hahahah its about your kda your farm and your damage all should be good. but i understand sometimes makes me angry too :D
Gerbster (EUW)
: I can't really see the problem ( I'm for ranked queues ) apart from ARAM accounts which are slightly nullified with the extra champs now included. 1 queue for normal ARAM 1 queue for ranked. Put a warning up for ranked saying it's random carry on at your own risk, it's not like anyone forces you to play ranked. I've most probably got a one sided view so sorry!
Silent Note (EUNE)
: 2 months ago I would've disagreed with the idea, because I hate it when there's RNG involved in ranked games. Then we got TFT ranked, so might as well make an ARAM ranked too.
i agree
Hansiman (EUW)
: Here's an explanation in an earlier [Ask Riot](https://nexus.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/2017/03/ask-riot-ranked-aram/).
i read it. but i do not agree. yes in aram some champs better than others. and you dont pick champs. its random. this means aram is about little bit luck( it depends your champs power. for example karthus better than elise) but its changes for your tems comp. usually ap champs better than ad champs.but your team can be 5 ad. and if you play good(that means you are a good player ranks exist for this :D) you can beat 5 ap. so sometimes you have luck sometimes they have luck. i believe in the and all players will be the same point. and luck also can be nice factor for the game. i cant understand why they complain about it? tft has luck too ?Luck adds another fact to the game that needs to be calculated.that not a bad thing.some games must own this. and the other hand they say if you dont play some champs you have disadvantage and thats unfair. i dont agree too. yes you have disadvantage but this is nice too. if you want to be good you should learn more champs. and this directs palyers play more champs and more game. thats good for riot too and good for normal map too. makes players better.
Rioter Comments


Level 59 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion