Morrhen (EUW)
: Calling someone with disability 'slurs'' and death/suicide threats is a zero tolerance act. What you can do is report and they'll get banned within a day or two. Additionally, you shouldn't talk and thus encourage these people. Staying calm and rational is the best way to avoid every single punishment there is, while keeping an upper hand :). 1) You don't always get notified if they get banned. 2) Banning people takes a while. Inters are tricky to detect, if the support team member isn't especially harsh. However, if they told you to kill yourself, it's an EASY report and 14 day or maybe even permanent ban. Unless you went way too far with threatening to report them. Riot doesn't like that.
>2) Banning people takes a while. also they tend to get banned in waves so it's harder to detect what not to do to avoid it in the future
tal11133 (EUNE)
: got banned for a stupid reason
>then in enother game someone called me a 8 years old so i said this >[12:47] [All] tal11133 (Renekton): im 21 [12:56] [All] tal11133 (Renekton): want a %%%%k pic to prove it? {{sticker:zombie-brand-facepalm}} being 21 does not make you mature
Brappa (EUW)
: Riot support gives different statement about this. Also when I was grinding the honor one said it would be hit on time and the other said there was only a small chance. When i found out honor level was time locked to tuesday I was stressed because it would be on the day or the day after the season ends. wich imo is kind of unfair since they stated it was possible to come back to honor level 2 from 1 in the victorious announcement. Also some support said it was possible to do in time. up until the point it actually happened and then i got the message they are sorry about the mis information. Tbh this whole situation is understandable but kind of scummy. If they make me believe it is doable even though i told them its timelocked to tuesday and i will hit it 19th november and then still they say it is np and I should keep on grinding. I just wasted a month playing 20+ games a day being as honorable as possible because i was in the illusion that I could make it wich was enforced. Again I dont want to bash on riot too hard because in the end it is my responsibility but its kind of heartbreaking
>I just wasted a month playing 20+ games a day being as honorable as possible because i was in the illusion that I could make it wich was enforced. if you were only being honorable because of the rewards then it's obvious you've missed the point
WoW PIayer (EUNE)
: End-Season Rewards
last year was an exception just like they mentioned it at the time
: Is it me? Or do people get chat restricted without any good reason?
*reads chatlog* *remembers similar case from youtube* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL5_LfKtpOc
JustTits (EUNE)
: TFW you're getting banned for personal reasons on Boards while..
CJXander (EUNE)
: Did this ever happened to you?
is Nicktron's gimmick pure theater?
: I have 4 permabanned accounts. Did I change?
>Lets say I play football and I see a guy who clearly cannot defend nor attack and he sucks at passing the ball right? I am gonna give him a tip, thing is in real life they try to get better so they aren't embarrassed after all people respect EFFORT.. BUT IN THIS GAME THEY HAVE THE AUDACITY TO DEFEND THEIR SHIT AND PATHETIC EGO. if you think football players don't flame each other and get punshed for it if they take it too far, then you don't know what you're talking about >Another example, having a player that never passes the ball, never tries to help you, he is just there to not take the game "seriously" ok. how does flaming them change their behaviour and make things better overall instead of worse by adding flame to the fire? >Sometimes they do feel guilty about it and start playing properly.. then I am nice. But its very rare.. It happened yesterday one case of it working out once in a blue moon does not mean it's ok to always do it > I just didnt care as much as u beta pricks here do i'd rather keep my account as it is than flame a random player because he isn't performing to my expectations and get punished. Some of us don't have your ego issues. So that's Lady Beta Prick to you :)
XO Mob (EUW)
: If that is your experience then I can assure you, the players you have reported weren't banned. Everytime I've reported someone and someone has gotten a ban, I've gotten an Instant Feedback Report back saying basically they have been punished.
it's not about experience. it's about how the system works https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752884-Reporting-a-Player
XO Mob (EUW)
: You keep making shit up left and right. Where did I ever say that I shouldn't have been punished because I'm some rape victim? The %%%% dude. I said that I found it very unfair that I am the only one getting punished for something that 3 others were completely a part of aswell. Jesus, your actually making me salty by not understand a single word said. > Now, could someone explain how this is a fair punishment in any way?
>Where did I ever say that I shouldn't have been punished because I'm some rape victim? ummm... where exactly did he say that? i'm unable to find the "rape victim" line
XO Mob (EUW)
: If this is the case, then could you explain why my first ever League account got **TWO** 14 day suspensions?
because of the reforming process and how it works the punishment system works like a ladder. the first punishment is the 10 game chat restriction, followed by the 25 game chat restriction, followed by the two week ban, followed by the permaban if you are particularly toxic you can skip the first two steps and get the two week ban from the get go however, given enough playtime without toxicity, one may be able to go down a step or more down the ladder before getting punished again. you can get two 2 week bans on the same account if you are lucky enough to have gone down a punishment step before the next one struck
XO Mob (EUW)
: Never got any information about next ban being a permanent.
i suggest you read the 2 week ban message again. the information is right there in black and white
JustClone (EUNE)
: So if I say "Sinfull succubus told me %%%", I should get punished? Based on what rule you say that?
the rule of slander for one but mainly because of all the posts where that happened and the support staff sticking with the decision
JustClone (EUNE)
: It is not against the rules, for sure.
: ban too harsh without warning
step 1 : see 0 tolerance word that gets people banned when used step 2: repeat it a few times step 3: ?!?! step 4: proffits! am i missing something, OP?
MusicaroN (EUW)
: ?? Is it my fault that he chose that name ? If I said "expected from Sinful Succubus" would I still deserve warning ?
i did. my question remains. i'll rephrase it for you: in which context does saying "expected of the guy called iron4playa"translate as not being offensive?
: I doubt that. Noone likes their time being wasted, and in any company wasting time means losing money by paying for work hours that achieve nothing. Do you have a source for your claim ?
i have to look for the post but it was on the old forum. the one Lyte was using edit: i'll update when i find the riot comment but meanwhile there's [this](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/1vUGoiuQ-riot-report-weigth-does-it-exist-or-not?comment=000200030000)
: Riot will disregard the reports of players who send out tons of false ones.
actually they stopped doing that a few seasons ago. now every report is checked but the invalid ones don't do anything
JustTits (EUNE)
: Don't forget to report every single player after the match, and NEVER honor anyone
>You might get someone banned from something he did 10 games ago but noone reported him. not how the report system works, dude
: On the moment Riot can prove there is money involved is other question. >3.1. What can I do with the Riot Services? (You can enjoy the Riot Services for your own, personal, non-commercial use.) We grant you a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable license to use and enjoy the Riot Services for your individual, non-commercial, entertainment purposes only and expressly conditioned upon your compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Unless otherwise expressly authorized by us in a signed writing, you may not sell, copy, exchange, loan, reverse engineer, decompile, derive source code from, translate, lease, grant a security interest in, transfer, publish, assign or otherwise distribute any of the Riot Services or any of Riot Games’ intellectual property, including any computer code associated therewith. Since Riot can say the he is using Lol (Riot Services) to make money without authorization it becames commercial use so he break TOS. Commercial = using it in or for a business or directly/indirectly for financial gain. non-commercial = anything other than commercial.
>Since Riot can say the he is using Lol (Riot Services) to make money without authorization it becames commercial use so he break TOS. by that logic, the streamers and youtubers making money off videos where lol is depicted should be banned too so no
: If they find a strong evidence about it (you pay for boost) you probably will get banned. And since you talked here about that on official forum I think Riot is already with a eye on you.
please stop spreading missinformation. getting boosted is not a bannable offence as long as it doesn't break the no account sharing rule. that's the only condition. as for talking about it on the forum, while it's true that riot watches what goes on in here, they don't act on it **alone** because statements on the internet are not always factual.
Awsane (EUW)
: Is Duo Q Boosting against TOS and or will get you banned? (If detected)
as long as your account is not being shared with someone else, there's nothing illegal about duo queue-ing
MusicaroN (EUW)
: How is this offensive ?
Ok Please tell us in which context calling someone an "iron4playa" is meant to be taken as a compliment, even if his name is that. {{sticker:fiora-cool}}
: New Member
That's not at all how it works First of all, unless you're scripting or account sharing, you can't get a perma for the first ever offence, Secondly 4reports have the same value as 9 and as 1 report. The extra 3/8 don't do nuttin. If you do nothing wrong, nothing happens. It doesn't matter how many people report you in a game. Riot doesn't care about mob prefference. Third, flaming is flaming. If someone else flames you first and you flame back, both of you are gonna be punished, depending on what was said. Lastly, "He started it" or "he said worse shit by comparison" or "I was defending myself" are not valid excuses to flame. If you want to defend your fragile ego, MUTE
: Why? To get an automated message from a bot and if u keep replying get an automated reply from a riot employee? xD
i wouldn't know. i've mostly used livechat since they installed the darn thing {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: dude the game is 10 years old ... their ban system isnt gonna get changed ... if u dont like trolls and can quit the game you probably should ... i would but idk what else to play (i need new main game)
you should buy a console and play lol when it comes out for consoles {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}}
CJXander (EUNE)
: Griefers and the report system in a nutshell
: So I just let everyone believe I'm Satan or something, and start collecting reports. Because F truth I guess
1. **Teemo IS Satan**. the fact that he has a devil skin with a crown should have made it obvious enough 2. reports don't do anything if you do nothing wrong. it doesn't matter how many there are
: Just got banned.
>I've always taken the systems side on these issues when forum posts of this type pop up, so I probably owe some apologies. and yet you're coming here with your software list instead of opening a ticket {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
: Is a permaban revertable?
>Is a permaban revertable? not if it was justified >so I just got permabanned for flaming a trolling teammate and it was someone else breaking the rules first does not make it ok for you to break them too sorry
: Do you think its correct to reset someone's honour for a chat ban?
>Do you think its correct to reset someone's honour for a chat ban? riot's game. riot's rules. if you don't like it, go play something else simple
RW Heaven (EUW)
: Take 2 minutes - Imagine LoL with a good ban system
overly complictaed plan is over complicated. instead of having two punishments for different types of inting, it's more cost efficient to have just the one. for inting. period. nomatter the variety
: I should not have to mute my own team mates and here is the issue, if i mute him and my team dont, they listen to a ping i cannot see lets say they engage his crazy tilted ideas my game is over, that is exactly waht happened he pinged several engages they leapt in and died superb.
you can't prevent people from making bad decisions but you can improve your experience by silencing the particularly annoying ones
: Make spam pinging reportable
You can mute individual pings, fyi
: You're expecting me to comment on something with less than half the information? I don't know what the other people in the match said. I don't know what was happening in the match to prompt what was said. I cannot make a decent judgement on it at all.
Sometimes I wonder if your boards account is used by more than one person because your comments swivel drastically from one end of the spectrum to the other with every new thread I see you in
Defend (EUW)
: Gaymers
why does the sexual orientation matter? are you here to play games or hook up?
GilxeN (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Arcade Lulu,realm=EUNE,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=FTvWlIbO,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-11-07T07:40:10.327+0000) > > You literally spent the whole game flaming the ezreal....... > > Okay, you got a 14 dy ban more than a year ago. And? That still doesn't mean that you're out of the hook. Sure it is possible to have your punishment level go down when enough time passes, but it takes really much time > So you should've just listened to the reform card when it said that the next offense would lead to a permanent suspension. Because as we can see, it did It's not how it works or you would think. I have tested how it actually works, you basically grinding games in silence in exchange to reset your penalty level. Approxmitaly you need hundred of games to reset it, depends on how silenced you play the games. Shit af system. Imagine another game getting banned for saying "you are trash", "you are an idiot", Played couple games and it's literally impossible to get banned, unless you throw racistic slurs and stuff, but in this game you can earn such easy perma ban just for casual trash talking, its pathetic.
then go play those other games insetad of complaining that this game has higher standards that you can't handle
Ghordir (EUNE)
: I GOT A 14 DAYS BAN
>LOL asked me 50€ to play on that account again. %%%% them ahahah proof or didn't happen >Not even a warning? instant %%%%ing ban. the ban **IS** the warning. >you lost one client i'm sure they'll get over it https://dotesports-media.nyc3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/11133156/2e394cb3-ee6e-49a0-9b2b-3a887bd36639.jpg
Arcade Lulu (EUNE)
: You literally spent the whole game flaming the ezreal....... Okay, you got a 14 dy ban more than a year ago. And? That still doesn't mean that you're out of the hook. Sure it is possible to have your punishment level go down when enough time passes, but it takes really much time So you should've just listened to the reform card when it said that the next offense would lead to a permanent suspension. Because as we can see, it did
>Sure it is possible to have your punishment level go down when enough time passes, but it takes really much time it should also be pointed out that the punishment gets reverted through playtime, not time elapsed. if you got the two week ban last year, then took a 6 month break and came back, the situation will be the same way you left it. you need to actually play the game while not being toxic for the reforming process to happen.
GLurch (EUW)
: I think others described everything in a pretty good way, just want to add something additional: Us not having a post where you can apply up doesn't mean you'll necessarily have to wait. In general, we're always looking for active and sportsmanlike people that seem to be motivated to do something. If we notice someone like that, we may end up reaching out to them just like that, without creating a "recruitment post" where they have to apply. In either case, to increase your chances of joining us, it's best if you are active on the boards, help others out and well, are in general a nice person (that includes being nice in League of Legends). Of course, boards activity isn't absolutely required, if you show a lot of motivation, some knowledge and other things that may make you qualified, you can apply once we post a recruitment thread. ######Also, just as a side-note, but I sadly can't tell you when exactly or if we'll even post a recruitment thread ^_^
i assume you have to be strike free in your recent history, no?
: I will always report someone for the slightest of toxicity. If they cant behave in chat, dont play. Get banned. Bye bye.
{{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
: > [{quoted}](name=Sinful Succubus,realm=EUW,application-id=NzaqEm3e,discussion-id=OsT9sYhO,comment-id=0001000000010000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-11-05T14:08:19.510+0000) > > if a punishment wasn't harsh there would be no point to have the punishment in the first place > > like Wormio said > > the 10 game chat restriction didn't mean anything before honor so it was basically a pointless punishment > > unlike today > > and wether it occurs in june or october is the fault of the one who flamed. and no ammount of mental gymnastics and tossing blame around to whomever feels better for the flamer will change that But today it is much, much easier to get it than it was in say 2009-2014. In fact, the current system was introduced in 2018, wasn't it? Worst thing Riot ever did.
it's the funnyest thing: i only ever see players who were punished complaining about it's supposed "unfairness"
JustClone (EUNE)
: Is punishment system working?
>Lets ask everybody today, what is the most toxic thing that you said, and got away with it. Nice try, Riot-senpai
Synchrone (EUW)
: > there is no such thing as a "variation of harshness". After explicitly pointing it out for you, you still saying that just proves you just don't want to have a logical discussion. Your only purpose here is to take a "holier than thou" attitude with everyone, which is actually quite hypocritical of you judging by all the negative and passive aggressive comments you've been posting on the forums for at least the past week. So yeah, I think we're done here.
> in which case I can only say book case example of Dunning-Kruger. the projection game is strong with this one
Synchrone (EUW)
: > there is no such thing as a "variation of harshness". After explicitly pointing it out for you, you still saying that just proves you just don't want to have a logical discussion. Your only purpose here is to take a "holier than thou" attitude with everyone, which is actually quite hypocritical of you judging by all the negative and passive aggressive comments you've been posting on the forums for at least the past week. So yeah, I think we're done here.
>Yeah they're random statements backed by no logical train of thought i'm sorry but i'm not in the habit of telling people what they like to hear just because anything else may offend them
Wormio BHR (EUNE)
: > high honor level is not an indicator of a good person since you can get honor 5 simply by carrying and not saying a word ever. we've had honor 5 players on these boards with chatlogs full of slurs before that's like saying mastery 7 or a high mastery score is an indicator that you know what your champion does and people can win games with you, when all it takes to get both of those is to play the game a lot For example, the with the highest mastery socre in the world (9.975.728) is currently in silver 4 and has mostly been placed in bronze since season 3 It is an indicator of a good person because they get rewarded, according to your logic, those are the non-toxic players that deserve to get rewards, and people who get toxic a day before the rewards are the ones that don't deserve any. Also, hello? I gave you a question, I've answered your meaningless question, how about answering mine? Or is it because you have nothing to say other than your horrible ad hominems that truly feel like a desperate attempt at an intelligent argument. Question: Why are ranked rewards attached with honor level? Ranked rewards are things that you achieve by being good at the game, something you earn. Why do you get rewarded with loot boxes from honor level 0 and keys from honor level 1, but you don't get even a pathetic ranked BORDER that you've EARNED by dominating in ranked? So you think having a toxic player rewarded with potential ultimate skins from hextech chests (by sheer luck and no skill, just a beautiful random reward for being level 1 honor, or hell even level 0 actually.. since Riot rewards toxic players with event tokens in missions that can be turned to keys! Who needs level 1 honor anyway?! Or is it because Riot knows that the only way to get keys for chests is to buy RP, which means they can gain $ from level 0 honor players that can't get any keys for the chests, the chests are used as a way to tease them and hopefully pay money to open them) for being toxic af, but not getting a ranked reward that they've achieved is fair and an argument that has titanium legs to stand on? The hypocrisy in your statements bewilders me, I am flabbergasted by thou. > your roots are just for show and your ad hominems are not worth adressing. That's what most people that I expose on forums say to me when I flabbergast them with my superior knowledge and convincing argument, they start spewing the hehexd word: "ah hominem" at my perfect arguments just to appear like they know what they're talking about when in fact they couldn't comprehend the argument I threw at them and instead resort to pathetic use of such words. You're not worth addressing because you're a hypocrite and you know what I said was right, come on I want you to answer the question above. Why do people get rewarded when they are honor level 0? New question for you while I'm at it: Why do people get anniversary rewards when they're dishonorable and not ranked rewards? The 10 year anniversary rewards were amazing! (ty Riot!! MUCH LOVE <3 I WISH YOU SUCCESS FOREVER), but why were they giving so many nice rewards to people who were so toxic? Things like the ANNI-VERSARY skin just to name a few!! IT'S MUCH MORE VALUABLE THAN ANY VICTORIOUS SKIN!! It's for DAMN sure more valuable than the new Aatrox skin lmfao! I'm waiting.
>It is an indicator of a good person because they get rewarded, according to your logic, those are the non-toxic players that deserve to get rewards, and people who get toxic a day before the rewards are the ones that don't deserve any. the minimum honor requirement for getting rewards is honor 2, which is where everyone starts. honor 5 is not the one and only requirement for it and i've never said such a thing >That's what most people that I expose on forums say to me when I flabbergast them with my superior knowledge and convincing argument, they start spewing the hehexd word: "ah hominem" at my perfect arguments just to appear like they know what they're talking about when in fact they couldn't comprehend the argument I threw at them and instead resort to pathetic use of such words. You're not worth addressing because you're a hypocrite and you know what I said was right, thanks for the karma >Why do people get rewarded when they are honor level 0? i thought we were talking about end of season rewards here, not the loot system. try to focus! >but why were they giving so many nice rewards to people who were so toxic? Things like the ANNI-VERSARY skin just to name a few!! because the anniversary has nothing to do with player skill or behaviour and everything to do with the 10 year celebration. rot rewarded the community for sticking around and the toxic side of the community still counts as part of the community so...
Synchrone (EUW)
: > there is no such thing as a "variation of harshness". After explicitly pointing it out for you, you still saying that just proves you just don't want to have a logical discussion. Your only purpose here is to take a "holier than thou" attitude with everyone, which is actually quite hypocritical of you judging by all the negative and passive aggressive comments you've been posting on the forums for at least the past week. So yeah, I think we're done here.
>After explicitly pointing it out for you, you still saying that just proves you just don't want to have a logical discussion did you read what i wrote after that or did you just stop there and ignored the rest because you can't be bothered to get your question answered? > for at least the past week. i'm trully flattered to understand that you've stalked me so far down the rabbit hole. i only hope you actually learned something along the way
Synchrone (EUW)
: > if a punishment wasn't harsh there would be no point to have the punishment in the first place I don't mean to assume that you're purposefully ignoring my point, but it seems you are. I'm not talking about the intensity of the harshness, but the varying of the intensity of the harshness depending on the point in the season. You have yet to point out what the purpose of that VARIATION is
the season begins at the begining of the year and ends somewhere near the end it always has the timeline is stipulated more accurately at the begining of every season in a specific post, along with the rules for the season. should riot change their mind along the way they uisually let everyone know ahead of time **there is no such thing as a "variation of harshness"**. the harshness is always the same. what changes is the time left till the end of season when a certain percentage of players get a reward based on their performance during the season. the reason you believe that there is a variation is because the punishments require a long and arduous reforming process that takes a lot of **TIME**. if you should blame anyone for slipping up and flaming when you don't have enough time to make up for it, look no further than the mirror.
JustClone (EUNE)
: I say that the ice-cream will have no effect on your health. Again, if you get AIDS from eating ice-cream while having sex with infected person, and you do not get it when eating ice-cream while having sex with non-infected person. It does not mean that the ICE-CREAM gave you AIDS. Or in any way contributed to your infection with the virus. The word "think" is incorrect here. I like to use the word "believe". Because this is accepting that something is true, without proof. As well as other myths. (I gave example with cold carbonated beverages, but there are many others). So, if you will allow me to correct your statement: >I don't ~~think ~~ believe so. Of course you can get infected by the virus of cold, by eating ice-cream alone, but someone infected with the virus should have sneezed on your ice-cream or something... And this may happen in the summer as well. And it may not be ice-cream at all... it may be a muffin. The virus is called "cold" but its contraction is not connected to the exposure of the cold, but to the exposure to the virus particles themselves. Which may happen usually in a warm room, that has or had a person infected with the virus.
>Again, if you get AIDS from eating ice-cream while having sex with infected person, and you do not get it when eating ice-cream while having sex with non-infected person. >It does not mean that the ICE-CREAM gave you AIDS. Or in any way contributed to your infection with the virus. thanks but i don't like **red herrings**. my stomache can't digest them well >The word "think" is incorrect here. I like to use the word "believe". Because this is accepting that something is true, without proof. As well as other myths. (I gave example with cold carbonated beverages, but there are many others). >So, if you will allow me to correct your statement: now you're gatekeeping words and strawmanning what i said i think we've gone off topic long enough arguing semantics. let's get back to league before a mod with no sense of humour shows up(you know who you are)
Synchrone (EUW)
: I wouldn't call an entire ranked season voided "a sting" though. More like annihilation/overkill.
Show more

Sinful Succubus

Level 35 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion