: > [{quoted}](name=Troldrum,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=VweAIuxq,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-10-11T08:39:07.091+0000) > > Talking about "let others do the work"... While I believe that Riot has more impact that you state, everyone says "yee but others have more impact why should I change?" Maybe Riot changing to renewable energy doesn't change a thing - if all online game industry would change to CO2 neutral, it would change alot. But someone has to start, and I believe Riot is a company that knows about its social responsibility, and has the resources to do something about it. co2 is no issue {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}} co2 = a coolant since it has no heat retention, nor is there any evidence co2 causes global warming, nor is there any evidence of global warming, please if we lower co2 any more or even manage to remove it entirely we will all die... in case you wonder why, PHOTOSYNTHESIS! co2 is broken into C and O2 by plants and flowers, the O2 is what we breathe and the C is converted into carbonhydrates (sugars), so if we lower Co2, plants will grow slower, therefore we will get slower or even less food, we get less oxygen as well, you won't hear me complain or panic unless the Co2 levels are near 10%, because 10% Co2 levels are toxic and lethal, in case you were wondering, the co2 levels are 0,04% {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}} so no co2 is not an issue~ don't believe me? read nasa's page and awe by their incompetence : 1 co2 does not trap heat, it reacts by vibrating and moving away from ANY heatsource letting heat pass through AFTER it bounces the first heat off and back into space, its being used as a coolant in refrigerators as well : https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/ , and they claim this bs at the same time https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/ , now lets take a look at the maps, the co2 map https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/ , scroll to 2016 dec, now open another tab with this link https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/ and scroll to 2016, what we see is co2 anomalies being highest on the center/lower half of the map, but when we look at the global temperature anomalies we can see them being highest at the arctic ocean {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}, on the co2 map greenland the patch of land upper left doesn't appear to have much co2, but the warming map shows half greenland in red... even better take the co2 map and scroll from beginning to end, not too fast, to see how the center/lower half turns red, now do the same with the global temperature map and see how the arctic and the upper half of russia/europe/greenland and canada truns red, and the world below south america/africa and australia are almost unaffected by temperature anomalies, these maps don't even correlate with one another. 2 when they claim the ice melts you can only hear them talk about the lenght of the ice, not the thickness.... OR DO THEY? https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/SeaIce , and now read this nonsese https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/arctic-sea-ice/ , use the slide on the ice map and go from 2012 to 2013 to see an actual increase in lenght and a CLEAR contradiction, so all they established is : the amount of ice in length depends on the weather {{sticker:zombie-brand-clap}} 3 melting sea ice causes raise in water level {{sticker:sg-kiko}} https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/ , now the arctic consists of nothing but sea ice btw, IT HAS NO LAND, now read this ''Melting sea ice won’t raise ocean levels any more than melting ice cubes will cause a glass of ice water to overflow.'' right above the topic ''The Sea Ice Life Cycle'' underneath the dolphin photo in this link https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/SeaIce now scroll all the way dow nto the topic ''arctic sea ice'' and read this ''Arctic sea ice occupies an ocean basin mostly enclosed by land. Because there is no landmass at the North Pole'' 4 global warming (see 1) and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_in_Earth%27s_atmosphere#Past_concentration , scroll down or click on ''Ongoing measurements of atmospheric CO2'' and read ''The first reproducibly accurate measurements of atmospheric CO2 were from flask sample measurements made by Dave Keeling at Caltech in the 1950s'' its funny how nasa claims to have accurate data of co2 levels prior to 1950 {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} we can rule out co2 being an culprit, so now we established co2 not being related to global warming let me tell you this, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_weather_records#Lowest_temperatures_recorded now click on or scroll down to ''Lowest temperatures recorded'' and see how some of these continents and countries are still making coldest temperature measured/recorded EVER while the world is allegedly increasing in heat {{sticker:zombie-brand-facepalm}} and two read this https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/ ''This graph illustrates the change in global surface temperature relative to 1951-1980'' and yet the graphs goes back to 1880, and the map to 1884 {{sticker:sg-lux-2}}, now read this https://history.nasa.gov/factsheet.htm ''the Congress and the President of the United States created the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) on October 1, 1958'' have you guys noticed the same trend as me ? that nasa speaks in anomalies but not in actual data? what was and are the temperature of the earth? what were and are the current co2 levels in %? and no actual measuremenst of sea levels themselves either O.O, no base readings just claims from nasa, and estimates in anomalies {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}} 5 https://climate.nasa.gov/ <---- is nothing but a propaganda site see all above.
1. Please read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect 2. Sea Ice https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vj1G9gqhkYA 3. Sea Level rising is due to the ice currently located on Greenland and antarctica thus now on land melting into the sea 4. you can measure CO2 lvls by taking samples of ice created thousands of years ago in Greenland and Antarctica
: I don't think RioT can have a say when it comes to nations deciding whatever they want to keep polluting earth or not. Everything else is kinda secondary and can't really make a difference. Maybe Tencent got sufficient influence in China to possibly pull off something like that...if they could find even only one freaking reason to even speculate about trying. {{sticker:sg-janna}}
Every private Household can choose to use 100% renewable Energy, it is super easy. Ofc, you get the same Energy as everybody else, but it sets a market signal for green Energy. Litterally 0 effort, atleast in Germany, if anything it Costs a bit more (not sure About that). Else, it is really easy to build an own solar power plant. Google does so, Microsoft does, small companies like Ecosia do so, too. Riot could be on that list.
: No point. EVERYONE is aware about climate change. And those who arent, wont be influenced by league skins. If you want to help, you need to talk to politicians.
Not talking about awareness, but about doing something. Politicians are great at talking about climate, but doing something against it might cost some votes from the generation 60+. And as long as politics doesn't do anything useful the private sector should take action.
: well what riot produces at CO2 a year, a cruiseship does in 1 day. {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}}
Talking about "let others do the work"... While I believe that Riot has more impact that you state, everyone says "yee but others have more impact why should I change?" Maybe Riot changing to renewable energy doesn't change a thing - if all online game industry would change to CO2 neutral, it would change alot. But someone has to start, and I believe Riot is a company that knows about its social responsibility, and has the resources to do something about it.
Rioter Comments
Rstonius (EUW)
: Hello? Rito? Answer please! Just this game right? i went 7/2 in lane with Twitch right? had 160cs in 20 mins, BUT GUESS WHAT? GUESS WHO 1V1ED THE FUCK OUT OF ME? A 1/3 NAUT, WITH 98 CS IN 20MINS, OH THE FUCKING GLORY, I USED ALL MY SUMMS AND HE STILL FUCKING ME. HOW DOES THIS SHIT EVEN MAKE ANY SENSE? AND I BET YOU GUYS ARE JUST GONNA IGNORE THE CALLS OF ADC MAINS ALL OVER AGAIN JUST LIKE IN S6
Twitch should never be able to 1v1 Nautilus. Twitch is supposed to stay behind his team, and RATATATA the sh*t out of everyone. ADCs deal really good dmg, maybe less then they used to do, but they are not useless at all.

Troldrum

Level 111 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion