Cryptidian (EUNE)
: You have just enrolled into Runeterra University, which two champions would you want as roomates?
: Groin-Master builder
Kudos on your creativity, but just so you know the word "groin" means pelvic area in English (like where the genitals are roughly located), so you might wanna consider changing his name or English readers like myself may not initially understand that this is a serious post (I did think in the non-translated post that this was a troll-post). And yeah, I reckon Riot would have a bit of a conundrum introducing dwarves into Runeterra; they like to have their own races for the most part. As for abilities, the courier passive is an interesting choice. I can't help feeling that it introduces a level of micromanagement Riot would again be uncomfortable implementing (which is why you can't control Lamb and Wolf separately when playing Kindred). His other abilities seem okay too (perhaps slightly underwhelming in terms of I don't know what he really has the potential to do that other champion's can't do better), buuut his tower repairing seems a bit too strong if it permanently repairs damage from a wrecked turret, and I don't even know what to properly think of his ult. It sort of seems like a Xerath ult with a repairy element to it? Overall, my main problem with your idea is I can't tell what your champion is supposed to be. His Q makes me want to build attack speed to take advantage of the brief buff, but I don't know whether his attacks are ranged or melee. If they're melee, it seems to make his E a bit useless because it knocks people out of his attack range. His ult makes me want to build damage, otherwise it seems rather underwhelming. His passives make me want to run him as some kind of utility support/jungler (?), so he can run between lanes repairing turrets, but this ability will be stupidly powerful early game and worthless late game when everyone's towers are down. And his kit just doesn't have the utility to support or gank especially well. Also I would have to assume he can't repair unless out of combat, because it would be ridiculous if he could. TLDR: Interesting, creative, flawed. Might wanna consider renaming him to something less pelvic
: Groin-Master builder
The only bits I understood were "Groin-Master Builder" and "Do you want him?" Okay I guess! {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}}
ZΣDs SON (EUW)
: ZED IS WEAK AND TOO OLD
Clearly no bias here at all...
: League of Royale - LoL Battle Royale
League of Royale is the absolute worst idea conceivable by man. It will, in actual fact, trigger both the apocalypse and rapture, in addition to awakening C'thulhu. Abandon all hope ye who enter, for such an idea is worse than all 9 of the circles of hell described in Dante's Inferno. Please never have an idea again, lest you wish to endanger all life on this poor world, which already suffers enough on a daily basis.
: > Lol Zoe isnt even that strong she is so easy to kill people just dont understand that they shouldnt use summoner spells against her only in need. thats one of the dumbest things ive heard, even if you dont use summoner spells, LOOK AT HER BASE STATS. SHE HAS MORE HP THAN TANKS!!! MORE ARMOR THAN TANKS!
https://gyazo.com/0f9c3b52bce25d96976835e4453805ca First of all, Shen seems to actually get 4 armour per level (see the above Google search in case you have trouble believing it.) Second, even if a tank was getting less armour per level than Zoe, that doesn't mean Zoe is necessarily optimised to make use of said stat. You wanna build "tank Zoe" against tank Shen? Go nuts! But that Shen is ultimately gonna be a more useful tank, because his abilities scale with %HP (whilst Zoe's scale with AP), and he has the abilities and passives themselves to support a tank build. Whilst he is not the best tank, he is surely decent for the simple fact that he can taunt enemies into attacking him, whilst negating the damage of auto-attacks. It allows him to absorb and direct the flow of damage away from his allies. He can also shield his allies from autos in the same vicinity, and give them a huge cock-blocking shield out of nowhere. The only stat for Zoe you have any right complaining about is her AP, given that's quite literally the only stat she has any potential to utilise. Finally, Zoe isn't actually overpowered. She is simply frustrating. She can do one thing (burst), and she can do it veeeery well. But that's it. One thing only. She is surprisingly mediocre in lane, because all of her abilities can be blocked by minions and she has no way of escaping ganks. She is shockingly bad against tanks as well due to her lack of consistent damage over time, and she relies entirely on hitting her Q. If the tanks on the enemy team walk in front of their carries with their massive hitboxes, even a good Zoe player is going to struggle to do anything meaningful in the end. Whereas an Ahri or Viktor can cut right through the tanks to the backline with their orbs and lasers, and doing so doesn't even reduce the damage they do! Any carry standing behind their tank WILL be hit, and late-game that's normally a death-sentence. Additionally, half of Zoe's burst comes from hitting her E and then hitting that same champion with a Q. An enemy champion can intercept that Q. A _minion_ can intercept that Q. QSS can be used to get rid of your E. Banshee's can get rid of your E. People can flash or blink or dash away from you to safety because even after they've been hit by Zoe's E, the sleep has doesn't go off immediately. --------------------------------------------------- I've said enough. In the end, Zoe has counter-play, and she is not overpowered. She is simply frustrating to play against in the most sadistic way a champion can be (almost Fizz and LeBlanc tier frustrating). I would suggest playing Zoe yourself, and seeing just how OP she really is.
: How i got A+ in this game?
I guess even more assists (like 30 somehow) and more CS. When I had to get Nami to 7 getting past 50 CS helped. Also, Soraka is just extremely hard to get 7 with in general, so a lot of good luck and patience may be additional requirements :/
: Riot seriously can we grow up and act like adults, this is ridiculous now
There's a point where it's just easier to stop talking. I get your frustration, and from what you've written I can tell you're probably rational most of the time. However, the truth is you're clearly not aware of the fact that a negative attitude is enough to be punished, _regardless_ of context (unfortunately.) It wasn't that you said anything explicit, but rather that it was obvious you were being unpleasant from what you were typing. No one's blind to the fact that there were many instances of blatant sarcasm and snide jabs at other players in your chatlog. People _can_ pick up on the context of a situation, even when it is in text sometimes. And clearly they did, because you've had your account suspended for 14 days. Face it; you lost your temper, and this is the consequence. But it's only for 14 days. You still have a chance to keep your account, so you need to calm down and learn to control what you type. It's hard and it sucks, but it's just what you've gotta do. Limit what you say in chat. When you have to speak, think about whether or not it will benefit the game and how other players could potentially interpret it. Avoid being abrasive if you can. Otherwise, your next punishment might not be so temporary :(
EcLisHERE (EUNE)
: I’m actually gold and you can check but i play for fun to be honest.
>i ask you and i beg you to bring back old rengar ultimate If you play for fun, why do you want to bring back one of the most anti-fun things that was ever in this game?
Kurotsu (EUW)
: Can we just talk about this Zed Yasuo fanart?
Yauso would trip over the first minion he/she dashes through because of that skirt.
Akaśhí (EUNE)
: Zed vs Lux
>Well now I understand that I may have lost as a Zed vs Lux because maybe she was better than me Gonna have to stop you right there, because that's probably right. You win some, you lose some. And while the idea of a Zed getting dumpstered on in lane by Lux is laughable, we all have those days. My recommendation is to save your W to jump over her binding/singularity so you get on top of her. Even if you get hit this way, you can't possibly miss with your E and Q's, meaning you'll proc electrocute, and might even be able to ignite auto for a level 3 cheese. She has no mobility, you do. Use that against her. If you, as an assassin are waiting around for the squishy immobile mage to run out of mana, you're doing it wrong.
crazÿ (EUW)
: i did`t mean make aurelion sol easy champion just balanced
I'm just speculating as to why he isn't played, not saying that he should be made any easier. However, if you wanted to increase the amount of people who play Aurelion Sol, then yes; you should make him more accessible and give him an edgier skin, because LoL players seem to like easy and edgy stuff more
: > [{quoted}](name=kiwishrew,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=zHX33FOP,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2018-12-12T16:06:45.443+0000) > > What mistakes? They're making more money than ever i dont think you get the point. champs like akali, irelia, zoe all that kind of bullshit have so much free shit its absolutely disgusting. they make more money because they give these champs 2 skins a year while champs that are lesser played get 1 every 3-4 years. so yes they do in fact make money because of making broken af champs and giving them %%%%ING 2 SKINS IN 1 PATCH!
Oooh, I get it now. You think they care about us {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} In all seriousness, the only things Tencent and Riot consider mistakes, are decisions which lose them money. Popular champions are often broken or easy to play, so yes; skins will be made for them more than champions who don't get played, because that is the more profitable choice. They know what they're doing
: when will riot actually learn from their mistakes
>when will riot actually learn from their mistakes What mistakes? They're making more money than ever
crazÿ (EUW)
: reason why people are not playing Aurelion Sol?
>reason why people are not playing Aurelion Sol? Two words: Derpy and Difficult. People generally seem to prefer edgy and easy.
: > [{quoted}](name=kiwishrew,realm=EUW,application-id=39gqIYVI,discussion-id=UH1qELmK,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2018-12-11T20:15:10.902+0000) > > The next group of Project skins, should be a new and original skinline, instead of the same bland, regurgitated grey with voice-filter and **glowstick colours**. {{sticker:zombie-nunu-tears}} Neon makes the PROJECT: line though! OT: Project {{champion:555}} . You all know this should happen.
Money-grubbing makes the Project line, and there is zero creativity behind it's concept. I bet for the next project event, you're only allowed to participate if you buy the "PROJECT: REBELLION" pass or something dumb like that. It'll probably make you collect some generic-ass "future-tokens"or something, by completing arbitrary and lengthy in-game tasks, so you can get the "super exclusive" BLACK PROJECT CHROMAS (because make it edgier to trick stupid children into buying the same product twice). But of course, only enough tokens for ONE of them unless you play religiously. And release a 4k RP bundle with only some of them in it; need to keep one exclusive so you buy the overpriced event pass (I'm gonna stop now because at this point I'm just describing every new event Riot does, but you get the idea.)
Cryptidian (EUNE)
: The next group of Project skins should have another support champion!
The next group of Project skins, should be a new and original skinline, instead of the same bland, regurgitated grey with voice-filter and glowstick colours.
: Why do Girls suck at videogames?
{{sticker:slayer-pantheon-popcorn}}
: the best dlc ever made #urfdlc
Please stop immediately, you'll give them ideas
yyzarc (EUW)
: Good Job Eambo !
You literally had a thread up wishing them a slow death 30 minutes ago
: People only play this game because they are addicted
Galrauch (EUW)
: did Riot decide to make Taliyah transgender anyway? (Neeko voice-line)
Kha'Zix says "change is good". Must be a trans. We'll call this "Neekonian Logic", because the second a lesbian champion is announced, people are gonna look for just about any reason to make every champion they can have some kind of sexuality. Well, so long as it isn't straight that is, because straight be evil these days
: That's not the issue. The issue is that they put up Neeko sales banner in the shop with the Winter skin and all but when you click on it there's no Neeko. Why put the banner "Buy neeko and the winter skin here" then click and nothing. I don't get it As for champion releases. I never pay attention to them. I didnt like any champion the last 2-3 years
My bad! It does seem a bit odd that they would advertise it in the store before it's even available
: There's a banner for Neeko, but no Neeko to buy in store when you click. What gives Rito?
You'd think after over a hundred champion releases people would finally get how it works by now {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} The champion comes "some time" after the patch notes. It could come a day after the patch releases. It could come as many as 2 weeks into the patch. Commonly however, a champion is revealed about a day after it's champion spotlight goes out. So, y'know, hold your horses and have a little patience
: No kings rules forever my son .... Fortnite is the king now.
Nah, Fortnite's just Minecraft; only kids and streamers play it. League will easily outlive it the moment the next hot battle royale rears its ugly head, or the day people finally get sick of the genre entirely.
: eventually every game dies and this one is nearing its end.
On the contrary, this game won't be dying any time soon. It's merely evolved into something nearly unrecognisable from the old game. There's too much money pouring in for it to just stop. There's too much competitive presence and merchandise and lore writing and such for this game to just "end". The only way I can see it falling is if something bigger and flashier takes it's place. But good luck with that. Remember when everyone thought Overwatch was going to kill League? That was funny
Marces T (EUW)
: WTF?
Honestly, the only thing I have against it is how much trouble it seems to cause. I don't see why it couldn't have been left ambiguous (like Taric). Instead, it's loudly announced on twitter and causes a huge commotion because a small part of the community is loudly going "w-w-wuuut?!", Whilst the large majority are even more loudly (and annoyingly) announcing how progressive they are by saying things like "I don't care. Who should I care? Its okay to be a lesbian, what's wrong with being a lesbian? I'm not making a fuss or anything but if anyone has a problem with Neeko being a lesbian that's not okay because I think you'll find I'm quite progressive and inclusive and wait, just let me slot in my left wing manif-" blah blah blah blah BLAH. I just want to play my game about killing champions and destroying towers, okay!? {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}} Don't need politics in my game, don't need controversy, don't need to know ANY of these animated pixel people's sexual preferences, because when I'm playing Malphite or Gangplank or whatever, I'm not thinking about who's genitals they chew on in their spare time; I'm thinking about beating my opponent and winning the game. Sheesh.
Lari (EUNE)
: Neeko release date?
2-4 weeks after reveal, just like every other new champion that's been released
Mada (EUW)
: Is League mainly about one's ability to keep track of stuff and acting accordingly?
Life is about being able to keep track of stuff and acting accordingly
Febos (EUW)
: Correct, it doesn't say "she's a child", but it does say "young". Also, I'm calling her a child because: > She developed a fondness for games, hiding trinkets and thoughts to see if others could find them. Her inquisitive nature knew no bounds, and she was pure and innocent in her charmed existence. Finally, her appearance. She doesn't look like older than 15. ######I'm still talking about age relative to her tribe. She could be 1000 years old, but still a child in her tribe.
>She could be 1000 years old, but still a child in her tribe. But nowhere is that established? Lot's of things "could" be true, but now you're just enforcing your headcanon on others. Your entire argument is based on assumptions. You saying things like >Still a child in her tribe. With that amount of conviction and no evidence to back it up just makes you look silly. Stick to facts, avoid assumptions. This champion is no more a problem to the game than any other champion Edit: Except perhaps in balance, but that's to be seen upon release
: Haha , funny how the fanboys come crawling out the woodwork, completely shutting down any critique at the game Like junkies and their drugs
That's a rather aggressive way of admitting that you're mad no one agrees with your opinion
Febos (EUW)
: Still a child in her tribe. Want a good example? Time-lords. A time-lord with 500 years is still a child.
Have not found anywhere so far where it explicitly states in her lore that she is a child. The only thing I've seen is what the creator of the champion has said about her, which is that if compared to humans, she is like a young woman in her early 20s. If there is somewhere where it says she is a child, I'd like to see it please
Febos (EUW)
: Good to know. Odd that a **child** identifies as a lesbian. Progressive times we live in. My head canon is better. I still see Neeko as more than just "the first lesbian champion". I hate those labels.
She's over 200 years old actually, if what I read is correct
: > [{quoted}](name=kiwishrew,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=BZNUHW95,comment-id=00010000000000000001,timestamp=2018-11-25T13:07:20.787+0000) > > Everything is offensive to someone though. Why don't we just censor all the words? {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}} > > Actually you know what, it's not just words: art can be offensive to someone too. And comedy. And fun. Better quickly censor all of that as well. > > But woah. What's that I see? Someone gesturing to another person in such a way as can be interpretted to MEAN a word, now that all words have been outlawed? Better ban that gesture. Censor that facial expression. Cease and desist any and all attempts at intelligent communication... > > Because, you know; those could offend someone. And we wouldn't want that. Better to zealously adhere to our principles than to consider what is practical and reasonable. > > {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}} > > _______________________________ > > OR MAYBE, > > Just because the word "Hitler" got censored, it doesn't automatically mean that the right thing to do is to censor other dictator names, despite their lack of use in the game? Maybe the context of the words' use within the game is in fact significant, and we should carefully consider what is sensible to do as opposed to banning words for the sake of doing so? > > Perhaps there are some things which appear hypocritical at a first glance, but upon closer inspection are in fact necessary... > > ______________________________ > > Nah. You're probably right actually! > > Because after all, when it comes to the politics regarding names which could be construed as offensive, who else but "**WangMaster9000**" could have the sensitivity and understanding required to address such a topic? > > {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}} Whoa, don't bring my playername into this discussion, it has nothing to do with anything man. Also the point im fighting for here is "ban everything or don't ban anything at all"
>the point im fighting for here is "ban everything or don't ban anything at all" Yes. And my point was "your point has it's flaws". The world doesn't work on absolutes
: > [{quoted}](name=kiwishrew,realm=EUW,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=BZNUHW95,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2018-11-25T10:57:36.963+0000) > > Have you not read what everyone's been telling you? The words "Hitler" and "Stallin" and "Lenin" are not offensive by themselves. They're just names. > > HOWEVER, this stopped being the case with "Hitler" in the context of League of Legends (and wider internet culture), due to HOW people used the word "Hitler", and how MANY people were using it. > > If it helps you to understand, one or two locust are not definitively a swarm, and pest control would laugh at you for calling them over such a small number. It's when there are nests of them in the hundreds that they will recognise it as a problem worth hauling together their resources for to deal with. (Hint: Riot is pest control, Stallin is a single locust and Hitler is a very, very big swarm) If censorship is being applied due to offenciveness of something, there shouldn't be a classification of numbers of how many people get offended and who don't. If something is offencive, it is offencive, be it against 1 person or many. https://boards.euw.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behaviour-en/AMENcWk1-hitler-is-censored many others seem to agree as well
>If something is offencive, it is offencive, be it against 1 person or many. Everything is offensive to someone though. Why don't we just censor all the words? {{sticker:slayer-jinx-unamused}} Actually you know what, it's not just words: art can be offensive to someone too. And comedy. And fun. Better quickly censor all of that as well. But woah. What's that I see? Someone gesturing to another person in such a way as can be interpretted to MEAN a word, now that all words have been outlawed? Better ban that gesture. Censor that facial expression. Cease and desist any and all attempts at intelligent communication... Because, you know; those could offend someone. And we wouldn't want that. Better to zealously adhere to our principles than to consider what is practical and reasonable. {{sticker:slayer-pantheon-thumbs}} _______________________________ OR MAYBE, Just because the word "Hitler" got censored, it doesn't automatically mean that the right thing to do is to censor other dictator names, despite their lack of use in the game? Maybe the context of the words' use within the game is in fact significant, and we should carefully consider what is sensible to do as opposed to banning words for the sake of doing so? Perhaps there are some things which appear hypocritical at a first glance, but upon closer inspection are in fact necessary... ______________________________ Nah. You're probably right actually! Because after all, when it comes to the politics regarding names which could be construed as offensive, who else but "**WangMaster9000**" could have the sensitivity and understanding required to address such a topic? {{sticker:sg-miss-fortune}}
: > [{quoted}](name=MadEclair,realm=EUNE,application-id=2BfrHbKG,discussion-id=BZNUHW95,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-11-25T10:06:30.782+0000) > > They don't censor Hitler because it's bad. They censor it because people started using it in inappropriate way. Just few years ago in early seasons term _kill yourself_ wasn't as popular and I doubt it was censored. If people start praising Stalin for Holodomor or other atrocities, you would see it banned pretty quickly. Shouldn't Osama and Kim Jong be censored as well then? I mean i live in a country where Russian occupation has happened 2 times in past 200 years and i should feel offended over names like Lenin and Stalin as well... Just because there are fewer people abusing the nameblame system doesn't mean it should be treated differently, am i wrong?
Have you not read what everyone's been telling you? The words "Hitler" and "Stallin" and "Lenin" are not offensive by themselves. They're just names. HOWEVER, this stopped being the case with "Hitler" in the context of League of Legends (and wider internet culture), due to HOW people used the word "Hitler", and how MANY people were using it. If it helps you to understand, one or two locust are not definitively a swarm, and pest control would laugh at you for calling them over such a small number. It's when there are nests of them in the hundreds that they will recognise it as a problem worth hauling together their resources for to deal with. (Hint: Riot is pest control, Stallin is a single locust and Hitler is a very, very big swarm)
: Star Guardian Zoe
It's just too obvious and simple. Why not have something more creative and unique instead?
: Buff Zoe Pls
As a Zoe player, I'm happy with how she is. You just gotta get good. Amumu wouldn't be one shotting you if you dodged his bandage toss. It's a predictable skillshot with a travel time that gives you plenty of time to step to one side. Heck, you could even ult with Zoe to dodge it, although I wouldn't really recommend that. And if you're getting caught out by his ult, it's because you're getting too close to him. Zoe fights at a distance, you should never be that close to him. Escaping his ganks should be easy too, because even if you miss your E, it creates a zone he cannot step in unless he wants a world of pain. Mobility champions make players lazy with their positioning. You just need to play more champions without mobility to learn the value of good positioning.
: why are bad players so quick to blame junglers for everything?
: Ezreal becomes gay
What's gay about being surrounded by hot women? {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}}
: We want URF!! (poll)
URF didn't get rid of tryharders (there's no such thing as a "tryharder"), and if anything it actually brought more complaining and toxicity to the game than ever before
: What is the hardest champion?
Malphite. He's rock solid
FrO0Ze3N (EUNE)
: The newest champion "Neeko"
It's not even a real word in Egyptian, it's slang. Why can't we all just be adults about this and accept the choices of the champion's designer?
: Not fair rewards?
Another addition to r/choosingbeggars I see... P.S. It's your attitude you should be apologising for
Solash (EUW)
: When you post lewds of the ambiguously aged chameleon
>ambiguously aged She's over 200 years old.
Yxion95 (EUW)
: Please Create "Trickster" Class!!
More needless complication in League's already overcomplicated class system? Nooope, no thank you I think we're just fine the way we are
: the Problem whit league and RIOT ; and why you should stop wasting your time playing this game .
Title Translate: "I don't like this game so YOU shouldn't either"
WhiteLiés (EUNE)
: i dont like ap champs since they literally have no damage on basic attack and they depend on abilities miss one ability and no kill + you are dead. i just dont like ap champs and dont force me to play them.
I wasn't forcing you to do anything? But you clearly haven't been playing Fizz, Diana, Ekko and Akali properly. Their autos do great damage, especially with a Lichbane (although you don't need Lich on Akali). That being said, you shouldn't even need to hit with more than one auto on any of these champions, because the whole point is you burst the enemy before they can blink and get out. Ekko might be the only exception to that rule, but even he is capable of deleting like that. And with Diana it's as simple as engaging with an empowered auto. Anyway, if you like autos more than abilities, why not just play midlane fighters, or ADCs? They can be just as assassiny while fulfilling your AD needs
gidson (EUNE)
: Essence Emporium
Well they're not gonna give you an unlimited supply now, are they?
WhiteLiés (EUNE)
: Can we get 1 new AD assassin midlane champ?
What is the difference? Both AP and AD assassins are known for their explosively quick burst and mobility. You're getting exactly what you want whether you play AP or AD. There's nothing "unfair" about it. Also, the reason there are so few AD assassins is because they are an unholy nightmare to balance. Either you have to literally design items completely around them (A.k.a: the Lethality Tragedy), which leads to other champions abusing those items. Or you Olaf the AD assassins into oblivion, or they become overpowered. The line between underpowered and overpowered for AD assassins is just too fine for balancing to be realistic...
Show more

kiwishrew

Level 68 (EUW)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion