: I can, depending on what we agreed upon. For example, if we had a contract in which you lend me your car for 6 months and you then took it back before 6 months passed I can sue for damages caused by lack of access to the car. And in OP's case it is something different. I don't know where OP lives and my knowledge is based in Polish law, but I suspect there are similar institutions elswhere. And probably some EU regulations, I'd have to check for those. So there's this legal concept called "abusive/forbidden contract clauses". It is used for contracts between companies and consumers when the contract uses a pre-made template - like LoL Terms of Service. Clauses in such contracts are not individually negotiated and in certain cases, if they are considered abusive, legal steps can be taken. There are governmental offices that can mete out monterary punishments on corporations using such clauses and in court the judgment will treat abusive clauses as non-binding. If OP were Polish for example, the success of that approach would ride on establishing jurisdiction of a Polish court and then proving that the clauses in the contract are indeed abusive. Right now that would be difficult given how Riot's European branch is located in Ireland. However there are some EU wide laws that'll come into effect in 2018 that will make suing the online services providers in the plaintiff's country much easier.
I’m well aware of abusive clauses but access to Riot’s property (like your account) is a privilege that Riot grants you for free and they can r coke that privilege at will. So I don’t think this could ever be categorized as an abusive clause. Maybe my example was bad so I’ll word it differently : « I will give you a key to my apartment, granting you the privilege to access it any time you want, but I can take that key back/change the lock whenever I want ». This is not a two party contract, it’s different and it has a name I think but I can’t remember it cause I’m shit in legal stuff
: Well, I never said I believed OP stood a chance. I actually do know ToS well enough to be aware of what you've just posted. This doesn't mean I wouldn't like to see OP try and suit Riot. It probably wouldn't be as amusing as Freemen on the Land cases (those are a riot) but there's some potential for hilarity there. And hell, there's even a very small chance that courts question the legality of Riot's chosen model. Online services are still relatively poorly regulated in most countries (law tends to lag behind technology) so with enough persistance and a lawyer well versed in EU consumer protection law it is hypothetically possible, but very improbable, that a case could be made and won. Of course the price of such a legal battle would be pretty high and Riot probably has some decent lawyers at their beck and call... But that's just a part of the "very improbable" thing.
Could be interesting. But most likely would be done in about 5 seconds, if I lend you my car you can’t sue me for taking it back can you?
OzX (EUW)
: Can’t start a game after update
Ok i found a 2014 post saying to press space enter esc and it works. Just wtf
: Good luck, keep us posted about the lawsuit. I'm serious, I'd love to read in details about the proceedings in such case because it would be a sort of precedent maker.
Riot owns all accounts and their contents I believe so even if they were to ban an account without any reason (which probably never happened and never will) you couldn’t say a damn thing
: UPD : THE 1387.7MB FRESH UPDATE I SEE
Good for you I got nothing yet :(
: cant open game. launcher wont start after 8.6 update.
OzX (EUW)
: Can’t start a game after update
I’m currently stuck in a solo training tool game. When I connect to my account it instantly tries to load that game and i get the black screen ...
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=OzX,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=0cK4RanY,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2018-03-19T01:18:40.557+0000) > > True but on the other hand old Kata had a very obvious window in which she could go in and it made her easy to counter. > > She was very much like that indeed, like most assasins. > I’m not saying the old one was flawless (even though I loved her) but I feel like the rework has at least as many issues. I honestly can't think of any assassins other than Akali who's burst is heavily point and click. Rengar maybe, but that's more down to his main damage being an auto attack that than anything. And yes, Kata in this current iteration may have as many issues as old kata, but it's a damn sight better for the game that the feast or famine has been somewhat removed.
{{champion:84}} {{champion:1}} {{champion:28}} {{champion:105}} {{champion:38}} {{champion:121}} {{champion:11}} {{champion:80}} {{champion:107}} {{champion:91}} {{champion:62}} {{champion:238}} Granted some of them are not 100% assasins or have some sort of skill shot that is either impossible to miss or not needed to assassinante. And she still is kinda feast or famine in the sense that she will be super weak if she can’t delete with eqr gunblade and super obnoxious if she can.
: > [{quoted}](name=OzX,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=0cK4RanY,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-03-19T00:35:39.581+0000) > > Old Katarina : go in badly > no kill no reset -> dead -> lost team fight > New Katarina : go in badly > no kill but still get a reset -> dash out -> wait cds -> go in etc etc... > > Litterally the only punishment new kata gets for failing is she doesn’t get a kill. > Her laning phase is also insanely stronger now, although slightly less safe due to the removal of wardhop, which does not force her to outplay or outroam her opponent anymore. > I don’t see how that makes her harder. > > But I see your point, I thought like you at first but I quickly realized that she was not harder, just more boring and frustrating to play as or against. What makes her harder is more that she has a readable zone of threat, as opposed to old Kata's point and click burst. Also, how you described old Kata is textbook feast or famine gameplay, which is actual really unhealthy.
> [{quoted}](name=The7thSeal,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=0cK4RanY,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-03-19T01:10:10.058+0000) > > What makes her harder is more that she has a readable zone of threat, as opposed to old Kata's point and click burst. True but on the other hand old Kata had a very obvious window in which she could go in and it made her easy to counter. > Also, how you described old Kata is textbook feast or famine gameplay, which is actual really unhealthy. She was very much like that indeed, like most assasins. I’m not saying the old one was flawless (even though I loved her) but I feel like the rework has at least as many issues.
Smerk (EUW)
: > Katarina requires skill now, pls revert I fixed your post for you
Old Katarina : go in badly > no kill no reset -> dead -> lost team fight New Katarina : go in badly > no kill but still get a reset -> dash out -> wait cds -> go in etc etc... Litterally the only punishment new kata gets for failing is she doesn’t get a kill. Her laning phase is also insanely stronger now, although slightly less safe due to the removal of wardhop, which does not force her to outplay or outroam her opponent anymore. I don’t see how that makes her harder. But I see your point, I thought like you at first but I quickly realized that she was not harder, just more boring and frustrating to play as or against.
Saljin (EUW)
: lux is not an aa champ so that doesn't even make sense, and he had tri force that gives a huge dmg spike. furthermore the ult has a cooldown where he regens ammo.
I agree Lux’s AA are not supposed to deal damages as she’s not an AA champ and not built like one. Likewise, Corki is an AA champ and built as one so his spells shouldn’t deal damages. Fyi i checked replay and I took about 700 dmg from his ult, doesn’t seem legit for a long range no cd spell that he did not itemize for (aside from Mpen boots).
: Ok, still doesn't make him a hypercarry.
You are right "hypercarry" might have been the wrong word. How do you call a champion that farms his core then proceeds to kill everything?
Shukr4n (EUW)
: well...u give that itemization to corki and use a squishy champ....obviously that s tons of damage.
A long range poking spell that has no cooldown and one auto should never even come close to deleting a squishy, especially when you build DPS items and not burst items. Oh wait statikk IE, in spite of being designed for dps actually give the highest burst in the game... Just for fun btw, for lux to kill someone with 1 E and 1 AA she would need more than 1500 AP with 3 items.
Nolex (EUNE)
: He is so unhealthy in midlane, they should focus him to his roots on adc spot. I played few games in s8 as adc corki and its not bad with press the attack rune.
I kinda like him mid, it fits him better, but he doesn't seem to have any real weakness.
: Hes a midgame champion. You want hypercarries look at vayne tristana kogmaw.
If he can kill them in 1 auto (like he did to me) it won't matter that they have more DPS tho. But you are right "hypercarry" might have been the wrong word. How do you call a champion that farms his core then proceeds to kill everything?
Eveninn (EUW)
: Pretty sure any Crit building champion always has been strong late. <.< While I don't think he is noticable amogst other Crit ADCs (except having a good midgame spike with Tri), he surely can keep up with other lategame DPS Mages (Cass/Azir). I'm not sure if MR itemzation has something to do with it, but I don't see anything wrong with his damage being like any other ADC. (And all crit ADCs I can think of will kill a nodefenses Lux with 2-3 AAs. x3) Apart from his Tri Force spike I never saw him be considered to be strong early though... at least not since his rework.
I think most of his damages are magic now (even from autos). Maybe I'm mistaken on that one, which would actually make things worse because I had zhonyas. Full build adcs will most likely kill a Lux in 2-3 autos (maybe even 1 for Draven if lux doesn't have zhonyas), I've never seen a 3 items ADC kill someone in 1 attack however (especially considering that he was not ahead of me be it in items or levels). On a totally unrelated subject, weren't you some kind of moderator or something here a couple years ago?
Fajerk (EUW)
: In fact Corki is a scaling hyper-carry, and his early game stats are not that "sick".
They are not sick indeed, but they are very decent for an ADC and it makes no sense given his synergy with triforce he should actually have lower base health to make up for the phage rush (while every other ad in the game is forced towards BF or attack speed). That's not really the most important part of my post tho.
: No. A hypercarry has tools that scale into the lategame, stuff like %hp, ever increasing range, bonkers steroids. That Corki was just fed, he still gets outscaled by real hypercarries/
No he was not fed, he had just a bit above average gold before starting to one shot everyone.
Rioter Comments
Doomley (EUW)
: You can't report players who ban champions that you are hovering and there is a good reason for it. You can however, report players who take your role with the first report option. It's one subcategory is "griefing".
Can't report him without going into the game tho. But anyway it would be difficult to punish someone for saying he will do something.
Cryptidian (EUNE)
: Would you prefer LP gain/loss based on individual performance rather than winning/losing games?
No. The only thing that matter in the game is destroying ennemy nexus. However I'd love to see some limitations implemented that check your personal performance vs your team performance. Eg : if you get a >2 kda on 3 games in a row, while your team averages at <0,5 kda you lose less points (like 10-25% less), with other factors too .. afks, warding, objectives ...
: Hey SatomiKun, Although more is always better I personally don't have a lot of issues with the mastery page max because they can be changed within champion select to fit the needs of the champion you have selected. So what I have is 19 mastery pages of most played champions and that one as empty I change around when I do something else. It's more a luxury problem but yes, more is always better #greedy {{summoner:31}}
Same here. Some generic pages, some champion specific pages and the "random" page (that I use in like 80% of my games anyway)
ExpStealer (EUNE)
: Wrong. I get autofilled every day. EVERY day. So, since when is Silver very high ELO? XD
Oh please i got autofîlled maybe 2/3 times. And i play mid/jungle in plat/dia.
Xeoron (EUNE)
: Let the Salt rain on us all! A.K.A. I've met Tank Ekko... AGAIN!!!
Riot made tank items twice as powerful as the others Its not even about ekko...
: WE WANT OLD KATA BACK
I see your point. I main the old kata (500k mastery i think) and was playing at mid/low Diamond level. I was pretty interested in the rework and i was so disappointed When i tried her. I was Playing her like the old one and i got wrecked. I gave it an other shot yesterday and she is not so bad actually. You just need to play her diferently. Only thing i hate is the reduced q range (i m used to the old one so i always fail it rofl) and suppresion of wardhop. Your laning and early game in general is virtually non existant, and if the jungler wants you dead you are dead. Unless you manage to farm under tower which seems hard with a melee assasin that has no instant spell. But after some levels and items she gets really good. I still have no idea about how to use her w tho. You drop something you can dash to but you can only place it on yourself. Imagine an Azir that could dash to his soldiers but cant move them lmao. Oh wait that would actually be a good nerf to this little shit. Tldr : i liked the old Kata more because of wardhop and instant reactions. But the new seems to have more depth and more possibilities so i will probably like her just as much after a couple hundred games.
: Why do so many people hate the plants?
It feels like they added them just to add something. Random effects at random locations does not sound appealing to me but we will see.
: Not anywhere does it say riot suspended his account, which they most probably didn't. The account merely isn't in his possession anymore. The account was lost from his possession due to a bug in the system or a hacker, nothing else. The account was already taken out of his posession before he had any contact with riot.
I think you misunderstood the post. Riot suspended the account because it's fishy to see an account get used again after 5 years of inactivity. The account was taken from his possession by riot because they suspect a fraud. Not by a hacker or a system bug.
Juice (EUNE)
: Nice "algorithm" RioTards
It's normal that you didn't get an S your farm is shit and you have too many deaths. But how on earth did ryze get an S?
Father Tios (EUNE)
: I would say teams can work around random globals, such as drakes.. But something that helps individual players as I've understood these plants would be.. Well.. As I explained in another post, they always will be more beneficial for the other side than the other, and hence it will be hard to play around even for teams. And will set one of the teams in an advantage regardless of their performance. ("You picked x champion that benefits heavily, while the other jungler picked y champion that doesn't benefit in any way.. Sucks for him")
Yeah I agree but in a team you can decide that an objective is too beneficial for an enemy champion in particular and get the buff for yourself. Not because you need it, but because you need to deny from the enemy. A bit like rift with heavy splitpushers
: No, riot did not take away his account. A bug in the game or a hacker took his account. The account was shared between riot and this guy anyways, riot owns EVERY account from before, there is no possible way for them to steal it from someone when it's already in their hands.
In the post he clearly states the he remembered the password so he had access to his account normally like anybody else. So yes riot suspended his account because they suspect a fraud. But they are still the one who "stole" him his account. Even if it's true that riot owns all accounts, it's still a sick move
Hardstuck (EUW)
: 500+ ping for no reason eventhogh my internet is perfectly fine
Happens to me too. Steady 28 ping then all of a sudden steady 1028 ping. It's so weird that it is exactly 1k ping. And it won't go down until I dc/rc :(
: Ghostcrawls opinion on Plants and my opinion of it.
There is already too much "randomness" to league for my taste. One crit, one HP escapes (not random actually but you get my point), drakes, TEAMMATES... That's already a shitload of randomness that can turn a game around without you on your own being able to change it. Those changes seem fine for teams because they can take decisions together according to what spawns. But for soloQ this basic means "play and hope for the best".
: So mid wanted blue
Just say "sorry reflex :-/" Rinse and repeat
Long n Hard (EUNE)
: Match making system is so busted it's sad
End of season is pure bullshit. Last month I had a particularly sad lose streak so I decided to check my teammates kda. Average over 20 games : 2/8. I know kda isn't everything but when teamscore WITHOUT ME is 8/32 in average .. yes it matters. My own kda was bad too (6/4) but I consider it decent for someone facing 10-0 ennemies.
Berisan (EUW)
: And in other games, it's the other way around. That's just how it is. I haven't seen anyone complain about it lately though.
That's not a decent balancing option. Drakes should all give you roughly the same amount of power. Obviously ocean and air are below by a huge margin. Especially ocean is like 200% useless after they olafed it. It's just not fair that a single drake overpowers 2/3 drakes.
Berisan (EUW)
: Like the new Dragons, Riot is adding more _RNG_ elements into the game to **"make every match feel unique"**. They don't want the jungle to be the same every game. Junglers usually have one route that they are following. Every game. (Routes change depending on the Champion, of course.) **Riot doesn't want this kind of repetition in their game and therefore remove the "predictable" elements of the Jungle.**
Yeah and look how it turned out with drakes. You get 2 drakes, 1 air 1 ocean, enemy gets 1, fire. You have twice as many drakes as your enemy yet they are buffed 10 times as much..
XIC Wolf (EUW)
: I quit some time ago so honestly, I shouldnt care. But it makes me sad to see that they are yet again, trying to 'fix' something that isnt broken. They will remove useful buffs and add more rng to the game (again). Nice one Rito :/
"We want to reduce rng so we added random drakes so now even if you have 3 drakes and ennemies have only 1 they still are stronger because fire drake >>> all kthxbye"
: According to Riots description you only have to divide the **duration**, not the damage. Otherwise the description should say something like "reduced effect for..."
It's a DoT so reducing the duration also reduces the damages.
: It's about that time isn't it?
Pretty accurate. My last 50 games have been ruined by a clueless retard fucking the game for one team or the other..
: will they give the lp back do you know ? same thing happend to me too
I got loss prevented 5 min later
: Can't login to EU West servers......
Yayyy thanks rito. I was in loading, couldn't connect to game. Tried to relog, this happens. -> remake = free -20 LP
: Jesus christ man if you're going to use the word literally so much then it should at least be literal. They did not literally steal your account, they didn't give you access to it. Two different things there. And they did not block you from the account for no reason at all. Riot have no way of knowing that the account is yours, and for them to give an account to a person so willy nilly is not an option for a company. The only way for them to know if its yours is if you give proper information, which you haven't, and thus they can't give you the account in case its not actually yours.
But he does not ask for the account. He had his account already and they took it away from him. And they won't give it back because of the lack of details. At least that's how I got it.
: Jesus christ man if you're going to use the word literally so much then it should at least be literal. They did not literally steal your account, they didn't give you access to it. Two different things there. And they did not block you from the account for no reason at all. Riot have no way of knowing that the account is yours, and for them to give an account to a person so willy nilly is not an option for a company. The only way for them to know if its yours is if you give proper information, which you haven't, and thus they can't give you the account in case its not actually yours.
But he does not ask for the account. He had his account already and they took it away from him. And they won't give it back because of the lack of details. At least that's how I got it.
: Connection problems
Happens to me too sometimes. Would like to know.
: Connection problems
Happens to me too sometimes. Would like to know.
: Confusing description in DFT keystone
The number displayed is the total damages over 4 second. You have to divide by 2 and 4 respectively to get damages of Aoe and Dot spells
Rioter Comments
: Not a bug Riven's e can go through created terain which Azir's r is, he created it. She can also go through Anivia's w and J4's r.
No you can't dash over azir wall without getting knocked back. Only blinks can go through (flash, arcane shift, shunpo...)
Player 00 (EUW)
: This is 100% true but as far as I am Gold I learned that what is happening on my lane is my responsibility, and if I lose the lane I have no one but myself to blaim. Keeps me from a lot of frusstration towards my jungler when I finaly realized that jungler is not responsible for my lane losing exept if he came there and purpously fed my opponent(s). Correct me if I am mistaking because I am only Gold tho.
Well this is true for a majority of games. But for a non negligible percentage of games, enemy jungler decides he will fuck you, and he does. And that's fine until you realise that the enemy jungle does that not only to your lane, but on the others 2 as well, while out farming your jungle and getting drakes.
Show more

OzX

Level 164 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion