you, so be it. Since you are already starting to insult me as naive and Rioters as "fucking dumb" instead of using actual arguments, I don't see how this discussion can go on constructively. Maybe we can dicuss about this on another occasion again. After all i love to discuss about PB...but not like this. You seem like an intelligent guy, i am sure you can do better and are actually interested to know if you are wrong about something. Let's cool things dow a bit for now, okay? If you want to level up your knowledge about PB for that future discussion, i'll leave some sources for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbYQ0AVVBGU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-5yKdpR0kU http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1020389/Enhancing-Sportsmanship-in-Online http://gdcvault.com/play/1017940/The-Science-Behind-Shaping-Player http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1022160/More-Science-Behind-Shaping-Player https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/sections/200382430-Behavior-Initiatives http://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/de/c/player-behaviour-en/qWU1kgFi-chat-restriction-faq http://clgaming.net/redtracker?user=142#lyte http://www.reddit.com/user/RiotLyte http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/05/using-science-to-reform-toxic-player-behavior-in-league-of-legends/ http://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/game-updates/player-behavior http://www.psychologyofgames.com/2015/06/podcast-4-toxic-behavior/ http://ask.fm/riotlyte/
> [{quoted}](name=Humpelstilzche,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WM2l8Ebk,comment-id=0000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T17:56:03.176+0000) > > No. Thats simply not how it works, that how you THINK it works. Reports are checked and the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment. [One of many sources](https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/37jego/doing_badly_is_not_reportable_being_toxic_while/crncnvr). a)U didn't understood a thing about your own link cause in ANY way there was written "number of report is not relevant". Saying that mean u didn't got the bare bone basic of the system right, and this is not me telling "Riot can lie when is convenient for the company" is me telling "Riot said a totally different thing". The number of reports is and will ALWAYS be relevant, NO one will EVER banned/punished for one report and so on; lyte statement was pointing out TOTALLY diffent things (that are most likely true: reports from guys that spam them everytime will be worth less yadda yadda yadda). b)U totally skipped the "boosted matter" that actually PROVE that Riot blatently LIED about something (ok it prove it for everyone smarter than a monkey: everyone else is free to think that every booster in the whole comm is bound to get busted). c)U started to LIE as well telling I called Rioters "fucking dumb" (I said the EXACT OPPOSITE, literally) So yeah u can spare me your "kindness" and yourself some time , thx :) PS so u may get it in your head, maybe "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that "the number of reports is not relevant for the punishment" is total bullshit and Riot itself never said that
: > [{quoted}](name=NewMasterYiNoob,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=cgpEA91W,comment-id=000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T17:23:34.017+0000) > > If it is, why not follow up for an answer rather than argue with me? cause was clear since start u weren't willing to give me one so, yes: I still interested in an answer
> [{quoted}](name=NewMasterYiNoob,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=cgpEA91W,comment-id=00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T17:50:56.219+0000) > > insisted on getting the answer your way instead. yeah, cause is a total legit one, while your request is plain absurd :)
: That's why I have a VERY hard time trusting the report system.
PS Don't get me wrong: I don't think Riot is "evil" or BS like that. But they are no saint either, and they are more than willing to lie or hide stuff for the sake of the company. The boosting example I can kinda understand the logic: we can't admit that atm is VERY hard to punish a booster or the problem will spread even more. I won't get that mad at that IF they will at least tryhard to mitigate the problem.
: If it is, why not follow up for an answer rather than argue with me? did you even legitimately want an answer to your "question"?
> [{quoted}](name=NewMasterYiNoob,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=cgpEA91W,comment-id=000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T17:23:34.017+0000) > > If it is, why not follow up for an answer rather than argue with me? cause was clear since start u weren't willing to give me one so, yes: I still interested in an answer
: > Lol? The old system was exactly like this...with the added bonus to a double check made by human beings to avoid false positives. Not at all. The old system didn't have automated chat analysis. So in contrary to what you are saying the old tribunal had a voting system INSTEAD of chat analysis, not in addition to it. And the old Tribunal had an false positive ratio of about 1% while the new system has a false positive rate of about 1/6000 (0,017%). > Was more accurate by definition: automated "busting" exactly like now Nope, that was never part of the old Tribunal. Automated chat analysis was introduced after the voting system got shut down. > I remember a guy being banned for insulting...himself after a mistake. The guy went to the forum and was eventually manually unbanned but with the tribunal most most most MOST likely wouldn't have been banned at all cause every human reading the logs would have immediatly understood the truth. Yep, this case is known as "Billy vs the machine". However your statement that the old Tribunal wouldn't have banned it is only an assumption...and not a very likely one since the overall error ratio was way higher in the old Tribunal. Additionally humans DID look on Billys case, 6 Rioters looked at it and didn't notice he flamed himself (which is why this case became so famous). So as you can see, humans are not at all a guarantee for avoiding mistakes. > 3)They are not included at all, even riot admitted it loud and clear (some weeks ago they said they will "consider something about the champ select chat IF the toxicity will not be already reduced enough by the dynamic queue" You misunderstood that. They talked about a report function for chat select, for the games that don't even start. But if you report someone after playing with him, all the chats are considered. [Source](https://twitter.com/riotlyte/status/598732037554446336). > the fact that when u are banned and u receive your chat logs and, in those, are NEVER included pre/post game bits should be a good enough proof While it is true that pre- and postgamechat are not part of the chatlogs you get sent, the reason for that is the reform card system sucks and simply isn't able to copy chatlogs from ingame and client. Thats crappy and (imo) a big flaw in Riots PB system, but pre- and postgame chat are still considered for the actual punishment. A few of those cases could already be seen on the boards.
> [{quoted}](name=Humpelstilzche,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WM2l8Ebk,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T17:02:07.888+0000) > > Not at all. The old system didn't have automated chat analysis. Neither this one. Or, at least, nothing remotely good enough to be worth mentioning, is stil basically "get enough report for flame, u will get punished" (I noticed for istance that talking a lot is BAD, even if u are not insulting anyone, even if u are not flaming: I would link a case I read just today but I don't remember the title LOL)- To be clear, in general: taking what Riot says regarding anything like is the absolute truth and there is no possible way they could be not 100% transparent on some isseus to avoid problems etc is naive. According to riot if u boost someone u WILL get caught: is not a matter of "if" but "when"; too bad this is SO untrue is not even funny, is such a GIANT lie I get super mad every time I read it. So: the new system has a better false positive ration? Sorry but is something Riot would probably say no matter what, I really think would be impossible for them to just admit "yea this system has a worse false positive ratio, deal with it". Six guys looked Billys case? That's SO clearly false is painful. The automated system is in place basically cause there are WAY too many cases for Riot to handle, same exact reason why if u submit a ticket u will get an answer from a BOT the vast majority of the time. Furthermore: if u remember the case was literally idiot-proof: I can't believe ONE human being could fuck that up, let alone SIX. The false positive of the tribunal happened mainly cause there were players voting BS for multiple reasons, and now Riot want us to believe SIX of his members (so the "troll" justification can't apply) were so fucking dumb to miss something SO Crystal clear? No one in his right mind should believe that nonsense, really. Pre game chat: I'd like to see a link of ONE guy punished for his behaving in champ select, i am serious and no sarcastic here. Really really really interested cause I find VERY hard to believe.
: No, you're comment/question is not on topic. Questioning the OP's curiosity does not answer nor contribute towards his question. Instead it is your own curiosity. It is quite clear that your intent and integrity behind the question is 0% showing that it is not actually genuine, if it was you would have been curious to find the answer rather than argue and hijack a thread. You were told what to do if you really cared for the question you asked. The authenticity of your question seems false and invalid.
> [{quoted}](name=NewMasterYiNoob,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=cgpEA91W,comment-id=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T16:05:27.217+0000) > > No, you're comment/question is not on topic. it is, and u bitching about it doesn't change this simple fact :) when u raise a question EVERYTHING concerning that question is totally on topic like i said, suck it up
Zephyr77 (EUW)
: It is not just random prejudice
yi is kinda OP atm, is not a big secret
: If the comment is ontopic and answers my question, then yes if the comment is asking about the asker and contributes noting else, then no if you care that much about it or have any actually concern then create a new thread.
> [{quoted}](name=NewMasterYiNoob,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=cgpEA91W,comment-id=00000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T15:51:00.525+0000) > > If the comment is ontopic it is, deal with it
: if thats the case then feel free to make a thread about it, instead of hijacking mine lol shots fired {{item:3094}} i cry every time {{item:3151}}
> [{quoted}](name=NewMasterYiNoob,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=cgpEA91W,comment-id=000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T15:23:41.245+0000) > > if thats the case then feel free to make a thread about it, instead of hijacking mine lol shots fired {{item:3094}} > > i cry every time {{item:3151}} ...or i will just comment on this like is perfectly normal to do
: 1. Thats simply not true. This current system is way more accurate than any previous human system. 2. We already have that, the feederbuster. Exactly like you say it's mainly focused on punishing the obvious ones. 3. They are included. 4. True. 5. True...ish. Imo, as much as i liked the voting system, it's not really crucial. The current system is way more accurate and the only reason why I am still looking forward to the new tribunal is that it will also judge positive behavior.
> [{quoted}](name=Humpelstilzche,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WM2l8Ebk,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T15:17:09.893+0000) > > 1. Thats simply not true. This current system is way more accurate than any previous human system. > 2. We already have that, the feederbuster. Exactly like you say it's mainly focused on punishing the obvious ones. > 3. They are included. > 4. True. > 5. True...ish. Imo, as much as i liked the voting system, it's not really crucial. The current system is way more accurate and the only reason why I am still looking forward to the new tribunal is that it will also judge positive behavior. 1)Lol? The old system was exactly like this...with the added bonus to a double check made by human beings to avoid false positives. Was more accurate by definition: automated "busting" exactly like now, with the "voting" part there just to avoid some false positives. I remember a guy being banned for insulting...himself after a mistake. The guy went to the forum and was eventually manually unbanned but with the tribunal most most most MOST likely wouldn't have been banned at all cause every human reading the logs would have immediatly understood the truth. 2)The feederbuster is totally useless except for the 0,00001% of the cases more or less. The rammus that powerball into the enemy tower mid over and over is NOT the main problem. And that was my point. 3)They are not included at all, even riot admitted it loud and clear (some weeks ago they said they will "consider something about the champ select chat IF the toxicity will not be already reduced enough by the dynamic queue" the fact that when u are banned and u receive your chat logs and, in those, are NEVER included pre/post game bits should be a good enough proof
: I Don't expect curiosity or to be questioned about why i asked the question since the topic is about the question and not the person asking it. There's a difference between caring and curiosity, regardless of that my question still stands.
> [{quoted}](name=NewMasterYiNoob,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=cgpEA91W,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T14:53:13.444+0000) > > I Don't expect curiosity or to be questioned about why i asked the question you really should, since u are posting in a public forum were players are as free as u are to express their...curiosity, and in the exact moment u ask something there they are perfectly free to comment it
: How would you fix the system if you were in charge?
> [{quoted}](name=Humpelstilzche,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WM2l8Ebk,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-04-03T14:48:59.235+0000) > > How would you fix the system if you were in charge? dude: make me in charge and grant me the approriate amount of money etc; then I will think about it :p srsly: is a though topic and is certaintly not up to me to come up with a solution; as a player the max I can do is give my feedback something can still be said, tho: 1)a complete automated system is very convenient for Riot, but will never be able to do a very accurate job, even for flame&Co 2)a complete automated system will be always SHIT for busting trolls&Co, at least the ones "smart" enough to not get 6 pair of boots and proceed to feed under tower until they are 0/30 3)the fact that pre and post game chat aren't included sucks a LOT 4)the fact that u can't report a troll in champ select if u are forced to dodge to avoid him sucks a LOT 5)the fact that riot promise a "new tribunal" (with actual human interaction) AGES ago and is still MIA sucks a LOT atm we live in a paradox were if u get a troll in your team u NEED suck it up and give him a big warm smile while he proceed to fuck your team in the ass cause otherwise YOU will be one banned, while u know he will get away wih that with no problems at all while at it: I DIDN'T DO THAT but telling a troll who rage and afk to go fuck himself shouldn't be bannable, at all many guys love to do comparison with real life so, here's that: in real life if u curse at someone that is willingly acting like a piece of shit toward you there is absolutely NO legal repercussion at all (as long as the guy was really doing something he had no right to do), cause the law understand that in situations like that is perfectly normal to lose your temper heck I studied a case were a guy insulted a woman for "stealing" his spot on a waiting line to a supermarket (surely not a big deal, surely afk like that on LoL is much more serious in comparision), and I got away with that
duckarp (EUNE)
: Some people are just naturally curious, no need to bash on them immediately. Still better than countless "WHERE IS URF" threads...
> [{quoted}](name=duckarp,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=cgpEA91W,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T14:46:47.556+0000) > > Some people are just naturally curious, no need to bash on them immediately. Good thing I didn't do that, then. And if u post a thread were u show such concern for such a petty thing u must expect some...curiosity in return.
: WHY do players keep calling Riot "Rito"?
some times ago were was a popular meme called "dolan", a twisted version of donal duck where everyone talked with a lot of typos etc doesn't sound that funny applied to Riot? is not
: WHY do players keep calling the dragon "drake"??
why u care SO much is a better question imo
Rioter Comments
degmynm (EUW)
: Does this deserve a ban?
doesn't deserve a ban at all, whoever says otherwise is just an hypocrite
: Patch 6.7
why in the hell downvoting for asking a simple question, wtf is wrong with this community
Eambo (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=GattaPaciugo,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=6FXz5T9r,comment-id=000000000001,timestamp=2016-04-03T09:54:33.503+0000) > > while at it, can u confirm there aren't any bugs involving their drop atm? cause I am reading a lot of stories about guys winning 10+ games without getting one, and I am on a streak myself Nope, there's no bug (At least, in Summoner's Rift - other modes I can't speak for at the moment as I'm a bit out of the loop on that one). It's purely random evilness with a hint of increased difficulty :-)
> [{quoted}](name=Riot Eambo,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=6FXz5T9r,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2016-04-03T09:55:48.830+0000) > > Nope, there's no bug (At least, in Summoner's Rift - other modes I can't speak for at the moment as I'm a bit out of the loop on that one). It's purely random evilness with a hint of increased difficulty :-) for the other modes I can update you: they said there is a bug that prevent the dropping, bound to be fixed with the new patch
Eambo (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=SeekerK,realm=EUNE,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=6FXz5T9r,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-04-03T09:42:42.275+0000) > > Theres no limit on how many key fragments you can get. > > Keys, perhaps unsurprisingly, open chests. Key fragments will sometimes drop after victory in any matchmade game mode--unlike chests, you can earn keys in ARAM or Twisted Treeline. Three key fragments can be forged into a single key; you can also purchase keys through the store for RP. Key fragments drop a little more frequently when you play with friends! > > NB! Info from Riot Support To add to this, key drop rates get increasingly difficult over the month. Timer starts from the day you got your first key fragment, and over the next 30 days each subsequent key drop will get a little rarer, until it resets monthly :-) So while there's no hard limit that I'm aware of, it's normal for keys to drop plenty to begin, then get harder to get. You're also at the mercy of RNG on top of that!
> [{quoted}](name=Riot Eambo,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=6FXz5T9r,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2016-04-03T09:44:56.729+0000) > > To add to this, key drop rates get increasingly difficult over the month. Timer starts from the day you got your first key fragment, and over the next 30 days each subsequent key drop will get a little rarer, until it resets monthly :-) > > So while there's no hard limit that I'm aware of, it's normal for keys to drop plenty to begin, then get harder to get. You're also at the mercy of RNG on top of that! while at it, can u confirm there aren't any bugs involving their drop atm? cause I am reading a lot of stories about guys winning 10+ games without getting one, and I am on a streak myself
Grammos (EUNE)
: '' We are ready to share that Ultra Rapid Fire will appear AT LEAST twice in 2016''
"weeeeeee weeeeeeeeee but if we don't get it on 1st april is not the sameeeeeeeeeeeee" crybabies :)
EpicMouse (EUNE)
: Is there any hidden stuff about keyfragment droprate?
I starting to fear the fragment stuff got bugged at the same time the match history started to have issues. Just a guess but I am having a similar problem.
XBlade312 (EUNE)
: To all 1 april haters/urf lovers
is telling the plain truth
: Plat Jungler (PLEASE READ) smurfing in silver (currently S3) LF Other smurfs
How u are stuck in silver after so many games if u are plat?
: Bug with my match history
Again, another game not recorded in the history :|
: Bug with my match history
PS if u go on OP GG u can see that game: a 3/2/11 win with sejuani.
Rioter Comments
horsht (EUW)
: ye got same problem aswell since 2weeks from 50. to 80-90~ feels like 300, it starts at 4pm
> [{quoted}](name=horsht,realm=EUW,application-id=eZuvYsEr,discussion-id=0Aij7NXI,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2015-12-10T19:42:48.932+0000) > > ye got same problem aswell since 2weeks from 50. to 80-90~ feels like 300, it starts at 4pm well mine started after the last patch, dunno if there is a conn or not
Show more

GattaPaciugo

Level 30 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion