isdan (EUW)
: my friend is a bad adc
Upload your friend's worse plays then show it to all both your friends and see their reaction lol
: > I saw news about Apex making a matchmaking system for hackers This system was experimented with similar games (and in reality as well) and never shown any sign of efficiency. Bring people who do wrong things together, and it will be normalized for them. So, that amount of player will never decrease and will increase because new players will come. And after they firmly believe it's a normal behavior, they still can smurf and go troll again the "good guy matchmaking". > Of course the hardest part of it would be, did this guy just have a bad game or is he really doing it on purpose? The hardest part you're talking about is the very reason why you don't want to let your community moderate themselves and want to do it yourself. If you do it yourself and things go wrong, people will tell you and you will suffer from this (less player, less revenue). That's exactly what's happening now by the way, but I'm still waiting for their reaction... > Or second idea, everytime you get a D, you will be pushed to a different queue because even the guy that is having a very painful game will at least be able to get C-. Also, you can have a D by trying your best. If you're a Silver facing a D1 smurfing for his stream (iron to diam rush seems pretty common and cancer), there are time you simply can't play because you don't have the knowledge about what you're supposed to do in this situation, and end up without any farm and 0/15 before your team surrender while flaming you (any D1 smurfing in silver can create this situation). So that's it, wanted to tell you why they don't do what you genuinely proposed. They either tried it or saw the results of other trying it and was not satisfied with it. But the fact they seems to do nothing right now (apart the really well made "tilt guide", but that's not an enough investment IMO) is really tilting...
Not bad, i never thought about it. Thanks a lot for the guidance
: What is wrong with ranked?
I saw news about Apex making a matchmaking system for hackers lately, I'm wondering why wouldn't Riot make a matchmaking for trollers. Let the best community players seek the replays where there was a troll playing and let them choose if the guy deserves to be in normal matchmaking or troll matchmaking for a certain period (3days, then a week, 3 weeks, 1 month) just to put pressure on those players and make them realise their mistakes. Of course the hardest part of it would be, did this guy just have a bad game or is he really doing it on purpose? Or second idea, everytime you get a D, you will be pushed to a different queue because even the guy that is having a very painful game will at least be able to get C-. What does everyone think about that?
: STOP PUTTING LVL 30s in GOLD GAMES !!
While smurfing, I realised at lvl 20 that some of my games have 9 level 20s and a level 150 guy, one was plat 3. Matchmaking is bad everywhere you go. But having a level 30 in a gold game must mean that the guy did well in precedent games. I remember playing with plats when I was unranked at some point but that's because I got carried in precedent games.
Rioter Comments
: >only sad thing is that Riot's warning system doesn't decrease on time. It does decrease, however _**the metric is not measured on time elapsed.**_ It's measured on games played, and your behaviour within them. If you played 100 games over a year, or 100 games in a month, with the exact same behaviour in both, you'd have equal progress to resetting it. It's all about your behaviour within those games that affect it. Positive behaviour will push it faster. Nuetral will progress, albeit slowly. Negative will regress, or result in further punishments.
Oh I see, not bad. And yeah i meant on time. You can stop playing games because you had enought of getting warned (like me lol) but you mean that if you get warned once in 100 games it's over. 100 games is like average 30-35 hours gameplay unless you stopped completely with the bad humour or you get banned because of 1 or 2 bad games in the time between you restart playing and the average 30 hours ending. But anyone that is tilted easely will have to mute everyone each game what makes the system imperfect but well rules are rules
Rioter Comments
: Permabanned players - Second chances.
You're right, only sad thing is that Riot's warning system doesn't decrease on time. If you had 2 warnings 1 year ago and the third is yesterday as exemple. It's over for you but that no one knows it and one tilted game can end you hahaha
GG Y2NG (EUW)
: welp, im from EU and IM NOT WORKING, still can afford skins and passes for the game, lul, and im wasting money on several games like OW, Heartstone, R6 Siege AND LEAGUE, think again if you come to complain about prices, still 50% of that money will go into winning pool + noone told you that you need to buy the pass, ITS A FREE TO PLAY GAME afterall, would you like to have league to be pay to play with monthly fee and still have to pay for passes and skins?
You sound like some spoiled kid or a guy getting aids. It's true not everyone can afford the prices while euw is where riot comes from, it's also where the prices are the highest.

Ignited Flower

Level 21 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion