: check out other forums
Yeah... a google search pretty quickly showed that Meteos has never been unbanned.
SHANi BD (EUW)
: Riots. Behaviour. Not. Players behaviour.
First of all: Never tell your password to anyone. Riot support will *never* ask you for your password. If a support representative *ever* asks for your password, make sure you are on the right site. Now: The problem isn't that they don't believe you are the owner of the credit card. For whatever reason, after you purchased the RP, your bank marked the transaction as fraudulent and Riot by law has to refund that money. **Marking non-fraudulent purchases as fraudulent is a crime, and can result in fines and in some cases, jail time**. If you didn't tell your bank to do this, call them and make find out what happened. Riot doesn't just ban players for the sake of it. They banned you because they were legally required to return money after a purchase, of which you benefited.
Silent Note (EUNE)
: Well this happened...
Eh, this stuff happens. The internet is vague, and people act like brats. It sucks when it happens, but there's not much to be done. Mute people like this and report them if they are harrasing you.
Flenkr (EUW)
: Riot Games is scamming us for real.
It's not really a scam since they announced RP price increase a long time ago.
M3GTRDragon (EUNE)
: Disabling allchat(in aram atleast) was a bad idea
They disabled allchat in ARAM? Or are you just talking about the dog/cat sounds everyone is making?
Thaodin (EUNE)
: How do i report if game prevented me from doing so ?
Yeah, you can make a ticket with [support](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us)
: Perma ban chat instead of account (Idea)
> especially from premade reports that has happened to me Premades don't hold more power than you. A single report does the exact same as 9 reports.
Valmarki (EUW)
: I am not sure I follow your reasoning here. No matter what you call what happened in that game, the point is that two players can effectively pin the other 3 players to the game despite insurmountable score differences. And what does low elo have to do with anything? Wether it happens in challenger or in Iron 4 does not change the fact of what will undeniably happen every now and then.
It's that in low ELO, comebacks are MUCH more likely, as low ELO players don't know how to keep a lead, and end the game while they have it.
RayleighTT (EUNE)
: and if you remove dns cable ??? from router =)) and plug it in and out ?? ??
I assume you mean the Ethernet cable, as there is no such thing as a DNS cable. It'd still look exactly the same as you just cutting the power: No data is being sent to Riots servers, and as such they cannot know if you blue screened, had a power-outage, pulled out the power plug, turned off the PC, or did as you said: Pulled out the ethernet cable. If you plug it in, and re-establish connection, you'd be alright if you werent out for *too* long. How long *too* long is, will probably remain a secret so that players don't intentionally AFK games for that exact amount of time, so as to not get penalized.
: I thought "%%%" results in an instantly harsh punishment??
How the specifics of the '0 tolerance words' work is actually relatively unknown. We just know that they are targeted much more harshly than other toxicity.
RazerX (EUW)
: Yea now Toxic players just choose a different option from the list when they report. At least before RIOT had a stat they could ignore.
But you gotta outweigh the pros against the cons. And Riot deemed that they'd ultimately rather try to filter out false reports (which actually works pretty well for them), rather than suggest to newer players that being unskilled is *actually* a reportable offence.
: Nightblue for example write 2-3 times last week %%% in the chat i bet if i do that 1 time i get an instant ban :') but its fine, tho i got my opinions have a good day sir, and good luck on the rift for u in the future
You can write whatever you want, and if you don't get reported, you'll never get punished. That goes for every player. Nightblue, me and you, and everyone else. But nightblue is playing in a higher ELO than you are. In high ELO players regularly play against eachother, and as such they form friendships. If nightblue wrote something and no one felt like reporting it because they liked him, then he'd get no punishment. That's fair, considering no reports means that no one get say they were offended, which means no one deserves a punishment.
: Warrent's a perma ban?
Did you already have a 14 day ban? If you did, then perhaps you should have actually read the reform card that came with it. You were told that the next punishment would be a permaban. Riot doesn't just punish based on severity of offence, but also consistency. So if you've worked yourself up the punishment ladder to a permaban, you had plenty warnings and chances to reform your behaviour. --- Now if you ***didn't*** already have a 14 day ban (or something similar), then definently contact support. I don't see anything in here that normally warrants an instant permaban. (I only know of 1 player getting actually instantly permabanned, without a 14 day ban, and he was toxic beyond even just homophobia and racism, which you definently aren't in these chatlogs.)
: You have got to be kidding me Riot
> What the actual fart! Whoa there buddy calm the down, no need to get offensive.
Drevorubac (EUNE)
: Nick name change
> refering hitler, morgana freeman, lil vayne, Obviously names reffering to Hitler should be removed when reported, but there's nothing wrong with the other two. I don't know why your name was removed. You'll probably have better luck asking [support](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us) directly. We are just regular players like you, and so have no inside knowledge of why people are punished in certain ways.
Velvenen (EUNE)
: Okey. Thanks. But what conditions? How many players? Office apartment rent? Organization? Hardwere etc.. For example: There is an Office in Dublin. Are there more players in Ireland than in Ukraine?
First you have to consider if it's even needed. Ukraine already has Russia, EUNE and EUW to connect to without too many major hiccups, I would assume due to their proximity to these servers. Then consider how many players there actually could even make use of the server. Any neighboring countries who is already connected to EUW, EUNE or Russia, probably wont make much use of. Switching over would provide only a minor improvement. And then there's cost. This depends on the country. Servers are EXTREMELY expensive to run, and if there isn't the right infrastructure for the servers to run, and for the clients to effeciently make use of the servers, they become much more expensive. I don't know about the hardware, but it's not cheap in any capacity.
Velvenen (EUNE)
: Ukraine Localozation
There probably just aren't enough Ukranian players to warrant an entirely new server dedicated to them. I have no clue about the infrastructure in Ukraine, but that's a major factor as well. There is however a Russian server, but I won't pretend to know if it's of any use to you.
: A team full of bots!
It's definently not fun, but it's the sad nature of f2p games like League. If you ban them, they'll just make new accounts. And you can't just ban them as soon as they're discovered, because this would mean that bot creators have an easy time figuring out exactly what got them detected. Then they'll just rewrite some of the behavior and it'll be harder for Riot to ban them in the future. So Riot intentionally doesn't ban them right away. They ban them in waves so that bot creators can't just see when and why they were detected. Keep on reporting, and it'll get better as you go up in levels.
MrYusak (EUW)
: It happens almost always when i buy or sell an item ( or even both at the time ) and close the shop fastly. Then ( when I'm going out of respawn ) I realise that all the items i bought are not in my equipment and the gold i spent is back, and all the items i sold are back in my equipment and the gold i got for them disappears. I'm sure that I'm not doing this, because i'm always awake when use UNDO option :) It happens to me ( let's say ) around once/twice a game. You should try it yourself, i'm 90% sure it will work when u try it.
Huh, yeah that's definently a bug. Weird that they haven't fixed it yet.
MrYusak (EUW)
: AUTO UNBUY & UNSELL
What do you mean by 'Auto-unsell'? I can't say that I've ever had something just unsell itself.
Wandalf3 (EUNE)
: Is there a way to disable auto reinstallation of updates
It only ever does that when it detects that something essential to playing has gone wrong, and it needs to repair. Riot doesn't just give you updates for the sake of it! :)
KokOnBush (EUW)
: New to this game, got camped by smurfs and got reported by my smuf team, now banned
I *almost* believed you. Too bad that OP.GG saves a map over where you die, and at what times. For example, you died at minute 3. Under enemy tower. In mid lane. You did the same a 5 minutes, untill you went top to die under enemy tower once again, less than a minute after dying in mid. Shame, you also died to the enemy tower, 0 minutes in. Considering you also sold all your items at 4 minutes (including pots) to buy boots, and then mobies, it's obvious that you knew what you were doing. Even more so, considering that you've never even built mobies before. So it's pretty obvious that you're not a new player. You have a lot of knowledge of the game, looking at your match history. --- Better luck next time.
Shamose (EUW)
: Yeah dude. That streamer with the name close to a champion plays ~900 games every season only when Riot tells him he's broken.
I also don't get why Riot would tell him that Yasuo is broken, like he isn't capable of reading the patch-notes himself.
Èclair (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=RallerenP,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=6hToAyNN,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-02-05T20:42:16.812+0000) > > I often see posts of players actually wondering why they got punished, and someone just responds 'nice to see the system is working' or 'I hope you get permabanned' I refuse to believe people who post chat logs with stuff like _"you should kill yourself for stealing me blu"_ are genuinely wondering why they were banned. The required brain capacity to make such connection is actually lower than to remember how to properly defecate. The question _"Rito why"_ isn't asked to know how IFS works but to display their displeasure with the fact that wishing somebody's death over a video game isn't consequence-free. Some people are way too smug when presenting chat logs leaking with vile shit and they usually retaliate anyway when replying to comments like that.
> I refuse to believe people who post chat logs with stuff like "you should kill yourself for stealing me blu" are genuinely wondering why they were banned. The required brain capacity to make such connection is actually lower than to remember how to properly defecate. Of course there'll be players like this. I still think that even in these cases we should just either ignore it, or just provide a simple explanation. But most posts are from players that are expressing displeasure AND is genuienly not seeing what was so toxic about their behavior. Simply explaining it in a non-hostile way and being patient with the person has the best chance of calming them down and then they might actually realize what they did wrong. Of course not everyone will be like that, but I think we should atleast still try.
: In any language that has no mechanism to combine words to arbitrary large length or where this is basically only used to a certain length, the set of words is finite and so is the set of combinations to a certain practical length, whether it is feasible to save them all is a different matter. But since there are certain rules to combinations (grammar), there is basically no need to save them all, just stems and combination rules. And actually just banning a few words solves already 90% of the problem. Nobody writes elaborate sentences to insult someone, 90% of the time it is one word or that one word characterizes the whole insulting phrase. You can basically never solve a problem 100%, trying to archieve a 100% catch rate is probably the worst approach you can have, since this would almost certainly trap many innocent ppl in your net. No, the idea is to take the most practical, most precise method to identify the worst cases of toxicity. And a simple stem list does it, and btw. even neural networks need feature lists and often work with the bag of words approach. When it's about the problem that ppl want the list to try and avoid it but still be toxic, then that is one argument against riot compiling and publishing such a list.
I think we're almost on the same wavelength here. I fully agree that if such a list could be made, it shouldn't be published. We are just arguing semantics about whether or not a list *can* actually be made. Sure, if everyone adhered by the same grammar rules and such, the list would be very small. But you don't have to adhere by grammar when you're toxic. So I am 100% convinced that there is an unending amount of ways you can be toxic. Once you *think* you've listed them all, someone will just come along with something new to add, and the process repeats.
: At the end of the day it comes down to intent, and there is no automated system in the world that can correctly identify a person's intent with 100% accuracy. It's just not possible.
Great point. Even humans often have trouble with discerning intent behind text. It's just too vague. But that doesn't mean we should stop trying :) --- The point of the system Riot has isn't to be 100% accurate, but to be accurate enough. (And it's surprisingly good. Initial analysis of the system showed that only 1 in 6000 cases was a false positive.) We have to recognize that nothing will ever have a 100% success rate. But a computer can get VERY close (or even better) than a human at detecting toxicity. The point of my post is to make people aware of why making a filter/list based system just isn't going work, and I present the alternative which Riot is currently using.
Haze97 (EUW)
: I didn't lol. Somebody else did and I would be pissed at it if I were in this guy's place. Trolling is still trolling however, and if he wanted to play adc he should have gone bot lane instead. Ironically in the second match he picked Caitlyn instead and you can refer to the second pic for his first words. Some people are here to ruin other's time and I don't regret losing 3 LP in place of 22 on that account.
Ah, ok. Then I fully agree with you that he's just an ass, and not you.
: 3rd Party Overlay Program
You might want to ask [Riot Support](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us) directly. It's a tough question actually, because any third party software would be 'use at your own risk'. As long as it's only information that you can actively see, like your own HUD you *may* be fine. But anything like tracking enemy cooldowns something like that which you *could* calculate yourself, is a no go. If you want to do that, calculate the time manually, and then write it in chat or something. I'd say ask support. If they tell just tell you that it's 'use at your own risk', I'd play it safe and just not use it.
Haze97 (EUW)
: RIot has the best moderation system in the world.
Well, did you ban his champion? I'm not saying that what he did was right, but there's nothing inherently wrong with playing MF top. The rules are that as long as others can't dictate what you play, you also don't get to dictate what others play. It's fine to want to play by the meta, but don't force others to go by the same rules :/ --- In the end, while I agree that what that player did was worse than what you did, what you did was also quite bad.
Evidence (EUNE)
: I like ur idea,hope riot sees this :)
Thanks, but I'm not actually proposing a change, sorry. I often see posts suggesting that Riot could just release a list over what is toxic. My post is explaining why such a list would be impossible :/ The system Riot actually uses at the moment, is also the system I would personally use if it was up to me. It's such a great idea, but it's a shame that we just aren't good enough at utilizing the technology to it's full extent!
: Wait, what, sry, but stopped in the middle. First such a list would be finite, 2nd such a list would be used by machines, which could easily detect variations, for human review a comprehended list of the stems would be sufficient, 3rd more complex interactions are often not required, but could be in theory tested for. But all aside the logic flaws, what is the point of this post, after half this block of text, i still dont get what you're going at, from the end i take, you are against Riot publishing such a list? If it is for technical reasons, then i would disagree, it would be technically possible. Personally, i think it is just something that isn't rly necessary, we all know, what insults and slurs are, it's no secret...
You may be correct in stating that simple variations on the single words (i.e. 'Pizza' and 'Pízza') wouldn't be infinite. But certainly a list of sentences that needed to get banned *would* be infinite. > 3rd more complex interactions are often not required, but could be in theory tested for. With something as complex as toxicity, you cannot simply ban a few words and call it a day. Toxicity is WAAAY more than just a couple of words or sentences (although it *can* come in those forms aswell, it's often not). So we *have* to test for these complex interactions. And if you want to do it by making a list of possible phrases of, going back to the example, ways to describe eating pizza, then it would be infinite (whether or not it's *actually* infinite is up for debate, but the point is that such a list would be too long to actually put together or even get any use of). > i still dont get what you're going at, from the end i take, you are against Riot publishing such a list? I understand :) My post actually went in the direction the technical reasons why Riot cannot possible make such a list. Then it went into the system Riot is currently using, a neural network. Finally, I ranted a bit about how I see alot of rude pricks that explain things like they are superior to the person they are talking to. (I certainly hope you don't get that vibe from me! :))
: How about not talking about fast food in an online game? That's how I avoid being flagged.
As I stated, this wierd company actually don't have a problem with talking about fast food. They just don't like people talking about *eating* fast food. Sure, that's how you avoid getting banned. But if you ban saying specific words like 'Pizza', you'd still end up with a ton of problems. Not just that people can no longer generally talk about pizza, or say any words associated with it, but people can still just tack on random letters to the words, and suddenly they still show up.
Rioter Comments
: Riot should add a list to let you know what counts as toxic or abusive
# very long post tl;dr at the bottom Ok. Let's make a list. This will be a list over words that will be banned in a hypothetical game. 1. Pizza 2. Hamburger 3. Fries Great. Our list, while bad, is now complete. But wait. What happens when someone then writes '*Pízza*'? Oh well, we'll just add it to our list 1. Pizza 2. Pízza 3. Hamburger 4. Fries Hmm. But now someone could just 'Pizzza', right? Ok, say that somehow we can manage to know every single variation of the word 'Pizza'. Of course, we'd also have to know every other variation of every other word on our list. So: 1. Pizza, etc.. 2. Hamburger, etc.. 3. Fries, etc.. Now this list is already unusable. There'd be a thousand different variations of each word. And what if we branch out. In hypothethical game, we actually don't care about people that say's Pizza. It's OK, Pizza isn't inherently offensive to us. It's *eating* pizza that is the problem. So would the list now look like this? 1. I like to eat pizza 2. I like to eat hamburgers 3. I like to eat fries But people could just phrase it differently i.e. '*I enjoy consuming pizza*'. Ok, so we figure out all the different variations of sentences you can use to describe eating pizza. 1. I like to eat pizza, etc.. 2. I like to eat hamburgers, etc.. 3. I like to eat fries, etc.. So now the list actually may be unending, because there could theoretically be a unending amount of ways to say these things. Oh, and you also have to avoid every singe variation of every single word in these sentences. Ok, lets say that you can magically do this. You've found out a way to list every single combination of phrases, including every variation of every word. What happens when someone says 'I like to eat pizza' and someone else responds 'me too!'? You'd need a list of all phrases describing eating pizza, with all possible variations of words used in those sentences, and all variations of all responses that would indicate that you agree with that sentiment of enjoying pizza, including all variations of words to possibly use in those sentences. Ok, you have that. You have the list. The extreme, infinite list of banned things. (Funny thought really, since the amount of banned things to say is infinite, there are as many banned things, as there are allowed things) What happens when the chatlog looks like this: > PizzaHater34: Wow, I really hate pizza > PizzaLover12: I like to eat pizza No problem, right? Well, now 'AgreeMan34' chimes in: > AgreeMan34: Me too! What is he agreeing to? There isn't actually a way to know. Do you punish for this deplorable act, or not? Ok, let's just say that you have godly powers (which you have, since you've made an infinite list, know every variation of the phrase '*I like to eat pizza*' and every possible variant of the words in that sentence). You make a list that also have perfectly maps every response to every sentence. No one else can read it. It's infinitely long. So you summarize it. The general idea is: Don't advocate eating junk-food. A couple of weeks later, someone write on your forum: "You should really make a list of what can be punished". --- This is the problem developers have been facing since the dawn of times. Censorship in games %%%%ing sucks. You cannot make a list. You and I know exactly what not advocating eating junk food is like. But computers are deterministic. They don't know. But we can teach them. You and I are pattern finding geniuses. We are experts in the field. We do it impressively well, literally before we are born. When we see a phrase saying: "I enjoy consuming pizza", we KNOW what it's about. Even if we had NEVER seen that exact phrase before, we know what it means. That's because we are pattern finding experts. We can from our past experiences determine what that phrase means. And only because our brains work so well, can we know what each word means, and dynamically create an understanding of the sentence. A computer *can* actually do that aswell. You teach it. The principle can be called 'machine learning'. Riot actually employs a subgenre of machine learning: Neural Networks. They function almost as our brains does, but they are initially empty. You feed the computer data. You show it an example of someone saying they enjoy pizza. Then one more. Do this for as long as you can, but you don't need to give it an infinite list. Also give it list of data with examples of someone NOT saying that they enjoy pizza. The computer will now be able to take in an input (i.e. '*I like pizza*'), and determine whether or not that input is actually advocating eating pizza. Riots algorithm works on this principle (Although, I have MASSIVELY simplified it, there are MANY more variables than the ones I mentioned), but it works with toxicity. It can actually do all the things you can't make a list of. The data Riot uses for it's algorithm comes from reports (although, a single report wont significantly affect it in ANY way to prevent false reports from clogging it up). That way, if something *becomes* offensive, when it previously wasn't, the algorithm can instantly respond. But a side effect of this is that, just like you can't possibly make a list, the computer can't either. # TL;DR no. they cant
: Trying to 1v9 game as support always pulls permaban what can i say more LAME COMPANY
> guess till that day be ready i just need to find good vpn Riot doesn't track your IP, which is the one thing a VPN hides.
RallerenP (EUW)
: You literally just proved his point lol. You answered his toxicity with your own, and it just escalated from him calling you sensitive, to you telling him that you hope he dies. And your comparison to real life doesn't work. In real life if you punch someone in the face they might be dettered. But this is online. You're not scary. You're not intimidating. You aren't dettering ANYONE through words on a screen. You're quite literally JUST escalating the situation. What if you had just ignored him calling you sensitive. Just stopped replying at that point? Then the situation wouldn't have escalated.
You're trying to tell me that 'I hope you die' is a resonable response? It's not. Your comment got removed because it was no question toxic. ImainLilSatan is *really* standing on the line. I agree he's toxic, but you escalated it even further. --- On another note, I havent report any of your comments, but starting up old threads is against the rules. Just wanted to make that clear, so you probably should respond to my comment. You can start a new thread if you want, but I wont be replying any more.
Avinychus (EUW)
: How does it work?
To build upon what TheToysTracker said, it's not actually always 6 months. The time it takes varies from case to case. This is because no 2 cases are exactly the same, and because it avoids people gaming the system. But just keep positive and you'll never have to worry about. Instead of typing anything negative, just type nothing :)
JuiceBoxP (EUNE)
: Changing your IP address is easier than brushing your teeth before bed. give me a break, The only reason he couldn't play not in secret is because if he'd stream they would see that it's him under a different name and he plays the game for a living. there's no point for him to play it if you he don't stream and make money off it.
I find it funny that you are rational enough to know this, yet not rational enough to know that you cannot track smurfs without accidentally affecting innocent players. Also, the amount of Diamond players is already EXTREMELY low. While the amount of Silver players is extremely high. The chances of you getting an actual Diamond smurf in your game, especially on a regular basis, are astronomical. To suggest that smurfing is part of what keeps you down in Silver is just unfounded.
N o (EUW)
: Saying "Ez"/"Easy" at the end of a game
> At last: In my humble opinion - as a player, who plays since this game exists, and who has been banned during Season 1-4 for being toxic - people should get an instant and hard punishment for saying something like this. I made it to get a grip and be a respectful, nice and calm player, always respecting my opponent, maybe fooling around with them a bit, but always keeping the respect up. I mean, I agree that it's negative and should get punished to a certain degree, I don't agree that it should be an instant punishment. The way they are handling it now is that while it'll never get someone punished on it's own, it can *contribute* ever so slightly to a punishment. Which is think appropriate. If you get overly offended, then you are taking it too personal. It's often not about disrespecting your opponents, but just having fun with your teammates. Rarely does anyone mean anymore than some light BM with it. This effect is ofcourse multiplied in URF where having fun and friendly BMing takes focus over anything else.
: ***
You literally just proved his point lol. You answered his toxicity with your own, and it just escalated from him calling you sensitive, to you telling him that you hope he dies. And your comparison to real life doesn't work. In real life if you punch someone in the face they might be dettered. But this is online. You're not scary. You're not intimidating. You aren't dettering ANYONE through words on a screen. You're quite literally JUST escalating the situation. What if you had just ignored him calling you sensitive. Just stopped replying at that point? Then the situation wouldn't have escalated.
Gsummon (EUW)
: Greetings Christien, giving my account's name and password is not allowed ,i know that. but it was under my roof, in my own personal computer.I wasn't aware of the circumstances Cordially yours
Thats still acount sharing. Which is still against the rules.
: I can go and spread the information. It's YOUR responsibility to check whether the source is credible or not and it's up to you to decide whether you believe it or not.
You have to be trolling man. It's just as much my responsibility to check whether the source is credible, (which I already did), as it is YOUR responsibility to provide evidence for your claims (which you didn't).
: I am the source.
Then you might as well be making it up. Don't go spreading information you can't provide any form of verification for, when you're not a trustworthy source.
: Actually using the f-word and the n-word would have been way worse. K y s doesn't get you banned as easily as those words.
I'm going to need a source for that
: Do I understand that right, people want to go on a "play strike" because some other players got basically free skins? This is petty jealousy in hyper drive mode lmfao. Ever considered to be HAPPY for those who got some nice skins? Wouldn't YOU be happy about getting some? It's not like someone stole from you. And don't come at me with "BuT iT RuInS vAlUE". No it doesn't this isn't the stock market, you can't sell your skins. If you complain about fortunate events happening to others you trully live a sad life. And no i didn't exploit the glitch I'm just not a miserable human being.
I imagine that these guys are the same that complain when others win the lottery. Some players were just at the right place at the right time. Riot stated that many regions had fewer than 100 players abusing the bug. Even if we are generous and assume that 300 players from each server were able to take heavy advantage of the bug, that's still only 0.00005% of the **monthly** active players from **2014**. The chances of ever meeting anyone with playing with a skin they got from this bug are astronomically low.
Vegito101 (EUNE)
: Program banning
Actually, some human behaviour isn't really that hard to classify. Toxicity in chat is really easy to work with. You have few factors to account for and it's relatively easy to process. Riot bases it's punishment system around what is being reported. So when trends shift and new things are found culturally inappropriate, Riot doesn't have to manually define that. The system is actually quite successful in that regard, and rarely gives false positives. Meaning almost no one gets unfairly punished. The few that are actually unfairly punished, can be dealt with via support and manual overrulings. I don't think the system is as bad as you think, it's just that you don't understand it. It doesn't look for who started it, or if you were being flamed back. It just looks at your chat a decides if what you wrote is toxic. It's really simple. Don't be toxic and you don't get punished. You're also missing the entire point of the system being automatic. There just aren't enough human resources to review all reports. Imagine if Riot had to look at every, single report being made. That's insane. Even hiring a thousand people to do it non stop, would still not be able to keep up with the amount of reports.
PH45 (EUNE)
: Stop lying to yourself :)
He is absolutely just trolling you man
Vytautis (EUNE)
: Is there a way to get a person insta permabanned when he says in chat....
Nope. That's just not how it works, sorry. You'll just have to report them normally. But LeaverBuster can definently still figure out if a person is AFK if all they're doing is standing in base.
: > [{quoted}](name=RallerenP,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=RiX8JnRE,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-12-26T23:57:20.680+0000) > > Lol this is a public forum and you are just spamming. > > This isn't the place to report anyone. Contact support, contact Battlefy admins. Spamming?. he just opened a thread about a problem.
lol you forgot to switch accounts
: ***
Lol this is a public forum and you are just spamming. This isn't the place to report anyone. Contact support, contact Battlefy admins.
Show more

RallerenP

Level 50 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion