: Either order, but just the top 10 please. I'm not sure there's enough space to list them all.
Eh, I'll give you a full list, that's ordered by both! 1. Everything
Karnelies (EUW)
: what do you mean
Which order the list should have
: Attempt to join queue failed
just wait, Riot f*cked their servers again
Sub Spice (EUW)
: Stuck in Ghost game
Yeah, game's broken rn
Karnelies (EUW)
: wtf is wrong with leauges login
>wtf is wrong with leauges login Alphabetically or chronologically?
: this was a problem in beta samba and was promised it wouldnt happen when going live. it then happened when going live.doesnt matter if the guy knows WHY it happened, fact is it happened.
You know you can reply to his comment directly, right?
G2A (EUW)
: Two 16 player TFT Tournaments tonight on EUW
Well, I wish you luck that the game works again by then
ZenosyX (EUW)
: for me, allowing cookies from > [\*.]lolesports.com > [\*.]riotgames.com solved it, for now... shouldn't get messy again, since the theory behind this is very, very simple: you are watching on lolesports.com which is pretty obvious, however... when you log on, your authentication is done on riotgames.com which create a thirdparty cookie (which is why the third party options has worked for some). so if you only allow lolesports.com you're not actually allowing the cookie to be used that keep you logged in, and thus get automatically logged out due to the failed check. a bit surprising that it suddently stopped working everywhere at the same time though... did all browsers do an update, OR... did riot change how the cookies was handled? lesson learned, don't mess with cookies... go for cake ~ I saw that others have fiddled with similar solutions. and well, if it work that simple then it should be possible to apply a similar fix using the same logic for any browser. the issue would simply be that the login is done on another domain. so for a different browser, look into allowing riotgames.com cookies with a wildcard function or "auth.riotgames.com" if necessary. possibly fiddle a bit with allowing third party cookies if necessary, and simply block others if it allow too much. I didn't touch my third party settings in chrome however, but it worked fine so far. let's hope it last~
Allowing third-party cookies hasn'r worked for me. However in Edge everything works just fine for me despite third-party cookies being blocked. I don't like Edge though, so I hope there will be a fix for this issue.
: Hey Ssent. Sorry to hear you're having these issues. What browser are you experiencing these issues on, and are you able to log onto this page in a different browser? If the issue persists, please send us a [support ticket at this link](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/requests/new) when you get a chance!
It seems there are many people experiencing this. https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/bug-reports-eu/3vxdmwsx-website-lol-esports-automatically-signing-off
Silent Note (EUNE)
: I play on EUNE. Also my main issue is that I want to play SR, but my friends are hardly ever playing lately, they started playing other games. And I was never a fan of muting people (I do it in some ridiculous cases), but I'm afraid of missing important information, like the plan on who split pushes, when do we want to approach objectives and such.
If someone starts flaming, you can usually be pretty sure that they won't make any important calls.
Impaler (EUW)
: that's not what it does. u can even block third party cokies above and it will still work
Do you know a similar fix when using firefox?
Impaler (EUW)
: u have to add **https://watch.lolesports.com** to the cookiesettings (chrome://settings/content/cookies) under "allow"
I won't allow third-party cookies if that's what this does
iTeaL (EUW)
: Having the same experience. Did you have a problem a week ago, where the site kept getting stuck in a redirect loop? With Firefox it seems to work fine.
Yes I had, but then the time window I had to stop the loop was a lot larger.
ZenosyX (EUW)
: I got the same problem in chrome, so it should not be firefox related. I haven't tested to cancel loading after login though
It worked when I tried it in Edge, so it's at least somewhat a browser related issue. I guess both Firefox and Chrome are affected
Rioter Comments
: Tbh . Your reply is cringy bud. You know that's not fair . Riot give the chat restriction to prevent people from being toxic. it's like a chance to make people talk less . But you now just talking what you don't know about . Tbh, all Emissary's replies are cringe and always get downvoted . idc about your response, I talk with players not with riot's bots
Dude, you don't seem to understand what cringe is, cause the only cringy responses I'm reading are yours. You flamed during your CR, so you got another punishment. Is that so hard to get? Better reform now, cause the next step is a 14d ban followed by perma.
Nídhøgg (EUW)
: I didn't get the 24 chat restriction. This is my 6th account, I already got 5 perma'd. I never got banned until a year ago, where light flame started being really punished. I'm pretty sure back in the day only really hard flame was punished. The only solution is unbinding ENTER, I've tried to reform, I just can't, only takes me a bad day IRL, a fight with my gf, a bad work day and a few bad and uncooperative teammates and I go bananas on them. Also, I don't see this game as VERY toxic, I would say it's mid level toxic, more passive aggressive attitude than actual verbal abuse. I don't know, maybe I'm just an idiot. I play the shotcalling role most often and I'm pretty good with decision making, when I see obvious things that we should be doing and my teammates fail to just listen to me. I snap. I really don't want to get perma'd cause I don't like buying accounts or levelling ALL the way to 30. I don't want it to make me quit League again. Because I know I have potential to get high ELO. I always have high win rates and climb fast.
>I never got banned until a year ago, where light flame started being really punished. I'm pretty sure back in the day only really hard flame was punished. You're right about this one. The reason is that the old tribunal system was extremely inefficient. Only the most extreme cases were even reviewed and even then it somtimes took more than a month until a punishment was issued. Since Riot implemented the current automated system every single report triggers a review of the corresponding game. That way way more flame and even low level toxicity get detected and can trigger punishments. Also the system orients itself on report behavior: If something gets reported more often, it starts to get punished or if it already does it's weighted more heavily. Because of this you can get banned on EUW for something you wouldn't on NA and vice versa. So if you get punished it means that you wrote something the majority of the players wants to be punished. >Also, I don't see this game as VERY toxic, I would say it's mid level toxic, more passive aggressive attitude than actual verbal abuse This may not be extremely toxic but it was still toxic. As I said, in my opinion that's not enough to warrant an instant 14d ban, so you might be able to get your punishment altered to a CR if you ask the support really nicely. If not, I think you can at least get them to explain the reasoning behind this log warranting an instant suspension. The current system is not only faster than the tribunal, it also makes way less errors. However it isn't without fail, so you might get lucky and get the punishment reduced. This game certainly deserves punishment but not an instant suspension. You have to be extremely patient and always stay nice when communicating with the support to even have a chance of that happening, but it's not impossible. If it doesn't get removed, be aware that the system will monitor you much more closely after a 14d ban. Even slight toxicity that normally wouldn't even warrant a CR might be the reason for the permaban because of that. >I play the shotcalling role most often and I'm pretty good with decision making, when I see obvious things that we should be doing and my teammates fail to just listen to me. I snap. Have you tried the tip I gave in my previous post (the one with shouting at your screen instead) already? If that doesn't work, i agree that unbinding your ENTER key may be your only option to stop flaming.
Nídhøgg (EUW)
: Well, I do understand that, but I do think they should come up with a different less harsh penalty system. A straight up 14 day suspension without even maybe a 2 and a 7 day before it, just seems really really harsh to me.
They had that system before the current one. The data gathered during this time indicates that smaller, more numerous steps had next to no impact on the number of ratio of people who reformed to the people who got permabanned. So they got rid of the additional steps to make the system more efficient.
Nídhøgg (EUW)
: That's something I talked about in the post. It's very unrealistic to be 100% civil in a competitive game like League. I don't think they should expect that much from their players. By the way, in case you don't know a lot of the time they skip the vhat restriction waves and just suspended them. I also think they should bring other punishments into the system. Some examples I thought myself of: Perma-Chat restriction, skin suspension (maybe making you unable to use skins you bought for a period of time), maybe some others are possible but I honestly don't recall any right now.
>It's very unrealistic to be 100% civil in a competitive game like League. You don't have to be 100% civil. It takes a lot of toxicity to get punished. >By the way, in case you don't know a lot of the time they skip the vhat restriction waves and just suspended them. An instant suspension doesn't happen unless you say something really bad. Oftentimes a player was chat restricted some time before and just didn't get rehabilited to a lower stage of escalation by the time they are punished again. This can lead to the perception of an instant suspension when in reality it was just the normal escalation of punishment. If neither of those is the case the suspension was possibly an error and can be changed to a CR by the support. However the support is not obligated do so and will likely not help if a player shows toxicity while communicating with them or they perceive it as such (as far as I know; I could be completely off the mark with this one, though). >Perma-Chat restriction They tried that one, it didn't work. People just started trolling more when they couldn't flame anymore. >skin suspension That one would only work on players that purchased skins, punishing paying players harder than non-paying players. Riot wants to have a punishment system that punishes everyone the same, whether they are paying players or not. If you want more information regarding player behavior, you can read up on it in the [player behavior knowledge base](https://en.volu-eu.org/library.php), a collection of information and sources collected by the volunteers.
Nídhøgg (EUW)
: Already did contact support and they told me the chat restriction was an error. I was supposed to get the 14 day suspension straight away. So.. yeah. I'm kind of lost now, got no more games to play, or stuff to do when I'm home for 14 days. Cool. Guess the only solution to stop this from haplening is just stop communicating in-game and having my ENTER key unbind. It's sad that nowadays you get banned for some much less than before.
>It's sad that nowadays you get banned for some much less than before. Well to be honest, you were really toxic in this game. But it doesn't seem enough to warrant an instant 14d ban. Did you get a 25 games CR recently (except the one being issued instead of the 14d ban)? What exactly "recently" means differs based on your played games and your behaviour in those games. >Guess the only solution to stop this from haplening is just stop communicating in-game and having my ENTER key unbind. Or you could stop writing toxic stuff and only communicate when you have something productive or nice to say. You don't seem like someone who enjoys flaming and I think you are able to better yourself. A good rule of thumb here is asking yourself "Does this sound like something a jerk would say?" or "Would I like to get this message from someone else?" If the answer to the first one is "Yes" and/or the answer to the second one is "No," you probably shouldn't write it. I get that you can get frustrated, especially when a team mate is really bad or you are getting flamed yourself. But flaming (back) only increases tension in the team and doesn't help anybody, especially not yourself. Just ignore them (or mute and report them if they flame you) and move on. If you can't do that, insult your computer screen instead. As long as you don't write that stuff you'll be fine. Also personally I find it an even better release to trashtalk idiots aloud than to write the stuff. Edit: spelling, words
Drupu (EUNE)
: Does Riot issue punishments for non-english toxicity?
Yes, they do get banned, but as always it requires someone to report them. I think people are not reporting as much if they don't know what gets written, so it might take a bit longer but in the end they do get punished.
Nídhøgg (EUW)
: 2 Suspensions in a row without NO games between them.. ?
Normally it shouldn't be possible to get 2 punishments with no games in between. I'd suggest you contact the [support](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us) regarding this matter. Always remember to be friendly and patient with the support even if you get an automated message at first to increase your chances of being taken seriously and getting your point across. Edit: spelling
Bl00dAndIce (EUNE)
: Actually it doesn't imply it yet, at least for me. It is possible that he is narrowminded (and probably is) but since he haven't expressed too many opinions yet I am not going to make that concludion. It seems like you haven't even had parents from the way you are behaving. You don't defend someone by trying to insulting and attacking the other person if you want to leave an impression that you are somehow better than them. Anyway i suggest you to go back to your parents, if you don't live with them which might be the case since you are acting like a 12 year old (get those a lot here in lol games) and ask them to re-educate you. They have failed. P.s I would appreciate if you would stop posting here (in this post), at least in this "direction". This is getting seriously off topic.
>It seems like you haven't even had parents from the way you are behaving. You don't defend someone by trying to insulting and attacking the other person if you want to leave an impression that you are somehow better than them. >Anyway i suggest you to go back to your parents, if you don't live with them which might be the case since you are acting like a 12 year old (get those a lot here in lol games) and ask them to re-educate you. They have failed. So are you saying your parents didn't educate you? Because right now you sure make it look like that. You insulted someone who just stated his opinion and can't deal with the backlash when someone does the same to you. I know that what I wrote was insulting, after all I did that on purpose to show you that it's not all that great when you are on the receiving end. I didn't say that your parents failed to educate you because you insulted someone; that would be stupid. I assumed you are an adult capable of deciding for yourself if you want to insult someone but it seems like you don't afford me the same courtesy. So since we are down to making unfavorable assumptions I'll just assume this is because of the tremendous immaturity you have shown throughout this thread, although I don't know if this is because of age or some other reason. >P.s I would appreciate if you would stop posting here (in this post), at least in this "direction". This is getting seriously off topic. This is a public board so you'll get all kinds of answers. Deal with it. If you don't like what I write, you always have the option to just ignore me.
Bl00dAndIce (EUNE)
: First of all I didn't call him narrowmined but hes opinion. Second, it sure seems like you are implying that having an opinion that somebody is narrowminded is a bad thing.... are you able to elaborate on this one? ;)
> First of all I didn't call him narrowmined but hes opinion. Which implies calling him narrowminded. > Second, it sure seems like you are implying that having an opinion that somebody is narrowminded is a bad thing.... are you able to elaborate on this one? ;) If I seriously have to tell you why it's offensive to call someone narrowminded your parents failed their task to educate you.
Bl00dAndIce (EUNE)
: I never said it has to be official stance, i am asking this because i am interested in their stance on this not some people narrowminded opinion (like yours) what is right and wrong.
At least he isn't calling people narrowminded who have a different opinion than himself
Rioter Comments
haxprox (EUW)
: Started like a couple days ago. Why everyone is so toxic?
It get's better as you level up. Most people who are toxic in low level get banned sooner or later, so only a few of those make it in the higher levels. Of course a few people start flaming only after they reached a higher level but the percentage of those flaming is way lower. As dumb as it sounds, just endure it, mute and report them and under no circumstances let yourself get triggered and flame back.
Bartosz (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=WhereAreMyEmotes,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=gvBlh7To,comment-id=0003000000000000,timestamp=2018-06-21T11:44:02.088+0000) > > feeding = inting and i wont get banned for it, as i said multiple times. you dont read often do you xD You sure mate? :)
Oh please tell me he just got banned
: Ummm yeah thats not a credible source. And besides there are countless threads made about players begging for inters to be punished and again nothing is done. There are literally people posting about them inting and destroying games here. Just face it going disco nunu is fine, probably a "bad game" be carefull not to flame the inting troll or you will get permaban on the instant. {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
Regarding the matter of it being a credible source: As Shiwah already pointed out just go check the footnotes. This site is a project by the emmissaries for which they collect and compile information from RIOTs statements. As for the "inters don't get banned" part: Yes they do. It's just that it's incredibly more difficult to determine if someone had a bad game or inted. I'm not talking about the "disco nunu" guys here, they usually don't more than a few games until they get their 14d ban.
Sir Veigar (EUNE)
: I have done that in many games (yes i admit it) and never got punished. I know that it can happen in case of hate speech, such as: (%%%, n-word, f--- your mom, g*y, death threats etc.)
It works with non-extreme bad behavior too. If you got away with it until now, consider yourself lucky.
: is flaming on someone who is intentionally feeding wrong?
Sir Veigar (EUNE)
: To get banned you need at least 20 chat messages and slightly toxic behaviour. You had 39 messages Arguing with your teammates, even though you did not directly harass them, is considered toxic behaviour, especially when you just ignored the mute option. I do not necessarily agree with it, i just tell you what went wrong in your case. And I dont mean to insult you, but the continuous grammar mistakes and misspellings just make your chat history look annoying and encourages people to be negative towards you and report you. Little psychology tip: Make sure you capitalize your sentences and dont make grammatical or dictational mistakes. Write "you" instead of "u". You will make a better impression this way and will be less likely to be flamed on/called toxic/reported. -ICFMJ
As I wrote underneath another of your comments, you don't need to write over 20 messages. Not sure where you got this misinformation from.
: Perma banned for this?
Short answer: Yes. Slightly longer answer: After reviewing the chat logs from Game 1, still yes.
Shiwah (EUW)
: ***
Don't forget racism
: Perma ban just because of one game where i was "toxic" compared to the other hundrets of games
: This has to stop..
Punishment only rarely triggers feedback. They are getting punished nonetheless. [source](http://en.volu-eu.org/library.php)
: i was 14 day about 5 months ago and that day i was tilted and overall im not tilted anymore
And you still wonder why you got a perma? After getting a 14d ban, even calling someone "noob" can result in a perma. Chat like yours is absolutely sure to result in a perma, when you had a 14d ban before. You should've been informed about that in the message you got regarding your 14d ban.
Sir Veigar (EUNE)
: Overall, to get banned you need over 20 chat messages in 1 game and slightly toxic behavior. You had overall quite toxic behavior and: - Game 1: 52 chat messages - Game 2: 54 chat messages Thats more than enough for a ban. Including the constant report calling, flame and toxicity, you are just asking for a ban.
That's partly incorrect: You don't need 20 messages to be able to get punished.If that was the case it'd be pretty stupid. You can write only a single message in the entire game and if that message is flame, you can get punished. For more information on how the systems work and on player behavior in general check out the [player behavior knowledge base](http://en.volu-eu.org/library.php).
: yes its rly easy to point that out when we can't read the blasfemy the others spammed me ;) w/e i go dinner, after ill play one game, and screen from the champion select, just to make things clear of how this game is handled. its complete bs. like ppl get away with get cancer because half the rest of the team says they are right flaming me, and i get banned for answering the, oh yeah i should ignore them, why create a chat in the first place?
As it was already stated numerous times in literally EVERY thread regarding so called "unfair" bans: Context DOES NOT matter. Even if someone else flamed you first, they didn't force you to flame too. You chose to. You could've just muted and reported them but you chose to lower yourself to their level. Only you are responsible for what you write, no one else. That's why context is not important.
Icehood (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=ChaosLlamma,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=EJwKM1qa,comment-id=,timestamp=2017-12-26T19:07:45.471+0000) > > Been honour 0 (very deserved) for months. > Managed to get back to level 1. > Slow grind back up, working on not being a %%%%head. > Just thought i'd share it is possible to get out of 0 How the hell are you still not banned with honor lvl 0, that is what is really ....woah . But yeah good job getting out of 0 I guess .
Simple, it's not Honor 0 that gets you punished but getting a punishment is what gets you to Honor 0.
: I need a rioter right now
Write a ticket to the support. You won't reach Riot here
Mr Kush1 (EUNE)
: I wasn't really really toxic but flammer. i've been tilted from bad players and teasing that's why i flammed. And toxic sometimes :D . I just want to know if i can talk to them and asked for giving back my account.
flaming = toxic behavior
: Writing k-y-s (without "-") in chat and getting banned for 14d without recent restrictions
The new automated systems are superior to the old Tribunal in ***every single*** aspect: They are faster, more thorough and more accurate.
: The problem with the ban system.
And yet another one who complains without knowing anything about the system. 1. There is not only the IFS which bans based on chat logs but also the Feederbuster and the Leaverbuster which analyses ingame patterns to find leaver, trolls and feeders. The problem with that is that in most cases it's really hard to determine if someone was actually feeding and trolling or just having a bad game. 2. The new automated systems are superior to the old Tribunal in ***every single*** aspect. They are faster, more thorough and more accurate.
: good {{sticker:sg-syndra}}
waiting for response from OP like {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
Sadolm (EUW)
: I don't even understand what you're saying or trying to make clear
*****sign*****
guddu001 (EUW)
: id recover
Thanks, now my eyes are bleeding... So, what I think I could distill from that terror attack of a text: You got a perma ban, think you have reformed and want it back? Well if that's the case I'll have to disappoint you. Not under any circumstances will Riot ever lift a permanent ban that was deserved. The only case where they lift a ban is when it was undeserved and the system was at fault.
Pyro997 (EUNE)
: Here is the only chat log in the reasoning of my ban, unedited.: > Game 1 > Pyro997: dude > Pyro997: start at bottom > Pyro997: or dont expect help > Pyro997: thats not how it works fam > Pyro997: comeon > Pyro997: please > Pyro997: dont do this fam > Pyro997: imma help you but i dont think its good idea > Pyro997: WITH WAT > Pyro997: LVL 1 FAM > Pyro997: im gold 2 wtf > Pyro997: yin > Pyro997: ? > Pyro997: wtf is wrong with you %%%got > Pyro997: can you all pls report xin? > Pyro997: open top > Pyro997: im a minion from now on > Pyro997: lol ornn why try so hard? > Pyro997: i told you i gave uo > Pyro997: lol > Pyro997: you won already > Pyro997: our xin is a %%%got troll douche > Pyro997: who flames and all that > Pyro997: man ive had more than enough of this xin > Pyro997: lol? XD > Pyro997: nah dude > Pyro997: youre against s > Pyro997: i only play cuz bot is cool > Pyro997: nsh > Pyro997: nah > Pyro997: you died > Pyro997: just to steal it? > Pyro997: wtf is wrong with you fam? > Pyro997: woah > Pyro997: big answers there fam > Pyro997: you the one trolling fam > Pyro997: LOL > Pyro997: HOLD THE PHONE > Pyro997: HOOOLD THE PHONE > Pyro997: INHUMAN BRAUM > Pyro997: IN HUMAN > Pyro997: WARD > Pyro997: WARD > Pyro997: gtfo %%%gon > Pyro997: bg > Pyro997: report xin for every possible reason > Pyro997: i wasnt trolling > Pyro997: and blaming anyone > Pyro997: you are just an arrogant twat Do you agree with the 2 weeks? Then what is it that deserves only chat bann? i rly dont get it. (still adding the explanation thing here: the inhuman braum thing was a baron steal with his q, we were cool with the guy :D) Still.... I know this is not okay, I just dont think i deserv 2 weeks of ban
Homophobic slur 3 times + heavy blaming. Be happy it wasn't an instant perma.
Fajerk (EUW)
: Is Eloboost allowed?
Depends on how you define Elo-Boosting: * If they play duo with you on an account they created and brought to lvl 30 themselves it's not wanted but at least **tolerated**. * If they play duo with you on an account they bought or brought to lvl 30 by using scripts it's **forbidden**. * If you give them your login data and they play on your account it's **forbidden** too. It doesn't matter if money is involved in that process though. I got this info from another thread in this forum, where a player postet his conversation with the supportabout that matter. I'm too lazy to search for it, but if you want to check go ahead.
: ***
Yes, i do think so. Because as I already wrote non-premade teammates can't know if you are joking with friends. From their perspective you are only an extremely toxic person.
Show more

Lantami

Level 105 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion