: i like maths so i will do this per equation : ( to riven : http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Riven )(dec. 15 2018) i will ignore runes in my calc and add comments regarding that while i am going -> riven base hp : 558.48 riven hp per lvl : 86 black cleaver hp : 400 lets say your lvl = x 558.48+400+86(x) = 1600 #equation for riven hp based on lvl = 1600 958.48+86(x) = 1600 86(x) = 641.52 x = 7.4595 since i ignored runes which can also give hp i should round this down to lvl 7 however i am certain that you rounded your hp(1600) down to begin with and you picked armor and not hp runes .. so lets round it up instead to lvl 8 .. so lets save : riven lvl 8 . if kled has only titanic and has 3.1k hp he needs to be (and here comes the problem) : lvl 14 ... here is my calc for kled since it is a weird result : (all info came from http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Kled )(dec. 15 2018) kled base hp = 400+60lvl kled passiv = 340+70(lvl-1)(0.7025+0.0175(lvl-1)) titanic hp = 450 so kleds hp = (400+340+450 #flat hp)+(60lvl #base hp scaling)+(70(lvl-1)(0.7025+0.0175(lvl-1)) #shield passiv scaling) you can rewrite that into : 1.225(x-1)²+49.175(x-1)+60(x)+1190=3100, where x is kleds lvl you can simplify the expresion into : 1.225(x-1)²+49.175(x)-49.175+60(x)+1190=3100|then(a+b)²=a²+2ab+b²|so : 1.225(x² - 2x + 1) + 49.175(x) - 49.175 +60(x) + 1190 = 1.225(x)² + 106.725(x) + 1142.05 and this all is equal to 3100 hp so: 1.225(x)² + 106.725(x) + 1142.05 =3100 which is equivalent to : 1.225(x)² + 106.725(x) - 1957.95 = 0 | /1.225 x² + (106.725/1.225)(x) - (1957.95/1.225) = 0 and now pq formula -> x1,x2 = - (p/2) +- ((p/2)² - q)^(1/2) if you give that into your calculator you get (rounded to the 4th digit after '.' ) x1 = - 103.0175 which you ignore since our x can only be between 1 and 18 ([1;18] U IN) x2=15.8951 which you must round down since we ignored runes etc .. but even so he would have to be lvl **14 at least !** so lets save : kled lvl >= 14 a lvl 8 riven can / should never be able / allowed to win against a lvl 14 kled in a fair fight .. most likely you gave wrong informations about your situation regarding the riven vs kled matchup or the league wiki is wrong or i did a grave mistake in my calc which shouldnt be the case (i dare you to find it if it is there) conclusion .. lvl 8 riven looses to lvl 14 kled .. totaly ballanced i can not say anything more based on my calcs ..
I found a mistake! You didn't think there was something wrong with lvl 14 kled only having titanic. OP is obviously crying hard and can't read the numbers right.
kiel453 (EUNE)
: Is Threhs a good OTP!?
Yes and no. I'd say he's a pretty popular pick in support, and hence often banned when there's nothing better to ban, but in higher ELO I guess not many people afford to ban him. He's a reliable pick, always among the better supports I'd say.
: Or I just switch my focus to different game. Flaming is a problem, but more annoying is the just plain...well...blindness or oblivious actions I see in game. That said, it's still better than straight out trolling("Staying nearby and letting the allies die, then go in solo and die yourself. Afk farming in jungle never helping anyone, despite all lanes being hardcore pushed in. Refusing to even walk in a direction of a person just because he is 4/0 while you're 0/1. Those kinds of things). The won games were won due to a 1) Troll in enemy team or 2) Afk.
Sure, that's fine too :) some people just aren't made for multiplayer games; League is A LOT more fun with friends and bullshittery than when you're being solo competitive. I'd much rather enjoy a good singleplayer rpg and finding out what's op and not than stress over not getting gold or that one lane losing. Sure, it's annoying, but if it is there's always better things to do. Can't wait for nexus blitz 2.
: 10 games trolling
I would like to see this "trolling", since I hardly ever come accross actual trolls and not just people throwing their lane/jungle/role that one game. And no, I haven't payed for rp in years. Also, I happen to see flamers a lot more often, I guess you could say flaming (or worse) is a way bigger problem and that you're part of it. Either way, you just go and enjoy leveling a new account if you can't accept that the internet will never (ever) be perfectly to your liking (especially in videogames).
Gabresol (EUW)
: Just a little idea I had about punishments I want to get some opinions on.
You could also argue that flamers are naturally at a disatvantage because of the amount of time they spend looking at chat instead of the game, but I'll put that aside. While it's clear that you could do this without the explanation, I think this might actually make people think more seriously about how they behave in game. Then again, they'll always be arguing that they're only doing it because of trolls and such not getting banned, but that's nothing new...
Nojima (EUNE)
: thats called time conzuming,which is every companys goal,so ofc no ones a moron to waist time on this projhect
the 1000th win rioter game is a tradition that actually happens sometime. This text is spiced with memes (I assume) but still...
: banned for 1 game without warning
N-word, f-word, r-word, k-word. Damn, it's hard to think you WEREN'T TRYING to get banned. Usually this is met with a 14 day suspension, but this honestly deserves a ban too. Go play cod or something.
: EU
If nothing else I want at least raw data and statistics on how EUW fares compared to other servers and their explanation for why it seems like we draw the short one.
: My history is free. My last game had 1 10 troll teemo again. That was premade with troll Malphite. Another lost ranked cause Riot matched me with lows as I said 100 times. Enough said bb.
That's like me saying that because I tossed a coin 5 times and got tails 5/5 times that it's magic/weighed. You just need something to whine over to de-stress, but you aren't doing yourself any favors {{sticker:sg-lulu}}
: Then you can't prove anything. {{sticker:cass-cry}}
Neither can you {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}} have fun
: I'm already playing good. {{sticker:sg-ahri-2}}
Then you're lying {{sticker:sg-lulu}} In all seriousness though, you sound delusional. Get a grip of yourself.
: Try to %%%%in lose me another ranked game %%%%y Riot. I dare you.
You'll get matched with better players when you start playing better {{sticker:sg-ahri-2}}
: can u tell me how to do it exactly ? i'm really confused and i dont know where to go
Here https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us
Chùos (EUW)
: unfair ban
"Cool guys" I bet you call gals whores for not dating you because of a dp you sent them
hmm (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=RewardWanted,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WQqfFlEl,comment-id=00000000000000010000,timestamp=2018-11-08T08:18:03.031+0000) > > League of legends, with their post-ban messages. Example: http://i.imgur.com/tYTTb8n.png League of legends claims 5% of players get a 10 game chat restrict, that's one in 20. Let's also say that the punishment system is perfect, that'd still leave one in twenty people flaming - a minority. But okay, let's be "real" and say that 50% of people flame, not a minority; It'd have to catch only one in 10 flamers then (very unreal, but you make of it what you will, I make of it that riot is very mild with flamers and that the majority of the playerbase don't flame, this is only for the 50% line, far from a sizeable majority). > Let me help you and show what a quality statement looks like: The majority of players has flamed and didn't get banned. > As is obvious my statement reflects reality. I really don't know what inspires the wierd imagination behind basically everything you say So the obvious conclusion is that 90%+ of players flame and the 5% worst of them receive a chat restriction. > Let me rephrase: Players don't even know they're being put at a disadvantage until they've sunk in considerable time into the game. New players aren't inherently flamers. It's not about knowing but interpreting. If jungler does a fail gank somewhere, or don't gank at all etc etc. the laner may interpret it that the jungler put him at a disadvantage. Such an interpretation triggers anger. To vent anger the player trolls, flames or signals that he is not interested to help back which is truly disadvantageous in a team based game. > Correlation doesn't always mean causation. More people can be "trolling" and less people flaming because more people see the game as casual; in this case, the same people _could potentially_ be the flamer and troller, but definitively not exclusive to them. I personally don't think people are transitioning more to trolling, I've actually seen a decrease in real hardcore flame. > If you wanna keep persuing this argument, you're gonna need to give me some proof; since the proof needs to be provided by the person making the affirmitive claim (or else I can just say there's no proof of what you're saying and disprove it as is). How about I call it a hypothesis? Then I provide information without needing to prove anything. The motivation for this hypothesis is my own observation of an increase in trolling and giving up. The theoretical explanation/argument for this observation is that when people aren't flaming, and anger is an emotion that needs expression, naturally they are expressing their anger by punishing their team in non verbal ways. I think this is a good hypothesis. Therefore I post it. > Oh, sorry, since you claimed I'm stupid, 1035480342572340x 0 is still 0. So if you have x=200/1035480342572340=1.9314708e-13 IQ then I got 200 IQ because 1.9314708e-13*1035480342572340 = 200. > That's kinda how the mmr works, if your mmr falls you're matched with people of the same mmr as your new fallen mmr. You wanting to make people constantly losing match with losing teammates would make a extremely unfriendly downspiral system that would probably make people even more toxic and likely to troll. At least I'd imagine it would. I think this is how the matchmaking system currently is. If the system recognizes you are bad due to losing some matches (which ofc happens to randomly getting trolls) then the system matches you with trolls and feeders to place you where it thinks you belong. > > I.e. if you go 0/14 for x% of games the system will only match you with trolls/feeders. Riot doesn't do that because of values. Wow that's exactly how I think rito matchmaking works. How do you know it doesnt do that?
You are really stubbornly trying to pass a point and not actually making arguments for it past "this is how I feel, hence it must be true, and you're stupid, basically". I'd keep arguing, but I see this conversation isn't productive for either of us, so toodles.
Master Mid (EUNE)
: Account suspension For what?
If you got a 14 day suspension for boosting it was probably because of the system finding some trait marks on your account for it, like frequent IP switching to distant locations, sudden mmr incline, change of champion pool, and even if flash is on f or d for instance. I'd speculate more, but I'd like to see a screenshot of the message.
ieruY (EUNE)
: The average player doesn't speak english to flame in chat.
Popular foreign curses are picked up as well, you see it in lots of chat logs shared here, if memory serves right.
: Maybe to ban the inters and trolls instantly and not after months?
And how do you achieve that? If there is a delay, it's not because riot feels like it, it's because the system needs that long
Kaimetsú (EUW)
: Should riot make a “League App”
Don't think it's that great. Maybe chat would be nice and might drive up champ and skin sales a bit, but doubt it overall.
hmm (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=RewardWanted,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=WQqfFlEl,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2018-11-07T17:54:14.659+0000) > > Riot would disagree with you, claiming that only a vast minority of players ever get punished more than once for flaming. In fact a very low percentage of players ever get a perma ban (single digits, exclusively for flaming, I'd imagine it maybe reacing 10% when accounting for 3rd party program usage and account sharing). Where do you get these numbers from? I hear about people getting chat restricted all the time. Most of my friends have been chat restricted before. I see flamers in most games as well. > Flamers usually begin flaming when they start understanding the game on a basic level, usually in a very self-centered way. You can argue all you want that everyone flames, but if they did then the majority of the player base would be banned, _I don't think I have to say that it clearly isn't the case, but I'll say it anyways._ Everything you say is basically a load of !"#@ lul. Flamers start to flame for example when they interpret that other players are putting them at a disadvantage. You say yourself that fewer people get banned than people get flamed. Then later you conclude that if everyone flamed everyone would be banned. Can you also see now that your logical reasoning isn't very impressive? Let me help you and show what a quality statement looks like: The majority of players has flamed and didn't get banned. As is obvious my statement reflects reality. I really don't know what inspires the wierd imagination behind basically everything you say {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}} > > I'm not defending trollers in any way, I'm simply not saying that because there's trollers flame should be glossed over as well (wich it already is! You probably won't ever get banned for flaming in the sense of "Bot is bad feeding" or "Omg this Vayne", but in the sense of using certain words that you'd really use only in places where you know you won't get stared at for saying it). Ironically enough, I can't remember the last time I encountered a genuine troll, **_and I play in low silver/high bronze/normals, so that should tell you something_**. Let me help you to think lulz. I claimed that decrease in flaming --> increase in trolling. Then it makes little sense to point out that we should decrease flaming still. Perhaps you should look for a counter argument to my claim instead? > It happens. Statistically, if you get a bunch of wins you probably aren't getting trolls, hence it seems intentional that you have that one promo with a troll. As for changing the algorithm... NO #%&@ SHERLOCK Here's a tip. Now that it is clear that I'm like 1035480342572340x smarter than you, you don't need to state the obvious. Thanks. xD After playing thousands of games every year, I can safely say that trolls, afkers and feeders in promos are 10x as common as in non promo games. > a) How should riot make sure that you don't get matched with a troll? They don't know people's intentions beforehand and we simply don't have the tech to be able to say "yup this guy is a troll ban him" when there's thousands of games being processed at once by the automated system. How to match someone against a troll? Easy, just match you up with a bunch of players with negative derivative on their mmr (losing streak) and at least one of them gonna be on tilt. There are many other factors that can determine a troll, e.g. the player flamed more than usual the previous games etc. Or just simply use a machine learning algorithm to evaluate relevant datasets to classify people who gonna troll. I think rito gives you bad teams if the system thinks you belong in a lower elo after a losing streak. > b) Riot is strictly against a "prisoner island" matchmaking system, i.e. they don't want people with potential of reforming matched with people who'd prevent them from reforming (more trolls and flamers), so they instead go with a strike system. No idea what the difference of these systems are, feel free to elaborate. > > Trolls are a unavoidable evil when it comes to gaming, like scammers are with trading and money or bullies are in school. You can't get rid of them, but you can change your view of them to make it better for yourself. You can't prove that there doesn't exist any measures to decrease trolls in a good way.
>Where do you get these numbers from? I hear about people getting chat restricted all the time. Most of my friends have been chat restricted before. I see flamers in most games as well. League of legends, with their post-ban messages. Example: http://i.imgur.com/tYTTb8n.png League of legends claims 5% of players get a 10 game chat restrict, that's one in 20. Let's also say that the punishment system is perfect, that'd still leave one in twenty people flaming - a minority. But okay, let's be "real" and say that 50% of people flame, not a minority; It'd have to catch only one in 10 flamers then (very unreal, but you make of it what you will, I make of it that riot is very mild with flamers and that the majority of the playerbase don't flame, this is only for the 50% line, far from a sizeable majority). >Everything you say is basically a load of !"#@ lul. Flamers start to flame for example when they interpret that other players are putting them at a disadvantage. You say yourself that fewer people get banned than people get flamed. Then later you conclude that if everyone flamed everyone would be banned. Can you also see now that your logical reasoning isn't very impressive? Let me help you and show what a quality statement looks like: The majority of players has flamed and didn't get banned. As is obvious my statement reflects reality. I really don't know what inspires the wierd imagination behind basically everything you say Yeah, start arguing with insults as you can apparantly not understand what I said. Let me rephrase: Players don't even know they're being put at a disadvantage until they've sunk in considerable time into the game. New players aren't inherently flamers. Again, see my above point as to why the majority of people aren't banned for it/aren't flamers. It's easy to call what you say reality, yet at least I give an effort to understand what you're saying. >Let me help you to think lulz. I claimed that decrease in flaming --> increase in trolling. Then it makes little sense to point out that we should decrease flaming still. Perhaps you should look for a counter argument to my claim instead? Correlation doesn't always mean causation. More people can be "trolling" and less people flaming because more people see the game as casual; in this case, the same people _could potentially_ be the flamer and troller, but definitively not exclusive to them. I personally don't think people are transitioning more to trolling, I've actually seen a decrease in real hardcore flame. If you wanna keep persuing this argument, you're gonna need to give me some proof; since the proof needs to be provided by the person making the affirmitive claim (or else I can just say there's no proof of what you're saying and disprove it as is). >NO #%&@ SHERLOCK Here's a tip. Now that it is clear that I'm like 1035480342572340x smarter than you, you don't need to state the obvious. Thanks. xD After playing thousands of games every year, I can safely say that trolls, afkers and feeders in promos are 10x as common as in non promo games. Oh, sorry, since you claimed I'm stupid, 1035480342572340x 0 is still 0. Again, burden of proof is on you, show me your stats. >How to match someone against a troll? Easy, just match you up with a bunch of players with negative derivative on their mmr (losing streak) and at least one of them gonna be on tilt. There are many other factors that can determine a troll, e.g. the player flamed more than usual the previous games etc. Or just simply use a machine learning algorithm to evaluate relevant datasets to classify people who gonna troll. I think rito gives you bad teams if the system thinks you belong in a lower elo after a losing streak. That's kinda how the mmr works, if your mmr falls you're matched with people of the same mmr as your new fallen mmr. You wanting to make people constantly losing match with losing teammates would make a extremely unfriendly downspiral system that would probably make people even more toxic and likely to troll. At least I'd imagine it would. >No idea what the difference of these systems are, feel free to elaborate. I.e. if you go 0/14 for x% of games the system will only match you with trolls/feeders. Riot doesn't do that because of values. >You can't prove that there doesn't exist any measures to decrease trolls in a good way. I don't have to, burden of proof is on you to prove a good way exists. There's ways. They're orwellian and aren't great but there's ways.
: Account lock
Contact riot support here: https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us If you have some basic information and access to the original e-main used to register the account then it should be no problem. Extra value if you have all the purchase data logged somewhere, like credit card transactions and old paysafe code reciepts. Note that account sharing is met with an insta ban (only one user per account, people can make their own free accounts)
: Is Sona the best support champion in League?
Yes, but she is also 1. Easily blown up 2. Easily caught out 3. Squishy 4. Has to position in the middle of the fight 5. Medium range 6. Meh effectivenes overall (except for the ult, the 5 man ults are worth gold)
: although i do agree with 99% , the principle of only the minority toxic based on those who got punished, no thats only those who got caught and id be willing to bet that the % of players who get caugh t compared to those who commit siad offences is very small just like in every game especially ones with large player bases. analogy: the police dont say thievery is high in an area based on how many thieves they caught, they do it based on how many reports of thievery combined and weighted with how many thieves they caught. with any online game most bad behaviour is only caught when its worse than bad, like really bad. most stuff like generic "u suck" flame and stuff like that, it doesnt get caught. i know people on my friends list who have wrongfully hurled racism in games before and got reported (rightfully so), and still yet to ever receive a chat ban let alone anything higher. :)
Fair point, I guess I was a bit biased as well in my arguments, but until riot allows us to get more reliable data we can really only speculate.
: Kda orbs were a great idea riot
{{champion:4}}: "Luck of the draw"
zagan93 (EUNE)
: Change Suggestion to Tryndamere's W
The thing is, I don't see Tryn to be in a bad spot overall. His kit is very forgiving (free sustain, slow and AD reduction, an AOE AD scaling dash that can jump walls and gets lowered with crits, and basically a kayle ult that can't be prevented unless he's literally nuked from orbit and delted under a second). The problem arises when you pit him against a coordinated team, one with cc, kiting, and survivability. The problem about this new w is simply that he doesn't need it. If he'd have hard cc (the enemy can do nothing other than walk twoard you and aa, shen and rammus are considered viable just because of that, so imagine giving tryn a situational version of it) he'd be borderline broken. Just keep to splitting and creating space for your team, otherwise you can start looking for a secondary champ to play.
hmm (EUNE)
: The average player does indeed flame. Yeah people might learn to not flame, but like i said, they learn to troll instead. Also they still flame after being subject to rito matchmaking for long enough time. I didn't say I have the solution, I just said what the problem is. But hey, if you're going to defend trollers, then I can assure you that you will have the opportunity to enjoy more than enough of them. I would suggest that rito matchmaking algorithm could be improved to be less tilting. E.g. the amount of trolls in promos is just mindblowing.
>The average player does indeed flame. Yeah people might learn to not flame, but like i said, they learn to troll instead. Also they still flame after being subject to rito matchmaking for long enough time. Riot would disagree with you, claiming that only a vast minority of players ever get punished more than once for flaming. In fact a very low percentage of players ever get a perma ban (single digits, exclusively for flaming, I'd imagine it maybe reacing 10% when accounting for 3rd party program usage and account sharing). Flamers usually begin flaming when they start understanding the game on a basic level, usually in a very self-centered way. You can argue all you want that everyone flames, but if they did then the majority of the player base would be banned, _I don't think I have to say that it clearly isn't the case, but I'll say it anyways._ >I didn't say I have the solution, I just said what the problem is. But hey, if you're going to defend trollers, then I can assure you that you will have the opportunity to enjoy more than enough of them. I'm not defending trollers in any way, I'm simply not saying that because there's trollers flame should be glossed over as well (wich it already is! You probably won't ever get banned for flaming in the sense of "Bot is bad feeding" or "Omg this Vayne", but in the sense of using certain words that you'd really use only in places where you know you won't get stared at for saying it). Ironically enough, I can't remember the last time I encountered a genuine troll, **_and I play in low silver/high bronze/normals, so that should tell you something_**. >I would suggest that rito matchmaking algorithm could be improved to be less tilting. E.g. the amount of trolls in promos is just mindblowing. It happens. Statistically, if you get a bunch of wins you probably aren't getting trolls, hence it seems intentional that you have that one promo with a troll. As for changing the algorithm... a) How should riot make sure that you don't get matched with a troll? They don't know people's intentions beforehand and we simply don't have the tech to be able to say "yup this guy is a troll ban him" when there's thousands of games being processed at once by the automated system. b) Riot is strictly against a "prisoner island" matchmaking system, i.e. they don't want people with potential of reforming matched with people who'd prevent them from reforming (more trolls and flamers), so they instead go with a strike system. Trolls are a unavoidable evil when it comes to gaming, like scammers are with trading and money or bullies are in school. You can't get rid of them, but you can change your view of them to make it better for yourself.
: Indeed, people learn to use /mute all but does it improve their attitude? I dont think so. Riot know it that there is unfair reportsystem but none changes it.
How do you suggest to change it then??? I personally (and I've looked into the report system quite a bit in my time repeating this over and over again on the boards) don't see how to improve it without making abusable loopholes.
Nonstopre (EUW)
: i dont own any of them yet XD. But all are very nice skins
Well you don't NEED the skins if you don't like the champs, but you can always keep them for later, no hurry and them being rare doesn't mean your rerolls are any better.
StormF (EUNE)
: He is having fun playing ranked. Its not %%%%ing fun when a random re-tard is intentionally loosing your games and times. This is what the casual part of the game will never understand
To me, as long as they get punished I feel like the total 20lp per 4 people is a fair price to pay for them getting punished. Odds are they didn't belong there anyways and they would be a burden to the team anyways. So take it as an obligatory contribution tax to cleaning the community.
hmm (EUNE)
: The biggest problem with player behavior
The average player doesn't flame in chat. The average player learns after the first restriction/warning that establishments have rules of behaviour. It is a lot easier to make a system to find flaming than trolling. Pay 1000 people to review for 16 h a day and you'll still get mad backlog, not to mention the pay can hardly be financed even by large companies. Untill people don't stop using troll reports for revenge/hate for someone having a bad game or something they don't like, we'll have to rely on them going 0/14 as viktor top (see hashinshin) for the system to kick in.
: Banned for 1 game 1 word and no chat restrict?
Yep. If you said %%%% 500 times over you'd probably get a chat restric or something. Actions and words have consiquences and you _should_ learn from them (doesn't mean everyone does). If you can't decide whether your words are going to get you punished or not maybe it's better not to say it. No employee goes over your log, but a system. I'm sure of it. If you want to appeal your ban and maybe get a chat restrict instead try to contact riot support; I'm not guaranteeing it'll help, but maybe the person there has a better explanation then me on why you shouldn't use "%%%%%%ed" as a casual insult.
: i am accully glad to be banned for 14 days, at least i don't have to play this game again
As long as fun > your value of your account I guess you're a'ight. Enjoy.
OG Noliξ (EUNE)
: Account Safety
Probably nothing to hold water, but if you can screenshot it...
Nonstopre (EUW)
: What would you do?
Well, do you play any of them or not?
: You...I like you.
At least someone does {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-rainbows}}
Yraco (EUW)
: I wish this was Reddit. I would give you gold so fast.
Well, yay for my hypothetical first r. gold! Thank you kind stranger.
: > Feels so more peaceful, I feel more zen during the game. https://i.redd.it/eus4yumg9l611.jpg
: I hope they unpermaban some accounts because everyone deserves a second chance
They tried it, didn't work
Elleonora (EUW)
: I have always been good over all the years, and now for just 3 games during the weekend that I lost my cool, I lose my ranked rewards and now my account got locked for no reason, not cool man
Just because you're an outstanding person doesn't mean that your wrongdoings are going to be overlooked in the future. As long as it isn't a permaban you'll manage to remember the next time tough.
Elleonora (EUW)
: account locked for no reason
Justly restricted, judging by the content of this post. If you're an adult, like a large part of the playerbase, you'll have to know that your actions have consiquences. If there's something not clear about what you should or shouldn't do tough, the rules and guidelines are always there, free to read up.
ChipiTheBot (EUNE)
: Punishment Tribunal
The tribunal upgrade was the automated response system. It looks for key-words, so it's not perfect, but doesn't need months to process all the requests. It's fairly accurate, and so long you don't think it should consider the scores of your teams, what happened to warrant a reply it picked up, etc. it's doing its job pretty well
: Minion Dematerializer on Syndra?
Bisquits are odd because they give you lane sustain but are only great vs poke lanes. I'd say take demat every other matchup and be conservative enough with your mana and smart on your trades not to need them.
: wow i'm unlucky as hell lol
Well, it is free. If I were you I'd have taken the masterwork chests instead and used the keys from auto-drops on them instead.
Rioter Comments
: misinformation. They wont be picke dup by system unless you report them
Fair point, remember to report them after the game for it to get evaluated.
spiider pig (EUNE)
: Toxic, report help
> The following are behaviors that may be acted on by our disciplinary systems: > > Insulting, harassing, or offensive language directed at other players. > > Any kind of hate speech such as homophobia, sexism, racism, and ableism. > > Intentionally ruining the game for other players with in game actions such as griefing, feeding, or purposely playing in a way to make it harder for the rest of the team. > > Leaving or going AFK at any point during the match being played. > > Unnecessarily disruptive language or behavior that derails the match for other players. > > Inappropriate Summoner Names. > . > The following are behaviors that would not be acted on by our disciplinary systems: > > Playing poorly but still trying to win. > > Strong language that does not insult or demean other people. > > Choosing unusual champions, building unusual items, or experimenting with new ideas that don’t match the current “meta”. > > Basically, if people are being mean, calling you/others names or slurs, etc. they'll most likely be picked up by the system.
ShanksFX (EUW)
: Alright, i will start. 20 bucks on a perma, even tho op did ofc absolutly nothing wrong :^)
I'd say lost promos/getting stomped in lane by a "newb pick"
GoD Jiren (EUNE)
: I have barely 0,30% packet loss and 100mb/s internet, I cannot fking play for around 2 weeks by now, "You have been disconnected" problem goes all over again. -.- I've traced routing to eune/euw, problem stars showing after connecting to riots redirecting servers, gj riot.
Might be worth contacting riot support over?
Remischal (EUW)
: Yet I have several games in my ban info where I'm not in any way offensive. How do you explain this?
Remischal (EUW)
: Banned because of unconventional picks and saying something back to flamers - no justice whatsoever.
You most likely got banned for flaming flamers, wich is widely seen as not good. Even if a flamer was flaming you there's ways to deal with it other than flaming (i.e. mute/ignore, don't flame, etc.) Just because you got wronged first doesn't mean you'll be exempt by the system. Keep this in mind in the future.
Show more

RewardWanted

Level 104 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion