kupuselefes (EUNE)
: Zoe nerfs consequences
People still ban her like....what the heck is wrong with you
: It's the reason I made this topic. I want to find her weakness. God, I'm asking for peoples advice and all I get is bashing. And Karthus cannot one shot people from anywhere on the map unless you are low or he is superfed. He doesn't automatically one shot. I try to give an example of an exaggerated champion, but you even have to fight me on that. We can't have a conversation if you're not willing to understand me.
Don't worry, they're reworking her (because all those changes are like a small rework) on patch 8.24 so all your whiney pro players will be satisfied and will be back complaining about another random pick you can't lane with. No bashing here, you've talked non sense so I answered back like that, so. I'm frustrated and annoyed and angry at Katarina and Fizz, and yet I never complained about them because I admit it's ME who can't play around their weaknesses.
: Yeah that's not a good reason. If I designed a champion that can point click instakill anyone anywhere on the map people would complain, but by your logic: she. is. designed. to. do. that.
Of course that is a good reason, if you can't play vs a Zoe well *that* is not a good reason to complain, she doesn't have 100% winrate, and to be honest she doesn't even get to 50% winrate at the moment so don't know why you like to complain that much instead of getting better at the game. Plus, your argument is just stupid because 1) Karthus can do that but you're not crying over him and 2) that is by far the most stupid thing because that's a random non sense thought that has no counter play, and there's no strategy or skill around the clicking to hit anyone everywhere in the map, while there's a category of mages called "BURST CHAMPION" and they're called like that for a reason: they have strenghts and they have weaknesses, and if you can only see strenghts that's nobody's fault. So maybe you wanna think before writing something like that.
: So the full engage assassin or ranged poke mage is the way to go I guess. Still, I just saw a match in pro play where Zoe dealt like 2200 damage with one Q after resistances. No other abilities nothing. 2200 damage with a single ability. That's just dumb. And Veigar's R cannot do that anymore since the changes, unless the game is like 2 hours in.
She. Is. DESIGNED. To. Do. That. And you can always dodge it if that's just her Q.
Rioter Comments
: So what is the counterplay?
So basically hany assassin vs a non-mobile mage is effective, in particular, an high mobility assassin is very effective because Zoe has only 2 spells to damage and those are skillshots, furthermore if she misses her E he doesn't have any chance to win a 1v1. That said, with Zed and Katarina is easy to go all in on her dodging her E (I would have said LeBlanc and Talon too but LeBlanc is underperforming so maybe would not be easy to counter Zoe with her, and Talon goes on her face with no escape chance, which makes easier for Zoe to land her E). Yasuo is her main counter, since your W can make everyone uneffective, and if you have only 2 damaging abilities, shielding even one of them is essential (not counting the drowsy effect lets you use W everytime to shield everything if used properly). Galio is the anti mage champion (I would say Kassadin too): you can't really easily die if you play carefully on early game and build enough mr. Syndra is my personal pick, it's something I found myself strong with, against Zoe, so isn't really a counterpick but something that works with me. Basically because her stun or her poke is just superior and easier to land and R is just clicking R (and the damage is very high without worrying about making your Q travel a lot :D). Fizz could work as well. I get all the complaints against Zoe for her damage but really she is DESIGNED to be like that, just like Xerath is designed to be annoying, or Veigar is DESIGNED to outscale you no matter what. And Veigar is much more annoying than Zoe in my opinion because his stun is wider and his passive is stupid and his R is point and click. So while I get the complaints because she can be annoying I don't get why people still haven't figured out how to play vs her.
: There's one big difference. Zoe is incredibly mobile and her skillshots have huge AoE. It's really hard to miss with those things. Remember when Nidalee spears were nerfed in width because they did so much damage? Well they made a nidalee champion with hard cc in a huge AoE and a short cooldown spear that does triple nidalee damage. I don't even understand how this champion was even considered to be balanced from a kit perspective. Sure it sounds cool, but it's just asking for trouble.
>Zoe is incredibly mobile Kappa
: Zoe counterplay
Seriously? {{champion:238}} {{champion:157}} {{champion:55}} {{champion:3}} {{champion:134}}
: Can any champion win a stat-check against yasuo`?
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Trenitaliyah,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=VQEc6Zby,comment-id=00070000,timestamp=2018-02-05T18:11:49.612+0000) > > I think I clearly wrote the worst English possible, since no one understood what I meant xD I don't know about your english, but if you are italian like me your nickname is the best I've ever read. I died laughing.
VibeYT (EUW)
: Akali's upcoming rework
Redmercy (a famous streamer), went to Riot Games LA office for a tour and to try out new things: new champions, new items, new reworked champions, and said that the new akali is cool but isn't finished yet, so would say late summer.
Rismosch (EUW)
: {{champion:17}} Teemo has many builds: Full AP, AD/Crit, splitpush, tank, onhit/attackspeed.... You can play himTop, Mid, Jungle, ADC, Support, feed, AFK......he fits in every role!
I think I clearly wrote the worst English possible, since no one understood what I meant xD
: is anybody else winning alot in ranked?
You're obviously too good at the game, I mean, B3 to S4 that's just....wow. I'm only playing placements from now on, and no ranked games whatsoever it's not evern worth the stress.
Smerk (EUW)
: {{champion:141}} ?
Kind of. But unfortunately I don't like him or his kit :(
: From the top of my mind {{champion:84}} {{champion:63}} {{champion:31}} {{champion:131}} {{champion:245}} {{champion:81}} {{champion:105}} {{champion:59}} {{champion:10}} {{champion:99}} {{champion:90}} {{champion:25}} {{champion:98}} {{champion:48}} {{champion:23}} {{champion:29}} {{champion:161}} {{champion:62}} {{champion:101}} {{champion:157}} {{champion:115}} {{champion:26}} {{champion:143}}
That's not what I meant, they all have the same build (except very few exceptions but they don't really work well) and the same playstyle wherever you play them. I meant a champion that can do different things depending on how you play him, sort of like Kayn transforming.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Blitzz (EUNE)
: being able to play in the old patches
I get the nostalgia, for most things in life, but I truly don't get why would you pay to play an older buggy useless crappy version of a game.
Blinkks (EUW)
: WHen is SHEN getting a Ultimate skin?
: 3vs3 Rankeds CHill/Fun Suppmeta
Hi, me and my friend play/used to play 3v3 a lot. Add me if you want :)
Rismosch (EUW)
: Damage. You are asking for damage. You cannot trade, you cannot poke the enemy, you deal 0 damage with Rakan. To make him viable as a solo laner he needs damage, because that is literally the only thing he is missing.
I tried him solo lane a few times, and the most difficult thing was farming, I'd need AD runes (back then) and long sword for starter. Then the itemization was weird for a solo laner because no matter how heavy AD/AP you're building, your damage is poor, but it's fine: what I like about him is his utility, the massive help he gives to the team, I like to deal damage but it's okay if he's not *that* good at it. I don't know, it's just sad that full AP he's not a good midlaner, full tank he isn't a good toplaner, he can't jungle and he's not an ADC so...kinda sad.
MadEclair (EUNE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Trenitaliyah,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=xge90lIW,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-01-28T12:57:01.693+0000) > > Consider giving us the possibility somehow of playing whoever we want where we want, and making it work mechanically fine, not forcing some boosted stats or weird items to do so. This is exactly how the League started and you can see it clearly even till this very day in kits of various champions, Nunu being the most notable example of that. And I doubt RG will return to the core after realizing that giving players any champion for them to put them in any late makes the game chaotic and even more unbalanced. Main problem with champions like Nunu is that he doesn't really conform to any role in general and while it makes him semi-viable in many different roles but the jack of all trades is master of none. And RG followed this pattern for many years by creating characters that might be picked and build in many ways. This is the reason why old champions had both AP and AD ratio on skills, even though they had only one optimal build for either AP or AD. It's more than unnecessary, it sometimes drives developers to force champions into meta by giving them powerful buffs that really make the champion overpowered _(see the Juggernaut update Morde or current Nunu that shouldn't have this stupidly good AP/AS buff)_ instead of remaking the kit to make it more fitting and healthy. So to answer your question - current champions are created with filling exclusively one or two roles in mind due to balancing purposes.
Thank you so much for your reply! I wasn't thinking to that actually :)
: Let me rephrase what you just said - I started with Garen btw.: Why can't I jungle with Garen? Why can't I mid with Garen? Why can't I adc with Garen? Why can't I supp with Garen? You can do all that though and you will suck at that. Just because you like a champ doesn't mean that he's fit for every role ;)
mmh am I missing your point or....? I asked about Rakan, and I didn't imply I want to play him in every role, hmm....you're confusing me
Pyrosen (EUW)
: You can play any champion anywhere you want, rakan is just most optimal for support. I've seen many AP rakans in the mid lane, some winning most losing lol
Rismosch (EUW)
: Well, Rakan is mainly balanced around his CC. Giving him more damage would make him stupidly strong.
I didn't ask for damage, I asked for something that could make him viable as a solo laner: an item that helps him farming, some kind of self shielding from his E, duno something like this...
GPet (EUW)
: You can play him mid. You also can play him Top. If you want you can play him ADC or Jungle too. If you now say 'but it's very suboptimal!', then consider if he would be made for all roles, he will be stronger on 1 or 2 and suboptimal in all others. (Let alone hat different roles need different things, and if you give all of those to 1 champion we are back to some 'overloaded' cries.)
You mean "you can play him mid if you get vs people who got no idea on how to play the game"? Because that's really it, he doesn't stand a chance vs A Tier midlaner in this patch, imagine God Tier ones. His waveclear for solo lanes sucks, trust me I've tried so many times, and his ratios are awful (AP or AD) :(
Rioter Comments
: Changing Mastery Emote
: Faker use it, must be OP.
I've said pretty much the opposite but go off.
: Hardest Champion in league as of season 8
Vsec Exile (EUNE)
: Besides the odd carries that can make use of jungle items late or midgame
I've seen Faker taking it on Zoe like....really? xD Not that I'm questioning Faker, but still was wondering.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=Trenitaliyah,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=HKELElkV,comment-id=0002000000010000,timestamp=2018-01-19T17:01:47.314+0000) > > Yeah, I guess it's the same reason why Riot admits people like Tyler1 to play this game ever again. > > I guess there could be (obvs not an expert about anything, just a 2 cent thought) an automatic program that instabans accounts who writes certain words in the in-game chat, you choose the words worthy of that. Or think to another system, duno. > Honestly it's your job to provide us the best experience possible, not mine to tell you how to do your job. It's not controlling human behaviour, is to punish people that make this game the worst thing ever, while it can be actually (like most of my games have to admit) a funny, challenging, friendly experience. > > I was referring to your previous post, my experience is overall pretty good in League so got nothing to complain really about, but you saying to a player "there shouldn't be "unless"" kind of triggered me, because you can act as polite as you want, as nice as your job at Riot requires you to be, but you're human too and if a stranger tells your mother to get c*ancer I guess you wouldn't just take it lightly any time, any day. Would something like that annoy me? Sure. Do I rage at times? You bet. Have I ever typed it into game/flamed my team mates? Never. If I'm angry, there may be some verbal frustration, maybe even a fist slam on the desk in really bad cases - but never do I press enter, type out frustrations and insults, and then press enter once again. This is the difference. Never have we pretended that there's not frustrations or anger at times, but what we do say is it's not okay to bring that into the game and insult and flame others. My being a Rioter has no influence on that - I've been posting on boards (previously forums) since at least 2010 - and my opinion and perspective on this has never changed. Keeping your anger out of chat should be something you can achieve, not that a system has to substitute for you. We can provide guidance, and give warnings - but if ultimately you continue to behave in this manner then is that really someone we want as part of our community consistently? (To clarify, by you I mean generic "you", not you in particular :) )
> Keeping your anger out of chat should be something you can achieve, not that a system has to substitute for you. I wasn't clear, I didn't say you should fix me writing with anger to flame others, I was saying you (as Riot) should prevent flame being *this* frequent and *this* consistent. League is mostly known for its flame nowadays. > is that really someone we want as part of our community consistently? Then ban them for God's sake! I've had an experience when someone totally flamed me for no reasons, really hard flame (only once in this game I've been flamed THAT hard, and that very time I did nothing but reading his insults and say nothing really not even a beep), reported and contacted support with evidence, and ok that you can't say anything about what you're gonna do with him for privacy, but I checked his op.gg and he was still playing (and still is), so you would excuse me but I lost faith in the system.
: > [{quoted}](name=Trenitaliyah,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=HKELElkV,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2018-01-19T13:52:34.356+0000) > > Eambo, with all due respects, that "unless" should be prevented by Riot, not the players. > Some people can manage anger or frustration or the urge to insult someone (even just telling them they're bad, not only hard flame), but some people can't, or can't in a particular day they're particularly stressed out or having personal issues. > I agree on everything you said as it's what I suggest everyone to do, always, in any case, but you can't say "There shouldn't be an "unless". There shouldn't be a "justification"." > > Because it would be Riot's task to give us an healthier environment, it's not my fault if someone wishes cancer to my entire family and I normally fire back: it's human nature, it's esport, competitives are like this, you can't really let others say things on you in every occasion, it's Riot's fault if that very person keeps playing the game, though. I usually mute people, but sometimes I forget, or try to trust the community, or simply I'm not playing a crucial game so I leave chat on, and the most horrible things happen. And honestly you can't think that capsules and emote given for free in the honor system could fix that. I believe what your asking is to somehow control human behaviour artificially because they can't be trusted, which isn't a reasonable request in my personal opinion. This is akin to saying "I couldn't stop myself punching him officer, it's your fault for not being here first!". If a large majority of the community are able to control themselves and have an element of self control, why should it be expect we have some special way of treating those who can't control themselves? No matter how advanced and sophisticated we try to be, it's pretty difficult to prevent people being jerks, and human reports aren't always the most reliable. For example, if someone feeds in their first game - should we punish them? How do we differentiate "trolling" from "having a bad game?". Players shouldn't be banned and punished for "not being good" - this is very difficult to distinguish at times from intentionally feeding for example.
Yeah, I guess it's the same reason why Riot admits people like Tyler1 to play this game ever again. I guess there could be (obvs not an expert about anything, just a 2 cent thought) an automatic program that instabans accounts who writes certain words in the in-game chat, you choose the words worthy of that. Or think to another system, duno. Honestly it's your job to provide us the best experience possible, not mine to tell you how to do your job. It's not controlling human behaviour, is to punish people that make this game the worst thing ever, while it can be actually (like most of my games have to admit) a funny, challenging, friendly experience. I was referring to your previous post, my experience is overall pretty good in League so got nothing to complain really about, but you saying to a player "there shouldn't be "unless"" kind of triggered me, because you can act as polite as you want, as nice as your job at Riot requires you to be, but you're human too and if a stranger tells your mother to get c*ancer I guess you wouldn't just take it lightly any time, any day.
Fajerk (EUW)
: TT has special version of the items. http://www.surrenderat20.net/p/current-pbe-balance-changes.html
Uhm, thank you, but I can't find the information anywhere in the article ç_ç EDIT: Nvm, it opened the wrong page for a sec. Thank you!
: > [{quoted}](name=jOhNyP,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=HKELElkV,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-01-19T13:00:32.908+0000) > > how to avoid perma ban > and what to do to get my 0 honor locked to finally unlock > > i know i shouldnt flame and i dont flame unless... That last word is the biggest risk you have. There shouldn't be an "unless". There shouldn't be a "justification". Focus on your gameplay, not on your rage. It's understandably difficult and extremely irritating if someone is trolling you on purpose, however raging isn't going to get you a win, nor will it improve any team morale (if any even exists). Focus on your gameplay as priority, try to do your best with the resources you've got (teammates and all) - and utilise the mute and report functions. The only thing you achieve by flaming is angering yourself, dividing the team, and potentially getting yourself punished - it's simply not worth it. If you find yourself getting extremely angered, wrap up that game and take a break. It's not worth getting yourself banned for, and it's not worth breaking your screen for X.x
Eambo, with all due respects, that "unless" should be prevented by Riot, not the players. Some people can manage anger or frustration or the urge to insult someone (even just telling them they're bad, not only hard flame), but some people can't, or can't in a particular day they're particularly stressed out or having personal issues. I agree on everything you said as it's what I suggest everyone to do, always, in any case, but you can't say "There shouldn't be an "unless". There shouldn't be a "justification"." Because it would be Riot's task to give us an healthier environment, it's not my fault if someone wishes cancer to my entire family and I normally fire back: it's human nature, it's esport, competitives are like this, you can't really let others say things on you in every occasion, it's Riot's fault if that very person keeps playing the game, though. I usually mute people, but sometimes I forget, or try to trust the community, or simply I'm not playing a crucial game so I leave chat on, and the most horrible things happen. And honestly you can't think that capsules and emote given for free in the honor system could fix that.
Rioter Comments
Rioter Comments
Fajerk (EUW)
: Is it possible to get rid of champion mastery?
I don't think so, but they should give you the option to do this!
: Honestly there are more variables than that... but simply put you should go for the champions that you outright find the most fun... you will learn faster on them, you will be able to main them without it feeling like you wanna,quit, and you will prob do better if your having fun as less prone to tilt. But objectively speaking... you have a control mage and a burst mage... that's two magic damage champions... So maybe lean towards an ad champion as your third so that you can supply physical damage if your team is heavy on magic already... So maybe zed or talon...
As weird as it might sound, I cannot play AD champions somehow :D I perform waaaaaay worse on AD than AP
: {{champion:103}} Solid, alllround, got some dashes, a sustain, true dmg. She's just generally pretty good. I consider her to be more of an assassin than a real mage, due to her mobility and pin point accuracy. Dashes, Q's and E allow for some mechanics, but not the most difficult. {{champion:131}} She's a pretty good assassin, that's got a bit of a tough early game, but gets fairly brawly late game. Will delete squishies and is a serious threat. Just not mechanically very challenging (not the same as easy to play). {{champion:245}} More of the same as Diana, but with a different flavor. Not the most high mechanic intense champ, but when he gets rolling he's a pretty good mage assassin. Can build tanky, or can be fairly safe when you have to play from behind. {{champion:84}} Bad early game, but enemy has to focus you, or lose the teamfight. Meanwhile you sustain all the dmg they try to get onto you. Only having a dash in means you'll have to consider your moves quite a bit...but the effecive threat range, and sustain makes up for a lot. Can definately solo carry if not taken care of by the complete enemy team. {{champion:238}} It's zed. Has a few mechanics with the whole shadow thing, but the payoff is stupid high. nuff said. I hate this champ. {{champion:91}} CAN BE GOOD. Though I have a feeling he might have a difficulty curve or situational viability like running into a brick wall. {{champion:7}} See her do pretty well occasionally. Needs a nice degree of mechanics since the rework. But could be a bit on the weak side atm. I think you'll have to judge that on your own.
Duno why but I can't play Ahri whatsoever, must be some sort of innate hate I got for the champion or something but I really feel bronze playing her. The rest is pretty good, yeah. Diana and Ekko are tempting on the list, I'll give you that. Might give a look to Katarina as well. Thank you!
Pelmorr (EUW)
: Should i wait to play provisionals?
If you're not in a rush, if you're just gonna play placements games and nothing else maybe wait a bit more, it's healthier later on. If you just wanna rank, go ahead, you can start climbing anytime.
  Rioter Comments
: You know when you get happy about earning a chest, open it and...
These days I only want to drop emotes, better than skins for me atm :D But yeah, keep it up
: Can not login
"We're aware of a problem causing login attempts to fail, and are working on a fix"
N1ghtOG (EUW)
: So like when do the preseason changes get reverted?
Hontah (EUNE)
: Remove yasuo
Ok, thank you for your feedback. I'm sure Riot will work on this as soon as possible.
Smerk (EUW)
: Galio is a mage
Smerk (EUW)
: You're thinking like meta sheep right there. You can choose any champion on any role, so think of it like 5 top, 5 jungle, 5 mid, 5 bot and 5 support
It's representative of the category, it's not meta. There's no mage in there, I'm a "mages" main. And still I despise ADcarries with all my heart (but that's personal preference) so seeing them under the spotlight so much for no reason TRIGGERED me.
Show more

Trenitaliyah

Level 81 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion