DominoKid (EUW)
: when your team has the option to end...
We often notices our team's mistakes, but not our own. I recommend downloading your replay and looking at what you could've done differently, since we can only control our own champion.
Rinart73 (EUW)
: Did Riot stop informing when reported player gets punished?
I think so. The other day, a Jhin trolled my game and said that he wants us to lose, kept refusing to help the team and flaming. In the post game lobby, he told someone to "k" themselves (but he said it in it's full wording), at least 2 people reported him (myself included), I still haven't received a feedback report.
: I checked his recent games and hes got a 39% winrate on TF so he might not be doing to hot right now.
I see. If even the best TF in the world is having trouble as TF, he must be weak right now.
: First of all: Vilemaw buff is a baron buff but the minions fear enemy minions as well. Its a stronger buff. Second of all: The altars are a core part of TT. They dont need to change it, they need to leave it as it is.
All it does is fear minions and make them slightly stronger. It does not grant AP and AD like Baron Buff, nor does it give you an empowered recall. The altars should not be a core part of the game, Dominion was deleted for a reason. Replace them with a proper jungle.
Cursed Wolf (EUNE)
: TFT 6 Brawlers
Rek'sai cards are too rare.
: Twisted Treeline Memorial. (RIP)
Riot ruined it by trying to turn it into Dominion, Dominion sucks, nobody wants to play it. Remove the damn alters and make a full, proper jungle with buffs. Make the Map's boss worth killing, and fix the lanes, make them longer and place the brushes properly.
: TF was my first main champ and i really enjoyed playing him. But the problem is his terrible earlygame so i had to put him down. Apdo is probably one of the best TF players in the world so his opinion on TF right now is FACT.
Would Apdo say TF is strong or weak right now?
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
: Permabanned players - Second chances.
That's not how it works in real life at all. They won't take away Tiger Wood's limited edition golf club because he called a fellow golfer an idiot. This thread is a prime example of Stockholm syndrome.
CJXander (EUNE)
: Players that are banned in-game should also be banned on boards
No they shouldn't. They should only be banned on the boards if the violated the rules of the boards.
: Does a 14-Day Ban reset?
From what I hear, the flags on your account decay due to matches played, not due to time. If you're extremely toxic in 1 match, then don't play for 1 year, then come back and you are extremely toxic in another match, you will be banned for the match you played 1 year ago.
: Dodges in ARAM
They should make it so ARAM only tells you what champion you're getting in the champion loading screen, and you also decide your runes there too.
Rioter Comments
: By your logic if i like to play Ezreal top i should be banned for the troll pick because people don't like my pick? And it doesn't matter that i have a positive win rate on that position with specific champ?{{sticker:zombie-brand-facepalm}}
How is that my logic? Did you read the entire post, or just one part?
Rioter Comments
: You seem to still be confused. It would be an indefinite ban until they redeem themselves through the honour system. Riot can also feel free to setup other possible ways of reformation, but we already have the honour system in place, so we can use that in the mean time. If they intentionally feed, then ban them for intentionally feeding. Intentionally feeding is actual gameplay abuse, and should be treated much harsher than people who say the wrong thing in chat.
Like I said before, you're still confused on how this would work, so let me remind you. Player uses the chat too toxicly, they get chat banned indefinitely. They redeem themselves through getting honoured by many players and they can get their chat back. In that time, they may be allowed to use the pre-written chat (i.e. safe chat). Riot should also be more lenient on punishment too, people often get banned for the smallest reasons, because riot thinks the players are so thinskinned that they can't take negativity or even jokes at times.
: You seem to still be confused. It would be an indefinite ban until they redeem themselves through the honour system. Riot can also feel free to setup other possible ways of reformation, but we already have the honour system in place, so we can use that in the mean time. If they intentionally feed, then ban them for intentionally feeding. Intentionally feeding is actual gameplay abuse, and should be treated much harsher than people who say the wrong thing in chat.
It would be more like taking away someone's driving licence because they got into an argument, then giving it back after many people vouched for them as an honourable person. It makes a lot of sense to give it back if the player has been said to be honourable in plenty of games, showing they have redeemed themselves, and if wasn't, then the honour system would be broken.
: You seem to still be confused. It would be an indefinite ban until they redeem themselves through the honour system. Riot can also feel free to setup other possible ways of reformation, but we already have the honour system in place, so we can use that in the mean time. If they intentionally feed, then ban them for intentionally feeding. Intentionally feeding is actual gameplay abuse, and should be treated much harsher than people who say the wrong thing in chat.
As I said before, 99% of the game is non-verbal, and other players can decide how helpful you are through honours. They can even add simple safe chat to the game too, that allows players to choose things to say from a pre-written toolbar.
: > [{quoted}](name=Simplexible,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2VR09sbx,comment-id=00040001000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-28T16:30:28.566+0000) > > 99.9% of the game is non-verbal. Most if not all of the honours I give people, and receive myself isn't for what they say, it's for what they do, how helpful they are, and how much they improve the gameplay experience in general with their actions. Doesn't mean they should be allowed back in the chat. Player : *flames too much*. Riot Games : "You're permanently banned from chat" **A few days later** Two options : A) The player has shifted his toxic behavior towards another mean, such as reported [here](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/fr/c/player-behavior-moderation/wsObUaFj-if-tyler1?comment=00010001000000000000), and will be banned accordingly. B) The player didn't take his toxicity business elsewhere. Then according to your belief, Riot should reinstate their right to speak. Spoiler alert : they'll flame again. Conclusion : it's useless.
You seem to still be confused. It would be an indefinite ban until they redeem themselves through the honour system. Riot can also feel free to setup other possible ways of reformation, but we already have the honour system in place, so we can use that in the mean time. If they intentionally feed, then ban them for intentionally feeding. Intentionally feeding is actual gameplay abuse, and should be treated much harsher than people who say the wrong thing in chat.
: > [{quoted}](name=Simplexible,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2VR09sbx,comment-id=000400010000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-27T22:48:10.860+0000) > > Your understanding is flawed. They should be muted indefinitely until they prove themselves redeemed. And they do that by receiving many honours. How can you truely redeem yourself if you're not given the possibility to fail ? It's like expecting a child not to fall off a bike the first time you take off the little wheels. Taking off their ability to write also takes off their ability to show reform.
99.9% of the game is non-verbal. Most if not all of the honours I give people, and receive myself isn't for what they say, it's for what they do, how helpful they are, and how much they improve the gameplay experience in general with their actions.
: > [{quoted}](name=Simplexible,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2VR09sbx,comment-id=0004000100000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-27T20:46:27.334+0000) > > That is incorrect. That experiment is flawed if it even happened. If a player receives an indefinite chat ban, but is told they can reverse it after many games with good behaviour, they are very likely to play better and not int. Your logic is flawed. If you can reverse a permanent sanction, it is not permanent. As a bonus : how can you prove you deserve to get back your chat back through "good behavior" when you can't prove you can use correctly since you are BANNED from talking in the chat ?
Your understanding is flawed. They should be muted indefinitely until they prove themselves redeemed. And they do that by receiving many honours.
Silent Note (EUNE)
: Why can't Katarina players resist the temptation of jumping on their daggers?
Once you build a habit, it happens almost automatically.
: > [{quoted}](name=Simplexible,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2VR09sbx,comment-id=00040001000000000000,timestamp=2019-05-27T19:47:49.658+0000) > > Not true. Some people may int, but not everyone who has the chat banned will int. Many will look at it as an opportunity to play the game without talking and realise how less distracted you are and how better your games go. The experiment was done. You cannot deny the results because you think people will act differently. The majority of those who would be toxic enough to get a permachat ban would eventually be toxic through another feature. That is a fact.
That is incorrect. That experiment is flawed if it even happened. If a player receives an indefinite chat ban, but is told they can reverse it after many games with good behaviour, they are very likely to play better and not int.
: > [{quoted}](name=Simplexible,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2VR09sbx,comment-id=000400010000,timestamp=2019-05-27T18:47:56.890+0000) > > Then if they int, ban them for inting. Pretty simple. Simple. If you permanently restrict their chat, they WILL int. That's what they got from their tests. So they just dodge the part where you int and ban you.
Not true. Some people may int, but not everyone who has the chat banned will int. Many will look at it as an opportunity to play the game without talking and realise how less distracted you are and how better your games go.
: > [{quoted}](name=Simplexible,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2VR09sbx,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-05-27T08:37:58.905+0000) > > I don't believe in permabans for arguing or being rude since it's easy to just mute toxic players or riot can just remove their ability to chat. > > You were toxic and you should be punished, but I don't think you deserve a permaban. That should be reserved for intentional feeders. That would be ignoring the fact that when people would get 3000 games of chat restriction, they would become toxic in another way (spam ping, troll, int etc). It's just allowing them to be toxic one extra time. It's useless. Toxic players that you would issue a "permanent chat ban" would just get banned another way a bit later. And it's not like the permaban comes out of the blue. Either you're saying things that are actually illegal in most countries (racism homophobia etc can get you fined thousands of € for instance) or you get 3 warnings before your permaban...
: > [{quoted}](name=Simplexible,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=2VR09sbx,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-05-27T08:51:08.009+0000) > > The issue is that you shouldn't be permabanned if you didn't int. That's like... your opinion man. And Riot has its own.
Right, and if Riot didn't have that "opinion" you wouldn't be parroting it. Something stupid isn't smart because Riot did it.
Tarolock (EUNE)
: >I don't believe in permabans for arguing or being rude since it's easy to just mute toxic players or riot can just remove their ability to chat. i dont believe in gun control since you can buy bulletproof vests...
Terrible comparison. Do you actually have a counter argument? Or just bad comparisons?
: You were banned 2 weeks saying it was the final warning and that any toxicity would result in a permaban. You have been toxic. You are permabanned. Where's the issue (except in your behavior) ?
The issue is that you shouldn't be permabanned if you didn't int.
: Riot thanks for banning me 14 days ;)
It is unfortunate that people can be permabanned for arguing back or saying something rude. Only proven intentional feeders should be permabanned. People abusing chat should have their chat privileges restricted or taken away and reduced to basic pings.
RecoreYT (EUW)
: I got permanently banned and this is my log + opinions + your opinions please.
I don't believe in permabans for arguing or being rude since it's easy to just mute toxic players or riot can just remove their ability to chat. You were toxic and you should be punished, but I don't think you deserve a permaban. That should be reserved for intentional feeders.
MIJ130 (EUNE)
: I'm considering leaving LoL forever because of Toxicity and Harassment
As soon as you start your match type in "/mute all", and press enter. Even if you have the most cheerful team in the world, mute all at the beginning of your match. Every match. If someone uses misuses their pings, mute their ping instantly and forget about them.
: A rhetorical question, which deserves everyone's attention...
Either the Silver players played so good that their Match Making Rank caught up to yours, or you've been playing so bad that your Match Making Rank has dropped to theirs, either way you are in the same invisible rank as them. Anyway, all that I can recommend is that you focus on the things that you have control over.
VernaxKa (EUW)
: haha riot, restricted me for saying xd
> VernaxKa: omg farm ashe > VernaxKa: she said hïtler did nothing wrong like wtf > VernaxKa: %%%%ING ASHE USELESS > VernaxKa: %%%%ing noob > VernaxKa: not main but k > VernaxKa: troll acc > VernaxKa: dw ill afk > VernaxKa: STFU KIDS > VernaxKa: SHUT THE %%%% UP That's a little more than "xd".
: AFK in bronze
It happens a lot, in every rank. You have to not let it tilt you. The good news is that you're bronze, if you focus on improving, you can carry even 4v5 games. I was bronze once too, and when I actually focused on getting better, I rapidly improved and was smashing through teams like a freight train, getting 40 kills per game. {{sticker:darius-angry}}
: what do ya'll think about this quick and lazy jungle tier list i made in less than 5 minutes?
I saw someone jungling brand the other day, why isn't he on your list?
: Debunking Shaclone claiming he is getting banned for no reason
: What's up with honors?
I find myself honouring the support usually. I care more about the thresh that saved me than the caitlyn that got a kill. So maybe try to play support and see if it increases your amount of honours.
Player 00 (EUW)
: The 14 days suspension is pretty much the "One last chance" you will get before getting permabaned. If you don't take that last chance you get, the 14 days ban, then you are not going to take any last chance seriously and won't reform. Not to mention the amount of chat restrictions you can get before getting that 14 days and permaban. Basically you are suggesting that Riot gives two last chances. Cus that's exactly what a 14 days ban is. The last chance.
Is that 100% true? I have heard from other players that if you are honoured a lot and a lot of time passes without you don't anything deserving of punishment, your "slate" becomes cleaner and you won't be permabanned in the next punishment.
: Tips to not tilt?
mute all, think about the lessons you're learning instead of the games you're losing.
: Did you check the images that i posted? They are direct response of riot support. I now don't even talk in chat anymore i just use /mute all because not even worth. Riot it's impossible to be perma ban if you don't talk in chat, or if you are just having bad games. The only ways are inting on purpose or flamming.
You can also be banned for making jokes. I would agree with you, it is a good idea to mute all in game.
mcheema4302 (EUNE)
: Permanent Bans
I support this, there needs to be more ways for players to reform. There also needs to be a better inception to not be toxic, the honor system needs to be improved.
: By this logic, a bunch of people are shoplifting in the world, and doing other small time crimes. We should reform the whole system, so they go unpunished. > the overwhelming majority of the player base is at risk of getting punished in some way Very good. Than it means, that the system is working as intended. I'd rather have 30% longer queue times, and 30% less people in lol, than a mode where they can just flame for free. It would have legit zero benefits. They eventually get permabanned over and over again, and hopefully in 3-4 years, only the hardcore oldskool core will remain, and we'll be able to finally have some fun.
> By this logic, a bunch of people are shoplifting in the world, and doing other small time crimes. We should reform the whole system, so they go unpunished. Bad analogy, shoplifting in irl would be like scripting in LoL, being sneaky and taking something that doesn't belong to you (kills/wins). Arguing with team mates are making negative comments would be like doing the same thing irl, it doesn't even require an anology. If someone argues every once in a while in LoL, they will eventually be permabanned. If someone argues or says something negative to their team mates every once in the military for example, they won't be so easily fired. They see you as a human being, and human beings sometimes argue and say negative things. > I'd rather have 30% longer queue times, and 30% less people in lol, than a mode where they can just flame for free. The beauty of this mode is, that if you don't like it, you don't have to turn it on. By default, everyone would be using the default chat mode and won't be able to see the comments of people who are using free chat mode. Do you have a counter argument against it?
: So you basically want a mode that's just like the one we have. And another one where you can tell someone to have intercourse with his relatives while drinking lighter fluid then jumping into a volcano while whistling Samoa's national anthem and repeatedly hitting his head with a rubber mallet mid-flight - in a videogame, that's about destroying the enemy nexus ? Who would this free chat mode benefit ? Sick people ? Edgy teenagers ? LOL is a huge game, it's leading the industry. You need quality. You can't allow everything, it would lower the quality/feel of the gameplay experience. The idea is just stupid.
LoL is a huge game, and in its current state, the overwhelming majority of the player base is at risk of getting punished in some way, shape or form due to the current chat system. Which is why it needs to be fixed, since riot don't plan on fixing the tribunal system any time soon.
: the game CHAT is nto a forum or a social media, it's nice to have it to strategize the game, you can socialize abit couple of seconds till minions spawn, but is not for casual CHAT ! so all those ideas are not ok, just cause people they can't retain the flame or curse or blame and nto spit it out ! also this >Restricted Chat Mode: You are very limited in what you say because this chat mode is a punishment. isn't accurate, you can also say anything you want, but it's limited on how many lines of text you write to teach players to write what is essential not spam so >Voluntary Restricted Mode: is silly since you don't get the system, restricted chat or not its same, you don't get banned because you were toxic in a restricted chat but because you got punished and got restricted the chat itself is free to say whatever you want
Some people would like to have their own chat limited. It removes the temptation to talk too much and helps them and their team. Without the ability to talk so much, you are more likely to only say what matters, in my experience of playing with people who are restricted, they typically only speak when they feel they need to. Also I should add, if you choose to restrict your chat, you will have to wait till after your game ends to use another chat mode.
: The problem of this is that the report button would be gone and flammers and inters would be very happy and you could not even play 1 single game without having the entire team inting and flamming and since there is no fear or being reported that would be hell broke loose. Even if Free chat mode the report button would be butchered hard and would have ban a tons of accounts without being necessary.
> [{quoted}](name=UltimatMax,realm=EUW,application-id=Mpd1UjGe,discussion-id=lhaFNKVG,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-05-18T23:35:54.584+0000) > > The problem of this is that the report button would be gone and flammers and inters would be very happy and you could not even play 1 single game without having the entire team inting and flamming and since there is no fear or being reported that would be hell broke loose. Even if Free chat mode the report button would be butchered hard and would have ban a tons of accounts without being necessary. In free chat, you would still be able to report people for inting, just not for anything they say. This would be a chat mode that people would have to go out of their way to enter, and can leave at any time. By default, all players will still be using default chat mode, which is the regular chat we right now.
Rioter Comments
CJXander (EUNE)
: Report Yuumi : Starter Pack
If you didn't ban Yuumi in champion select, you deserve your loss.
: Is it possible to be perma banned if you didn't even talk in chat?
Even if you don't talk much, you should be careful. I was once chat restricted because I said "get dunked" when I killed someone as darius (literally the only thing I said all game). You can get punished for the most mundane things in LoL.
: Twisted Treeline Overrun by 3rd party AI bot accounts! FIX this!!!!
They should start by bringing back the old 3v3 so people would actually want to play it again.
Show more

Simplexible

Level 148 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion