Rouhsif (EUW)
: how do i play as the US?
Lethality. Magic Penetration. Armour Penetration. Percentage Health Damage. True Damage. Percentage Health True Damage. Slow. Roots. Stuns. Mobility.
: This 14 day suspesion feels unfair (actually serious)
You were toxic. Doesnt matter the context; breaking the rules has no justification.
: Skin for kayn
_**G I V E Y O R I C K A D E C E N T S K I N P L E A S E!**_
: Human patience has a limit
"A little bit toxic" - Uh, no. You need to grow up, dude. You are far too fragile and far too angry to be playing this game. Glad to see you go, sadly. Wow, you are so utterly hateful....
Danitao (EUW)
: What about all i had in teh account i has final request asked for info on how much i used in league it 820 euros(of course he was in th span of 8-9 years). Riot if they cant give the account they should give me my stuff back
_That's the point of the perma-ban._ Don't you get it? The user agreement states that you may lose your entire account and all the effort you put into it if you so severely break the rules. No, you should not have your stuff back, because that us part of the punishment. You dont actually own any of the items - you paid to add them to what is essentially a rented account that would be taken away from you if you continued to break the rules. You lost access to the account because you were an asshole in that exact moment. You cant undo what you - what happened has happened and you have to suffer the consequences. It doesn't matter what anyone else did. Your actions are your own choice and you have to take responsibility. No one forced you to do anything. You are the one at fault for what you did and you were rightfully punished for it, Dude.
Danitao (EUW)
: Well you thank godI am a stubborn guy I think there should be way to prove u deserve another chance that's my stance if you don't like or think otherwise who I am to judge you.
You do not need to _prove_ you deserve a second chance - you are able to make a new account, but the old one is still gone because that is punishment given out for the toxic incident. Riot gives you the means to turn over a new leaf and absolve yourself by starting over with a new account. This is not a way to win your old account back and that should never be your aim. Your aim is to become a better person, not reverse a punishment.
: An idea for smoother Roa
If it stacked quicker then it wouldn't be the Rod of Ages. Just the Rod of Better-Go-On-a-Killing-Spree
: People get angry at me for banning a champion they didn't pick
See, while being flamed is a bad thing and I should feel sorry for you for having to suffer that... I am also sorry that you have a teammate that is too dumb to understand that the answer to their own question is as clear as day. I hope you won those games?
Danitao (EUW)
: I have I spent the last 2 months I proving upon myself and only then I came up with this idea in order to maybe try to save a few people who really regret what they did
Regret doesn't undo what has happened. The player is punished for the actions they have done. Improving your behavior should incorporates the recognition of _why_ you were punished and how the punishment is fair. A person who had reformed understands that their account is gone.
Danitao (EUW)
: Nah they won't go back look at old fiora a complete beats of champion crushing any lane it was in l, people rioted it so rito made her even more broken now ;)
To be honest, just buying {{item:3076}} {{item:3075}} countered old Fiora, and despite it being "overpowered" hasn't her old ultimate been slightly co-opted by Master Yi in his Alpha Strike? Really wish people hadn't complained as much because now we have the totally "balanced" Percentage Maximum Health True Damage...
Danitao (EUW)
: A Second Chance To Change!!
Your second chance is you being able to make a new account. Your original account was banned because you were toxic. The punishment was because of the actions you purposefully took at that time. If the punishment gets taken away, then what about your toxic actions? Suddenly it never happened? No. It did happen and that is why the punishment is there. It is as clear as that. You were punished for your actions, not your mind set. Stop trying to abuse "give me a second chance" when you really mean "I am only sorry I lost my account".
: Mordekaiser adjustment (that makes sense)
To be honest, his ultimate is not the problem. You are stuck in a rather large area against a champion that is incredibly slow. Kite him. Currently his only problems are his Q solo damage and his passive's damage plus synergy with Rylai's. Reduce damage there and he'll be fine.
: WHY IS MY LASTNAME OFFENSIVE!?????????????????
Well it's a simple case of your _german_ surname being an off-spelling of an incredibly vulgar and offensive _english_ word. English is used by a large part of the gaming world and profanity filters are always trying to stamp down on people attempting to subvert them. Your surname is just sadly one way that too many nasty people try to offend people! 😕
: Just saying. Riot's goal for last season according to their "daily update video" they wanted every champion to have a secondary place somewhere, but right now they are forcing champions to stick with 1 role. They haven't said anything that they will make champions only having one role, so they are kinda breaking their promise that they said to their fans if they want Pyke only to be a support. Edit: Read this, They wanted him mid as a secondary role on purpose. But ain't they biting themselves in the butt now? https://www.riftherald.com/interviews/2018/5/14/17352460/pyke-design-interview-lol
To be fair, this is Riot - the same people who have a small number of champions forever in meta and also seem to only give regular skins to another small number of champions. I'd say anything they say that involves "every champion" should be taken with a pinch of salt. Anyway, even with the nerfs, I'd say that Pyke is still viable elsewhere. The focus is still more on his single-target prowess rather than AoE. His clearing isn't as robust but he can still pack a decent punch to his attack target. I think there are a number of reasons why he has been tuned down. Mainly stopping him being a great farmer _and_ a lethal opponent _and_ a decent sustainer.
: Pyke Get non-champion damage removed next patch.
Well, remember that Pyke is meant to be a support, so apart from maybe collecting stacks for {{item:3302}} he is best not touching the wave, right? His E could potentially steal gold from his ADC and push the wave. On top of this, as a main-role support, he shouldn't really _be_ as effective in other lanes - he isn't just an assassin that gives out gold to his teammates. I think Riot are trying to kerb the thought that Pyke is a carry pick that you can choose if you get stuck with the support role. He was put in to add a bit of diversity and give a new perspective to aggressive supports but he certainly isn't meant to be Zed/Talon 2.0. His Q, as I recall, still can damage minions, just will prioritize champions to prevent unluck attempts inside the minion wave. That's fair enough really, as Pyle seems more of an champion killer than a lane pusher.
: Why are people refusing to watch replay after the game?
Because it sounds incredibly pretentious and belittling. Not you in particular, OP, but I mean it comes across in a number of ways as if you regard yourself as better than everyone else. Like the kind of player who is a bit full of themselves because they know so much about the game and then proceed to treat everyone else like children, thinking that they are being charitable by sharing their knowledge with the idiots around them. Don't get me wrong, I can see your positive intentions, but you need to understand that anything along the lines of when someone deemed a peer tries to raise themselves above others in a teaching role without being asked beforehand, can be seen as rather insulting. Comes across as you thinking you are better than them - their superior of sorts and mocking them. Also, pretty much, people in League of Legends and most other games don't really like "I'll tell you that you're shit" services - which is how the majority of people will see the service. Even if it's just one mistake in an ocean of perfect play. No one likes having their mistakes paraded around.
: how to get unban
How to get unbanned if you reformed? Well if you reformed then you'd understand the necessity of your punishment and will accept it, then make a new account and carry on. Reforming doesnt _undo_ the crime you did, so why should they _undo_ the punishment? The punishment is there to deal with the rule breaking you commit to. Reforming is just understanding why that punishment was needed and living with it.
: Super scared of Getting banned, help me!?
The Meta at any one point is a small core of several over-used champions and one or two FotM choices. The list of off-meta picks is massive and would relegate a large swathe of the champion pool to being unplayable. Riot are dumb and have made a number of dumb choices in the past, but I really doubt they'd be that stupid enough to kneecap themselves by stopping 60% or more of their game assets being playable. If you get banned for an off-meta pick, then you'd be wrongly punished. Nothing wrong with non-meta. Even if you lose, what's the difference between sucking at an off-meta pick and sucking as a meta pick? Why does one "deserve" a report over the other. Actually, there is no choice to report for "off-meta pick".
: > [{quoted}](name=IIIrd Bishop,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=6iumB3Z2,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-06-14T12:53:54.680+0000) > > Unless you stun him, root him, slow him, cleanse the debuff, kite him, kill him, become immune/untargetable or tank him for 7 seconds. > > I'd say that is more than a 0.01% reprieve from death maybe, but how many ppl in low elo will do that{{sticker:zombie-brand-clap}}
Well I'm in Low ELO and I can narrow it down to everyone on the enemy team and _sometimes_ myself if I stop panicking. Also seems to work being Renekton.
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: i certainly would. I would probably be able to start at 5 cases a day tho and then get better. A small hand of human reviews atleast makes the system feel more reliable
And what will stop you from being biased? What would prevent you from aiding the accused when punishment is based on actions not the context? Many of the anti-bot rants are pivoted by people who have been banned and are oblivious to the clear reason why they were banned.
: 14 day suspension
After 1 perma-ban and close to another, have you not taken time to step back and consider what you are doing wrong? You obviously dont know what trolling or being toxic means, and that is worrying. People can be oblivious to being a %%%% and dont realise that there is a very reasonable middle ground between utter asshole and simpering PC wuss. You can still be decent person and not look like a weak-willed pushover. You dont have to swear to be toxic. Threatening a report on others is toxic - it's an abuse of the report system.
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: just say it correctly. best thing to do is be a punching bag
Best thing to do is grow up and stop letting anonymous people in a video game shatter your fragile macho masculinity. It's not being a punching bag, it's about being the better man and not stooping to the level of angry eejits!
Nar7ia (EUW)
: Yes, I'd take less but quality skins over plenty of lackluster skins anyday. Unfortunately, Caitlyn doesn't have very good looking skins, at least for my taste despite having plenty. I do wish they step up their skin game. Make more quality skins for less popular champs, its boring to see a new lux, kata, ahri, ezreal, yasuo skin every other patch but afterall Riot is a company and they care about the profit first and foremost.
Oh, I completely forgot to suggest Pulsefire Caitlyn as a decent skin for her but then, if you play Caitlyn (I honestly don't play ADC much at all) then you'd have more of an eye for what is good and not good for her. She is just a lady with a oversized rifle after all! I am sure tons of people think Yorick has enough "good" skins, while I beg to differ! But yeah! That's the thing - we have our favorite champions religated to obscurity while the money-printing "forever meta" cool champion get skins constantly! Yasuo is one of these most toxic champions in the game, with such a toxic playerbase behind him, but look at how many high quality skins he has! Look at Kai'sa too - she has tons and she is only a new release... You are right, Riot put profit well before the game itself. Non of us want them to go bankrupt but the priority of squeezing as much money out of a small core of champions is really sad to see... Just look at the "prestige" skin line and its clear to see. I always think if they focused on making the _game_ and not some skin simulator or LCS merchandise backdrop, then they could make so much more money with a much better League of Legends!
Nar7ia (EUW)
: Exactly. Caitlyn and even Kai'Sa do not look like themselves at all in those skins. It seems they purposefully made Arcade Caitlyn lackluster to sell her Prestige skin. These Arcade skins just feel like they were rushed as a quick cash grab. When you look at Dark Star skins you get the feeling that they really put their heart into it, when you look at new Arcade skins they feel like quick cash grab. At this point I just wish they scrap the whole Arcade Caitlyn (Kai'Sa too) and give her some other skin, maybe something like Debonair Caitlyn, been waiting for that since years.
Ah! That's another thing - at least they are getting skins, which makes it even worse when you consider how lacklustre they are... As a Yorick main, I'm already in a bit of a mood because of the last two skins he has gotten. New Yorick Skins are already so rare, but the last two skins are so tacky and lacklustre themselves. Ugh... I wish they'd focus on 1 skin and make it great and then give it to someone who deserves it and isnt getting skins everyone other patch!
: > [{quoted}](name=IIIrd Bishop,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=bMftjJZg,comment-id=000900000000,timestamp=2019-06-14T12:41:22.678+0000) > > Illegal means _forbidden_ anyway. Forbidden by law, with "law" in this instance being the Terms & Conditions that Riot has you agree to before playing. > > Illegality does not always mean jail time. The ToU aren't laws, they're a contract and at best, rules.
Laws are rules though. Plus the ToU is there for legal purposes so Riot cant be sued or have legal action taken against them for a number of reasons. Honestly, mate, you are just being pedantic here! ^^
: the issue with the new morde ( well it not really an issue ) is that hes totally team undependant. he doesn't need teamwork at all. the kit just allows him to basicly run over a whole team, bit like darius but way stronger atm. on top of that getting hit by his ult is like a 99.99% surtain dead.
Unless you stun him, root him, slow him, cleanse the debuff, kite him, kill him, become immune/untargetable or tank him for 7 seconds. I'd say that is more than a 0.01% reprieve from death
Nar7ia (EUW)
: I really have no idea but the new Arcade skins feel very lackluster and disappointing. Dark Star Jhin literally mesmerized me. Meanwhile I don't even want to look at Arcade Kai'Sa and Caitlyn despite them being among my favorite champions. Just look at Arcade Riven, MF, Hecarim and Arcade Caitlyn, Kai'Sa side by side and you will know what I mean. The previous Arcade skins feel colorful, joyful and fun. The current Arcade skins feel bland and edgy. The difference between the quality is almost as if the Dark Star and new Arcade skins were designed by a different company. It sucks because I really wanted a good Caitlyn skin and now I'll be stuck with a lackluster Arcade Caitlyn for long time.
I'd hope that the new skins cost less than the previous ones in the series but they dont seem to... They do look like just a set up from recolouring like they used to do back in the day. In fact, they look so gaudy as to be knock-off bootleg toys from some RIP-off fake manufacturer! I'd be worried that Caitlyn's Arcade Skin is purposefully dull just to give more focus to the Prestige Money Grab skin...
: > [{quoted}](name=IIIrd Bishop,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=bMftjJZg,comment-id=0009,timestamp=2019-06-14T10:10:25.312+0000) > > Account selling/buying is illegal. Naming & Shaming is also illegal by the Forum Rules. You paid money for something you were not allowed to have and should have been aware of such a thing. Furthermore, you actually bought it without any protection whatsoever. You kind of deserve to lose out on this. Do not mix up illegal with forbidden. Will he go to jail ? No. It's not illegal. Will he get banned ? Possibly : it's forbidden.
Illegal means _forbidden_ anyway. Forbidden by law, with "law" in this instance being the Terms & Conditions that Riot has you agree to before playing. Illegality does not always mean jail time.
Azazel131 (EUNE)
: Why can QSS cleane mord ult
> he litteraly transports you to another dimension That's not really something small. I see that as a major cc to be honest. It's a banish attack and is a hard form of crowd control. The banish is cleansed, thats fair. You have to play smart with Morde's ult or be outsmarted!
: plz RIOT look what i say
First off, please learn to use punctuation - use "." after each new sentence. Like, imagine how you'd talk to someone. Where you'd take a breath or stop one statement before going into the next. You also need to understand that punishment is for the _action_ without regard for the context. **_Riot do not want toxic behavior in the game_**. It doesn't matter why you do it; the end doesn't justify the means. If people feed or flame or troll, that is their problem and they will be punished. If _you_ feed or flame or troll, _for whatever reason_ then you are also at fault!
Ιsaac (EUW)
: I bought an account and the owner took it back without refund or notice
Account selling/buying is illegal. Naming & Shaming is also illegal by the Forum Rules. You paid money for something you were not allowed to have and should have been aware of such a thing. Furthermore, you actually bought it without any protection whatsoever. You kind of deserve to lose out on this.
Nar7ia (EUW)
: For me at least, the new arcade skins do look rushed and qualitatively worse than the previous ones. Though the dark star skins they just released look awesome, wish I could say the same about Arcade skins too.
Would it be the exact same people working on both sets of skins? Could be a change in effort between different staff members. Bit awkward for whoever is doing the new Arcade skins if they ever did a side-by-side comparison with the just-released Dark Star skins! ^^
iaapvp (EUW)
: 8/10 games there is 1 or 2 mordekaisers
This happens with all new releases and reworks - not sure what this thread is getting at. Both wanting to play the _new_ champion/rework and also wanting to get in on the inevitable power-spike-on-release. Mordekaiser follows the same trend - he is overpowered but not maybe to a degree of some other releases. He can still be countered hard by champions like Renekton or through simply not being silly. Riot just pumps damage into the new champions to try and push sales of the champion and their skins! :)
: then who is the pudding champion? i'm sorry i'm tired i can't think right XD
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH! Ah, right, the "%%%%% Pudding" joke was a joke about the following character from Adult Swim's Robot Chicken show. https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/robot-chicken-fanon-2/images/1/17/Angry_%%%%%_Pudding.PNG/revision/latest?cb=20171012165001 Did the image show? She is a nasty piece of work. You can guess her first name; a very prominent B-word. You can look up how nasty she can be to everyone! Haha _That's_ how bad I think Qiyanna is! ^^
: you mean zac?
(Uuuuuugh! What is with the phone version of the boards today?! I didnt mean to down vote you! Haha...) What do you mean by Zac? Zac always seems like a decent personality, what do you mean? Also, saw that you've clicked with Qiyanna being Tira from Soul Calibur! You think she'll be as annoying? ^^
Trias000 (EUNE)
: She can't be toxic because she doesn't exist. She's not conscious. So she can only imitate toxic behaviour. Does it really bother you if a character in a video game is rude to you? There are so many examples of this. E.g. in all Fallout and Witcher games you meet assholes right and left. But not only that's not bad, it's part of what makes those games so good.
First off, _please_ look up the term "roleplaying". I just think you've got it wrong there and are looking for a different word. Secondly, again, Qiyanna is the character - she has been consciously designed by Riot to be an asshole. If she doesn't exist, how can she imitate? To imitate would imply a conscious action towards replicating behavior that she can acknowledge. Since that is ridiculous and she _is_ a non-sentient parcel of data, the blame falls on Riot, _which is who I am pointing the blame at anyway from the beginning_. Riot is creating Qiyanna. They are the ones who have decided that this sort of toxic shit-talking "%%%%% of a character" personality is alright to implement into the game, while also telling players not to act in a similar fashion. They say that toxicity has no place in League of Legends but here they are putting it into the game. Asshole characters in gaming are not bad things, I agree, but remember that those games that use asshole personalities don't also run a complete opposite moral outlook that involves condemning the same behavior that they have implemented into these characters. No one likes being nasty, obviously, but games with asshole characters tend not to say that being an asshole or being nasty has "no place in their game" because the act of putting those nasty assholes in the game really just defeats the purpose. Not only that, but these characters tend to be vulnerable to player reprisal (if the player chooses to do so) therefore opening up avenues for dealing with the toxic behavior. LoL is different - you play _as_ Qiyanna. You _are_ the asshole character. You cannot get _away_ from the asshole character. You are forced to play _against_ the toxic personality put in the game by Riot, who are the same people who will ban you if you act in a similar way. Imagine if Riot completely and utterly banned all swearing in the game, but then released a champion that did nothing but swears.
rHarvey (EUW)
: Hotfix mordekaiser
**_P L A Y R E N E K T O N_**
Trias000 (EUNE)
: I don't know how toxic Qiyana is, but there's clearly a distinction. She's roleplaying, toxic assholes aren't.
That's not really the case. "Roleplaying" is the imitation of a character, but Qiyanna _is that character_. Riot has designed her to be this kind of an asshole. She is not _pretending_ to be a toxic shit-talker, Qiyanna _is_ a toxic shit-talker. Riot have gone and intentionally made a character that emulates asshole behavior, while also condemning that behavior from the players. Double Standards and utterly hypocritical!
CJXander (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=IIIrd Bishop,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=enVxb4vX,comment-id=0009,timestamp=2019-06-11T23:29:54.510+0000) > > It's fine making a %%%%%y stuck-up champion that acts like an asshole to everyone but then clamp down hard on _players_ emulating a similar personality in game. > > How can you advocate one and not the other? Hypocrisy! And Riot will _still_ blame a "few" bad players and not the game design itself for the toxicity problem... Pretty surprised you got downvoted, was probably one of the emmissaries.
Ah, cheers! ^^ It might be due to my use of the word "%%%%%", or maybe that it could be construed as defending nastyness from players. I'm not; I am just pointing out that being an asshole doesn't change into being cool and good just because its Riot doing it instead of the playerbase! I've been downvoted for similar responses in other threads! :o
kiwishrew (EUW)
: Qiyana's Interactions (mini rant)
Is Qiyanna emulating the toxic shit-talking playerbase? But will Riot allow players to emulate Qiyanna? There is an irony that Riot are introducing this champion yet are highly against shit-talking toxicity among players. Honestly a bad move, her gameplay looks interesting.
Lil Jahseh (EUNE)
: i understand and i accept the consequences thanks for your time man we learn from the mistakes:)
Good luck in the future! Just keep cool and level headed as much as you can. Rage to yourself but never in-game. Always try and be the friendly lad on your team, the game is less stressful if you don't stoop to the level of any assholes you are forced to play with/against - muting is always an option!
: Arcade Kai'sa... Riot is high lol
League of Legends is a Money Printing Excercise, not just a game. The game is secondary and just really a backdrop for selling skins and e-sports merchandise. Sometimes you got to wonder why they even waste resources on rendering the least popular champions. Gotta squeeze as much money out of the core of popular champions by pumping them full of skins! Worse still, I am a Yorick main - **_I actually got a new skin recently_** and its AWFUL! Where is Disco Yorick? Dark Star Yorick? Project: Yorick...?
Svinjex (EUW)
: HotRod Rammus
You'll have to have large exhaust tubes coming out of either side and tire skid marks on the ground when he makes a turn during Powerball!
Lil Jahseh (EUNE)
: i saw that the bans where getting bigger and bigger but i didn't expect that.. thanks for talking to me for real you and im bula bula and arcade lulu made me understand what i did wrong is there any chance of getting my skins back?
Everything in life has consequences. You always gotta realise that rules are there for a reason, and punishment is there to ensure those rules are kept. Always think, how would you feel if people repeatedly did what you told them not to do? You'd get progressively more vocal in telling them to stop and may impose little sanctions against them. If you are still constantly being ignored, you might feel disrespected and stop granting them services that you provided - after all, why should you give them anything if they are not respecting your rules? Always consider that in the future. Sadly, you've lost all those skins forever. That is part of the magnitude and severity of the punishment. The skins and champions paid for with real money on that account are bound to that account. Riot owns the account overall, and you agree to the fact that you are spending money on an account that is essentially borrowed. Technically borrowed _indefinitely_ but with the agreement that it can be taken away forever if you break the rules. Many people who get perma-banned just don't realise the gravitas of such a punishment until it happens to them. A perma-ban means a loss of all that you earned on that account. You spent money to add to the account, but in the Terms & Agreements its stated that the account is never truly yours. All that you can do is accept your punishment, learn from it, and start again.
Lil Jahseh (EUNE)
: i know i was banned before but i had no idea when i would get perma banned..i wanna know what happend to that other person like i get banned and not him? i can see my fault and i understand but they cant bann an account immediately send a text saying that the next report you will get ,will get you permabanned...
As IM Bula Bula has stated, once you got banned the last time you would have been notified clearly that your next infraction would result in a permanent ban. Frankly, after your _first_ punishment you really should not have been testing your luck with the punishment system. What did you expect would happen after you were banned the last time? Can you not see that since you wouldn't stop committing punishable offenses that the punishment would have to escalate? Even ignoring the warning after your 2-week ban, you should have had the awareness to see those continuous infractions were resulting in bigger and bigger punishments...
Ephixus (EUW)
: They have no ideas anymore to make an unique champion, throwing dumb champ designs with dumbest kits ever they could imagine. Because why not, the game is not so broken yet.
To be fair, Magic Cat and Book is fine. Especially if it is a _female_ champion that isn't just another slim, white/off-white woman in her mid-20s or early 30s. It's just how they portrayed Magic Cat and Book that is the problem - it is too twee, too anime and cutesy. Just for me, it doesn't fit into the way League of Legends is designed and they should have taken a different approach. But still, Yuumi does fit into a new niche playstyle while contributing to female champion diversity.
Lil Jahseh (EUNE)
: I dont have the logs but in champion select i banned teemo and i picked jax to play as a jungler and he banned my jax and i said why did you banned my jax? he responded saying : who ever bans teemo he is an ape and in game his score is 1-15 after that we jumped into the game and because he died he blamed me because i was far away... i can find his name if u want
Don't name and shame. That would be a major offense and definitely not help your situation. You should not have responded to this other player. You chose to engage in rule breaking dialogue with this person, so you are at fault. You have clearly been banned before so you knew what was at stake. It doesn't matter what other people do, it only matters what _you_ do. The rules tell you what you should not do. Nowhere does it say "unless in X situation" - it simply says that you should be rude, hurtful or harass other players. No context will save you.
: Riot, the players don't like Qiyana
Oh, its ok for Riot to make %%%%% Pudding into a champion, but not for players to act like %%%%% Pudding? Hmm... I smell a double standard!!
: honestly, WHO was Qiyana made for?
It's fine making a %%%%%y stuck-up champion that acts like an asshole to everyone but then clamp down hard on _players_ emulating a similar personality in game. How can you advocate one and not the other? Hypocrisy! And Riot will _still_ blame a "few" bad players and not the game design itself for the toxicity problem...
CJXander (EUNE)
: Qiyana is toxic!
Qiyanna was designed to be a %%%%%, but Riot seem to have double standards over what they feel is fine for "character design" and not fine for players... Oh, but it isn't the _game's_ fault that LoL is toxic. Oh noooo! The game is all roses and rainbows! No toxic champion designs. Certainly no toxic mechanics or personalities. /sarcasm.
Show more

IIIrd Bishop

Level 71 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion