Rioter Comments
: How do you think your account got hacked? Do you suspect it was more on the part that it was intercepted and decrypted, so on the fault or RIot Games, or would it more likely be that your details was simple or even was willing shared, either player shared (against EULA), or fished (again User responsibility)? Did you provide all relevant player dates and IPs that were valid, to help them exclude those and see if there was a discrepancy with the claims hacked usage?
My acc was not hacked. It is not really possible. I have other acc from season 2 and it was never ever hacked. I asked Riot what can I give them to prove that I didn't use any software. They said that I can't do anything... Lol
Mcgalakar (EUNE)
: The third party applications are not only cheats, but also programs that allows you to use skins created by Riot. Also if an app that you have been using allows you getting unfair advantages, even if you have not used them, you still will get banned. For why they do not say what app leaded to ban is rather simply. Giving information like this is like giving people creating this kind of apps a free candy. This would allow them to learn how the algorithm is searching for installed stuff and use this information for their profit. It doesn't mean obviously that I accuse you for cheating or using other 3rd party applications! This was only an explanation.
Yes I know, I made, oh irony, an article about it on gaming portal. I never used ANY app for game.
: ??? False positives do happen. And they do unban, especially on something like this, coz we don't have any easy to judge chat log, but rather a bot like behavior. It just doesn't happen thru the forums, but via tickets. And you only hear from the ones who fail to get unbanned, as otherwise nobody would bother posting.
No. They not, believe me. You can't give them any proof that you didn't use any 3rd party software and they don't want to talk about it because they say that it's a secret and they can't tell me that. So the "evidence" they have is something you can't even confront and explain or anything. I didn't installed anything on my laptop for months, I had no weird softwares on my computer when they permabanned me. I even made scans after the ban to see if something was wrong - nothing. Also I played on 2 other servers and it was totally fine, I didn't got ban there. I argued with them for 1-2 months and I never received any serious answer. It was only "sorry, we can't help you". They just don't care.
N3TNINJAH (EUW)
: I got wrongly Perma-banned for allegedly using 3rd Party Apps ? Almost 10 year old account mind you.
Hi fellow friend. Sorry to tell you but I don't think Riot will unban it. I had the same situation 1-2 years ago with my diamond acc on EUW. I was playing like I always play, MAINING JANNA and one day Bah - permaban. Without any warning. I was writing to Riot so many times about it and their reply were always copy-paste. I asked them which software I used that you say is bad and they said that they CAN'T GIVE ME ANSWER. Sadly we should all be aware that they can do whatever they want because their Rules that we HAVE TO accept says they can ban us any time. And yeah I was playing 80% of my time back then as Janna, mained support. Why the hell I would play support if I was using any cheats? XD There is 0 logic in that. 0. Riot amazes me sometimes.
Rioter Comments
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: That's the problem you will face. Early on Riot was like every small company, they put a lot more effort into playerbase. As soon as they got big tho, they got more and more distant. You also need to know when players are RIGHT and when they are WRONG. So not %%%%ing your players...I'm sorry to say this but you have to do it eventually.
Yeah I know, you are right. Also I am only illustrator so I will only be able to talk things out, not make any decisions. I was a moderator and tester for an MMORPG tho and its true, when it went big and popular creators were looking more for money than players... but I saw how this game "crashed" after greedy steps. Thats why I hope, and I believe, our team is smarter than that. I will not talk that LoL is slowly fading but making TFT is a bit desperate move, to make something new for players who are leaving this mode for battle royal. Its sad tho that they are not thinking of all people who are still here and are used to things that were here for years... :(
: They probably had a meeting and that meeting probably ended with something like "the core mechanics and concepts of what makes twisted treeline what it is just isn't appealing to our playerbase and it might be better to leave the space open in the game selection screen for other potential future gamemodes" I personally think it's a shame that they get rid of an iconic gamemode and that they should have tried to rework it into something more appealing, but oh well
We should be aware that the games are focused also on new generation. Not old farts like me or maybe you. Kids have different tastes and probably don't overthink a lot of stuff like people who play games 10+ years. :/
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: Moba market is quite compeitive and the hype is gone. It won't be that much different, because of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ywdh1on_HU You need to fund your project somehow. And companies who keep the players hooked will last longer than companies who can't keep the playerbase intrest(see fortnite)
Dont worry its going in a right place. Yeah I am aware that its competitive but also still there is a lot of people who are interested (we can see it with beta signs). We also want to make it a bit more complicated aka interesting. :) Every type of game is risky if you don't have a plan. But we have. I just want to be sure that we will not fk our players like big companies do.
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: That is a logic for every gaming company nowadays. As long as they can bypass laws, they will keep doing it.
well I am working on a new moba in my team and I really hope (or maybe I am naive) that it will be much different... :/
wowlukas (EUNE)
: Why delete twisted treeline :(
Why not making something better? Nah better just delete it. And make more skins and other micro transactions so people will spend more money but enjoy game less. Riot's logic.
: Please dont Humiliate players because of your buggy client
Is it weird that I did not experienced this lags and bugs in client people write so much? I had ONCE lag in lobby. Once in like a month. It happens. You will not be punished if you leave one game.
: Well I actually went on a huge win streak nearly getting promoted twice. Then after that I got demoted and went on a loss streak. Since then my MMR has been shit but in most games I've performed well compared to the rest of my team. Op.gg regularly giving me MVP or ACE, but I cant get regular wins or something moving fast most games I cant get the team moving forward enough on my own. It's one carry vs 3 basically and no matter how hard I try I cant turn them all. I dont think it's a skill think, although I'm far from the best player. Just with bad mmr I genuinely get the worst team more often than not. I had one game with 2 irons and a bronze with me vs a full silver team. How do I win that?
Sorry but I dont believe that from one lose streak you got so low MMR. I also have 8-10 lose streak games sometimes and still I am getting 20-25 LP for win and -15 for lose. If you are losing so much LP then probably you sit in a right division for now. Aand I am sorry but blaming your team for your ranking is just not going to work. You are getting a new team every game. Silver, Bronzes - skills level are similar anyway. On this point it doesnt really matter. Also your Bronzes could have better MMR than enemy team.
: > [{quoted}](name=Hexa XV,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=At9sKOGp,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-07-22T18:39:25.453+0000) > > I think that there are only few things that are fine in TFT and timer is one of them. There is little time because you should think quickly and plan ahead. If the timer was longer this game would be endless and it's long enough right now... How's that a good thing for a new player that doesn't know exactly what he is doing?
If we will make this game more "easy" for new players then it will be even easier for people who already know how to play it. We are not making games focusing on NEW players - we are making games focused on normal, everyday players who count much more than someone who is starting. Of course beginners will struggle at the beginning - thats why normals exist and you can learn without losing any points or anything. After you are ready and know the mechanics you are starting to play rankeds. Its like you would ask for 10 bans instead of 1 on soloQ because "you are new and you are learning". XD Games and life are not working like that man.
: [TFT] Need longer timer between rounds
I think that there are only few things that are fine in TFT and timer is one of them. There is little time because you should think quickly and plan ahead. If the timer was longer this game would be endless and it's long enough right now...
: RIOT, CLEAN THE MESS THAT YOU MADE
Sometimes I think that Riot doesn't have any testers in their team... If they have then maybe they should change them. xD
Cräfty (EUW)
: I can confirm that at 3 Nobles, the buff sometimes fail to activate properly. I don't know if this also happens at 6 Nobles, though.
Aaaand Redemption also don't work sometimes. Just had a game when in 2 rounds my Redemption didn't heal ANYONE... -_- Amazing ranked games, Riot.
: Winning everything is probably worst thing you can do in this game mode. I got some items but all of them had crappy combined results. As I was top 1 for half a game I couldn't pick anything I needed because I was last to pick an item. Then nothing useful dropped either. After that I got deleted because my items were not so good and couldn't get a lvl3 unit for most of game. And I had like 3 different units that only needed 1-2 units for upgrade. That lead only gave me a couple gold so it was completely useless. I even had multiple games where I would get like 3 or more tears. Some units like pyke are insane. He builds his mana quickly and stuns most of enemy team while dealing a lot of dmg. He is very reliable on his stuns too. Currently I am only playing for those rewards. I only have left last two which are icons. They are so similar and boring that I don't even know if I want to get last two rewards.
I was not talking about winning every round. I was talking about winning most of GAMES=matches.
: TFT Little heroes, skins for champions and more ideas @Riot
Instead of bans it would be nice if this mode was finally balanced. Because after playing half of this day TFT I am really exhausted with seeing a guy who crush my team with 1 star Aurelion with 3 build items having 2 champions less than me. And me instead of getting fking items I was getting gold coins from monsters... I won most of the games but it doesn't change the fact that this game is sooo based on luck I can't even... I just won a game because I got Kayle 3 times in a row in the shop. How is that TACTIC? IDK.
: I used to play normals only to enjoy the game , I got insulted and mocked for my "unranked " status , once I decided to change it I placed through Silver and climbed Gold to Plat , and I'm still unskilled under someone's judgment who can't win lane at least XD .
There will always be people who will flame you for everything. I am sure they don't care which division are you - they are writing things that they think they will HURT YOU somehow. The best way is to just mute them and report at the end of the game. They are not worth your anger. :)
Cräfty (EUW)
: List of bugs in TFT I encountered
Noble buff sometimes doesn't work - no champ gets the buff in game. Champions at the back still don't attack sometimes even if they are able to... they made rankeds but still didn't fix this damn thing. -_- Sometimes champions use special ability even if they are stunned - really annoying.
Aryenzz (EUW)
: People using LoL as a chat room instead of a videogame (SUGGESTION TO RIOT)
Totally agree... But I wouldn't use honor to it. More like - you have ALWAYS 20 messages per game. I think it's enough to communicate with people on normal level. And it would automatically stop trolls and flamers from tilting others.
: The most disheartening thing about league.
If you are getting 16 LP for win and lose 20 LP for lose then you're MMR must be very low. So your skills are probably on a level of your actual division. Yeah I hate trolls too and I get them sometimes that's why I personally hate rankeds but my winratio was never that bad, maybe you should stop playing after 2 loses, not more. Or just practice more on normals?
: Rank Shaming in 2k19
Do you still care about it? I don't. I was in Diamond on my first account for a while but after ban I decided "fk this" and didn't got higher than Gold 3-2. I don't see any big difference between those matches and people's mentality. Of course you can find worse players with less experience in Iron and Bronze but not all of them are like that. Sometimes it's just people who play with friends as smurfs or are not into rankeds at all. The more I play this game (5-6 years now), the less I enjoy playing rankeds...
Sarokh JR (EUW)
: sometimes... it's not good to save up for 50 gold
You know you missed a one big point of this topic. I had good team and lots of gold, I was winning. I almost had 4th champ on 3 stars but couldn't buy that champ. So what is here about money man? If I had less I would be able to buy that champ or what? Or you just wanted to write something totally pointless and downvote someone's topic without reason?
: i like the fact that we can claim icons from TFT without playing it.
Really? There is someone who actually like that icons? They are the worst I have seen in a while...
Rioter Comments
Shamose (EUW)
: You can only voice chat with your premades, not your whole team.
Really? No way... -.-
Rioter Comments
Zaκ (EUW)
: TFT feedback
> This would still allow those who are at the bottom of the standings to choose first, but with no luck about where the champions are positioned when you are finally able to select what you want. THIS! As a bottom player you are first to pick to help you but the time you have to look over all available champs is too short. And sometimes when going to get that one champ takes you too long and someone else take it. I HATE IT! Sometimes also people are blocking the way making others pick something else by mistake - this is also shitty thing to do. Also can we have a moment to talk about Draven's insane damage? How many times he played against my 3rd star Vayne with 3 items, he was 2d star and one item and still beat her without a problem! So why am I wasting time and money to find missing Vaynes to get 3rd star if someone is lucky to find 3 Dravend and already is better than me... wtf Riot
: This aint Team fight tactics. This is Teamfight RNJesus. Alteast if someone received an item everyone else should receive one aswell..
> Alteast if someone received an item everyone else should receive one aswell.. Or at least nerf them in early. Because Vayne on 2d level with 2 finished items can beat 3 champions on 1st lvl without any problem.
Joetri10 (EUW)
: TFT is NOT RNG based, it's actually worse, and i'll tell you why.
Yeah I heard this theory yesterday. It seems legit because I couldn't find any Kassadins in the store and 2 of my enemies were upgrating this champ on level 3... Also, what's very annoying, in late game high lvl champs will appear taking place of low lvl champions so upgrating Garen or Nidalee on 3 in late is less possible than making Swain on 2d (legit story xD).
Silent Note (EUNE)
: That's true, but why is it worse than having it based on RNG? This way it takes actual skill to keep track of the builds of your 7 opponents and try to deny them their units. I really like this element of the gamemode.
Like he said - if you will do that then you will not gain anything by it for yourself. You will also be unable to upgrade those champions and they will take you space on the board. The only option that seems "possible" is going duo and one person is taking people's champs so the other can win, lol. But yeah that sounds a bit like cheating.
Mizognida (EUNE)
: "First off, the 3 minion camps to begin with. There is a high chance of going through it with no items and a high likelihood of your opponents getting 3 or more" this alone is so f bad. when this happens i usually just go afk and surrender at krugs edit: for example my last game some guy had 3 items after just the minion waves, i had 3 items after minion waves, 2 carousels and krugs. 2 games in a row 0 items from krugs etc i really hope they change drop chance cuz otherwise i really enjoy tft
My best-worse match was when all I was droping was belt. xD All. Game. Srsly Riot
: TFT really is a pain
I just had a game where I had one champ on2 stars and it was stage 3... xD When I saw guy against me with 2 champs with 3 stars I just surr'ed it lol... This is sad
Seeko94 (EUNE)
: i'd rather if they make the items purchasable with gold just like the normal game instead of making it dropping rng . a fixed price so people can decide between refreshing a page for champs leveling up or getting items .
Looking at how items are powerful I'm afraid people will just stock the money to buff one champ with lots of items. And the adventage of top players would be 100x bigger.
: Soo lets start: 1.Player who stack up gold are gonna do better than those who don't, that's called strat, player who stacks gold and has lower HP than his teammates will get 1st to pick the champ he wants from fountain, no one will take his items/champs he needs to succesfuly play the game, as you progress higher tier champs are more likely be rolled from refresh. 2.Selecting Oponent is based on RNG, but if you lost against one summoner the game will "see" that you lost against him and you will have less chances to get him in next round, the chance of getting the same game isn't 0% tho, the game is about RNG. Last Point, Items Matter more than star levels(to some extent), some champs exceed in 1v1'ing some in teamfights like Kha'Zix is made for 1v1 and Sejuani is made for Teamfights.
1. You missed the biggest point of all of this: it's not about people deciding to store gold in early. It's about the difference of GAINING gold from top people and bottom one. Person with 100 points and win streak will automatically earn more gold AND he is able to risk and don't buy anything to get more gold for the future while people with very low points have to fight for life in every round. 2. No that is not true. I don't know how many games you played (I played A LOT) and I had situations where I played against top as one of bottom players 3 times in a row. Also losing 10 points for lost game which, imo, is huge basing on points difference. And it's ok if this person play against someone on the bottom, but the point is - the losing player shouldn't lose so many points and the top shouldn't gain so much gold for another win. You don't need to explain to me this game, Usually either I'm 1st or 2d or at the bottom - usually because of RNG. And I would be ok with that - well sh happens, but I think that some things should be balanced so people are able to complete their team and fight for higher place.
Rioter Comments
: So i recently left yasuo open, because some dude in my team prepicked it. The enemy picked yasuo and destroyed us. As a mainly ADC player, I mostly play champs that can get countered hard by windwall, e.g. Ezreal, Miss Fortune. On top of that I think the champ is really unfun to play both against and with, so those are multiple good reasons to ban him even if a teammate hovered it. I will usually not ban him, if the person wanting to take it is firstpick, which is rarely the case, but even those games have been rather unenjoyable, so I went back to simply banning the champ every game. Often I just mechanically do the yasuo ban, without much thinking, so even if someone had it prepicked I might not notice until after I banned it. And your comparison makes no sense, he is banning your champ (prob some op stuff he hates to play against) for a valid reason, while you just ban his champ because you want to be petty.
So I peersonally hate Ezreal, really like VERY much, and if I see my adc is taking Ez I just want to ban it purely egoisitic because I hate him. You think it's ok? Well I don't. Because I'm not egoistic player and I think there are way too much people in LoL who sadly are. And honestly I prefer to ban his champ if he bans mine and pick something bad even to lose the game because I care more for the fact that I can't control the game I'm playing in (being taken the chance to play it with my best champ) than care for someone's comfort especially if he is the reason why I can't enjoy the game. So if we are all going to be egoistic then ok, I can do that. I can lose that game, I will win next. But he with his egoistic thinking will probably have more lose streaks and unless he's in my team I really don't care. And if he wanted Yasuo but was last pick, it is obvious that Yasuo is a popular pick so someone should have picked it for him. Not having the most popular champs is just as bad as not having any champ for 1 role in case of being autofilled. I didn't have much champs on this acc but still had Yasuo, Morde etc just in case before starting rankeds. Such things can save your games and help your teammates. But nah better just ban everything out and focus on yourself (if you can solo carry whole game then ok, go ahead, I want to see that 100% win ratio).
CJXander (EUNE)
: Some frustrating things about League's current system.
This is a main reason why on EUNE I just stayed in Gold and didn't want to climb. Not because I didn't saw myself in Plat on higher but because it takes too much of my time and nerves to do that. I feel so helpless in some games that all I want is to just turn off my computer. As support too I am faced with lost mid and toplanes and even if me and my adc are fed there is very little chance that we will win. I enjoy lost games when I feel it was a lesson to everyone and we played as a team but we were worse. I do NOT enjoy games where we have a guy who writes "omg Im going afk, hate this game, report me idc" and this person is not banned even tho he went AFK truly... I reported with tickets so many people who were like that - they admitted they feed, AFK or troll and they claimed they don't care about bans and this game. NOT EVEN ONCE such person was banned form playing. And they had long loses streak. I don't know if it would solve the problem but punishing people who are so obviously doing everything to lose the game is such a good, clear and obvious thing that I have no idea why Riot is not doing something with it. But when you write on the chat something controversial you can got perma banned. Phew.
Rioter Comments
: > > people do not usually ban 'your champ' specially because of you > They do, because I picked it and they saw it. They don't ask, they just do it and feel awesome about it. Psssst. Pal. If you think that you can hear what's in a certain man's head... then I've got news for you. Those news are either good if you can hear them from my mind, and they are bad if you can't. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}} > And you hurt person who picked his main. Plz don't be a hypocrite. > Again - you are doing exactly the same. Ehm. No. {{sticker:zombie-brand-facepalm}} The difference is obvious: in case A you just make environment better for yourself regardless of anyone else, in case B you intentionally make your teammate's environment worse regardless of your own performance. Case A is pure capitalistic egoism. Case B is clearly driven by the idea of justice and revenge. In case B you stop being practical and start hurting your own team. In case A you just make sure that you can give out as much performance as you can (even if at the cost of someone else). > So this trick made you to Silver 4 with so many loses? Hmm sorry I prefer my way then. 'So many losses'? And what do you think a number of losses should be? :D Zero? It seems you've got a lot to learn about matchmaking, and winrates, and statistics overall. Anyway. Once you stop discussing the subject and start discussing the opponent, there's no more reason for the discussion itself. I am glad I've finally got to mid-silver from where I've been. Hope you can say the same about your own position and rank dynamics.
> Psssst. Pal. If you think that you can hear what's in a certain man's head... then I've got news for you. Those news are either good if you can hear them from my mind, and they are bad if you can't. My superhero abilities aside - it's you who started about they doing it not intentionally to hurt me. So - do YOU read minds? Also it is easy to guess what they were doing when they write it on a chat after ban. > Ehm. No. Ehm. Yes. > The difference is obvious: in case A you just make environment better for yourself In case B also, I am making enviro better for myself by making it as bad for the player who made it bad for me. ^^ Clear air etc. > Case A is pure capitalistic egoism. Case B is also pure egoism. Thats why both cases are not ok and the same. > In case B you stop being practical and start hurting your own team. In case A you also hurt your own team. > 'So many losses'? And what do you think a number of losses should be? :D Zero? Less than half would be pretty ok and would tell others that you actually know how to play well. > It seems you've got a lot to learn about matchmaking, and winrates, and statistics overall. After so many years and writing for gaming portals I think I know pretty well how it works. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}} > Once you stop discussing the subject and start discussing the opponent, there's no more reason for the discussion itself. Unless it's about authority and the knowledge based on your personal experience and score. Duuh.
: WHY IS MY LASTNAME OFFENSIVE!?????????????????
There is also a LOT of censored things in my language. To the point that we had to turn it off because we were unable to understand each other on the chat. :D I checked on the Internet why those words can be offensive but found nothing. Maybe someone just hit his head in keyboard when picking new words to ban? Who knows. Also people can be offended by everything so maybe ban chat and names and leave only numbers (oh but not all, 666 and 69 can be offensive too!! D:)
: The 'hell' is this: you know that you ban your teammate's main, and you know that you want to hurt him that way. While he most probably banned just 'a champion he doesn't want to see' (and you happened to be the one who gets the worst of it). I do not say that it is a case where you could be punished. But I say that you know what your intentions are, and they are definitely to hurt your teammate and team's performance (even though as a revenge for what they did to you). PS: The trick is... you can't trust anyone but yourself in soloQ. People say they 'main' something and that they will 'carry' so much more often than they really do. It's not you. It's just that you can't trust such claims in League (as long as there're no consequences for a lie like that). If you banned Yasuo as often as I do, you would know that 6/10 such players (at least) can easily play something else, or just can't play a champion as good as they claim. Often they don't even take the game seriously enough: they're not here to win a match, they're here to play their beloved champion once more. Whose fault is it that a player's word is not something you can trust? Neither yours, nor mine. But that changes nothing. PPS: I think you do not understand this little thing: people do not usually ban 'your champ' specially because of you. They ban a champ they do not want to see, and you personally are just not taken into consideration, at all.
> you know that you ban your teammate's main, and you know that you want to hurt him that way. While he most probably banned just 'a champion he doesn't want to see' And you hurt person who picked his main. Plz don't be a hypocrite. > But I say that you know what your intentions are, and they are definitely to hurt your teammate and team's performance (even though as a revenge for what they did to you). Again - you are doing exactly the same. And honestly I don't care that I am doing it only for revenge. It is as mean as banning my champ. Karma comes pretty fast. > The trick is... you can't trust anyone but yourself in soloQ. So this trick made you to Silver 4 with so many loses? Hmm sorry I prefer my way then. > people do not usually ban 'your champ' specially because of you. They do, because I picked it and they saw it. They don't ask, they just do it and feel awesome about it. Listen... I know it's great to give advices and write like a pro about stuff related to teamwork and game but when you have such stats maybe it's time to think about it... I am meeting a lot of geniuses on SR who knows what ally will do before game starts, they know people will feed in lobby already, they know "game is lost" before 2 minutes. Yeah, I met them a lot in low elo. Funny thing that the higher you climb people are not much better players per se but they have that totally different thinking. The thinking that make it possible to win more games. It's called "teamwork". Of course you will meet trolls, feeders and afks but you shouldn't judge everyone because of your previous games. It doesn't work this way. One Yasuo can be bad, the next one can carry team in 20 minutes. And yes, you should trust people unless you are able to carry 1v5 and don't cry later on boards that you lose because of "noob team". {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}}
Cypherous (EUW)
: > I think you don't understand... xD Let me clear this for you: No i understood what you said, and i would still rather them play anything other than the thing i've decided needs to be banned for one of numerous possible reasons, its not complicated, and aslong as they don't break the rules then they are free to play anything that isn't banned > No, being arrogant means being arrogant. And yet all i've done so far is state facts, that pretty much implies me being correct has caused you to see me as arrogant, and i'm perfectly fine with that
Also looking at your games played and division u sit in I guess your "way to win" may be somehow incorrect. Maybe it will be worth to try other way around.
Cypherous (EUW)
: > I think you don't understand... xD Let me clear this for you: No i understood what you said, and i would still rather them play anything other than the thing i've decided needs to be banned for one of numerous possible reasons, its not complicated, and aslong as they don't break the rules then they are free to play anything that isn't banned > No, being arrogant means being arrogant. And yet all i've done so far is state facts, that pretty much implies me being correct has caused you to see me as arrogant, and i'm perfectly fine with that
> And yet all i've done so far is state facts, that pretty much implies me being correct has caused you to see me as arrogant, and i'm perfectly fine with that I think you should check on the Internet what being arrogant means :v Just because you think something is right doesn't mean it is. And you act like you have a right to decide what is good for others. Sorry but it doesn't work this way. As a person with new acc on EUW I had few champs at the beginning of rankeds and picking Morgana was always my "safe pick" because I am good with her and she is cheap champ. But lots of people kept banning it even if I was 2d in lobby. They also knew what is better for me and for team and because of that I couldn't go to higher elo having total lose streak until I bought more midlane champs I'm good with. So plz, don't tell me that it is a good way to ban someone's pick. On EUNE I had jumped Bronze-Gold in like 3 days almost only with Morgana. It is weird that this kind of "banning ally champ" culture I'm meeting only on EUW, on EUNE it was maybe twice a year and usually by accident.
Cypherous (EUW)
: > I don't think so. All you have to do is pick useless for team champion and just "try" but not so much. If you will not say on the chat that you troll and you will not int then no one will ban you for it. Sure, because you aren't breaking the rules, nobody says you have you play your best champ in ranked so that isn't against the rules, but that also isn't trolling, so either you actually troll in annoyance or you accept it and try on a champ you'r enot good at, doesn't change that we're still going to bane whatever we deem fit and riot has already stated there are reasons to bean someone someone has pre-picked, if you dislike that then thats too bad for you > So you say that you prefer for someone to troll you game than let this person play what they want? Your attitude is just amazing. If what they "want" is something i don't want to see on the battlefield then yes, i don't care how pro that teemo thinks he is in silver, he doens't contribute anything once the lane phase ends and we're essentially 4v5 anyway so what do i have to lose exactly > You know that you sound very arrogant here? If stating facts makes me arrogant then so be it, not my problem
> Sure, because you aren't breaking the rules, nobody says you have you play your best champ in ranked so that isn't against the rules, but that also isn't trolling, so either you actually troll in annoyance or you accept it and try on a champ you'r enot good at, doesn't change that we're still going to bane whatever we deem fit and riot has already stated there are reasons to bean someone someone has pre-picked, if you dislike that then thats too bad for you I think you don't understand... xD Let me clear this for you: - you ban something because you want to win and the person picked, in YOUR opinion, a bad champ. - this person pick a champ that he can't play because you tilted him - this person probably will lose lane so your preventing to lose is actually not logical at all > If stating facts makes me arrogant then so be it, not my problem No, being arrogant means being arrogant.
neropa (EUNE)
: Remake system should be based on does the player leave the fountain
My enemy had few times 4v5 lately and I felt so bad for them. Even me as an enemy I would vote to remake. But sadly each time the afking person was online for the first seconds, sometimes bought item, and then logged out. :/ They were 4v5 from the begining and still couldn't remake. That sucks.
Cypherous (EUW)
: > Still, this person could be a really good player and would do much more than for example noob Yasuo with 5th mastery. You. Don't. Know. That. So let this person play whatever ffs he wants. And i "could" suddenly start pooping out solid gold bars, if we all sit around waiting for miracles then nothing will change > Sure, and then you accept that people go full troll on you. Thats fine, not me that risks getting banned for it :P
> And i "could" suddenly start pooping out solid gold bars, if we all sit around waiting for miracles then nothing will change You know that you sound very arrogant here? > Thats fine, not me that risks getting banned for it :P I don't think so. All you have to do is pick useless for team champion and just "try" but not so much. If you will not say on the chat that you troll and you will not int then no one will ban you for it. So you say that you prefer for someone to troll you game than let this person play what they want? Your attitude is just amazing.
: Some "mains" are not even worth to be mentioned, sorry. "I am Zed main let me zed or I feed" says a guys with 44% winrate on Zed and average stats of Iron. Or it could be a guy who plays for two weeks total. I've seen this so many times, that I do not even try noticing that kind of claim. > if someone bans my hover pick i op gg him and ban his main smh And here you go breaking the code of conduct via malicious banning. Maybe that is not the case where you can be caught easily, but you know you're doing it. I.e. you join the evil you meant to fight. Congrats, Anakin! Funny thing is that it usually changes nothing, unless you meet someone who only knows how to play one champ.
> And here you go breaking the code of conduct via malicious banning. Well, you are doing the same so why the hell not? Once someone banned my champ and random guy banned his too <3 that was so cute of him :D
Show more

Hexa XV

Level 54 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion